Literature DB >> 33997769

DNA damage measurements within tissue samples with Repair Assisted Damage Detection (RADD).

Kevin J Lee1,2, Elise Mann1, Luciana Madeira da Silva1,2, Jennifer Scalici2, Natalie R Gassman1,2.   

Abstract

Exposures to genotoxic carcinogens and reactive species result in strand breaks and a spectrum of covalent modifications to DNA that can induce mutations and contribute to the initiation and progression of cancer. Measurements of DNA damage within tissue or tumor samples can serve as a biomarker for exposures or assess changes in DNA repair capacity relevant in cancer development and treatment. Numerous methods to characterize DNA damage exist. However, these methods are primarily applicable to isolated DNA or cultured cells, often require a substantial amount of material, and may be limited to the detection and quantification of only a handful of DNA adducts. Here, we used the Repair Assisted Damage Detection (RADD) assay to detect and excise DNA adducts using a cocktail of DNA repair enzymes, then the damage site within the genome are tagged for detection using a modified nucleotide. We previously demonstrated the RADD assay can detect lesions within isolated DNA and fixed cells, and now RADD can be used to detect DNA adducts and DNA strand breaks in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue samples. We verified the ability of the RADD assay to detect DNA damage in tissue by exogenously inducing DNA damage with X-rays and restriction enzymes. We also showed that RADD can be multiplexed with antibodies to detect cell cycle markers or other proteins of interest. Finally, we showed that RADD can detect DNA damage within clinically relevant ovarian tumor samples. RADD is a flexible and easy-to-use assay that allows relative damage levels to be determined within FFPE samples and allows the heterogeneity of DNA adducts and strand breaks within clinically relevant samples to be measured.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 33997769      PMCID: PMC8118132          DOI: 10.1016/j.crbiot.2019.11.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Res Biotechnol        ISSN: 2590-2628


  32 in total

1.  Preparation of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue for immunohistochemistry.

Authors:  Kirstie Canene-Adams
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.600

2.  TUNEL apoptotic cell detection in tissue sections: critical evaluation and improvement.

Authors:  F Labat-Moleur; C Guillermet; P Lorimier; C Robert; S Lantuejoul; E Brambilla; A Negoescu
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.479

Review 3.  Gynecologic Cancers: Emerging Novel Strategies for Targeting DNA Repair Deficiency.

Authors:  Rebecca S Kristeleit; Rowan E Miller; Elise C Kohn
Journal:  Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book       Date:  2016

4.  Lighting up individual DNA damage sites by in vitro repair synthesis.

Authors:  Shahar Zirkin; Sivan Fishman; Hila Sharim; Yael Michaeli; Jeremy Don; Yuval Ebenstein
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 15.419

Review 5.  In situ ligation: a decade and a half of experience.

Authors:  Peter J Hornsby; Vladimir V Didenko
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2011

6.  Simultaneous detection of multiple DNA damage types by multi-colour fluorescent labelling.

Authors:  Dmitry Torchinsky; Yael Michaeli; Natalie R Gassman; Yuval Ebenstein
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 6.222

Review 7.  DNA damage response genes and the development of cancer metastasis.

Authors:  Constantinos G Broustas; Howard B Lieberman
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 2.841

8.  Defective base excision repair in the response to DNA damaging agents in triple negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Kevin J Lee; Cortt G Piett; Joel F Andrews; Elise Mann; Zachary D Nagel; Natalie R Gassman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Chromatin compaction protects genomic DNA from radiation damage.

Authors:  Hideaki Takata; Tomo Hanafusa; Toshiaki Mori; Mari Shimura; Yutaka Iida; Kenichi Ishikawa; Kenichi Yoshikawa; Yuko Yoshikawa; Kazuhiro Maeshima
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  DNA adductomics.

Authors:  Silvia Balbo; Robert J Turesky; Peter W Villalta
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 3.739

View more
  5 in total

1.  Associations between DNA Damage and PD-L1 Expression in Ovarian Cancer, a Potential Biomarker for Clinical Response.

Authors:  Elise K Mann; Kevin J Lee; Dongquan Chen; Luciana Madeira da Silva; Valeria L Dal Zotto; Jennifer Scalici; Natalie R Gassman
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-29

2.  From single-molecule to genome-wide mapping of DNA lesions: repair-assisted damage detection sequencing.

Authors:  Noa Gilat; Dena Fridman; Hila Sharim; Sapir Margalit; Natalie R Gassman; Yael Michaeli; Yuval Ebenstein
Journal:  Biophys Rep       Date:  2021-12-08

3.  Repair-Assisted Damage Detection Reveals Biological Disparities in Prostate Cancer between African Americans and European Americans.

Authors:  Kimiko L Krieger; Jie H Gohlke; Kevin J Lee; Danthasinghe Waduge Badrajee Piyarathna; Patricia D Castro; Jeffrey A Jones; Michael M Ittmann; Natalie R Gassman; Arun Sreekumar
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 4.  Diagnostic and Therapeutic Potential of Circulating-Free DNA and Cell-Free RNA in Cancer Management.

Authors:  Sadia Hassan; Adeeb Shehzad; Shahid Ali Khan; Waheed Miran; Salman Khan; Young-Sup Lee
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-08-22

5.  Cytoprotective Effect of Vitamin D on Doxorubicin-Induced Cardiac Toxicity in Triple Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Kevin J Lee; Griffin Wright; Hannah Bryant; Leigh Ann Wiggins; Valeria L Dal Zotto; Michele Schuler; Christopher Malozzi; Michael V Cohen; Natalie R Gassman
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 5.923

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.