Literature DB >> 30760478

PARP Inhibitors: Extending Benefit Beyond BRCA-Mutant Cancers.

Patrick G Pilié1, Carl M Gay2, Lauren A Byers2, Mark J O'Connor3, Timothy A Yap4,5,6,7.   

Abstract

A mounting body of evidence now indicates that PARP inhibitors have the potential to be used as a foundation for both monotherapy and combination strategies across a wide spectrum of molecular backgrounds and tumor types. Although PARP inhibitors as a class display many similarities, critical differences in structure can translate into differences in tolerability and antitumor activity that have important implications for the clinic. Furthermore, while PARP inhibitors have demonstrated a clear role in treating tumors with underlying homologous recombination deficiencies, there is now biological and early clinical evidence to support their use in other molecular subsets of cancer, including tumors associated with high levels of replication stress such as small-cell lung cancer. In this article, we highlight the key similarities and differences between individual PARP inhibitors and their implications for the clinic. We discuss data that currently support clinical strategies for extending the benefit of PARP inhibitors beyond BRCA-mutant cancers, toward broader populations of patients through the use of novel biomarkers of homologous recombination repair deficiency (HRD), as well as predictive biomarkers rooted in mechanisms of sensitivity outside of HRD. We also explore the potential application of PARP inhibitors in earlier treatment settings, including neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and even chemoprevention approaches. Finally, we focus on promising combination therapeutic strategies, such as those with other DNA damage response (DDR) inhibitors such as ATR inhibitors, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and non-DDR-targeted agents that induce "chemical BRCAness." ©2019 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30760478     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-0968

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  98 in total

Review 1.  Targeting DNA repair in cancer: current state and novel approaches.

Authors:  Apostolos Klinakis; Dimitris Karagiannis; Theodoros Rampias
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 9.261

2.  Prioritization of Therapy Options for a Patient With High Tumor Mutation Burden and Microsatellite Instability but No Clinical Benefit From Immunotherapy.

Authors:  Ryan S Nelson; Rutika J Mehta; Howard L McLeod; Christine M Walko
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2019-10-01

Review 3.  Considering the potential for gene-based therapy in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Justin R Gregg; Timothy C Thompson
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 14.432

4.  Veliparib in Combination With Platinum-Based Chemotherapy for First-Line Treatment of Advanced Squamous Cell Lung Cancer: A Randomized, Multicenter Phase III Study.

Authors:  Suresh S Ramalingam; Silvia Novello; Salih Zeki Guclu; Dmitry Bentsion; Zanete Zvirbule; Maria Szilasi; Reyes Bernabe; Konstantinos Syrigos; Lauren Averett Byers; Philip Clingan; Jair Bar; Everett E Vokes; Ramaswamy Govindan; Martin Dunbar; Peter Ansell; Lei He; Xin Huang; Vasudha Sehgal; Jaimee Glasgow; Bruce A Bach; Julien Mazieres
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-08-26       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Olaparib for Chinese metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: A real-world study of efficacy and gene predictive analysis.

Authors:  Baijun Dong; Bin Yang; Wei Chen; Xinxing Du; Liancheng Fan; Xudong Yao; Wei Xue
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 6.  Potentiating Therapeutic Effects of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibition in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Kyu Sic You; Yong Weon Yi; Jeonghee Cho; Jeong-Soo Park; Yeon-Sun Seong
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-18

7.  Inhibition of the mutated c-KIT kinase in AML1-ETO-positive leukemia cells restores sensitivity to PARP inhibitor.

Authors:  Margaret Nieborowska-Skorska; Elisabeth M Paietta; Ross L Levine; Hugo F Fernandez; Martin S Tallman; Mark R Litzow; Tomasz Skorski
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2019-12-10

8.  Dysregulated G2 phase checkpoint recovery pathway reduces DNA repair efficiency and increases chromosomal instability in a wide range of tumours.

Authors:  Madushan Fernando; Pascal H G Duijf; Martina Proctor; Alexander J Stevenson; Anna Ehmann; Shivam Vora; Dubravka Skalamera; Mark Adams; Brian Gabrielli
Journal:  Oncogenesis       Date:  2021-05-15       Impact factor: 7.485

Review 9.  Understanding and overcoming resistance to PARP inhibitors in cancer therapy.

Authors:  Mariana Paes Dias; Sarah C Moser; Shridar Ganesan; Jos Jonkers
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 66.675

10.  ATR Inhibition Induces CDK1-SPOP Signaling and Enhances Anti-PD-L1 Cytotoxicity in Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Patrick G Pilié; Chuandong Geng; Zhe Tang; Ganiraju C Manyam; Guang Yang; Sanghee Park; Daoqi Wang; Shan Peng; Cheng Wu; Guang Peng; Timothy A Yap; Paul G Corn; Bradley M Broom; Timothy C Thompson
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 12.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.