Literature DB >> 26142383

What Predicts the Use of Genetic Counseling Services After the Birth of a Child with Down Syndrome?

Veronica Collins1, Jane Halliday, Robert Williamson.   

Abstract

In the state of Victoria, Australia, a government funded genetic counseling service exists to meet the needs of families. An audit showed that many families do not use this service after the birth of a child with a genetic problem. To investigate this we surveyed families of children born with Down syndrome over 2 years in Victoria. Questionnaires were completed by 74 mothers, of whom only 18 had received genetic counseling between the birth and the time of the study (mean 3.5 years). Of those not receiving genetic counseling, 71% said they were not offered or had not heard of it. Mothers who had genetic counseling were younger than those who had not, and were more likely to have attended University. Those who had genetic counseling indicated less "satisfaction with care at the diagnosis" and were more likely to perceive their child as "unwell at birth" than those who were aware of genetic counseling but did not have it. Of those who did not have genetic counseling, over half were unclear about what it is, although 74% agreed with the statement "genetic counseling is most useful when planning to have another child." Of those who had heard of genetic counseling, 73% said they were not sure how it could help. Many families with children with Down syndrome are not aware of the existence or functions of genetic counseling. With greater awareness, some may still choose not to have genetic counseling, but others enunciated needs that could be met by this service if it were offered to them.

Entities:  

Year:  2003        PMID: 26142383     DOI: 10.1023/A:1021495117739

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  24 in total

1.  From a different planet. Women who choose to continue their pregnancy after a diagnosis of Down's syndrome.

Authors:  J Edwins
Journal:  Pract Midwife       Date:  2000-04

2.  Uptake and impact of carrier testing for cystic fibrosis. A review and a theoretical framework about the role of knowledge, health beliefs and coping.

Authors:  M Decruyenaere; G Evers-Kiebooms; L Denayer; M Welkenhuysen
Journal:  Community Genet       Date:  1998

3.  Parental reactions to loss and disappointment: the diagnosis of Down's syndrome.

Authors:  A Gath
Journal:  Dev Med Child Neurol       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 5.449

Review 4.  Genetic counseling.

Authors:  F C Fraser
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1974-09       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Follow-up validation study of the Victorian Congenital Malformations Register.

Authors:  M Kilkenny; M Riley; J Lumley
Journal:  J Paediatr Child Health       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 1.954

6.  Down syndrome clinic in a semi-rural setting.

Authors:  C M Lovell; R A Saul
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1999-06-25

7.  Down syndrome: perinatal complications and counseling experiences in 216 patients.

Authors:  J K Spahis; G N Wilson
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1999-06-25

8.  Factors influencing whether or not couples seek genetic counselling: an explorative study in a paediatric surgical unit.

Authors:  I Hobus; P G Frets; H J Duivenvoorden; D Tibboel; M F Niermeijer
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 4.438

9.  Decision making during the prenatal diagnostic procedure. A questionnaire and interview study of 211 women participating in prenatal diagnosis.

Authors:  B Sjögren; N Uddenberg
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 3.050

10.  Primary care physicians' utilization and perceptions of genetics services.

Authors:  S J Hayflick; M P Eiff; L Carpenter; J Steinberger
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  1998 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  5 in total

1.  Effects of a genetic counseling model on mothers of children with down syndrome: a Brazilian pilot study.

Authors:  Marcos Ricardo Datti Micheletto; Nelson Iguimar Valerio; Agnes Cristina Fett-Conte
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-06-23       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Racial-ethnic differences in genetic amniocentesis uptake.

Authors:  Jennifer B Saucier; Dennis Johnston; Catherine A Wicklund; Patricia Robbins-Furman; Jacqueline T Hecht; Manju Monga
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 3.  A systematic review of factors that act as barriers to patient referral to genetic services.

Authors:  Türem Delikurt; Graham R Williamson; Violetta Anastasiadou; Heather Skirton
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 4.246

4.  Integrating a Geneticist in a Multidisciplinary Clinic for Down Syndrome Increases Commitment to Genetic Counseling.

Authors:  Stephanie L Santoro; Theodora Jacobson; Stephanie Lemle; Thomas Bartman
Journal:  Pediatr Qual Saf       Date:  2017-08-25

5.  The design, implementation, and effectiveness of intervention strategies aimed at improving genetic referral practices: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  April Morrow; Priscilla Chan; Katherine M Tucker; Natalie Taylor
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2021-08-24       Impact factor: 8.822

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.