Literature DB >> 34049392

Carbon ion radiotherapy eradicates medulloblastomas with chromothripsis in an orthotopic Li-Fraumeni patient-derived mouse model.

Milena Simovic1,2, Michiel Bolkestein1, Mahmoud Moustafa3,4,5,6,7,8,9, John K L Wong8,10, Verena Körber11, Sarah Benedetto11,12, Umar Khalid1,2, Hannah Sophia Schreiber1,13, Manfred Jugold14, Andrey Korshunov8,15, Daniel Hübschmann8,16,17,18, Norman Mack8,10,18,19,20, Stephan Brons12, Pei-Chi Wei21, Michael O Breckwoldt22, Sabine Heiland22, Martin Bendszus22, Jürgen Debus4,6,8,23,24,25, Thomas Höfer11, Marc Zapatka8,10, Marcel Kool8,19,20,26, Stefan M Pfister8,18,19,20, Amir Abdollahi3,4,5,6,7,8, Aurélie Ernst1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Medulloblastomas with chromothripsis developing in children with Li-Fraumeni Syndrome (germline TP53 mutations) are highly aggressive brain tumors with dismal prognosis. Conventional photon radiotherapy and DNA-damaging chemotherapy are not successful for these patients and raise the risk of secondary malignancies. We hypothesized that the pronounced homologous recombination deficiency in these tumors might offer vulnerabilities that can be therapeutically utilized in combination with high linear energy transfer carbon ion radiotherapy.
METHODS: We tested high-precision particle therapy with carbon ions and protons as well as topotecan with or without PARP inhibitor in orthotopic primary and matched relapsed patient-derived xenograft models. Tumor and normal tissue underwent longitudinal morphological MRI, cellular (markers of neurogenesis and DNA damage-repair), and molecular characterization (whole-genome sequencing).
RESULTS: In the primary medulloblastoma model, carbon ions led to complete response in 79% of animals irrespective of PARP inhibitor within a follow-up period of 300 days postirradiation, as detected by MRI and histology. No sign of neurologic symptoms, impairment of neurogenesis or in-field carcinogenesis was detected in repair-deficient host mice. PARP inhibitors further enhanced the effect of proton irradiation. In the postradiotherapy relapsed tumor model, median survival was significantly increased after carbon ions (96 days) versus control (43 days, P < .0001). No major change in the clonal composition was detected in the relapsed model.
CONCLUSION: The high efficacy and favorable toxicity profile of carbon ions warrants further investigation in primary medulloblastomas with chromothripsis. Postradiotherapy relapsed medulloblastomas exhibit relative resistance compared to treatment-naïve tumors, calling for exploration of multimodal strategies.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PARP inhibitor; carbon ion radiotherapy; chromothripsis; medulloblastoma; synthetic lethality

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34049392      PMCID: PMC8643436          DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noab127

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuro Oncol        ISSN: 1522-8517            Impact factor:   12.300


• Carbon ions eradicate chromothriptic medulloblastoma in a preclinical mouse model. Children developing medulloblastomas with chromothripsis have a very poor prognosis. Tightly linked with pathogenic germline variants in TP53, these aggressive brain tumors are challenging to treat by conventional photon radiotherapy and chemotherapy due to the risk of secondary malignancies. Particle radiation has not been extensively tested in pediatric (neuro-) oncology and in the context of germline predisposition. We hypothesized that the high precision provided by particle therapy might be utilized to eliminate medulloblastoma cells, while minimizing the damage to the surrounding brain tissue. Furthermore, the marked homologous recombination repair deficiency detected in these tumors might offer vulnerabilities that can be targeted by synthetically lethal interactions. We showed that carbon ions eradicate primary medulloblastoma cells with chromothripsis in preclinical patient-derived xenografts. Chromothripsis is a recently identified form of genome instability, by which a one-off catastrophic event gives rise to massive genomic rearrangements of one or a few chromosome(s).[1,2] Generally regarded as an early event in tumor development, chromothripsis is thought to play a causative role in tumor initiation.[3-5] This phenomenon is frequently observed in cancer, occurring in more than 20% of cases in numerous cancer types.[6-9] In specific tumor entities and molecular subgroups, the prevalence of chromothripsis reaches up to 100%, such as for instance in medulloblastomas developing in children with Li-Fraumeni Syndrome (LFS).[1,10] Like in other malignant brain tumors and in a number of additional tumor types, chromothripsis is linked with poor prognosis in these patients,[10] who have limited treatment options, stressing the urgent need for innovative treatment modalities. Due to the germline TP53 mutation, local therapy intensification in these patients is limited by the risk of development of secondary malignancies, which could occur in 30%–50% of LFS cases, often within the radiation field.[11,12] Likewise, genotoxic chemotherapy can contribute to the development of subsequent tumors in the context of p53 dysfunction.[13] Therefore, maximal normal tissue sparing is a prerequisite for therapy intensification in this cancer entity. Recent developments in high-precision radiotherapy utilizing protons and carbon ions (CIRT) offer a steep dose gradient and sparing of surrounding normal tissue.[14-16] The benefits of particle therapy alone or in combination with other modalities were shown in a number of tumor types.[17,18] In pediatric patients, particle therapy with heavy ions has not been extensively studied, and has been limited to few tumor types, such as inoperable osteosarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, or chordoma.[19,20] Even though these technologies are extremely powerful, the novelty and the potential risks linked to side-effects have slowed down their applications in pediatric (neuro-) oncology, in particular for heavier ions like carbon. Synthetic lethality and sensitization approaches may allow using lower doses of radiation, limiting side-effects.[21] In the context of medulloblastomas with chromothripsis and p53 dysfunction, utilizing synthetically lethal interactions would decrease the risk for secondary tumors. Chromothripsis is tightly linked with DNA repair defects, and in particular with Homologous Recombination (HR) repair deficiency or BRCAness.[22,23] Importantly, HR deficiency may offer vulnerabilities to target tumor cells, as it makes cells potentially sensitive to radiation[24] and to Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibition.[25,26] Synthetic lethality between BRCA-mutant tumors and pharmacologic inhibition of PARP first led to clinical trials in breast and ovarian cancer.[27,28] This strategy was then successfully extended to a range of tumor types such as gastric cancer, pancreatic cancer, small cell lung cancer, Ewing’s sarcoma, melanoma, and glioblastoma, not only in the context of BRCA mutations but for tumors presenting molecular signatures of BRCAness.[29] Remarkably, PARP inhibitors (PARPi) were also identified as potent radiosensitizers[30-32] and showed promising results in the clinic as single treatment or combined with radiation or chemotherapy.[33] Even though chromothripsis plays a major role in tumor development, no specific therapy has been developed for patients with chromothriptic tumors. Therefore, we set off to test particle therapy in medulloblastomas with chromothripsis, alone and in combination with the novel PARPi BGB290.

Materials and Methods

Cell Culture

DAOY cells were cultivated in DMEM high glucose (Gibco, #41965) with 10% FCS and 1% L-glutamine. For spheroid cultures, tumors were isolated from the mouse brains, homogenized by pipetting in NeuroCult™ NS-A Proliferation Kit (STEMCELL Technologies, #05751) and filtered to obtain single cell suspensions. To cultivate spheroids, 0.25–0.5 million cells were plated per 25 cm2 flask (Greiner, #690195) in 10 ml media (see Supplementary Table 1).

In vitro Radiation and Drug Response

DAOY cells were seeded in 96-well plates (Corning, #3596) at a density of 5000 cells per well and treated 24 h later. For treatment with radiation and topotecan, see Supplementary Methods. Metabolic activity was analyzed 72 h after treatment start with MTT assays (Sigma-Aldrich, #M5655). Spheroids from patient-derived xenograft models (PDX) were treated with 5 µM Topotecan alone or combined with BGB290 (IC20 or IC40). Metabolic activity was measured after 96 h with ATPlite Luminescence assays (Perkin Elmer, #6016943).

Clinical Samples

Clinical samples and data were collected, after receiving written informed consent in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approval from the respective institutional review boards.

Animal Studies

Orthotopic PDX mouse models were established in 6–10-week-old female immunocompromised mice (NSG, NOD.Cg-PrkdcIl2rg). For the pilot radiation study, patient-derived cells were injected in mice of NOD.Cg-PrkdcIl2rg (NSG, DKFZ breeding), NOD.Cg-Rag1Il2rg (NRGS, DKFZ breeding) and BALB/cAnNRj-Foxn1 (BALB/c, Janvier). For all other experiments with PDX models, 6–10-week-old female NRGS mice were used. Patient-derived tumor cells were injected into the cerebellum, as described previously.[34] Tumor growth was followed by MRI and animals were randomized into treatment groups based on tumor volume measurements. For radiation experiments with Trp53+/− mice, 6–10-week-old male and female mice from the 129-Trp53tm1Tyj strain were used. All animal experiments were performed in accordance with ethical and legal regulations for animal welfare and approved by the governmental council (Regierungspräsidium Karlsruhe, Germany).

In vivo Radiation and Chemotherapy

Prior to cerebellum particle irradiation, mice were anaesthetized by inhalation anesthesia, a mixture of 2% isoflurane with 2 L/min flow rate compressed medical air. The whole cerebellum, 7 × 7 mm region around the cell injection site was irradiated with 3 Gy of carbon ions or protons for 5 consecutive fractions at HIT. For details of radiation, PARPi and chemotherapy treatment see Supplementary Methods.

Histology, PARP Pharmacodynamic Activity, PARPi-FL Blocking Study, Bioinformatic Analysis, Magnetic Resonance Imaging

See Supplementary Methods.

Results

To evaluate the benefits of particle therapy and PARPi for medulloblastomas with chromothripsis, we tested this approach in vitro and in PDX models derived from matched primary and relapsed tumor cells. We first tested particle therapy alone and in combination with the recently developed PARPi BGB290 in medulloblastoma cells with chromothripsis. We selected a p53-deficient chromothriptic medulloblastoma cell line (DAOY) and applied different doses of proton or CIRT with or without addition of BGB290. We used talazoparib as a positive control for in vitro experiments, due to the high potency of this PARPi. Both types of particle radiation led to a dose-dependent decrease in the metabolic activity of the cells, with CIRT being more potent than protons (Figure 1a and b). At 2, 4, and 6 Gy of proton irradiation, BGB290 addition led to a significant decrease in the metabolic activity of the cells as compared to proton irradiation alone. CIRT was very potent as a single treatment and the added benefit of BGB290 was only significant at 2 Gy (Figure 1b). For comparison, we also applied BGB290 in combination with the topoisomerase inhibitor topotecan, which is used in clinical studies in combination with PARPi.[35] At 10 nM topotecan, BGB290 addition led to a significant decrease in the metabolic activity of the cells as compared to topotecan alone (Figure 1c). To confirm the effects of DNA damage in combination with BGB290 in additional medulloblastoma models with chromothripsis, we generated spheroid cultures from six PDX models from four patients. Importantly, BGB290 with topotecan led to a significant reduction in the metabolic activity of the cells as compared to topotecan alone (Figure 1d). Altogether, particle radiation and topotecan alone as well as in combination with PARPi showed promising results in vitro.
Fig. 1

Effects of particle radiation, topotecan and combination with PARPi in human medulloblastoma cells (DAOY) (a–c) and in spheroids from PDX models (d, each model shown in a different color, with the first three models derived from one patient). Metabolic activity was determined 72h (a–c) or 96 h (d) after treatment start. For statistical comparison between single and combination treatment effects, two-way ANOVA was performed in a–c and paired t tests were performed in d (*P < .05, **P < .01, ***P < .001).

Effects of particle radiation, topotecan and combination with PARPi in human medulloblastoma cells (DAOY) (a–c) and in spheroids from PDX models (d, each model shown in a different color, with the first three models derived from one patient). Metabolic activity was determined 72h (a–c) or 96 h (d) after treatment start. For statistical comparison between single and combination treatment effects, two-way ANOVA was performed in a–c and paired t tests were performed in d (*P < .05, **P < .01, ***P < .001). Before moving on to in vivo models, we tested whether the primary tumors and PDX models investigated here were susceptible to PARPi at all. We showed that medulloblastomas with chromothripsis have a significantly higher HR deficiency (HRD) score as compared to medulloblastomas without chromothripsis from the same molecular subgroup (Figure 2a). In addition, the exposure for COSMIC mutational signature ID8, characteristic of DNA DSB repair by nonhomologous end-joining and linked with HRD,[36] was significantly higher in medulloblastomas with chromothripsis as compared to other medulloblastomas from the same molecular subgroup (Figure 2b). RNA sequencing of tumor tissue showed that PARP1 is expressed at high levels in medulloblastomas from this molecular subgroup (Sonic Hedgehog, SHH) (Figure 2c). Furthermore, immunohistochemical analyses showed homogenous high expression of PARP1 in SHH medulloblastomas with chromothripsis (Figure 2d, Supplementary Figure 1) and in orthotopic PDX models with chromothripsis (derived from a primary and relapse tumor from the same patient, Figure 2e), suggesting that these models can be used to test radiation in combination with PARPi.
Fig. 2

Rationale for the use of PARPi in SHH medulloblastomas with chromothripsis. (a) HRD score in SHH medulloblastomas with and without chromothripsis (Wilcoxon-test, ***P < .0001). (b) Exposure to indel signature 8, linked to DNA DSB repair by NHEJ (Wilcoxon-test, **P < .01). (c) Expression levels of repair factors (RNA-sequencing) in SHH medulloblastomas showing elevated PARP1 expression. PARP1 expression is not significantly different between SHH medulloblastomas with and without chromothripsis at RNA level. (d) PARP1 expression (immunohistochemistry) in SHH medulloblastomas with and without chromothripsis (*P = .0142, unpaired t test) . (e) PARP1 expression (immunohistochemistry) in primary tumor and first relapse PDX models of a SHH medulloblastoma-LFS patient. Scale bars: 40 μm. NHEJ, Non-Homologous End-Joining.

Rationale for the use of PARPi in SHH medulloblastomas with chromothripsis. (a) HRD score in SHH medulloblastomas with and without chromothripsis (Wilcoxon-test, ***P < .0001). (b) Exposure to indel signature 8, linked to DNA DSB repair by NHEJ (Wilcoxon-test, **P < .01). (c) Expression levels of repair factors (RNA-sequencing) in SHH medulloblastomas showing elevated PARP1 expression. PARP1 expression is not significantly different between SHH medulloblastomas with and without chromothripsis at RNA level. (d) PARP1 expression (immunohistochemistry) in SHH medulloblastomas with and without chromothripsis (*P = .0142, unpaired t test) . (e) PARP1 expression (immunohistochemistry) in primary tumor and first relapse PDX models of a SHH medulloblastoma-LFS patient. Scale bars: 40 μm. NHEJ, Non-Homologous End-Joining. For preclinical in vivo studies in medulloblastoma PDX models, blood-brain barrier penetrant PARPi are needed. Due to its poor blood-brain barrier penetrance, the widely used PARPi talazoparib is problematic in the context of brain tumors. We tested the inhibitory effect on the enzymatic activity of PARP1 and the blood-brain barrier penetrance of BGB290, a recently developed PARPi.[37] PARP enzyme activity quantification showed that at a 10 nM concentration, BGB290 offers the same range of inhibition of PARP enzyme activity as talazoparib, a potent but poorly brain-penetrant PARPi (Supplementary Figure 2a). To test for blood-brain barrier penetrance of PARPi, in vivo competition assays with a fluorescently labeled PARPi (PARPi-FL) can be used.[38] To probe the BGB290 uptake in brain xenografts, we injected BGB290 into xenograft-bearing mice before PARPi-FL addition. This significantly reduced the uptake of the fluorescent imaging agent by 25% (P < .05), confirming that BGB290 crosses the blood-brain barrier (Supplementary Figure 2b). We next applied particle radiation or chemotherapy (topotecan) with PARPi in preclinical mouse models of medulloblastoma. First, we tested the effects of the radiation alone in a highly aggressive model that we established from medulloblastoma cells from a heavily pretreated patient, who had received chemo- and radiotherapy. When the implanted tumors had reached a predefined size-threshold based on MRI measurements, we randomized the mice and applied five fractions of CIRT (5 × 3Gy) to the cerebellum in the treated group. Remarkably, this 5-day treatment was sufficient to delay tumor growth by 53 days (median survival: 96 days in treated animals; 43 days in controls), providing a highly significant survival benefit (Figure 3a). In contrast, topotecan alone or in combination with BGB290 did not lead to any survival benefit in the same model (Supplementary Figure 3). Encouraged by these promising results with CIRT in a pretreated tumor, we then used the patient-derived model of the matched untreated primary tumor and tested the effect of PARPi in addition to CIRT or proton radiation (Figure 3b). PARPi alone did not lead to any benefit as compared to the control group. In contrast, proton irradiation (5 × 3Gy) led to a significant improvement in survival (85 vs 52 days, P < .01). The addition of BGB290 to proton irradiation significantly improved the survival as compared to proton alone (96 vs 85 days, P < .05). The most striking results were obtained with CIRT, which led to a complete response in 79% of the animals (11 out of 14) based on MRI and histology (Figure 3c, Supplementary Figure 4). Three CIRT mice showed a tumor regrowth, two of them over 180 days after the 5-day treatment and one after 60 days. The remaining 11 animals were tumor-free, with four of them being sacrificed due to age-related issues or other tumor-independent issues such as vaginal prolapse. The 11 cured animals remained tumor-free for up to 300 days after the 5 days of irradiation. Additional benefits of PARPi were possibly hidden by the strong CIRT effect. Therefore, we investigated the mechanism of action of CIRT in the two PDX models.
Fig. 3

Effects of fractionated particle radiation (5 × 3 Gy) alone or in combination with PARPi BGB290 on tumor growth and survival in matched first relapse (a, n = 13 for controls and n = 8 for carbon ions) and primary tumor (b, n = 11 for controls, 7 for PARPi, 8 for PARPi + protons, 5 for protons, 7 for PARPi + carbon ions, 7 for carbon ions) PDX models from a SHH medulloblastoma-LFS patient. The results of log-rank (Mantel-Cox) tests on Kaplan–Meier curves indicate the survival benefit of each treatment group in comparison to control (*P < .05, **P < 01, ***P < .0001). (c) Representative MRI images of PDX brains pre- and postradiation. A representative image of hematoxylin and eosin (HE) stain shows the cerebellum in CIRT animal after the complete response to irradiation. Scale bar: 500 µm.

Effects of fractionated particle radiation (5 × 3 Gy) alone or in combination with PARPi BGB290 on tumor growth and survival in matched first relapse (a, n = 13 for controls and n = 8 for carbon ions) and primary tumor (b, n = 11 for controls, 7 for PARPi, 8 for PARPi + protons, 5 for protons, 7 for PARPi + carbon ions, 7 for carbon ions) PDX models from a SHH medulloblastoma-LFS patient. The results of log-rank (Mantel-Cox) tests on Kaplan–Meier curves indicate the survival benefit of each treatment group in comparison to control (*P < .05, **P < 01, ***P < .0001). (c) Representative MRI images of PDX brains pre- and postradiation. A representative image of hematoxylin and eosin (HE) stain shows the cerebellum in CIRT animal after the complete response to irradiation. Scale bar: 500 µm. For our initial in vivo experiment with carbon ions (pilot study, Figure 3a), we used three different strains of immunocompromised mice (NSG, NRGS and BALB/c-nude) for the following reasons. First, NSG mice, which are commonly used for PDX models, are radiation-sensitive and may not tolerate high doses of radiation well due to the DNA-PK knockout.[39] Second, potential treatment effects on the tumor growth in these animals may be linked with the death of surrounding damage-sensitive mouse cells rather than with direct effects of the treatment on xeno-transplanted human tumor cells. NSG mouse cells, in contrast to the cells of NRGS or BALB/c mice, lack a functional nonhomologous end-joining repair process,[39] and comparing strains gives hints to which repair processes rejoin radiation-induced DNA breaks. Including both radiation-sensitive and radiation-tolerant mouse strains also allowed testing the effects of the treatment and side-effects on normal tissue in an LFSlike context. At the applied radiation dose, animals from all three strains showed similar survival benefits (Figure 3a). However, the molecular effect of the treatment on cells surrounding the tumor differed substantially between the mouse strains (Figure 4). We examined the brains of these mice and performed hematoxylin and eosin stains, STEM121 stains to identify human cells in the mouse brains as well as immunofluorescence analyses of γH2AX (marker of DNA DSBs) and RAD51 (HR repair factor). We quantified the signals within the radiation field (cerebellum, mostly containing human tumor cells), in the mouse cells directly surrounding the tumor (within the irradiated cerebellum), in the cortex close to the irradiation field and in the frontal cortex (far from the targeted irradiation field, Figure 4a).
Fig. 4

Molecular analysis of brain tissues after fractionated CIRT (5 × 3 Gy) in the first relapse PDX mouse model of SHH medulloblastoma. (a) Hematoxylin and eosin and STEM121 (human cell marker) stains show the location of xenografted cells. Scale bars: 2.5 mm. (b) DNA damage >70 days after CIRT (5 × 3 Gy) remains unrepaired in the mouse cells of NSG animals. Quantification and comparison of DNA damage repair between irradiated and control mice at the survival endpoints (two-tailed Mann–Whitney test ***P < .0001) in brain locations shown in (a). Scale bars: 5 µm (magnified image) and 10 µm. (c) RAD51 scoring in tumor cells of control and CIRT PDX brains of NRGS mice. Scale bars: 5 μm.

Molecular analysis of brain tissues after fractionated CIRT (5 × 3 Gy) in the first relapse PDX mouse model of SHH medulloblastoma. (a) Hematoxylin and eosin and STEM121 (human cell marker) stains show the location of xenografted cells. Scale bars: 2.5 mm. (b) DNA damage >70 days after CIRT (5 × 3 Gy) remains unrepaired in the mouse cells of NSG animals. Quantification and comparison of DNA damage repair between irradiated and control mice at the survival endpoints (two-tailed Mann–Whitney test ***P < .0001) in brain locations shown in (a). Scale bars: 5 µm (magnified image) and 10 µm. (c) RAD51 scoring in tumor cells of control and CIRT PDX brains of NRGS mice. Scale bars: 5 μm. Xenografted human tumor cells showed similar levels of DNA DSBs across mouse strains and also across treated and untreated animals, suggesting that the vast majority of DNA DSBs observed more than 70 days after the radiation were tumor-cell intrinsic (Figure 4b, left panel). In NRGS and BALB/c mice, we detected only very few γH2AX-positive mouse cells in the cerebellum and in the cortex, suggesting that DNA DSBs were already repaired at this stage or that damaged cells were successfully eliminated. In contrast, NSG mice showed significantly higher levels of DNA DSBs in CIRT animals as compared to control animals, with massive unrepaired damage in the cerebellum, but also some damage in the cortex, even more than 70 days after treatment. Unrepaired DNA DSBs in NSG animals suggest that carbon ion-induced damage was at least partly repaired by nonhomologous end-joining, as this repair process is inactive in NSG mice. As expected for tumors showing high HR deficiency scores, RAD51-positive cells were very rare, with <40% of the cells showing at least one signal per nucleus shortly after irradiation (Figure 4c). More than 70 days after the treatment, we detected even fewer cells with RAD51 foci, with levels of positive cells in the same range as for the control animals. As CIRT achieved long-term local tumor control in this aggressive primary medulloblastoma model, we sought to investigate potential side-effects in the normal tissue in cured mice. For children with brain tumors receiving radiation, impaired cognitive function and neurological development represent a major issue. Therefore, we quantified neurogenesis in the dentate gyrus of the hippocampus of CIRT-treated and control mice. For this, we performed immunofluorescence analyses of doublecortin, an established marker of newborn neurons. Importantly, the numbers of newborn neurons in the dentate gyrus were not significantly different between control and treated animals (Figure 5a). The general neurological function of the mice cured by CIRT was not noticeably affected, as the animals moved and behaved normally. The brain morphology of the CIRT animals presented a normal appearance based on MRI and histology. Quantification of the brain volumes over time did not show any significant difference between control and treated animals due to radiation (Figure 5b). The only significant change in brain volume was an increase in control animals due to the tumor growth. In addition to possible consequences on the brain function, another potential side-effect of radiation is the induction of secondary tumors. Therefore, we analyzed brain MRI data from all animals (Figure 5c, Supplementary Figure 5a). We did not detect any putative radiation-induced secondary tumor in the CIRT mice (up to 300 days after treatment). In the pilot cohort from the pretreated model for which the tumor regrew after 96 days, neuropathological evaluation did not show any significant difference between control and CIRT animals in terms of number of mice with necrosis within the tumors and there was no necrosis outside the tumors (Supplementary Figure 5b). Neuropathological analysis also confirmed the normal cerebellum structure and the absence of neuronal loss, disruption of the tissue architecture or fibrosis in cured animals (Supplementary Figure 5c). Immunohistochemical analyses were done for STEM121 to detect putative remaining human cells, GFAP as astrocyte marker and Ki67. This showed that the few remaining human cells in the cured animals form no tumor remnants but foci of cerebellar gliosis, with intense GFAP immunostaining containing reactive astrocytes and compact glial fibers, suggesting posttreatment pathomorphosis (Supplementary Figure 5c). Even in repair-deficient NSG mice that are closer to the p53-deficient context as compared to NSG or nude mice, no secondary tumor was detected within the observation period.
Fig. 5

Analysis of putative long-term side-effects of CIRT. (a) Quantification of doublecortin (marker of newborn neurons) and comparison between irradiated (n = 5 mice, 240–270 days postirradiation) and control animals (n = 5 mice, 50–60 days postrandomization) (two-tailed Mann–Whitney test, P = .7). Immunofluorescent staining and quantification of DCX in the dentate gyrus was done on three to five sagittal brain sections per animal. Scale bars: 5 μm (magnified neuron) and 100 μm. (b) Quantification of the brain volumes (n = 7 mice for carbon ions, n = 7 mice for PARPi + carbon ions and n = 11 mice for controls) (c) A representative T2-weighted image (corresponding to 1 from 20 slices taken per animal) from each treatment group. No radiation-induced tumor could be detected in any of the CIRT animals (with or without PARPi addition). (d) Overall survival of Trp53+/− mice after particle radiation. (e) Histopathological analysis shows a normal cerebellum structure for Trp53 mice (representative images for each group). Scale bars: 500 µm. (f) Quantification of cells positive for DSB marker γH2AX in Trp53 mice (one-way ANOVA, *P < .05, ***P < .0001). Scale bars: 5 µm (magnified cell) and 10 µm, 2.5 mm (HE image).

Analysis of putative long-term side-effects of CIRT. (a) Quantification of doublecortin (marker of newborn neurons) and comparison between irradiated (n = 5 mice, 240–270 days postirradiation) and control animals (n = 5 mice, 50–60 days postrandomization) (two-tailed Mann–Whitney test, P = .7). Immunofluorescent staining and quantification of DCX in the dentate gyrus was done on three to five sagittal brain sections per animal. Scale bars: 5 μm (magnified neuron) and 100 μm. (b) Quantification of the brain volumes (n = 7 mice for carbon ions, n = 7 mice for PARPi + carbon ions and n = 11 mice for controls) (c) A representative T2-weighted image (corresponding to 1 from 20 slices taken per animal) from each treatment group. No radiation-induced tumor could be detected in any of the CIRT animals (with or without PARPi addition). (d) Overall survival of Trp53+/− mice after particle radiation. (e) Histopathological analysis shows a normal cerebellum structure for Trp53 mice (representative images for each group). Scale bars: 500 µm. (f) Quantification of cells positive for DSB marker γH2AX in Trp53 mice (one-way ANOVA, *P < .05, ***P < .0001). Scale bars: 5 µm (magnified cell) and 10 µm, 2.5 mm (HE image). To evaluate putative side-effects to the normal brain in the context of p53 inactivation, we applied proton irradiation or CIRT to the cerebellum of Trp53+/− mice (5 × 3Gy, Figure 5d). Importantly, MRI and neuropathology analyses did not detect any tumor lesion, after 200 days of follow-up (Figure 5e). The brain structure of treated animals (n = 10 for carbon ions and n = 8 for protons) was indistinguishable from that of control animals (n = 10) (Figure 5e). We quantified DNA DSBs in the irradiated area, close to the irradiated area and in the frontal cortex (far from the irradiated area). This analysis showed only minor differences in the percentage of cells positive for γH2AX (5% for controls and 6%–7% for treated mice in the irradiated cerebellum, Figure 5f). Altogether, CIRT provided an effective treatment strategy in the primary PDX model, with favorable toxicity profile even in NSG mice showing unrepaired DSBs. As in the pretreated model the tumors started regrowing after 53 days, we performed high-coverage whole-genome sequencing (60x) to get insights into the genomic profile and clonal composition of the regrowing tumors (Figure 6). We did not detect any major change in somatic CNVs after irradiation (Figure 6a). On chromosomes 8 and 12, we observed a less deep coverage drop after irradiation, suggesting a minor enrichment for a clone without any loss on these two chromosomes. No increase in SVs was detected postradiation, with only two breakpoints present in the irradiated sample but not in the control sample. Therefore, cells with high amounts of radiation-induced DNA breaks likely died or were present in a proportion below the detection limit. The high similarity between the genomic profiles of the control and CIRT cells was further supported by the comparable growth kinetics of the tumors, with no significant difference in the slopes (doubling times of 16 and 17.5 days, respectively), despite a growth delay of 53 days postirradiation (Figure 6b). Similar growth rates supported the absence of major treatment-induced clonal shift and suggested no significant increase in aggressiveness after CIRT. Next, we analyzed clonal and subclonal SNVs to further characterize the composition of the regrowing tumors. The clonal composition did not change significantly, after irradiation, with only minor shifts detected based on allele frequency analysis (Figure 6c). Private somatic mutations detected only in the control or only in the irradiated cells were rare (121 and 272, respectively, Figure 6d).
Fig, 6

Whole-genome sequencing analysis of re-grown tumors from the first relapse PDX model after CIRT. (a) CNV comparison between carbon ion treated (91 days postirradiation) and control animal from the first relapse model. (b) Tumor growth rates and doubling times in the control and CIRT tumors. (c) Analysis of clonal and subclonal SNVs shows no major clonal shift after CIRT. (d) Rare private mutations detected only in the control or in the irradiated sample. In a neutrally and exponentially expanding population, mutations accumulate according to a power-law-distribution, which would be supported in the control sample. After irradiation, the small R2 suggests a deviation from the power-law.

Whole-genome sequencing analysis of re-grown tumors from the first relapse PDX model after CIRT. (a) CNV comparison between carbon ion treated (91 days postirradiation) and control animal from the first relapse model. (b) Tumor growth rates and doubling times in the control and CIRT tumors. (c) Analysis of clonal and subclonal SNVs shows no major clonal shift after CIRT. (d) Rare private mutations detected only in the control or in the irradiated sample. In a neutrally and exponentially expanding population, mutations accumulate according to a power-law-distribution, which would be supported in the control sample. After irradiation, the small R2 suggests a deviation from the power-law. Neutral tumor evolution was linked with power-law distributions of mutant allele frequencies.[40] For untreated tumor cells, the linear distribution of mutations suggested potential neutral tumor evolution, indicating that all clonal selection might have occurred before the onset of cancer growth and not in later arising subclones (Figure 6d). In contrast, after irradiation, the measured distribution deviated from the distribution expected under neutral evolution, which could possibly reflect a change in mutation rate, cell survival or clonal selection. As daughter cells were likely killed during the treatment, only the outcome of final cell divisions was observed in the DNA sequence, leading to apparently higher mutation rates. Importantly, the fractions of tumor stem cells (SOX2-positive) and proliferating cells (Ki67-positive) were comparable between control and irradiated animals, after the tumors had regrown (Supplementary Figure 6), suggesting that radioresistant cancer stem cells might have reconstituted the tumors, with similar features to the original tumors. In line with this, the modeling indicated that 10% of the tumor cells may have survived the treatment. To conclude, we identified an efficient local therapy intensification strategy with CIRT to treat primary medulloblastomas with chromothripsis in preclinical models. Further options to overcome radioresistance of pretreated and relapsed tumors will be needed, to achieve similar tumor control rates in the relapse setting as observed in treatment-naïve tumors.

Discussion

We assessed different approaches to meet the needs for highly precise treatments targeting the tumor cells, while utilizing the HR repair defects of medulloblastomas with chromothripsis. Remarkably, CIRT led to a complete response for the vast majority (79%) of the animals harboring treatment-naïve orthotopic medulloblastoma of the highly aggressive TP53-mutant chromothriptic subgroup. The experimental set-up was close to the situation in the clinic, with a treatment start well, after tumor onset. Importantly, the applied fractionated CIRT regimen was comparable to therapeutic settings in humans, as similar or even higher doses are applied to patients.[41] Therefore, further investigation of CIRT to eradicate aggressive medulloblastomas developing in LFS patients is warranted, and more broadly in the context of pediatric oncology. High precision, that is, sparing of normal tissue has been attributed to reduced risk of secondary cancer, after proton therapy and CIRT.[42] Even though secondary malignancies cannot be formally excluded, we performed a long-term follow-up (300 days) and did not detect any. The low radiation dose received outside the target area (cerebellum) visible in NSG mice did not cause any radiation-induced tumor, despite the repair deficiencies of these animals. However, the impact of CIRT and germline TP53 status needs to be further explored as densely ionizing space irradiation was shown to enhance tumor formation in p53-null breast tissue background.[43] Further detailed analyses will be required before clinical applications (eg, additional experiments in p53-deficient genetic mouse models, deeper evaluation of the impact on neurologic performance, behavioral experiments to assess neurocognitive function) to exclude any side-effect that remained undetected at this stage. Furthermore, the benefits from the addition of a PARPi to reduce the radiation dose need to be further explored. An important aspect is the specificity of the carbon ion effects to chromothriptic cells, to medulloblastoma cells with chromothripsis and to tumor cells with HR deficiency. A similar strategy did not cure the mice in a glioblastoma xenograft model[44] or in a genetically engineered mouse model of soft tissue sarcoma,[45] suggesting that this approach does not have a general pan-tumor effect. In prostate cancer and in medulloblastoma, Konings and colleagues showed in vitro that carbon ions were more effective in decreasing cell survival and migration as compared to X-rays or proton.[46] It will be essential to further investigate the specificity of the biological effects of CIRT in chromothriptic medulloblastoma. Even though the treatment was successful in the context of untreated primary medulloblastoma, the same strategy applied to the matched PDX model established from the posttreatment relapsed tumor led to a significant benefit but eventually relapse. There are several reasons for radio-resistance, with one important source being cancer stem cells.[47] Immunofluorescence analysis showed the presence of cancer stem cells in both the primary tumor and in the relapse. Treatment-naïve cancer stem cells did not seem to be a major issue here, as shown by the high complete response rate to CIRT. However, tumors raised after previous radiotherapy exposure, as in the matched PDX from the relapsed tumor investigated here, acquired relative resistance to CIRT leading to tumor relapses, after a growth delay phase. Importantly, we detected no major clonal shift and no significant induction of genome rearrangements after CIRT, suggesting that the regrowing tumors were very similar to the initial tumors. Higher radiation doses to overcome putative radioresistant stem cells would go along with more side-effects, suggesting the need for a combination treatment targeting cancer stem cells. Altogether, this study bears the potential to identify new therapeutic approaches for this challenging subgroup of patients. Tumor vulnerabilities to CIRT, like HRD and chromothripsis or more broadly genome instability in medulloblastoma demonstrated here may pave the way for the development of novel strategies. Click here for additional data file. Click here for additional data file. Click here for additional data file. Click here for additional data file. Click here for additional data file. Click here for additional data file. Click here for additional data file. Click here for additional data file. Click here for additional data file.
  47 in total

1.  Olaparib monotherapy in patients with advanced cancer and a germline BRCA1/2 mutation.

Authors:  Bella Kaufman; Ronnie Shapira-Frommer; Rita K Schmutzler; M William Audeh; Michael Friedlander; Judith Balmaña; Gillian Mitchell; Georgeta Fried; Salomon M Stemmer; Ayala Hubert; Ora Rosengarten; Mariana Steiner; Niklas Loman; Karin Bowen; Anitra Fielding; Susan M Domchek
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Carbon irradiation overcomes glioma radioresistance by eradicating stem cells and forming an antiangiogenic and immunopermissive niche.

Authors:  Sara Chiblak; Zili Tang; Dieter Lemke; Maximilian Knoll; Ivana Dokic; Rolf Warta; Mahmoud Moustafa; Walter Mier; Stephan Brons; Carmen Rapp; Stefan Muschal; Philipp Seidel; Martin Bendszus; Sebastian Adeberg; Otmar D Wiestler; Uwe Haberkorn; Jürgen Debus; Christel Herold-Mende; Wolfgang Wick; Amir Abdollahi
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2019-01-24

Review 3.  Choosing wisely: Selecting PARP inhibitor combinations to promote anti-tumor immune responses beyond BRCA mutations.

Authors:  Jennifer Taylor Veneris; Ursula A Matulonis; Joyce F Liu; Panagiotis A Konstantinopoulos
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 5.482

4.  A biobank of patient-derived pediatric brain tumor models.

Authors:  Sebastian Brabetz; Sarah E S Leary; Susanne N Gröbner; Madison W Nakamoto; Huriye Şeker-Cin; Emily J Girard; Bonnie Cole; Andrew D Strand; Karina L Bloom; Volker Hovestadt; Norman L Mack; Fiona Pakiam; Benjamin Schwalm; Andrey Korshunov; Gnana Prakash Balasubramanian; Paul A Northcott; Kyle D Pedro; Joyoti Dey; Stacey Hansen; Sally Ditzler; Peter Lichter; Lukas Chavez; David T W Jones; Jan Koster; Stefan M Pfister; Marcel Kool; James M Olson
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 53.440

5.  Inhibition of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase enhances cell death and improves tumor growth delay in irradiated lung cancer models.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Albert; Carolyn Cao; Kwang Woon Kim; Christopher D Willey; Ling Geng; Dakai Xiao; Hong Wang; Alan Sandler; David H Johnson; Alexander D Colevas; Jennifer Low; Mace L Rothenberg; Bo Lu
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2007-05-15       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 6.  PARP Inhibitors: Extending Benefit Beyond BRCA-Mutant Cancers.

Authors:  Patrick G Pilié; Carl M Gay; Lauren A Byers; Mark J O'Connor; Timothy A Yap
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  Identification of neutral tumor evolution across cancer types.

Authors:  Marc J Williams; Benjamin Werner; Chris P Barnes; Trevor A Graham; Andrea Sottoriva
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2016-01-18       Impact factor: 38.330

8.  Defective DNA damage repair leads to frequent catastrophic genomic events in murine and human tumors.

Authors:  Manasi Ratnaparkhe; John K L Wong; Pei-Chi Wei; Mario Hlevnjak; Thorsten Kolb; Milena Simovic; Daniel Haag; Yashna Paul; Frauke Devens; Paul Northcott; David T W Jones; Marcel Kool; Anna Jauch; Agata Pastorczak; Wojciech Mlynarski; Andrey Korshunov; Rajiv Kumar; Susanna M Downing; Stefan M Pfister; Marc Zapatka; Peter J McKinnon; Frederick W Alt; Peter Lichter; Aurélie Ernst
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Pamiparib is a potent and selective PARP inhibitor with unique potential for the treatment of brain tumor.

Authors:  Yao Xiong; Yin Guo; Ye Liu; Hexiang Wang; Wenfeng Gong; Yong Liu; Xing Wang; Yajuan Gao; Fenglong Yu; Dan Su; Fan Wang; Yutong Zhu; Yuan Zhao; Yiyuan Wu; Zhen Qin; Xuebing Sun; Bo Ren; Bin Jiang; Wei Jin; Zhirong Shen; Zhiyu Tang; Xiaomin Song; Lai Wang; Xuesong Liu; Changyou Zhou; Beibei Jiang
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 5.715

Review 10.  Hematologic malignancies and Li-Fraumeni syndrome.

Authors:  Mahesh Swaminathan; Sarah A Bannon; Mark Routbort; Kiran Naqvi; Tapan M Kadia; Koichi Takahashi; Yesid Alvarado; Farhad Ravandi-Kashani; Keyur P Patel; Richard Champlin; Hagop Kantarjian; Louise Strong; Courtney D DiNardo
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Mol Case Stud       Date:  2019-02-01
View more
  1 in total

1.  Potential role of carbon ion radiotherapy in chromothripsis-induced medulloblastoma and other malignancies.

Authors:  Gregory K Friedman; Girish Dhall
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 13.029

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.