Literature DB >> 11291381

Elective amniocentesis in low-risk pregnancies: decision making in the era of information and uncertainty.

Y Lesser1, J Rabinowitz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Rational choice theory was applied to explain women's use of amniocentesis. Variables included knowledge about prenatal diagnostics, attitudes, and emotional preferences.
METHODS: Using structured instruments at 9 to 14 and at 29 to 34 weeks' gestation, we interviewed 232 Israeli women who had low-risk pregnancies.
RESULTS: Women who had elective amniocentesis (n = 39) were more knowledgeable about prenatal diagnostics, risks of invasive procedures, and probability of fetal abnormality in high maternal age; had fewer children; and had less favorable attitudes toward parenthood than those who had medically indicated amniocentesis (n = 57) and those who did not have amniocentesis (n = 136).
CONCLUSIONS: The use and possible overuse of amniocentesis were associated with having more information about prenatal diagnostics and definite emotional preferences.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11291381      PMCID: PMC1446643          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.91.4.639

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  11 in total

1.  Adult polycystic kidney disease: knowledge, experience, and attitudes to prenatal diagnosis.

Authors:  K A Hodgkinson; L Kerzin-Storrar; E A Watters; R Harris
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 6.318

2.  Evaluation of the Health Belief Model and decision making regarding amniocentesis in women of advanced maternal age.

Authors:  B N French; T W Kurczynski; M T Weaver; M J Pituch
Journal:  Health Educ Q       Date:  1992

3.  Prenatal diagnosis for psychological reasons: comparison with other indications, advanced maternal age and known genetic risk.

Authors:  B Sjögren; N Uddenberg
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 3.050

4.  Cystic fibrosis: community knowledge and attitudes towards carrier screening and prenatal diagnosis.

Authors:  M Decruyenaere; G Evers-Kiebooms; L Denayer; H Van den Berghe
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 4.438

5.  An interview study of pregnant women's attitudes to ultrasound scanning.

Authors:  B Hyde
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 4.634

6.  Factors in a woman's decision to undergo genetic amniocentesis for advanced maternal age.

Authors:  B L Davies; T A Doran
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  1982 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.381

7.  Psychological effects of having amniocentesis: are these due to the procedure, the risk or the behaviour?

Authors:  T M Marteau; J Kidd; R Cook; S Michie; M Johnston; J Slack; R W Shaw
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 3.006

8.  Reactions to prenatal diagnosis: an analysis of 87 interviews.

Authors:  Danielle Silvestre; Nadine Fresco
Journal:  Am J Orthopsychiatry       Date:  1980-10

9.  Factors affecting the uptake of screening for neural tube defect.

Authors:  D Kyle; C Cummins; S Evans
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1988-06

10.  Decision making during the prenatal diagnostic procedure. A questionnaire and interview study of 211 women participating in prenatal diagnosis.

Authors:  B Sjögren; N Uddenberg
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 3.050

View more
  7 in total

1.  Information and decision support needs of parents considering amniocentesis: interviews with pregnant women and health professionals.

Authors:  Marie-Anne Durand; Mareike Stiel; Jacky Boivin; Glyn Elwyn
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Assessment of psychosocial outcomes in genetic counseling research: an overview of available measurement scales.

Authors:  Nadine A Kasparian; Claire E Wakefield; Bettina Meiser
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-08-13       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Invasive Prenatal Diagnostic Testing Recommendations are Influenced by Maternal Age, Statistical Misconception and Perceived Liability.

Authors:  Talya Miron-Shatz; Sivan R Rapaport; Naama Srebnik; Yaniv Hanoch; Jonina Rabinowitz; Glen M Doniger; Linda Levi; Jonathan J Rolison; Avi Tsafrir
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Factors that affect the decision to undergo amniocentesis in women with normal Down syndrome screening results: it is all about the age.

Authors:  Julia Grinshpun-Cohen; Talya Miron-Shatz; Liat Ries-Levavi; Elon Pras
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 3.377

5.  Adjunct prenatal testing: patient decisions regarding ethnic carrier screening and fluorescence in situ hybridization.

Authors:  Erica L Sturm; Kelly E Ormond
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Systematic overuse of healthcare services: a conceptual model.

Authors:  Najlla Nassery; Jodi B Segal; Eva Chang; John F P Bridges
Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.561

7.  The limited effect of information on Israeli pregnant women at advanced maternal age who decide to undergo amniocentesis.

Authors:  Julia Grinshpun-Cohen; Talya Miron-Shatz; Michal Berkenstet; Elon Pras
Journal:  Isr J Health Policy Res       Date:  2015-08-17
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.