Literature DB >> 29394365

Live birth rate following frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer is higher with blastocysts expanded on Day 5 than on Day 6.

Lucile Ferreux1, Mathilde Bourdon2,3, Amira Sallem1, Pietro Santulli2,3, Virginie Barraud-Lange1, Nathalie Le Foll1, Chloé Maignien2, Charles Chapron2, Dominique de Ziegler2, Jean-Philippe Wolf1,4, Khaled Pocate-Cheriet1,4.   

Abstract

STUDY QUESTION: The aim of this study was to evaluate the live birth rate (LBR) after frozen-thawed Day 5 (D5) and Day 6 (D6) blastocyst transfers. SUMMARY ANSWER: LBR following frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer is significantly lower with D6 than with D5 blastocyst regardless of embryo quality. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: During fresh embryo transfer cycles, pregnancy rates (PR) are significantly higher when transferring blastocysts expanded on D5 compared with slow developing blastocysts (D6). In programmed thawed blastocyst transfer (TBT) cycles, the same clinical outcomes should be expected when transferring D5 or D6 blastocysts because of endometrial/embryonic synchronization due to hormonal priming of endometrial receptivity. However, the impact of delayed blastocyst expansion at D6 on clinical outcomes remains unclear. Some reports have shown higher PRs after D5 TBT compared with those of D6, while others have shown equivalent TBT outcomes after D5 and D6 cryopreserved blastocysts transfers. STUDY, DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This retrospective cohort follow-up study included 1347 single autologous frozen-thawed blastocyst transfers performed between January 2012 and December 2015 at a tertiary care university hospital. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,
METHODS: All of the patients scheduled for TBT were allocated to two groups according to the day of blastocyst expansion: on D5 (n = 994) or on D6 (n = 353). The primary outcome was LBR per embryo transfer in the first blastocyst thawing cycle. Secondary outcomes were clinical pregnancy rate (cPR), early miscarriage rate and neonatal outcomes following TBT for the two groups. Statistical analyses were conducted using univariate and multivariate logistic regression model. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The LBR was significantly increased in the D5 group compared to the D6 group [294/994 (29.6%) versus 60/353 (17.0%); P < 0.001]. The cPR was also higher when blastocysts were vitrified on D5 compared with those vitrified on D6 [429/994 (43.2%) versus 95/353 (26.9%); P < 0.001]. No significant differences were found between groups in terms of early miscarriage rate (P = 0.862). More good-quality embryos (defined as an B3-B4 or B5 embryo ≥BB according to the grading scale proposed by Gardner) were transferred in the D5 group than in the D6 group [807 (81.2%) versus 214 (60.6%); P < 0.001]. However, a comparison of TBT cycles with equal embryo quality (good versus low) also supported the superiority of D5 blastocysts. Concerning neonatal outcomes, the D5 group infants had a lower mean birth weight compared to those of the D6 group (P = 0.001). In addition, a significantly shorter gestational age at birth is reported in the D5 blastocyst group as compared to the D6 group (P = 0.004). After multivariate logistic regression taking into account potential confounders such as the women's age, number of previous IVF/ICSI procedures, the day of the blastocyst vitrification (D5 or D6) and embryo quality, blastocyst expansion at D6 was independently associated with a significant decrease in LBR compared to D5 expanded-blastocysts (OR 0.52; 95% CI 0.38-0.72; P < 0.001). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The poor predictive value of the morphological approach in embryo selection could constitute a limitation in this study. However, blastocyst quality was evaluated similarly in both groups. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE
FINDINGS: The LBR following frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer was significantly lower with D6 than with D5 blastocysts, regardless of their quality. These results could affect cryopreservation procedures as they suggest that the use of D5-expanded blastocysts for TBT may be preferred in order to shorten the time of conceiving. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): No specific funding was obtained for this study. None of the authors have any competing interests to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Not applicable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29394365     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dey004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  20 in total

1.  Meddling with new technologies or amending an embryos' potential.

Authors:  David F Albertini
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Effect of Embryo Developmental Stage, Morphological Grading, and Ploidy Status on Live Birth Rate in Frozen Cycles of Single Blastocyst Transfer.

Authors:  Hui Ji; Yuxi Zhou; Shanren Cao; Junqiang Zhang; Xiufeng Ling; Chun Zhao; Rong Shen
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 3.060

3.  Day 5 versus Day 6 blastocyst transfers: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Mathilde Bourdon; Khaled Pocate-Cheriet; Astri Finet de Bantel; Veronika Grzegorczyk-Martin; Aureli Amar Hoffet; Elisangela Arbo; Marine Poulain; Pietro Santulli
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2019-10-02       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  Live Birth Rate of Frozen-Thawed Single Blastocyst Transfer After 6 or 7 Days of Progesterone Administration in Hormone Replacement Therapy Cycles: A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study.

Authors:  Xinhong Yang; Zhiqin Bu; Linli Hu
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-08-11       Impact factor: 5.555

5.  Cell number considerations for blastocyst transfer in younger patients.

Authors:  Zhiren Liu; Mingting Jiang; Linyun He; Yun Liu
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Clinical outcomes following frozen-thawed blastocyst transfers with blastocysts derived from different cell numbers on day 3: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Haibin Zhao; Hui Liu; Mei Li; Keliang Wu
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-01-04       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  Day 5 vitrified blastocyst transfer versus day 6 vitrified blastocyst transfer in oocyte donation program.

Authors:  G M Yerushalmi; T Shavit; S Avraham; M Youngster; A Kedem; I Gat; U S Dorofeyeva; S Mashiach; E Schiff; A Shulman; D S Seidman; A Wiser; E Maman; A Hourvitz; M Baum
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Day 5 vs day 6 single euploid blastocyst frozen embryo transfers: which variables do have an impact on the clinical pregnancy rates?

Authors:  Andrea Abdala; Ibrahim Elkhatib; Aşina Bayram; Ana Arnanz; Ahmed El-Damen; Laura Melado; Barbara Lawrenz; Human M Fatemi; Neelke De Munck
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2022-01-22       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  Effect of Day 3 and Day 5/6 Embryo Quality on the Reproductive Outcomes in the Single Vitrified Embryo Transfer Cycles.

Authors:  Ningling Wang; Xinxi Zhao; Meng Ma; Qianqian Zhu; Yao Wang
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 5.555

10.  Tobacco consumption is associated with slow-growing day-6 blastocysts.

Authors:  Mathilde Bourdon; Lucile Ferreux; Chloé Maignien; Catherine Patrat; Louis Marcellin; Khaled Pocate-Cheriet; Charles Chapron; Pietro Santulli
Journal:  F S Rep       Date:  2020-06-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.