Literature DB >> 30885458

Risk of subsequent primary cancers after carbon ion radiotherapy, photon radiotherapy, or surgery for localised prostate cancer: a propensity score-weighted, retrospective, cohort study.

Osama Mohamad1, Takahiro Tabuchi2, Yuki Nitta3, Akihiro Nomoto3, Akira Sato2, Goro Kasuya3, Hirokazu Makishima4, Hak Choy5, Shigeru Yamada3, Toshitaka Morishima2, Hiroshi Tsuji3, Isao Miyashiro6, Tadashi Kamada7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The risk of subsequent primary cancers in patients with prostate cancer after treatment with photon radiotherapy is small in absolute numbers, but it is higher than that after surgical treatment. Carbon ion radiotherapy has a theoretically lower risk of inducing secondary malignancies than photon radiotherapy, but this risk has not been investigated in practice because of the low number of facilities offering such therapy worldwide and the limited data on long-term follow-up because the therapy has only been available since 1994. We aimed to analyse the risk of subsequent primary cancers after treatment with carbon ion radiotherapy in patients with localised prostate cancer and to compare it with that after photon radiotherapy or surgery in this setting.
METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we reviewed records of patients who received carbon ion radiotherapy for prostate cancer between June 27, 1995, and July 10, 2012, at the National Institute of Radiological Sciences (NIRS) in Japan. We also retrieved the records of patients diagnosed and treated for prostate cancer between Jan 1, 1994, and Dec 31, 2012, from the Osaka Cancer Registry. Eligible patients had histologically confirmed localised prostate cancer and a minimum follow-up of at least 3 months; no age restrictions were applied. We excluded patients with metastasis, node-positive disease, or locally invasive (T4 stage) prostate cancer, those with previous or synchronous malignancies, and those who received previous radiotherapy or chemotherapy. We did a multivariable analysis to estimate predictors of subsequent cancers after carbon ion radiotherapy treatment. We also used propensity score inverse probability weighting to retrospectively compare the incidence of subsequent cancers in patients with localised prostate cancer treated with carbon beams, photon radiotherapy, or surgery.
FINDINGS: Of 1580 patients who received carbon radiotherapy for prostate cancer at the NIRS, 1455 (92%) patients met the eligibility criteria. Of 38 594 patients with prostate cancer identified in the Osaka registry, 1983 (5%) patients treated with photon radiotherapy and 5948 (15%) treated with surgery were included. Median follow-up durations were 7·9 years (IQR 5·9-10·0) for patients who received carbon ion radiotherapy (after limiting the database to 10-year maximum follow-up), 5·7 years (4·5-6·4) for patients who received photon radiotherapy, and 6·0 years (5·0-8·6) for those who received surgery. 234 subsequent primary cancers were diagnosed in the carbon ion radiotherapy cohort; some patients developed several tumours. On multivariable analysis, age (p=0·0021 for 71-75 years vs ≤60 years; p=0·012 for >75 years vs ≤60 years) and smoking (p=0·0005) were associated with a higher risk of subsequent primary cancers in patients treated with carbon ion radiotherapy. In the propensity score-weighted analyses, carbon ion radiotherapy was associated with a lower risk of subsequent primary cancers than photon radiotherapy (hazard ratio [HR] 0·81 [95% CI 0·66-0·99]; p=0·038) or surgery (HR 0·80 [0·68-0·95]; p=0·0088), whereas photon radiotherapy was associated with a higher risk of subsequent primary cancers than surgery (HR 1·18 [1·02-1·36]; p=0·029).
INTERPRETATION: Our analysis suggests that patients with localised prostate cancer treated with carbon ion radiotherapy appear to have a lower risk of subsequent primary cancers than those treated with photon radiotherapy. Although prospective evaluation with longer follow-up is warranted to support these results, our data supports a wider adoption of carbon ion radiotherapy for patients with expected long-term overall survival or those with poor outcomes after receiving conventional treatments. FUNDING: Research Project for Heavy Ions at the National Institute of Radiological Sciences (Japan).
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 30885458     DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30931-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Oncol        ISSN: 1470-2045            Impact factor:   41.316


  25 in total

Review 1.  Proton RBE dependence on dose in the setting of hypofractionation.

Authors:  Thomas Friedrich
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  Carbon ion radiation therapy in breast cancer: a new frontier.

Authors:  Timothy D Malouff; Anita Mahajan; Robert W Mutter; Sunil Krishnan; Bradford S Hoppe; Chris Beltran; Daniel M Trifiletti; Laura A Vallow
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Immunomodulatory effects of carbon ion radiotherapy in patients with localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Wei Hu; Yulei Pei; Renli Ning; Ping Li; Zhenshan Zhang; Zhengshan Hong; Cihang Bao; Xiaomao Guo; Yun Sun; Qing Zhang
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 4.322

4.  Physics and biomedical challenges of cancer therapy with accelerated heavy ions.

Authors:  Marco Durante; Jürgen Debus; Jay S Loeffler
Journal:  Nat Rev Phys       Date:  2021-09-17

5.  Predicted Secondary Malignancies following Proton versus Photon Radiation for Oropharyngeal Cancers.

Authors:  Varsha Jain; Peyton Irmen; Shannon O'Reilly; Jennifer H Vogel; Liyong Lin; Alexander Lin
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2020-04-22

Review 6.  A Review on Curability of Cancers: More Efforts for Novel Therapeutic Options Are Needed.

Authors:  Shuncong Wang; Yewei Liu; Yuanbo Feng; Jian Zhang; Johan Swinnen; Yue Li; Yicheng Ni
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 6.639

7.  Application of Carbon Ion and Its Sensitizing Agent in Cancer Therapy: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Xiaolin Wang; Xiaojun Chen; Guangfei Li; Xiao Han; Tianxin Gao; Weifeng Liu; Xiaoying Tang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 8.  Physical and Biological Characteristics of Particle Therapy for Oncologists.

Authors:  Hwa Kyung Byun; Min Cheol Han; Kyungmi Yang; Jin Sung Kim; Gyu Sang Yoo; Woong Sub Koom; Yong Bae Kim
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 4.679

Review 9.  Carbon Ion Therapy: A Modern Review of an Emerging Technology.

Authors:  Timothy D Malouff; Anita Mahajan; Sunil Krishnan; Chris Beltran; Danushka S Seneviratne; Daniel Michael Trifiletti
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 5.738

Review 10.  Who Will Benefit from Charged-Particle Therapy?

Authors:  Kyung Su Kim; Hong-Gyun Wu
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 4.679

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.