| Literature DB >> 29437879 |
Jeremy M Brownstein1, Amy J Wisdom2, Katherine D Castle2, Yvonne M Mowery1, Peter Guida3, Chang-Lung Lee1, Francesco Tommasino4,5, Chiara La Tessa6,4,5, Emanuele Scifoni4, Junheng Gao7, Lixia Luo1, Lorraine Da Silva Campos1, Yan Ma1, Nerissa Williams1, Sin-Ho Jung7, Marco Durante4, David G Kirsch8,2.
Abstract
Carbon ion therapy (CIT) offers several potential advantages for treating cancers compared with X-ray and proton radiotherapy, including increased biological efficacy and more conformal dosimetry. However, CIT potency has not been characterized in primary tumor animal models. Here, we calculate the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of carbon ions compared with X-rays in an autochthonous mouse model of soft tissue sarcoma. We used Cre/loxP technology to generate primary sarcomas in KrasLSL-G12D/+; p53fl/fl mice. Primary tumors were irradiated with a single fraction of carbon ions (10 Gy), X-rays (20 Gy, 25 Gy, or 30 Gy), or observed as controls. The RBE was calculated by determining the dose of X-rays that resulted in similar time to posttreatment tumor volume quintupling and exponential growth rate as 10 Gy carbon ions. The median tumor volume quintupling time and exponential growth rate of sarcomas treated with 10 Gy carbon ions and 30 Gy X-rays were similar: 27.3 and 28.1 days and 0.060 and 0.059 mm3/day, respectively. Tumors treated with lower doses of X-rays had faster regrowth. Thus, the RBE of carbon ions in this primary tumor model is 3. When isoeffective treatments of carbon ions and X-rays were compared, we observed significant differences in tumor growth kinetics, proliferative indices, and immune infiltrates. We found that carbon ions were three times as potent as X-rays in this aggressive tumor model and identified unanticipated differences in radiation response that may have clinical implications. Mol Cancer Ther; 17(4); 858-68. ©2018 AACR. ©2018 American Association for Cancer Research.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29437879 PMCID: PMC5912881 DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-17-0965
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Cancer Ther ISSN: 1535-7163 Impact factor: 6.009