Literature DB >> 34019490

Are Damage Modes Related to Microstructure and Material Loss in Severely Damaged CoCrMo Femoral Heads?

Stephanie M McCarthy1, Deborah J Hall1, Mathew T Mathew2, Joshua J Jacobs1, Hannah J Lundberg1, Robin Pourzal1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fretting and corrosion in metal-on-polyethylene total hip arthoplasty (THA) modular junctions can cause adverse tissue reactions that are responsible for 2% to 5% of revision surgeries. Damage within cobalt-chromium-molybdenum (CoCrMo) alloy femoral heads can progress chemically and mechanically, leading to damage modes such as column damage, imprinting, and uniform fretting damage. At present, it is unclear which of these damage modes are most detrimental and how they may be linked to implant alloy metallurgy. The alloy microstructure exhibits microstructural features such as grain boundaries, hard phases, and segregation bands, which may enable different damage modes, higher material loss, and the potential risk of adverse local tissue reactions. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: In this study, we asked: (1) How prevalent is chemically dominated column damage compared with mechanically dominated damage modes in severely damaged metal-on-polyethylene THA femoral heads made from wrought CoCrMo alloy? (2) Is material loss greater in femoral heads that underwent column damage? (3) Do material loss and the presence of column damage depend on alloy microstructure as characterized by grain size, hard phase content, and/or banding?
METHODS: Surgically retrieved wrought CoCrMo modular femoral heads removed between June 2004 and June 2019 were scored using a modified version of the Goldberg visually based scoring system. Of the total 1002 heads retrieved over this period, 19% (190 of 1002) were identified as severely damaged, exhibiting large areas of fretting scars, black debris, pits, and/or etch marks. Of these, 43% (81 of 190) were excluded for metal-on-metal articulations, alternate designs (such as bipolar, dual-mobility, hemiarthroplasty, metal adaptor sleeves), or previous sectioning of the implant for past studies. One sample was excluded retroactively as metallurgical analysis revealed that it was made of cast alloy, yielding a total of 108 for further analysis. Information on patient age (57 ± 11 years) and sex (56% [61 of 108] were males), reason for removal, implant time in situ (99 ± 78 months), implant manufacturer, head size, and the CoCrMo or titanium-based stem alloy pairing were collected. Damage modes and volumetric material loss within the head tapers were identified using an optical coordinate measuring machine. Samples were categorized by damage mode groups by column damage, imprinting, a combination of column damage and imprinting, or uniform fretting. Metallurgical samples were processed to identify microstructural characteristics of grain size, hard phase content, and banding. Nonparametric Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis statistical tests were used to examine volumetric material loss compared with damage mode and microstructural features, and linear regression was performed to correlate patient- and manufacturer-specific factors with volumetric material loss.
RESULTS: Chemically driven column damage was seen in 48% (52 of 108) of femoral heads, with 34% (37 of 108) exhibiting a combination of column damage and imprinting, 12% (13 of 108) of heads displaying column damage and uniform fretting, and 2% (2 of 108) exhibiting such widespread column damage that potentially underlying mechanical damage modes could not be verified. Implants with column damage showed greater material loss than those with mechanically driven damage alone, with median (range) values of 1.2 mm3 (0.2 to 11.7) versus 0.6 mm3 (0 to 20.7; p = 0.03). Median (range) volume loss across all femoral heads was 0.9 mm3 (0 to 20.7). Time in situ, contact area, patient age, sex, head size, manufacturer, and stem alloy type were not associated with volumetric material loss. Banding of the alloy microstructure, with a median (range) material loss of 1.1 mm3 (0 to 20.7), was associated with five times higher material loss compared with those with a homogeneous microstructure, which had a volume loss of 0.2 mm3 (0 to 4.1; p = 0.02). Hard phase content and grain size showed no correlation with material loss.
CONCLUSION: Chemically dominated column damage was a clear indicator of greater volume loss in this study sample of 108 severely damaged heads. Volumetric material loss strongly depended on banding (microstructural segregations) within the alloy. Banding of the wrought CoCrMo microstructure should be avoided during the manufacturing process to reduce volumetric material loss and the release of corrosion products to the periprosthetic tissue. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Approximately 30% of THAs rely on wrought CoCrMo femoral heads. Most femoral heads in this study exhibited a banded microstructure that was associated with larger material loss and the occurrence of chemically dominated column damage. This study suggests that elimination of banding from the alloy could substantially reduce the release of implant debris in vivo, which could potentially also reduce the risk of adverse local tissue reactions to implant debris.
Copyright © 2021 by the Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34019490      PMCID: PMC8373544          DOI: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001819

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.755


  44 in total

1.  A multicenter retrieval study of the taper interfaces of modular hip prostheses.

Authors:  Jay R Goldberg; Jeremy L Gilbert; Joshua J Jacobs; Thomas W Bauer; Wayne Paprosky; Sue Leurgans
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  The John Charnley Award: a study of implant failure in metal-on-metal surface arthroplasties.

Authors:  Pat Campbell; Paul E Beaulé; Edward Ebramzadeh; Michel J Le Duff; Michel LeDuff; Koen De Smet; Zhen Lu; Harlan C Amstutz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Contact conditions for total hip head-neck modular taper junctions with microgrooved stem tapers.

Authors:  Maren Bechstedt; Jonathan A Gustafson; Steven P Mell; Julian Gührs; Michael M Morlock; Brett R Levine; Hannah J Lundberg
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Modern trunnions are more flexible: a mechanical analysis of THA taper designs.

Authors:  David A Porter; Robert M Urban; Joshua J Jacobs; Jeremy L Gilbert; José A Rodriguez; H John Cooper
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Does Taper Angle Clearance Influence Fretting and Corrosion Damage at the Head-Stem Interface? A Matched Cohort Retrieval Study.

Authors:  Sevi B Kocagöz; Richard J Underwood; Shiril Sivan; Jeremy L Gilbert; Daniel W Macdonald; Judd S Day; Steven M Kurtz
Journal:  Semin Arthroplasty       Date:  2013-12-01

Review 6.  Electrochemical corrosion of metallic biomaterials.

Authors:  M Pourbaix
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 12.479

7.  Adverse local tissue reaction arising from corrosion at the femoral neck-body junction in a dual-taper stem with a cobalt-chromium modular neck.

Authors:  H John Cooper; Robert M Urban; Richard L Wixson; R Michael Meneghini; Joshua J Jacobs
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  In vivo corrosion of modular hip prosthesis components in mixed and similar metal combinations. The effect of crevice, stress, motion, and alloy coupling.

Authors:  J L Gilbert; C A Buckley; J J Jacobs
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1993-12

9.  Femoral head material loss at the head-neck junction in total hip arthroplasty: the effect of head size, stem material and stem offset.

Authors:  Giuseppe Valente; Brent Lanting; Steven MacDonald; Matthew G Teeter; Douglas Van Citters; James Howard
Journal:  Hip Int       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 2.135

10.  Ceramic Heads Decrease Metal Release Caused by Head-taper Fretting and Corrosion.

Authors:  Sevi B Kocagoz; Richard J Underwood; Daniel W MacDonald; Jeremy L Gilbert; Steven M Kurtz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  2 in total

1.  Microstructure and electrochemical behavior of contemporary Ti6Al4V implant alloys.

Authors:  Mozart Queiroz Neto; Simona Radice; Deborah J Hall; Nicholas B Frisch; Mathew T Mathew; Alfons Fischer; Joshua J Jacobs; Robin Pourzal
Journal:  J Bio Tribocorros       Date:  2021-12-24

2.  Nickel-free high-nitrogen austenitic steel outperforms CoCrMo alloy regarding tribocorrosion in simulated inflammatory synovial fluids.

Authors:  Simona Radice; Mozart Q Neto; Alfons Fischer; Markus A Wimmer
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2021-09-07       Impact factor: 3.102

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.