Literature DB >> 27249731

Gynecologic Cancers: Emerging Novel Strategies for Targeting DNA Repair Deficiency.

Rebecca S Kristeleit1, Rowan E Miller1, Elise C Kohn1.   

Abstract

The presence of a BRCA mutation, somatic or germline, is now established as a standard of care for selecting patients with ovarian cancer for treatment with a PARP inhibitor. During the clinical development of the PARP inhibitor class of agents, a subset of women without BRCA mutations were shown to respond to these drugs (termed "BRCAness"). It was hypothesized that other genetic abnormalities causing a homologous recombinant deficiency (HRD) were sensitizing the BRCA wild-type cancers to PARP inhibition. The molecular basis for these other causes of HRD are being defined. They include individual gene defects (e.g., RAD51 mutation, CHEK2 mutation), homozygous somatic loss, and whole genome properties such as genomic scarring. Testing this knowledge is possible when selecting patients to receive molecular therapy targeting DNA repair, not only for patients with ovarian cancer but also endometrial and cervical cancers. The validity of HRD assays and multiple gene sequencing panels to select a broader population of patients for treatment with PARP inhibitor therapy is under evaluation. Other non-HRD targets for exploiting DNA repair defects in gynecologic cancers include mismatch repair (MMR), checkpoint signaling, and nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) DNA repair. This article describes recent evidence supporting strategies in addition to BRCA mutation for selecting patients for treatment with PARP inhibitor therapy. Additionally, the challenges and opportunities of exploiting DNA repair pathways other than homologous recombination for molecular therapy in gynecologic cancers is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27249731     DOI: 10.1200/EDBK_159086

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book        ISSN: 1548-8748


  6 in total

1.  DNA damage measurements within tissue samples with Repair Assisted Damage Detection (RADD).

Authors:  Kevin J Lee; Elise Mann; Luciana Madeira da Silva; Jennifer Scalici; Natalie R Gassman
Journal:  Curr Res Biotechnol       Date:  2019-11-15

2.  Recommendations for biomarker testing in epithelial ovarian cancer: a National Consensus Statement by the Spanish Society of Pathology and the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology.

Authors:  A Oaknin; R Guarch; P Barretina; D Hardisson; A González-Martín; X Matías-Guiu; A Pérez-Fidalgo; B Vieites; I Romero; J Palacios
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 3.  High-intermediate risk endometrial cancer: moving toward a molecularly based risk assessment profile.

Authors:  Tavonna D Kako; Maahum Z Kamal; Jhalak Dholakia; Carly B Scalise; Rebecca C Arend
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Dihydroartemisinin and its anticancer activity against endometrial carcinoma and cervical cancer: involvement of apoptosis, autophagy and transferrin receptor.

Authors:  Tian Tang; Qingjie Xia; Mingrong Xi
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 1.858

5.  Clinically actionable mutation profiles in patients with cancer identified by whole-genome sequencing.

Authors:  Anna Schuh; Helene Dreau; Samantha J L Knight; Kate Ridout; Tuba Mizani; Dimitris Vavoulis; Richard Colling; Pavlos Antoniou; Erika M Kvikstad; Melissa M Pentony; Angela Hamblin; Andrew Protheroe; Marina Parton; Ketan A Shah; Zsolt Orosz; Nick Athanasou; Bass Hassan; Adrienne M Flanagan; Ahmed Ahmed; Stuart Winter; Adrian Harris; Ian Tomlinson; Niko Popitsch; David Church; Jenny C Taylor
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Mol Case Stud       Date:  2018-04-02

6.  CCNE1 expression in high grade serous carcinoma does not correlate with chemoresistance.

Authors:  Stav Sapoznik; Sarit Aviel-Ronen; Keren Bahar-Shany; Oranit Zadok; Keren Levanon
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-07-15
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.