Literature DB >> 24397478

DNA damage response genes and the development of cancer metastasis.

Constantinos G Broustas1, Howard B Lieberman.   

Abstract

DNA damage response genes play vital roles in the maintenance of a healthy genome. Defects in cell cycle checkpoint and DNA repair genes, especially mutation or aberrant downregulation, are associated with a wide spectrum of human disease, including a predisposition to the development of neurodegenerative conditions and cancer. On the other hand, upregulation of DNA damage response and repair genes can also cause cancer, as well as increase resistance of cancer cells to DNA damaging therapy. In recent years, it has become evident that many of the genes involved in DNA damage repair have additional roles in tumorigenesis, most prominently by acting as transcriptional (co-)factors. Although defects in these genes are causally connected to tumor initiation, their role in tumor progression is more controversial and it seems to depend on tumor type. In some tumors like melanoma, cell cycle checkpoint/DNA repair gene upregulation is associated with tumor metastasis, whereas in a number of other cancers the opposite has been observed. Several genes that participate in the DNA damage response, such as RAD9, PARP1, BRCA1, ATM and TP53 have been associated with metastasis by a number of in vitro biochemical and cellular assays, by examining human tumor specimens by immunohistochemistry or by DNA genome-wide gene expression profiling. Many of these genes act as transcriptional effectors to regulate other genes implicated in the pathogenesis of cancer. Furthermore, they are aberrantly expressed in numerous human tumors and are causally related to tumorigenesis. However, whether the DNA damage repair function of these genes is required to promote metastasis or another activity is responsible (e.g., transcription control) has not been determined. Importantly, despite some compelling in vitro evidence, investigations are still needed to demonstrate the role of cell cycle checkpoint and DNA repair genes in regulating metastatic phenotypes in vivo.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24397478      PMCID: PMC4064942          DOI: 10.1667/RR13515.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   2.841


  293 in total

1.  Recurrent fusion of TMPRSS2 and ETS transcription factor genes in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Scott A Tomlins; Daniel R Rhodes; Sven Perner; Saravana M Dhanasekaran; Rohit Mehra; Xiao-Wei Sun; Sooryanarayana Varambally; Xuhong Cao; Joelle Tchinda; Rainer Kuefer; Charles Lee; James E Montie; Rajal B Shah; Kenneth J Pienta; Mark A Rubin; Arul M Chinnaiyan
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-10-28       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  A role for the Tip60 histone acetyltransferase in the acetylation and activation of ATM.

Authors:  Yingli Sun; Xiaofeng Jiang; Shujuan Chen; Norvin Fernandes; Brendan D Price
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-09-02       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Rapid PIKK-dependent release of Chk1 from chromatin promotes the DNA-damage checkpoint response.

Authors:  Veronique A J Smits; Philip M Reaper; Stephen P Jackson
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 4.  DNA damage checkpoints in mammals.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Niida; Makoto Nakanishi
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2005-11-28       Impact factor: 3.000

5.  MDC1 directly binds phosphorylated histone H2AX to regulate cellular responses to DNA double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Manuel Stucki; Julie A Clapperton; Duaa Mohammad; Michael B Yaffe; Stephen J Smerdon; Stephen P Jackson
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2005-12-29       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  Fhit and CHK1 have opposing effects on homologous recombination repair.

Authors:  Baocheng Hu; Hongyan Wang; Xiang Wang; Hua-Rui Lu; Cuifen Huang; Simon N Powell; Kay Huebner; Ya Wang
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2005-10-01       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 7.  Genomic instability and cancer: networks involved in response to DNA damage.

Authors:  Jorunn Erla Eyfjord; Sigridur Klara Bodvarsdottir
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2005-07-05       Impact factor: 2.433

8.  Integrative genomic and proteomic analysis of prostate cancer reveals signatures of metastatic progression.

Authors:  Sooryanarayana Varambally; Jianjun Yu; Bharathi Laxman; Daniel R Rhodes; Rohit Mehra; Scott A Tomlins; Rajal B Shah; Uma Chandran; Federico A Monzon; Michael J Becich; John T Wei; Kenneth J Pienta; Debashis Ghosh; Mark A Rubin; Arul M Chinnaiyan
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 31.743

9.  Differential impact of mouse Rad9 deletion on ionizing radiation-induced bystander effects.

Authors:  Aiping Zhu; Hongning Zhou; Corinne Leloup; Stephen A Marino; Charles R Geard; Tom K Hei; Howard B Lieberman
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.841

10.  Mammalian Rad9 plays a role in telomere stability, S- and G2-phase-specific cell survival, and homologous recombinational repair.

Authors:  Raj K Pandita; Girdhar G Sharma; Andrei Laszlo; Kevin M Hopkins; Scott Davey; Mikhail Chakhparonian; Arun Gupta; Raymund J Wellinger; Junran Zhang; Simon N Powell; Joseph L Roti Roti; Howard B Lieberman; Tej K Pandita
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.272

View more
  95 in total

Review 1.  p53 and RAD9, the DNA Damage Response, and Regulation of Transcription Networks.

Authors:  Howard B Lieberman; Sunil K Panigrahi; Kevin M Hopkins; Li Wang; Constantinos G Broustas
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 2.841

2.  DNA Damage Repair Inhibitor for Breast Cancer Treatment.

Authors:  Ahrum Min; Kyung-Hun Lee; Seock-Ah Im
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.622

3.  Analysis of Human Nuclear Protein Complexes by Quantitative Mass Spectrometry Profiling.

Authors:  Katelyn E Connelly; Victoria Hedrick; Tiago Jose Paschoal Sobreira; Emily C Dykhuizen; Uma K Aryal
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 3.984

4.  Comprehensive Profiling of DNA Repair Defects in Breast Cancer Identifies a Novel Class of Endocrine Therapy Resistance Drivers.

Authors:  Meenakshi Anurag; Nindo Punturi; Jeremy Hoog; Matthew N Bainbridge; Matthew J Ellis; Svasti Haricharan
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 5.  DNA double-strand breaks: a potential therapeutic target for neurodegenerative diseases.

Authors:  Nidheesh Thadathil; Roderick Hori; Jianfeng Xiao; Mohammad Moshahid Khan
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2019-11-09       Impact factor: 5.239

Review 6.  Molecular Signaling in Response to Charged Particle Exposures and its Importance in Particle Therapy.

Authors:  Christine E Hellweg; Arif Ali Chishti; Sebastian Diegeler; Luis F Spitta; Bernd Henschenmacher; Christa Baumstark-Khan
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2018-09-21

7.  DNA polymerase beta modulates cancer progression via enhancing CDH13 expression by promoter demethylation.

Authors:  Meina Wang; Kaili Long; Enjie Li; Lulu Li; Binghua Li; Shusheng Ci; Lingfeng He; Feiyan Pan; Zhigang Hu; Zhigang Guo
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 9.867

8.  Molecular alterations associated with chronic exposure to cigarette smoke and chewing tobacco in normal oral keratinocytes.

Authors:  Pavithra Rajagopalan; Krishna Patel; Ankit P Jain; Vishalakshi Nanjappa; Keshava K Datta; Tejaswini Subbannayya; Kiran K Mangalaparthi; Anjali Kumari; Malini Manoharan; Karunakaran Coral; Sakthivel Murugan; Bipin Nair; T S Keshava Prasad; Premendu P Mathur; Ravi Gupta; Rohit Gupta; Arati Khanna-Gupta; Joseph Califano; David Sidransky; Harsha Gowda; Aditi Chatterjee
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 4.742

9.  HUS1 regulates in vivo responses to genotoxic chemotherapies.

Authors:  G Balmus; P X Lim; A Oswald; K R Hume; A Cassano; J Pierre; A Hill; W Huang; A August; T Stokol; T Southard; R S Weiss
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 9.867

10.  Identification of RECQ1-regulated transcriptome uncovers a role of RECQ1 in regulation of cancer cell migration and invasion.

Authors:  Xiao Ling Li; Xing Lu; Swetha Parvathaneni; Sven Bilke; Hongen Zhang; Saravanabhavan Thangavel; Alessandro Vindigni; Toshifumi Hara; Yuelin Zhu; Paul S Meltzer; Ashish Lal; Sudha Sharma
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 4.534

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.