Literature DB >> 28383964

Adding depth to overlapping displays can improve visual search performance.

Hayward J Godwin1, Tamaryn Menneer1, Simon P Liversedge1, Kyle R Cave2, Nick S Holliman3, Nick Donnelly1.   

Abstract

Standard models of visual search have focused upon asking participants to search for a single target in displays where the objects do not overlap one another, and where the objects are presented on a single depth plane. This stands in contrast to many everyday visual searches wherein variations in overlap and depth are the norm, rather than the exception. Here, we addressed whether presenting overlapping objects on different depths planes to one another can improve search performance. Across 4 different experiments using different stimulus types (opaque polygons, transparent polygons, opaque real-world objects, and transparent X-ray images), we found that depth was primarily beneficial when the displays were transparent, and this benefit arose in terms of an increase in response accuracy. Although the benefit to search performance only appeared in some cases, across all stimulus types, we found evidence of marked shifts in eye-movement behavior. Our results have important implications for current models and theories of visual search, which have not yet provided detailed accounts of the effects that overlap and depth have on guidance and object identification processes. Moreover, our results show that the presence of depth information could aid real-world searches of complex, overlapping displays. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2017 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28383964     DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000353

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  6 in total

1.  The depth of executive function: Depth information aids executive function under challenging task conditions.

Authors:  Dawn M Sarno; Mark B Neider
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 2.157

Review 2.  Avoiding potential pitfalls in visual search and eye-movement experiments: A tutorial review.

Authors:  Hayward J Godwin; Michael C Hout; Katrín J Alexdóttir; Stephen C Walenchok; Anthony S Barnhart
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 3.  Using Eye Movements to Understand how Security Screeners Search for Threats in X-Ray Baggage.

Authors:  Nick Donnelly; Alex Muhl-Richardson; Hayward J Godwin; Kyle R Cave
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2019-06-04

4.  Improved X-ray baggage screening sensitivity with 'targetless' search training.

Authors:  Alex Muhl-Richardson; Maximilian G Parker; Sergio A Recio; Maria Tortosa-Molina; Jennifer L Daffron; Greg J Davis
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2021-04-14

5.  The Oddity Detection in Diverse Scenes (ODDS) database: Validated real-world scenes for studying anomaly detection.

Authors:  Michael C Hout; Megan H Papesh; Saleem Masadeh; Hailey Sandin; Stephen C Walenchok; Phillip Post; Jessica Madrid; Bryan White; Juan D Guevara Pinto; Julian Welsh; Dre Goode; Rebecca Skulsky; Mariana Cazares Rodriguez
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-03-30

Review 6.  The Short-Term Retention of Depth.

Authors:  Adam Reeves; Jiehui Qian
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-08
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.