Literature DB >> 30665078

An improved method of obtaining electrocochleography recordings from Nucleus Hybrid cochlear implant users.

Viral D Tejani1, Paul J Abbas1, Carolyn J Brown1, Jihwan Woo2.   

Abstract

Interest in electrocochleography (ECoG) has recently resurged as a potential tool to assess peripheral auditory function in cochlear implant (CI) users. ECoG recordings can be evoked using acoustic stimulation and recorded from an extra- or intra-cochlear electrode in CI users. Recordings reflect contributions from cochlear hair cells and the auditory nerve. We recently demonstrated the feasibility of using Custom Sound EP (clinically available software) to record ECoG responses in Nucleus Hybrid CI users with preserved acoustic hearing in the implanted ear (Abbas et al, 2017). While successful, the recording procedures were time intensive, limiting clinical applications. The current report describes how we improved data collection efficiency by writing custom software using Python programming language. The software interfaced with Nucleus Implant Communicator (NIC) routines to record responses from an intracochlear electrode. ECoG responses were recorded in eight CI users with preserved acoustic hearing using Custom Sound EP and the Python-based software. Responses were similar across both recording systems, but the recording time decreased significantly using the Python-based software. Seven additional CI users underwent repeated testing using the Python-based software and showed high test-retest reliability. The improved efficiency and high reliability increases the likelihood of translating intracochlear ECoG to clinical practice.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Electrocochleography; Hearing preservation; Hybrid cochlear implant; Neural response telemetry

Year:  2019        PMID: 30665078      PMCID: PMC6421572          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2019.01.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  6 in total

1.  Impact of stimulus frequency and recording electrode on electrocochleography in Hybrid cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Viral D Tejani; Rachael L Carroll; Paul J Abbas; Carolyn J Brown
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Residual Hair Cell Responses in Electric-Acoustic Stimulation Cochlear Implant Users with Complete Loss of Acoustic Hearing After Implantation.

Authors:  Viral D Tejani; Jeong-Seo Kim; Jacob J Oleson; Paul J Abbas; Carolyn J Brown; Marlan R Hansen; Bruce J Gantz
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-02-04

3.  Assessing temporal responsiveness of primary stimulated neurons in auditory brainstem and cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Mahan Azadpour; William H Shapiro; J Thomas Roland; Mario A Svirsky
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Intracochlear Electrocochleography and Speech Perception Scores in Cochlear Implant Recipients.

Authors:  Carla V Valenzuela; Jeffery T Lichtenhan; Shannon M Lefler; Kanthaiah Koka; Craig A Buchman; Amanda J Ortmann
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 2.970

5.  Effects of noise on integration of acoustic and electric hearing within and across ears.

Authors:  Shelby Willis; Brian C J Moore; John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  EEG-based diagnostics of the auditory system using cochlear implant electrodes as sensors.

Authors:  Ben Somers; Christopher J Long; Tom Francart
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.