Literature DB >> 3399480

Decision making during the prenatal diagnostic procedure. A questionnaire and interview study of 211 women participating in prenatal diagnosis.

B Sjögren1, N Uddenberg.   

Abstract

Counselling in connection with prenatal diagnosis (PND) is a common task for the obstetrician and the midwife. However, the decision making processes of pregnant women are not completely known, for instance, the questions of women's autonomy, the decision on how to act in the case of an abnormal test, and the partner's participation in the decision. A questionnaire and interview study was carried out among 211 women undergoing PND by amniocentesis or chorionic villus biopsy. Most women in the sample indicated that PND was completely voluntary. However, at the same time almost every woman reported that it was difficult to decline from PND when offered. Even before the visit to register at the antenatal clinic, most of the women (83 per cent) had made up their minds to have PND. At the time of the test, many of the participants (62 per cent) had decided in favour of a legal abortion if the test indicated an abnormality in the fetus. At the same time, however, the data indicate a need for reflection and ambivalence, which the medical staff have to accept. In the questionnaire most of the women stated that they and their partners had similar attitudes towards PND, but when interviewed 38 per cent of the women admitted some differences between their own attitudes and their partners'. Although some women reported considerable deliberation and ambivalence, most of them said that they would undergo PND in another pregnancy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3399480     DOI: 10.1002/pd.1970080404

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prenat Diagn        ISSN: 0197-3851            Impact factor:   3.050


  10 in total

1.  Attitudes toward maternal serum screening in Chinese women with positive results.

Authors:  Sheau-Wen Jan; Chih-Ping Chen; Lian-Hua Huang; Fu-Yuan Huang; Chung-Chi Lan
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Antenatal screening policies for Down's syndrome. Audit of Down's syndrome screening is not valid.

Authors:  Nicholas J Wald; Wayne Huttly; Allan K Hackshaw
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-11-02

3.  The uptake and acceptability to patients of cystic fibrosis carrier testing offered in pregnancy by the GP.

Authors:  N E Hartley; D Scotcher; H Harris; P Williamson; A Wallace; D Craufurd; R Harris
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 6.318

4.  What Predicts the Use of Genetic Counseling Services After the Birth of a Child with Down Syndrome?

Authors:  Veronica Collins; Jane Halliday; Robert Williamson
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Embodied Knowledge and Making Sense of Prenatal Diagnosis.

Authors:  A Lippman
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Elective amniocentesis in low-risk pregnancies: decision making in the era of information and uncertainty.

Authors:  Y Lesser; J Rabinowitz
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Distress associated with prenatal screening for fetal abnormality.

Authors:  Marci Lobel; Lynette Dias; Bruce A Meyer
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2005-02

8.  Antenatal screening and its possible meaning from unborn baby's perspective.

Authors:  Sahin Aksoy
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2001-05-22       Impact factor: 2.652

Review 9.  A systematic review of decision support needs of parents making child health decisions.

Authors:  Cath Jackson; Francine M Cheater; Innes Reid
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 10.  Ethical considerations in prenatal diagnosis.

Authors:  E A Gates
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1993-09
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.