Protein-protein modulation has emerged as a proven approach to drug discovery. While significant progress has been gained in developing protein-protein interaction (PPI) inhibitors, the orthogonal approach of PPI stabilization lacks established methodologies for drug design. Here, we report the systematic ″bottom-up″ development of a reversible covalent PPI stabilizer. An imine bond was employed to anchor the stabilizer at the interface of the 14-3-3/p65 complex, leading to a molecular glue that elicited an 81-fold increase in complex stabilization. Utilizing protein crystallography and biophysical assays, we deconvoluted how chemical properties of a stabilizer translate to structural changes in the ternary 14-3-3/p65/molecular glue complex. Furthermore, we explore how this leads to high cooperativity and increased stability of the complex.
Protein-protein modulation has emerged as a proven approach to drug discovery. While significant progress has been gained in developing protein-protein interaction (PPI) inhibitors, the orthogonal approach of PPI stabilization lacks established methodologies for drug design. Here, we report the systematic ″bottom-up″ development of a reversible covalent PPI stabilizer. An imine bond was employed to anchor the stabilizer at the interface of the 14-3-3/p65complex, leading to a molecular glue that elicited an 81-fold increase in complex stabilization. Utilizing protein crystallography and biophysical assays, we deconvoluted how chemical properties of a stabilizer translate to structural changes in the ternary 14-3-3/p65/molecular glue complex. Furthermore, we explore how this leads to high cooperativity and increased stability of the complex.
Protein–protein
interaction (PPI) modulation has fundamentally
changed drug discovery, expanding the druggable proteome.[1−4] This shift in perspective has rapidly expanded the number of entry
points for novel therapeutic intervention for many diseases.[2,5] The development of PPI inhibitors has progressed steadily, leading
to the emergence of clinically approved PPI inhibitors such as Venetoclax
for chronic lymphocytic leukemia or small lymphocytic lymphoma.[5] In contrast, PPI stabilization has emerged slowly,
with the retrospective elucidation of the mode of action of clinically
approved immunosuppressants, rapamycin,[6,7] and the cytostaticpaclitaxel.[8,9] Successes of immunomodulators, lenalidomide,
and cooperative PROTACs like AT1 provide valuable ″proofs-of-concepts″
for modulating cell homeostasis using synthetically derived PPI stabilizers.[10−12] However, a systematic understanding of how to design small molecules
that stabilize PPIs is urgently needed. The disconnection between
these orthogonal PPI modulation approaches is primarily driven by
a poor understanding of drug design rules for PPI stabilizers due
to the complicated kinetics of dynamically interacting components
that form the complex,[13,14] shallow surface pockets, and
limited or no structural information about the essential interactions
that drive complex formation. A major obstacle for the development
of PPI stabilizers is identifying chemical starting points, as the
transient nature of complexes makes detecting ligand binding challenging.
Further, affinity of a ligand to a complex is not necessarily correlated
to the ligand’s stabilizing activity.There is a significant
need to develop novel drug discovery methodologies
and alternative types of chemical matter to identify hit compounds
for the development of PPI stabilizers. Fragment-based drug discovery
has emerged as a promising approach leading to several clinically
approved drugs.[15,16] Since the clinical approval of
ibrutinib, the stigma relating to covalent drugs and fragments has
dissipated,[17] resulting in a rise in the
application of covalent tethering, particularly for challenging drug
targets.[18,19] The emergence of fragment tethering approaches
using covalent chemistry has simplified the identification of hit
compounds as binding fragments are easily detectable, and instrumentation
is not reliant on detecting transient fragments/complex interactions
to identify hits.[20,21] Covalent fragment screening uses
a covalent bond that is formed between a natural or engineered amino
acid inside the targeted binding pocket and a reactive handle installed
on the fragments.[22] Recent fragment screening
approaches utilizing disulfide tethering have proven successful in
identifying hit fragments for PPI stabilization. Such site-directed
fragment identification has recently been reported by us for stabilization
of the protein 14-3-3 in complex with estrogen receptor α (ERα)[23] and estrogen related receptor gamma (ERRγ)[24] utilizing a disulfide tethering approach. We
have also reported a new aldimine-based covalent tethering approach
for the 14-3-3/p65 subunit of NF-κB PPI.[25] This approach employs a dynamicimine-based tether to anchor
the fragment at the interface of the composite pocket. Lysine tethering
is a particularly attractive approach as the large percentage of the
proteinogenic amino acids makes it amendable to a wide array of chemical
probe development projects.[26−29]Targeting the p65 subunit of NF-κB is
of specific interest
since NF-κB is a homo- and/or heterodimeric transcription factor
involved in the regulation of immune responses, cell proliferation,
and inflammation and therefore is connected to cancer and autoimmune
diseases, among others.[30−32] Attempts to directly inhibit
the transcriptional activity of NF-κB have typically failed
due to the inability to identify NF-κB-targeting matter.[33,34] Interestingly, increased transcriptional activity of p65 has been
correlated with downregulation of 14-3-3 in studies on ischemia–reperfusion
and breast cancer.[35,36] Also, upregulation of 14-3-3
has been shown to favor cytosolic localization of p65,[37] subsequently preventing transcriptional activity.
Stabilization of the 14-3-3/p65complex could therefore furnish a
novel entry point for targeting NF-κB and enabling a controlled
therapeutic intervention.Point mutational studies on p65 revealed
three potential 14-3-3
binding sites surrounding the phosphorylation sites S45, S281, and
S340.[37] Binding affinities and structural
information for two of these sites, pS45 and pS281, were reported,
showing the direct physical interaction between both proteins.[38] Benzaldehyde-based molecular fragments were
shown to bind specifically to Lys122 of 14-3-3 via imine bond formation,
thereby stabilizing the interaction with the p65 motif around phosphorylation
site pS45 via hydrophobiccontacts with p65.[25]Here, we extend upon our initial communication reporting on
an
imine-based site-directed fragment approach to develop a 14-3-3/p65
molecular glue.[25] Critical to the development
of molecular glues is a robust understanding of molecular interactions
and structural changes in the protein–protein–ligand
complex that result in cooperative behavior. To understand the chemical
properties that produce cooperative ligands, we employed a fragment
extension design process using structural information gathered from
X-ray crystallography soaking experiments and fluorescence anisotropy
(FA) measurements. This enabled us to design initial fragments into
molecular glues that showed stabilizing activity for the 14-3-3/p65complex, culminating with the discovery of compound 24j that elicits an 81-fold stabilizing effect on the 14-3-3/p65complex.
Results and Discussion
We have previously shown that
aldimine bond formation is highly
selective for Lys122 of 14-3-3 that lies at the interface between
14-3-3 and p65 in the composite binding pocket (Figure A). The enhanced selectivity for Lys122 is
the result of a combination of the local hydrophobiccharacter of
the composite pocket, a lowered pKa of
the lysine side chain, and the templating effects of p65 binding.[25] Given the intrinsically disordered nature of
large parts of the p65 subunit of NF-κB (Figure B), we utilized a 13-mer phosphopeptide representing
(EGRSAG pSer45 IPGRRS) the recognition sequence of 14-3-3 to expedite
chemical matter elucidation. Our initial investigation used X-ray
crystal soaking experiments and a fragment library of commercially
available aldehydes (34 fragments) to identify four key chemotypes
that induced imine bond formation with Lys122 within the 14-3-3/p65composite pocket (Figure C,D): methylsulfonyl (1 and 2),
1-nitro,3-hydroxybenzene (3), methyl acetamide (4), and five-membered N-heterocycles (5, 6, and 7). Biochemical assessment
of fragments 1–7 used a fluorescence anisotropy
(FA) assay. To assess the fragments’ capacity to induce a ternary
complex, the fragments were titrated to a solution of 100 nM fluorescently
labeled p65_45 peptide (FITC-βAla-EGRSAG pSer45 IPGRRS) and
50 μM of 14-3-3γ. The subsequent outputs are herein termed
″half maximal complex concentration (CC50)″.
Results from the assay showed that these fragments did not increase
complex formation. However, the lack of increase in complexation at
relevant fragment concentrations was in accordance with crystal data,
which indicated little to no direct contacts between the fragments
and the p65 peptide. Fragments that are detectable in crystallography
experiments but do not induce a detectable effect on complex formation
are termed ″silent-binders″. We sought to develop a
structure–activity relationship (SAR) based upon these four
chemotypes with the specific goal of developing molecular glues that
orthosterically engage with p65 and stabilize the 14-3-3/p65complex.
Figure 1
Exploring
the p65/14-3-3 interface with imine forming fragments.
(A) Overview of the composite binding pocket of 14-3-3 and the p65_45
peptide (PDB: 6QHL).[38] (B) Crystal structure of the NF-κB
subunit p65 (PDB: 1IKN,[39] IκBα and p50 hidden for
clarity) with known phosphorylated serine residues Ser281 and Ser45
labeled. (C) Interface of the ternary complex of 1/p65_45/14-3-3
(PDB: 6YOW).[25] Indicated are three subpockets (the roof of
14-3-3, the FC-binding pocket, and the deep binding pocket), which
can be exploited by fragment extension. Shown are 14-3-3 (white sticks,
surface and cartoon), p65_45 peptide (red sticks), and fragment 1 (cyan sticks). (D) Fragment hits based on X-crystallography
screening with benzaldehyde binding to Lys122 of 14-3-3.
Exploring
the p65/14-3-3 interface with imine forming fragments.
(A) Overview of the composite binding pocket of 14-3-3 and the p65_45
peptide (PDB: 6QHL).[38] (B) Crystal structure of the NF-κB
subunit p65 (PDB: 1IKN,[39] IκBα and p50 hidden for
clarity) with known phosphorylated serine residues Ser281 and Ser45
labeled. (C) Interface of the ternary complex of 1/p65_45/14-3-3
(PDB: 6YOW).[25] Indicated are three subpockets (the roof of
14-3-3, the FC-binding pocket, and the deep binding pocket), which
can be exploited by fragment extension. Shown are 14-3-3 (white sticks,
surface and cartoon), p65_45 peptide (red sticks), and fragment 1 (cyan sticks). (D) Fragment hits based on X-crystallography
screening with benzaldehyde binding to Lys122 of 14-3-3.To facilitate rapid optimization of the initial hit compounds
into
molecular glues, six focused libraries were designed based on the
four chemotypes from the initial screen. Key to the development of
molecular glues is understanding which specific interactions (hotspots)
between the fragments and the 14-3-3/p65complex lead to cooperative
binding. Within our lab, we have developed a highly robust crystallography
screening system to rapidly access X-ray crystal structures of soaked
fragments. Utilizing this system, we gain unparalleled structural
information that guides hit optimization.
Focused
Library Development around the 3-Hydroxy,4-nitrobenzaldehyde
Scaffold
Initial focused library development concentrated
on extension of 3 based on crystal data, which showed
complete coverage of the fragment by the electron density map, indicating
a high occupancy for 3 within the composite pocket. Analysis
of the X-ray crystal structure of 3 indicated that a
relatively large solvent exposed pocket was present in front of the
fragment formed by p65 (Figure A). We sought to explore this chemical space via extension
of 3 from the 3-hydroxy position. To expedite exploration,
focused libraries 1 and 2 were obtained from a commercial supplier
and screened using X-ray crystallography (Scheme ).
Figure 2
Nitrobenzaldehyde structural analogues. (A)
Initial fragment hit 3 covalently bound to the 14-3-3/p65_45
complex. The fragment
can be extended from its meta-position (black arrow
shows proposed vector for extension) (PDB: 6YOY).[25] (B) Ternary
structure of 9a (salmon sticks; PDB: 7NMH), p65_45 (red sticks),
and 14-3-3 (white cartoon/sticks). Water molecules: red spheres; hydrogen
bonds: black dashes. (C) Ternary structure of 10a/p65_45/14-3-3
(PDB: 7BJF).
Details as in (B). (D) Ternary structure of 13e (left;
PDB: 7BJL), 13f (middle; PDB: 7BJW), or 13l (right; PDB: 7BKH) binding to the
p65_45/14-3-3 complex. Compounds are shown as yellow sticks; the rest
are as described before. The 2Fo-Fc electron density map is contoured
at 1σ for all.
Scheme 1
Synthesis of Focused
Fragment Libraries 1 to 3
Nitrobenzaldehyde structural analogues. (A)
Initial fragment hit 3 covalently bound to the 14-3-3/p65_45
complex. The fragment
can be extended from its meta-position (black arrow
shows proposed vector for extension) (PDB: 6YOY).[25] (B) Ternary
structure of 9a (salmon sticks; PDB: 7NMH), p65_45 (red sticks),
and 14-3-3 (white cartoon/sticks). Water molecules: red spheres; hydrogen
bonds: black dashes. (C) Ternary structure of 10a/p65_45/14-3-3
(PDB: 7BJF).
Details as in (B). (D) Ternary structure of 13e (left;
PDB: 7BJL), 13f (middle; PDB: 7BJW), or 13l (right; PDB: 7BKH) binding to the
p65_45/14-3-3complex. Compounds are shown as yellow sticks; the rest
are as described before. The 2Fo-Fc electron density map is contoured
at 1σ for all.Analysis of focused libraries 1 and 2 using X-ray crystal soaking
experiments showed three sulfonate fragments (9a–c) and four ester fragments (10a, d, j, and m) bound to Lys122 in the crystal structures (Figure B,C; Figure S1A,B; Table S1). The various substituents elicited poor to moderate coverage
by the electron density map, except for the sulfonates 9a and 9b. However, neither 9a nor 9b were active in functional FA assays (Figure S1A). For these smaller substitutes (9a and 9b), no favorable contacts with the peptide could
be observed, whereas the larger substitutions resulted in a loss of
electron density, indicative of a high conformational freedom of the
ester side chain (9c, 10a, and 10j; Figure S1A,B).An additional collection
of fragments (focused library 3) was synthesized
based on tertiary amines at the meta-position. The
replacement of the phenoloxygen of 3 with a ternary
amine increased the number of vectors for fragment extension, reduced
conformational freedom, and enabled the exploration of a different
chemical space. A one-step nucleophilic aromatic substitution using
the key benzaldehyde intermediate 11 and the corresponding
amine (12a–u) was employed to afford 21 analogues
(13a–u) with yields ranging from 20 to 68% (Scheme ). Focused fragment
library 3 was then soaked into p65_45/14-3-3crystals and tested in
the FA assay. Of this collection, four fragments bound in crystallography
experiments, with 13e, f, l, and q showing significant electron density coverage
(Figure D, Figure S1C, Table S1). Notably, all four fragments
contained six-membered saturated N-heterocyclic rings
with polar functional groups that formed either direct hydrogen bonds
with the backbone of p65 or water-mediated hydrogen bonds. The binding
poses of these compounds were well defined, whereby the saturated N-heterocyclic ring extends toward the C-terminus of the
p65 peptide. These results suggest that these fragments are shielded
by the amphiphilic amino acids Pro47, Gly48, Arg49, and Arg50 of p65,
which facilitate covalent tethering. Biophysical assessment of 13e, f, l, and q using
FA compound titration assays showed that the fragments did not elicit
significant ternary complex formation at biochemically relevant concentrations
(Figure S1C). Surprisingly, 13f and 13l showed no increased complex formation, considering
that both fragments engage in hydrogen bonding with p65. Given the
lack of 14-3-3/p65 increased complex formation in FA compound titration
assays at concentrations practical for hit optimization, we shifted
focus to the five-membered N-heterocycleschemotype.
Focused Library Development around the 4-(1H-Imidazol-1-yl)benzaldehyde Scaffold
Fragment 5 was selected for fragment library development as the para-substitution proved to be more solvent exposed compared
with 7 and the 1,3-substituted imidazole provided the
possibility for fragment extension from three vectors of the N-heterocycle (Figure A). A focused library of 13 fragments (focused library
4) was synthesized using a nucleophilic aromatic substitution reaction
with cesium fluoride, triethylamine, 4-fluoro-nicotinaldehyde (14), and an array of substituted imidazoles (15a–e) or benzimidazoles (15f–k) (Scheme ). The starting reactant 4-fluoro-nicotinaldehyde
(14) was used to improve the solubility of the fragments
and to provide a further point for a polar interaction compared with 5–7. The resulting library was then subjected
to X-ray crystal soaking experiments and FA assay. Notably, fragments 16b, c, f, and g–k were tested as mixtures of regioisomers.
Figure 3
Imidazole-benzaldehydes
are stabilizing the p65_45/14-3-3 complex.
(A) The imidazole moiety of 5 (teal sticks) offers three
vectors for fragment growth (arrows) (PDB: 6YP3).[25] (B) Fragment
induced p65_45/14-3-3γ ternary complex formation, measured with
compound titrations in FA (r/mAU). The compounds were titrated to
50 μM 14-3-3γ and 100 nM p65_45. (C) Ternary structure
of 16d (light blue sticks; PDB: 7NM9) binding to the
p65_45/14-3-3σΔC complex. (D) Mixture of structural isomers
of 16j and 16k. (E, F) Crystal structure
of 16k binding to the p65_45/14-3-3σΔC complex
(PDB: 7NR7).
The electron density map indicates two binding poses (E). Based on
the position of the methoxy substitution, the 2-chloro substitution
points either toward the peptide (16k-5) or to the FC
pocket (16k-6). Both binding poses engage in hydrophobic
contacts with 14-3-3 and p65 (sphere representation, F). For all:
14-3-3: white cartoon, surface, sticks; p65_45: red sticks; 2Fo-Fc
electron density map (contoured at 1σ): gray mesh.
Scheme 2
Synthesis of Focused Fragment Libraries 4 and 5
Imidazole-benzaldehydes
are stabilizing the p65_45/14-3-3complex.
(A) The imidazole moiety of 5 (teal sticks) offers three
vectors for fragment growth (arrows) (PDB: 6YP3).[25] (B) Fragment
induced p65_45/14-3-3γ ternary complex formation, measured with
compound titrations in FA (r/mAU). The compounds were titrated to
50 μM 14-3-3γ and 100 nM p65_45. (C) Ternary structure
of 16d (light blue sticks; PDB: 7NM9) binding to the
p65_45/14-3-3σΔCcomplex. (D) Mixture of structural isomers
of 16j and 16k. (E, F) Crystal structure
of 16k binding to the p65_45/14-3-3σΔCcomplex
(PDB: 7NR7).
The electron density map indicates two binding poses (E). Based on
the position of the methoxy substitution, the 2-chloro substitution
points either toward the peptide (16k-5) or to the FC
pocket (16k-6). Both binding poses engage in hydrophobiccontacts with 14-3-3 and p65 (sphere representation, F). For all:
14-3-3: white cartoon, surface, sticks; p65_45: red sticks; 2Fo-Fc
electron density map (contoured at 1σ): gray mesh.Analysis of the fluorescence anisotropy assay identified
that fragments 16d, e, j, and k induced
an increase in anisotropy (Figure B); however, only 16d, j,
and k were detected in the electron density map of soaking
experiments. Notably, all three fragments showed a mixture of conformational
poses (Figure C–F, Figure S2, Table S2). Both structural isomers
of 16j (2-methyl-5-methoxy-benzimidazole) and 16k (2-chloro-5-methoxy-benzimidazole) were observed to bind within
the composite binding pocket as result of the soaking experiment using
mixtures of the structural isomers (Figure D–F). For instance, the chlorine atom
in 16k points toward the p65 peptide, while the methoxy-substitution
can be detected in the 5-position (Figure E). For the other binding pose, the chlorine
atom in 16k points to the FC pocket, whereas the methoxy-substitution
located in the 6-position is positioned above Ile46 of p65. Both structural
isomers of 16k engage in hydrophobiccontacts with the
roof of 14-3-3 and Ill46 of p65_45 (Figure F). Despite their similar binding poses, 16k (CC50 = 260 μM) elicited a significantly
higher increase in anisotropy compared to 16j, which
induced a negligible ternary complex formation in the FA assay (Figure B). The replacement
of a chloro-moiety for a methyl group in 16k (16j) on the imidazole ring has a significant impact on complex formation,
resulting in diminished anisotropy.
Focused
Library Development around the 4-Formylbenzamide
Scaffold
We next turned our attention to fragment extension
based upon fragment 4. Analysis of the co-crystal structure
showed that the N-acetyl group of 4 probes
up and toward the p65 peptide. To expediate the rapid parallel synthesis
of focused library 5, the N-(4-formylphenyl)acetamide
(4) was inverted to a N-substituted
4-formyl-benzamide (19a–t), improving the nucleophilicity
of the amine in the corresponding amidecoupling reactions as well
as providing greater chemical diversity of the fragment extension
(Scheme ). Further,
a previously published cluster analysis of occurring torsion (τ)
angles of benzamide report a τ ≈ 30 and 150° between
the benzene ring and the acetamide head group (Figure A).[40] We hypothesized
that extension of the fragment from this vector provides the opportunity
to engage with the p65 peptide and enhance fragment binding (Figure B). Focused library
5 was synthesized using standard amidecoupling conditions, 1-formylbenzoic
acid (17), and amines 18a–t. In total,
13 fragments (19a–t) with amide substitution in
the para-position of the aldehyde functionality were
synthesized, soaked in p65_45/14-3-3σΔCcrystals, and
tested in FA compound titrations. All fragments from library 5 were
shown to bind within the composite binding pocket using X-ray crystallography
(Figure S3, Table S2). Subsequent biophysical
analysis identified that all compounds were silent binders, not inducing
detectable formation of a ternary complex at assay relevant concentrations.
X-ray co-crystallization experiments and an assessment of the C–C–C–N
torsion angles provided an explanation for the lack of activity for
this series of fragments. The electron density map of the aldehydes
showed highly resolved electron density for the benzaldehyde ring
and the amide of the benzamide. The carbonyl of the benzamide engages
in polar contacts with the water shell of 14-3-3, thereby stabilizing
this orientation of the fragments (Figure C). The binding poses of the different R-substitutions
are poorly resolved by the electron density map, suggesting a high
level of conformational freedom and a high-level entropy of the substitutes,
unfavorable for binding. Assessment of this library of fragments showed
the R-substitution pointing toward the solution above the p65 peptide
or Asp215 of 14-3-3 with limited possibilities to engage in favorable
contacts. For a few fragments, the R-substitutes engage in polar contacts
with the 14-3-3water shell, exemplified by 19e (Figure C). However, the
additional polar contacts do not translate to significant increases
in ternary complex formation potentially due to entropic penalties
or lack of contacts with the p65 peptide. Given the lack of cooperative
ternary complex formation of this library at biochemically relevant
concentration, we shifted focus to the 4-formyl benzenesulfonamidechemotype.
Figure 4
Acetamide-benzaldehydes in complex with 14-3-3/p65_45. (A) 3D (beige
sticks) and 2D structure of 4-formyl-benzamide. The C–C–C–N
torsion angles (orange lines) cluster at τ ≈ 0 and 180°.[40] (B) Initial fragment hit 4 can
be extended from its para-position (black arrows;
PDB: 6YOX).[25] (C) Ternary structure of 19e (green
sticks) in complex with p65_45 (red sticks) and 14-3-3σΔC
(white cartoon and sticks) (PDB: 7BIY). Hydrogen bonds are indicated with green
dashes; the 2Fo-Fc electron density map is shown as gray mesh, contoured
at 1σ.
Acetamide-benzaldehydes in complex with 14-3-3/p65_45. (A) 3D (beige
sticks) and 2D structure of 4-formyl-benzamide. The C–C–C–N
torsion angles (orange lines) cluster at τ ≈ 0 and 180°.[40] (B) Initial fragment hit 4 can
be extended from its para-position (black arrows;
PDB: 6YOX).[25] (C) Ternary structure of 19e (green
sticks) in complex with p65_45 (red sticks) and 14-3-3σΔC
(white cartoon and sticks) (PDB: 7BIY). Hydrogen bonds are indicated with green
dashes; the 2Fo-Fc electron density map is shown as gray mesh, contoured
at 1σ.
Focused
Library Development around 4-Formyl-benzenesulfonamides
Having
investigated focused libraries 1–5, we shifted our
attention to development of a focused library based on fragment 1. Analysis of the crystal structure of fragment 1, specifically the torsion angle of τ = 90 ± 30°
between the benzene ring and the mesyl group, proved interesting (Figure A).[40] Extension of the fragment from the methyl group provided
a potential point of reaching over the p65 peptide, trapping its binding
to 14-3-3 (Figure B). Alternatively, we postulated that fragment extension could also
result in a change in the conformation of the fragment leading to
the occupation of the FC pocket and increasing 14-3-3-based affinity.
To expedite fragment development, the methyl group was replaced for N-substituted amines to facilitate rapid access to a library
of 25 structural analogues of 4-formyl-benzenosulfonamides. This library
of sulfonamides was synthesized by conversion of sodium 2-formylbenzene-1-sulfonate
(20) to 4-formyl-benzenesulfonyl chloride (21) using thionyl chloride in DMF. Subsequent coupling of 21 with N-substituted amines (22a–z) afforded fragments 23a–z.
Figure 5
Sulfonamide-benzaldehydes
are active in FA compound titrations.
(A) 3D and 2D chemical structure of 4-formyl-benzenesulfonamide with
a C–C–S–N torsion angle τ as indicated.[40] (B) The benzenesulfonamides are extended toward
the FC pocket or toward the p65 peptide (red; 14-3-3: white; both
with sticks and transparent surface) (PDB: 6YOW).[25] (C) FA
compound titrations in the presence of 50 μM 14-3-3γ and
100 nM p65_45. The compounds are divided into weak (left), medium
(middle), and high (right) activity. The legends are sorted by activity.
Sulfonamide-benzaldehydes
are active in FA compound titrations.
(A) 3D and 2D chemical structure of 4-formyl-benzenesulfonamide with
a C–C–S–N torsion angle τ as indicated.[40] (B) The benzenesulfonamides are extended toward
the FC pocket or toward the p65 peptide (red; 14-3-3: white; both
with sticks and transparent surface) (PDB: 6YOW).[25] (C) FA
compound titrations in the presence of 50 μM 14-3-3γ and
100 nM p65_45. The compounds are divided into weak (left), medium
(middle), and high (right) activity. The legends are sorted by activity.In contrast to focused libraries 1–5, most
of the tested
4-formyl-benzenesulfonamide fragments showed significant stabilization
in FA assays, allowing a differentiated SAR analysis (Table , Figure C). The activity ranged from a weak affinity
with a small, not quantifiable increase in anisotropy to a two-digit
micromolar CC50 potency in compound titrations. From the
focused library 6, nine fragments elicited CC50 values
ranging from 57 to 430 μM. An additional assessment of stabilization
using the FA protein titration assay showed for 19 fragments a significant
shift of apparent KD values in the presence
of 1 mM of the fragments. Fragments 23e, f, k, t, w, and z showed KD values of <30 μM
compared to the binary complex of full-length 14-3-3 and the p65_45
peptide that gave a KD = 300 ± 100
μM. Analysis of this subset of fragments showed that these shifts
in KD’s (stabilization factor,
SFs range from ∼12- to 65-fold). Fragment 23z,
possessing a N-substituted 1,2,3,4-tetrahydroquinoline,
showed the greatest SF of ∼65-fold.
Table 1
Exploration
of 4-Formyl-benzenesulfonamidesb
Fit did not converge.
CC50: values of compound
titrations with 50 μM 14-3-3γ. KD,app: value of protein titrations in the presence of 1 mM
of the fragment. SF: the fold-change of apparent KD in comparison to a DMSO control. ND: not determined.
All fragments bound to the p65_45/14-3-3σΔC complex. For
additional data, see Figure S4 and Table S3.
Fit did not converge.CC50: values of compound
titrations with 50 μM 14-3-3γ. KD,app: value of protein titrations in the presence of 1 mM
of the fragment. SF: the fold-change of apparent KD in comparison to a DMSOcontrol. ND: not determined.
All fragments bound to the p65_45/14-3-3σΔCcomplex. For
additional data, see Figure S4 and Table S3.Comparison of X-ray crystal
soaks provided an explanation for the
FA assay results. Structural data showed that 2-methyl pyrrolidine
(23e) and piperidine (23f) were tolerated
within the composite binding pocket. Ring expansion to the N-methyl diazepane (23 g) proved to be detrimental
to stabilization (CC50 = 640 μM). Notably, polar
functionalities within six-membered N-heterocycles
were not well tolerated; specifically, hydrogen bond accepting and
donating groups (23h, n–u) elicited
high CC50 values and modest SFs (6–16-fold). This
can be exemplified by fragment 23f containing piperidine
(app KD = 15 μM, SF =22) compared
with N-methylpiperazine 23h (app KD = 100 μM, SF = 3.3) and morpholine 23u (app KD = 52 μM, SF
= 6.3) (Figure A,B).
Analysis of the X-ray structures showed that introduction of a polar
functionality typically resulted in reorientation of the R-substitute
of the fragment toward the FC-binding pocket. Introduction of a hydrophobic
functionality such as 23k (app KD = 27 μM, SF = 12.2) and 23v (app KD = 430 μM, SF = 10.6)[25] recovered stabilizing activity, with the fragments re-establishing
hydrophobiccontacts with the p65 peptide. Notably, large amphiphilic
modifications were also not well tolerated, such as 23m (app KD = 74 μM, SF = 4.5) and 23n (app KD = 94 μM, SF
= 3.5) (Figure C, Table ), with both 23m and 23n occupying solvent exposed space within
the composite pocket but not engaging in contacts with p65. Interestingly,
fragment 23w (app KD = 26
μM, SF = 12.7) showed a significant drop in stabilization with
respect to 23f. Crystal soaking experiments showed that
fragment 23w engages in hydrophobic interactions with
Ile46, Pro47, and Gly48 of p65 (Figure D). However, unlike other fragments, 23w induces a conformational change in the C-terminus of the peptide
shifting toward the pS45. Analysis of soaking experiment with fragment 23y showed that the tetrahydroisoquinoline ring engages in
hydrophobiccontacts with the p65 peptide; however, unlike 23e and 23f, the bicyclic rings repulse Pro47 of p65 (Figure E). This provides
an explanation for the poor stabilizing activity of 23y. In contrast to 2-tetrahydroquinoline (23y), 1-tetrahydroquinoline
(23z) was highly tolerated, eliciting CC50 = 57 μM and app KD = 5.1 μM;
this translated to ∼65-fold stabilization. X-ray crystallography
analysis of fragment 23z provided valuable explanation
for the high stabilization observed in FA assays. Specifically, the
bicyclic substructure in 23z engages the p65 peptide
and is positioned upwards occupying the hydrophobic roof of 14-3-3σΔC
shaped by residues Ile219, Leu218, and Leu222 (Figure F). Further, 23z also engages
in direct hydrophobiccontacts with Ile46 and Pro47 of p65. Most notably,
the 14-3-3/p65/23z ternary complex formation results
in a reorientation of the p65 peptide leading to additional 14-3-3/p65contacts. Fragment 23z appears to function as a template
for the additional binding of p65, increasing cooperative behavior
of the ternary complex. Fragment 23z facilitates additional
14-3-3/p65contacts by enabling the C-terminus of p65 to wrap over 23z and engage in electrostaticcontacts with 14-3-3. Specifically,
salt bridges are observed between Arg49/Glu14 and Arg50/Asp215 of
p65_45/14-3-3, respectively. These structural features translate to
high activity in FA assays, with a CC50 of 57 μM
and an SF of 65 (Figure G). The additional interactions between 14-3-3 and p65 induced by
the binding of 23z lead to increased cooperativity of
the ternary complex. This improved cooperative behavior directly translates
into improved stabilization of the 14-3-3/p65complex.
Figure 6
Sulfonamide-benzaldehydes
inducing complex stabilization. (A) Overlay
of 23h (green sticks; PDB: 7NLE), 23k (orange sticks; PDB: 7NK5), 23f (cyan sticks; PDB: 7NJB), and 23u (yellow sticks; PDB: 7BJB) binding to p65_45
(red sticks) and 14-3-3 (white cartoon and sticks). Hydrogen bonds
are shown as black dashes, and hydrophobic contacts are indicated
with transparent spheres. A conserved water molecule (small sphere)
is shown colored based on the related fragment color. (B) Fragments 23h, k, f, and u show
complex stabilization in FA compound titrations (left; [14-3-3γ]:
50 μM, [p65_45]: 100 nM) and protein titrations (right; [fragment]:
1 mM, [p65_45]: 100 nM). (C) Overlay of 23n (brown sticks;
PDB: 7NM3) and 24m (light blue sticks; PDB: 7NM1) in complex with 14-3-3σΔC/p65_45.
(D) Crystal structures of 23w (blue sticks; PDB: 7NLA) binding to the
composite binding pocket of p65 (red sticks) and 14-3-3 (white cartoon
and sticks). The 2Fo-Fc electron density map (1σ) is displayed
as gray mesh, and hydrogen bonds are shown as black dashes. (E) Overlay
of 23y (green sticks; PDB: 7NK3) and 23z (yellow; PDB: 7NJ9) binding to the
p65_45/14-3-3 complex. Upon binding of 23y, Pro47 changes
its conformation (red sticks, as reference: Pro47 of the 23z/p65_45/14-3-3σΔC complex shown as yellow sticks). (F)
Ternary structure of 23z (yellow sticks; PDB: 7NJ9) binding to the
p65_45/14-3-3 complex. Details as in (D). (G) Ternary complex formation
of 23x, y, and z was measured
with FA compound titrations (left; [14-3-3γ]: 50 μM, [p65_45]:
100 nM) and the stabilizing activity of 23w, y, and z with protein titrations (right; [fragment]:
1 mM, [p65_45]: 100 nM).
Sulfonamide-benzaldehydes
inducing complex stabilization. (A) Overlay
of 23h (green sticks; PDB: 7NLE), 23k (orange sticks; PDB: 7NK5), 23f (cyan sticks; PDB: 7NJB), and 23u (yellow sticks; PDB: 7BJB) binding to p65_45
(red sticks) and 14-3-3 (white cartoon and sticks). Hydrogen bonds
are shown as black dashes, and hydrophobiccontacts are indicated
with transparent spheres. A conserved water molecule (small sphere)
is shown colored based on the related fragment color. (B) Fragments 23h, k, f, and u show
complex stabilization in FA compound titrations (left; [14-3-3γ]:
50 μM, [p65_45]: 100 nM) and protein titrations (right; [fragment]:
1 mM, [p65_45]: 100 nM). (C) Overlay of 23n (brown sticks;
PDB: 7NM3) and 24m (light blue sticks; PDB: 7NM1) in complex with 14-3-3σΔC/p65_45.
(D) Crystal structures of 23w (blue sticks; PDB: 7NLA) binding to the
composite binding pocket of p65 (red sticks) and 14-3-3 (white cartoon
and sticks). The 2Fo-Fc electron density map (1σ) is displayed
as gray mesh, and hydrogen bonds are shown as black dashes. (E) Overlay
of 23y (green sticks; PDB: 7NK3) and 23z (yellow; PDB: 7NJ9) binding to the
p65_45/14-3-3complex. Upon binding of 23y, Pro47changes
its conformation (red sticks, as reference: Pro47 of the 23z/p65_45/14-3-3σΔCcomplex shown as yellow sticks). (F)
Ternary structure of 23z (yellow sticks; PDB: 7NJ9) binding to the
p65_45/14-3-3complex. Details as in (D). (G) Ternary complex formation
of 23x, y, and z was measured
with FA compound titrations (left; [14-3-3γ]: 50 μM, [p65_45]:
100 nM) and the stabilizing activity of 23w, y, and z with protein titrations (right; [fragment]:
1 mM, [p65_45]: 100 nM).
Optimization
of Fragment 23z
Encouraged by the high stabilizing
effect of covalent fragment 23z, we looked to develop
a library of 10 sulfonylamides based
on tricyclic fragment 23z. Due to the rearrangement of
the p65 peptide in the presence of 23z forming a narrow
and enclosed binding pocket, this limited the sites for fragment modifications
to the 5-, 6-, or 7-position of the tetrahydroquinoline ring (Figure A). As a result,
we focused on small modifications to build additional interactions
with the hydrophobic patch in the roof of 14-3-3 or extension of the
fragments over Ile46 of p65. Additionally, we investigated the addition
of heteroatoms in the 4-position of the tetrahydroquinoline ring to
engage with the backbone carbonyl or nitrogen of Pro47 or Gly48 to
establish additional polar contacts. A small library of 10 analogues
was synthesized using our previously mentioned sulfonamidecoupling
(Table ).
Figure 7
Optimization
of 23z. (A) Ternary structure of 23z (yellow
spheres) in complex with 14-3-3σΔC
(white surface) and p65_45 (red cartoon, transparent spheres) (PDB: 7NJ9). Carbons of the
bicyclic head group are numbered. (B) Ternary structure of 24b (orange sticks) in complex with p65_45/14-3-3σΔC (PDB: 7BIQ). The distance between
the 2-methyl and water (red spheres) is indicated with black dashes.
Polar contacts are shown as black dashed lines. (C) Structure of 24e (cyan sticks) binding to the p65_45/14-3-3σΔC
complex (as in A; PDB: 7BI3). Hydrophobic contacts are indicated with transparent
spheres. (D) FA compound titrations with 50 μM 14-3-3γ
and 100 nM p65_45. (E) FA protein titrations with 1 mM fragment and
100 nM p65_45. (F) Structure of 24j binding to the p65_45/14-3-3σΔC
complex (as in A; PDB: 7BIW). A beneficial hydrogen bond is formed between the
backbone carbonyl of p65s’ Pro47 and 24j (black
dash).
Table 2
Exploration of structural
analogs
of 23zb
Tested as an enantiomeric
mixture.
CC50: values of compound
titrations with 50 μM 14-3-3γ. KD,app: values of protein titrations in the presence of 1 mM
of the fragment. SF: the fold-change of apparent KD in comparison to a DMSO control. ND: not determined.
All fragments bound to the p65_45/14-3-3σΔC complex. For
additional data, see Figure S5 and Table S4.
Optimization
of 23z. (A) Ternary structure of 23z (yellow
spheres) in complex with 14-3-3σΔC
(white surface) and p65_45 (red cartoon, transparent spheres) (PDB: 7NJ9). Carbons of the
bicyclic head group are numbered. (B) Ternary structure of 24b (orange sticks) in complex with p65_45/14-3-3σΔC (PDB: 7BIQ). The distance between
the 2-methyl and water (red spheres) is indicated with black dashes.
Polar contacts are shown as black dashed lines. (C) Structure of 24e (cyan sticks) binding to the p65_45/14-3-3σΔCcomplex (as in A; PDB: 7BI3). Hydrophobiccontacts are indicated with transparent
spheres. (D) FA compound titrations with 50 μM 14-3-3γ
and 100 nM p65_45. (E) FA protein titrations with 1 mM fragment and
100 nM p65_45. (F) Structure of 24j binding to the p65_45/14-3-3σΔCcomplex (as in A; PDB: 7BIW). A beneficial hydrogen bond is formed between the
backbone carbonyl of p65s’ Pro47 and 24j (black
dash).Tested as an enantiomeric
mixture.CC50: values of compound
titrations with 50 μM 14-3-3γ. KD,app: values of protein titrations in the presence of 1 mM
of the fragment. SF: the fold-change of apparent KD in comparison to a DMSOcontrol. ND: not determined.
All fragments bound to the p65_45/14-3-3σΔCcomplex. For
additional data, see Figure S5 and Table S4.Structural analysis of
this library showed that this series of
analogues retained a similar cooperative behavior as 23z, inducing additional PPI contacts. Biophysical analysis using an
FA assay provided valuable insight into the SAR around fragment 23z. Analysis of the CC50 concentration indicated
that 23z showed the highest ternary complex formation,
with all other analogues in this series eliciting a drop in complexation
(CC50 values ranging from 110 to 310 μM). However,
significant insight into complex stabilization was gained from the
analysis of app KD values. Substitution
of 23z for an indoline (24a) or racemic2-methyl-tetrahydroquinoline (24b) was tolerated; however,
a 2-fold reduction was observed in stabilization, with app KD values of 11 and 9.6 μM, respectively.
Structural analysis of 24a showed additional space around
the five-membered heterocycle potentially providing additional sites
for functionalization in the future (Figure S5). Fragment 24b showed excellent electron density across
the entire fragment within the X-ray crystal structure, enabling unambiguous
assignment of stereochemistry. From the structure, it was identified
that the R-enantiomer exclusively bound in the crystal, suggesting
that the pure R-enantiomer may have significantly underestimated CC50 and app KD (Figure B). This site may provide an
excellent point for fragment extension toward the p65 peptide. Addition
of a halogen or methoxy in the 6-position resulted in a reduction
in stabilization, with 6-fluoro (24c), 6-chloro (24d), or 6-methoxy (24e) substituted tetrahydroquinoline
fragments affording app KD values of 6.2,
9.9, and 10 μM, respectively. Analysis of soaking experiments
shows that modifications in this position resulted in unfavorable
contacts with the roof of 14-3-3 (Figure C). Addition of an oxygen to the saturated
six-membered ring (24f) proved detrimental to stabilization
(app KD = 15 μM). Further addition
of halogens or methoxy groups in the 6 or 7 positions did not re-establish
lost stabilization, such as 6-chloro (24h), 6-methoxy
(24i), or 7-fluoro (24g). Substitution of
the benzomorpholine (24f) for tetrahydroquinoxaline (24j) resulted in an improvement in stabilization with 24j eliciting an app KD of 4.3
μM, translating into the highest stabilizing effect with an
81-fold stabilization (Figure D,E). Structural analysis showed that the introduction of
a nitrogen atom in the saturated ring installs an additional hydrogen
bond with the backbone carbonyl of Pro47 of p65 (Figure F).To assess the selective
ternary complex formation of 24j with 14-3-3/p65, the
fragment was further screened in a compound
titration FA assay against three well-established 14-3-3 interactions
(p53, ERα, and TAZ; Figure S6). Gratifyingly,
no ternary complex formation was detected for p53, ERα, or TAZ
complexes, proving that 24j is not a pan-stabilizer of
14-3-3 interactions and indicating an initial selectivity of 24j toward the p65/14-3-3 interaction.
Conclusions
Summarizing, here we build upon our initial
report of a novel covalent
fragment screening approach using an aldehyde fragment library. These
covalent fragments form a covalent tether with Lys122 within the 14-3-3/p65composite binding pocket. Specifically, we describe the optimization
of initial hit covalent fragments into a p65/14-3-3 molecular glue
that elicited an 81-fold stabilization of the 14-3-3/p65complex.
Critical to this success was the use of X-ray crystallography and
FA measurements to develop a robust understanding of the structural
activity relationship. Direct hydrophobic engagement with p65 was
the driving interaction that established complex stabilization. Hydrophobiccontacts between 23z or 24j and p65 resulted
in a conformational change in the 14-3-3/p65 interface with extended
interactions, in turn increasing the cooperativity of the ternary
complex. Fragment 23z or 24j might serve
as a valuable starting point for optimization for the development
of a chemical probe to study the effects of 14-3-3-mediated regulation
of p65 in a cellular context. Particularly, the aldehyde functionality
requires additional investigations to validate its activity and oxidative
stability in a cellular context such as with the aldehyde-containing
drug voxelotor.[41] Alternatively, the aldehydecould be replaced with a more benign chemical handle that is less
susceptible to oxidation, or the application of a prodrug approach
to protect the aldehyde may need to be considered when moving toward
cellular studies.Considering the lack of rational methodologies
to develop PPI stabilizers,
here we describe a systematic approach to developing initial hit fragments
into molecular glues. Observations from this research indicate that
the direct engagement of molecular glues with the partner peptide
is significant for stabilization. Specifically, hydrophobiccontacts
are effective to enhance ternary complex formation and support a cooperative
binding mode. Analysis of SAR results indicates that fragments that
facilitate templating of the p65 peptide and promotion of additional
contacts between 14-3-3 and p65 resulted in increased complex stabilization.
This research has direct applications to further development of PPI
stabilizers as well as the field of PROTACs. There is a growing body
of evidence showing that cooperative PROTACs, which stabilize direct
PPIs, lead to improved efficacy, reducing problems associated with
the hook-effect and the necessity for highly potent molecules.[42−45] Additionally, research from the field of PROTACs and our findings
appear to be in agreement that the molecular glue/cooperative PROTAC
potency of a ligand for a complex is not the driving force for increased
complex stabilization; rather, the cooperativity behavior of the ternary
complex appears to be the driving force for PPI stabilization.[11,42,45,46]
Experimental Section
Protein Expression and Purification
The 14-3-3 proteins
were expressed and purified using standard protocols.
In short, pPROEX HTb vectors encoding the 14-3-3σΔC (truncated
C-terminus ΔC17) and 14-3-3γ isoform were transformed
into BL21(DE3) cells. Protein expression was initiated with 0.4 mM
IPTG at a cell density OD600 = 0.8–1. The expression
took place overnight at 18 °C. The cells were harvested by centrifugation
(10,000g, 15 min) and resuspended in a lysis buffer
(50 mM Tris/HCl pH 8, 300 mM NaCl, 12.5 mM imidazole, and 2 mM β-mercaptoethanol).
The cells were lysed with a homogenizer, and the lysate was cleared
via centrifugation (40,000g, 30 min). Ni-NTAcolumns
were used to isolate the protein, which was washed with 10 CV lysis
buffer and eluted with 250 mM imidazole (50 mM Tris/HCl pH 8, 300
mM NaCl, 250 mM imidazole, and 2 mM β-mercaptoethanol). The
full-length 14-3-3γ was dialyzed against 25 mM HEPES pH 7.5,
100 mM NaCl, 10 mM MgCl2, and 0.5 mM Tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine)
and stored at −80 °C. For the 14-3-3σΔC, the
His6-tag was removed by the TEV protease; the TEV was removed with
Ni-NTAcolumns. The rest of the imidazole of the 14-3-3σΔC
solution was removed by size exclusion chromatography (20 mM HEPES
pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, and 2 mM β-mercaptoethanol) and stored
at −80 °C.
X-ray Crystallography
Binary crystals
with p65_45 peptide (sequence: EGRSAG pS45 IPGRRS, C-terminus:
amidation; N-terminus: acetylation)[47] and
14-3-3σΔC were grown at a 14-3-3σΔCconcentration
of 12 mg/mL in a 1:2 ratio with the acetylated peptide in 20 mM HEPES
pH 7.5, 2 mM MgCl2, and 2 mM β-mercaptoethanol. This
complexation mixture was incubated overnight. In a hanging drop setup,
the complexation mixture was mixed in 1:2 ratio with the precipitation
buffer (95 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 27–28% PEG400, 190 mM CaCl2, and 5% glycerol). For data acquisition, crystals were directly
flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen.Fragment soaks were performed
by adding compounds in DMSO stock solutions direct to fully grown
crystals with a final compound concentration of 10 mM (≤1%
DMSO). The soaks were incubated for 7 days prior to data acquisition.
Diffraction data were measured either at the P11 beamline of PetraIII
(DESY campus, Hamburg, Germany) or the i-03/i-24 beamline of the diamond
light source (Oxford, UK) or in-house. The diffraction data were integrated
with the xia2/DIALS pipeline[48] followed
by molecular replacement with MolRep.[49,50] The binary
p65_45/14-3-3σΔC structure was used as a search model
(PDB ID: 6QHL). Model refinement took place in iterative cycles with Coot,[51] Refmac5,[52] and phenix.refine.[53] 3D structures of ligands were prepared using
the fragment SMILES and elbow of the phenix suite.[53] Figures were generated with PyMOL (V2.0.6, Schrodinger
LLC).
Fluorescence Anisotropy Assays
Complex
stabilization was measured using a fluorescently labeled p65_45 peptide
(FITC-βAla-EGRSAG pS45 IPGRRS) at a concentration
of 100 nM throughout all assays. During compound titrations, the 14-3-3γ
concentration was constant at 50 μM and the compound was titrated
in a 1:1 dilution series. In protein titrations, 14-3-3γ was
titrated in a 1:1 dilution series in the presence of 1 mM compound.
The plates (Corning 384 well plates, black, round bottom, low binding)
were incubated for 3 h at RT prior to fluorescence anisotropy (FA)
measurements with the Tecan Infinite 500 plate reader (FITC dye: excitation
485 nm and emission 535 nm). Dilution series were prepared in an FA
buffer (10 mM HEPES pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, and 0.1% Tween20).The activity of the hit compound 24j was measured for
the TAZ-peptide[23] (FITC-βAla-RSH
pS89 SPASLQ), p53-peptide[54] (TAMRA-Ahx-SRAHSSHLKSKKGQSTSRHKKLMFK
pT387 EGPDSD-COOH), or ERα-peptide[13] (FITC-O1Pen-AEGFPA pT594 V-COOH) and 14-3-3γ. Therefore, the
compound was titrated in a 1:1 dilution series to a constant concentration
of 14-3-3γ and 10 nM peptide. The protein concentration was
adjusted to one-third of the KD of the
binary protein/peptide complex (final 14-3-3γ concentration
for the measurement with TAZ: 0.1 μM; with p53: 0.3 μM
and with ERα: 0.1 μM). For a better comparison, the baseline
of each measurement was subtracted (Δr/mAU).All measurements were performed as single measurements. Data analysis
was performed with Origin 2019 (V9.6.0.172, OriginLab Corporation)
with the inbuilt ″Hill1″ function for data fitting.
For data sets without an upper plateau, the Hill coefficient n was set to n = 1.
Chemistry:
General Information
All
commercial chemicals were used as received. Reagents were used without
further purification unless otherwise noted. TLC analysis was performed
on TLCaluminum sheets, silica gel layer, ALUGRAM SIL G UV254, 20
× 20 cm by MACHEREY-NAGEL. TLC plates were analyzed by UV fluorescence
(254 nm). UHPLC–MS analysis was performed using the UPLC Agilent
Technologies 1290 Infinity coupled with the Agilent Technologies 6120
Quadrupole LC/MS DAD detector. Column: ACQUITY UHPLC BEH C18 (1.7
μm) 2.1 mm × 50 mm. Temperature: 40 °C. Detection:
DAD + MS/6120 Quadrupole. Injected volume: 1 μL. Flow: 1.2 mL/min.
Solvent A: water + 0.1% formic acid. Solvent B: acetonitrile + 0.1%
formic acid. Gradient: 0 min 2% B, 0.2 min 2% B, 2.0 min 98% B, 2.2
min 98% B, 2.21 min 2% B, and 2.5 min 2% B. Preparative HPLC was performed
using the UPLC Agilent Technologies 1260 Infinity coupled with the
Agilent Technologies 6120 Quadrupole LC/MS. Column: Waters XBridge
Prep C18 5 μm OBD 19 × 150 mm. Detection: DAD + MS/6120
Quadrupole. Flow: 32 mL/min. Solvent A: water + 0.1% formic acid.
Solvent B: acetonitrile + 0.1% formic acid. Gradient: 0 min 77% A/23%
B, 1 min 77% A/23% B, 9 min 16% A/84% B, 9.01 min 2% A/98% B, and
11 min 2% A/98% B. The purity of the synthesized compounds is ≥95%. 1HNMR and 13CNMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker
300 MHz spectrometer at ambient temperature. The chemical shifts are
listed in ppm on the δ = scale, and coupling constants were
recorded in hertz (Hz). Chemical shifts are calibrated relative to
the signals corresponding of the nondeuterated solvent (CHCl3: δ = 7.26 ppm for 1H and 77.16 ppm for 13C; DMSO: δ
= 2.50 ppm for 1H and 39.52 ppm for 13C). Abbreviations are used in
the description of NMR data as follows: chemical shift (δ =
ppm), multiplicity (s = singlet, d = doublet, t = triplet, m = multiplet,
bs = broad singlet, dd = doublet of doublets, td = triplet of doublets),
and coupling constant (J = Hz).For general
procedures, chemical characterization, NMR spectra, and LC–MS
traces, see the Supporting Information.
Authors: Adelajda Zorba; Chuong Nguyen; Yingrong Xu; Jeremy Starr; Kris Borzilleri; James Smith; Hongyao Zhu; Kathleen A Farley; WeiDong Ding; James Schiemer; Xidong Feng; Jeanne S Chang; Daniel P Uccello; Jennifer A Young; Carmen N Garcia-Irrizary; Lara Czabaniuk; Brandon Schuff; Robert Oliver; Justin Montgomery; Matthew M Hayward; Jotham Coe; Jinshan Chen; Mark Niosi; Suman Luthra; Jaymin C Shah; Ayman El-Kattan; Xiayang Qiu; Graham M West; Mark C Noe; Veerabahu Shanmugasundaram; Adam M Gilbert; Matthew F Brown; Matthew F Calabrese Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2018-07-16 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Donna Oksenberg; Kobina Dufu; Mira P Patel; Chihyuan Chuang; Zhe Li; Qing Xu; Abel Silva-Garcia; Chengjing Zhou; Athiwat Hutchaleelaha; Larysa Patskovska; Yury Patskovsky; Steven C Almo; Uma Sinha; Brian W Metcalf; David R Archer Journal: Br J Haematol Date: 2016-07-05 Impact factor: 6.998
Authors: Blake E Smith; Stephen L Wang; Saul Jaime-Figueroa; Alicia Harbin; Jing Wang; Brian D Hamman; Craig M Crews Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2019-01-10 Impact factor: 14.919