Literature DB >> 8759451

Saccade target selection and object recognition: evidence for a common attentional mechanism.

H Deubel1, W X Schneider.   

Abstract

The spatial interaction of visual attention and saccadic eye movements was investigated in a dual-task paradigm that required a target-directed saccade in combination with a letter discrimination task. Subjects had to saccade to locations within horizontal letter strings left and right of a central fixation cross. The performance in discriminating between the symbols "E" and "E", presented tachistoscopically before the saccade within the surrounding distractors was taken as a measure of visual attention. The data show that visual discrimination is best when discrimination stimulus and saccade target refer to the same object; discrimination at neighboring items is close to chance level. Also, it is not possible, in spite of prior knowledge of discrimination target position, to direct attention to the discrimination target while saccading to a spatially close saccade target. The data strongly argue for an obligatory and selective coupling of saccade programming and visual attention to one common target object. The results favor a model in which a single attentional mechanism selects objects for perceptual processing and recognition, and also provides the information necessary for motor action.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8759451     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(95)00294-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  459 in total

1.  Phonological priming effects on speech onset latencies and viewing times in object naming.

Authors:  A S Meyer; F F van der Meulen
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-06

2.  To see and remember: visually specific information is retained in memory from previously attended objects in natural scenes.

Authors:  A Hollingworth; C C Williams; J M Henderson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-12

3.  Overt and covert object-based attention.

Authors:  Jason S McCarley; Arthur F Kramer; Matthew S Peterson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-12

4.  Motion perception of saccade-induced retinal translation.

Authors:  Eric Castet; Sébastien Jeanjean; Guillaume S Masson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-11-04       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Where to look first for an explanation of induction with uncertain categories.

Authors:  Oren Griffiths; Brett K Hayes; Ben R Newell; Christopher Papadopoulos
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-12

6.  Inhibition of return spreads across 3-D space.

Authors:  Jan Theeuwes; Jay Pratt
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-09

7.  Rapid simultaneous enhancement of visual sensitivity and perceived contrast during saccade preparation.

Authors:  Martin Rolfs; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Explicit knowledge and real-time action control: anticipating a change does not make us respond more quickly.

Authors:  Brendan D Cameron; Darian T Cheng; Romeo Chua; Paul van Donkelaar; Gordon Binsted
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Spatial attention, precision, and Bayesian inference: a study of saccadic response speed.

Authors:  Simone Vossel; Christoph Mathys; Jean Daunizeau; Markus Bauer; Jon Driver; Karl J Friston; Klaas E Stephan
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  Peri-saccadic natural vision.

Authors:  Michael Dorr; Peter J Bex
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.