Literature DB >> 33968366

Accuracy of digital dental models and three-dimensional printed dental models in linear measurements and Bolton analysis.

William Suryajaya1, Maria Purbiati1, Nada Ismah1.   

Abstract

Background: Due to advances in digital technology, it is possible to obtain digital dental models through intraoral scanning. The stereolithographic data collected from the scanner can subsequently be printed into a three-dimensional dental model in resinic material. However, the accuracy between digital dental models and printed dental models needs to be evaluated since it might affect diagnosis and treatment planning in orthodontic treatment. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of digital models scanned by a Trios intraoral scanner and three-dimensional dental models printed using a Formlabs 2 3D printer in linear measurements and Bolton analysis.
Methods: A total of 35 subjects were included in this study. All subjects were scanned using a Trios intraoral scanner to obtain digital study models. Stereolithographic data from previous scanning was printed using a Formlabs 2 3D printer to obtain printed study models. Mesiodistal, intercanine, intermolar, and Bolton analysis from all types of study models were measured. The intraclass correlation coefficient was used to assess intraobserver and interobserver reliability. All data were then statistically analyzed.
Results: The reliability tests were high for both intraobserver and interobserver reliability, which demonstrates high reproducibility for all measurements on all model types. Most of the data compared between study models showed no statistically significant differences, though some data differed significantly. However, the differences are considered clinically insignificant.
Conclusion: Digital dental models and three-dimensional printed dental models may be used interchangeably with plaster dental models for diagnostic and treatment planning purposes. Keywords: Accuracy, 3D printing, digital dental model, printed dental model. Copyright:
© 2021 Suryajaya W et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D printing; Accuracy; digital dental model; printed dental model

Year:  2021        PMID: 33968366      PMCID: PMC8078212          DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.31865.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  F1000Res        ISSN: 2046-1402


  17 in total

1.  A comparison of 3 computerized Bolton tooth-size analyses with a commonly used method.

Authors:  J J Tomassetti; L J Taloumis; J M Denny; J R Fischer
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  [Optimization of the powder application in the Cerec method with environment-friendly propellant systems].

Authors:  B J Meyer; W H Mörmann; F Lutz
Journal:  Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed       Date:  1990

Review 3.  Orthodontic measurements on digital study models compared with plaster models: a systematic review.

Authors:  P S Fleming; V Marinho; A Johal
Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res       Date:  2010-11-22       Impact factor: 1.826

4.  Consistency of orthodontic treatment decisions relative to diagnostic records.

Authors:  U K Han; K W Vig; J A Weintraub; P S Vig; C J Kowalski
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 2.650

5.  Agreement of treatment recommendations based on digital vs plaster dental models.

Authors:  Hsiu-Ching Ko; Weitao Liu; Derek Hou; Sepideh Torkan; Charles Spiekerman; Greg J Huang
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 2.650

6.  Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of linear measurements on digital models obtained from intraoral and cone-beam computed tomography scans of alginate impressions.

Authors:  Matthew G Wiranto; W Petrie Engelbrecht; Heleen E Tutein Nolthenius; W Joerd van der Meer; Yijin Ren
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.650

7.  Reproducibility and accuracy of linear measurements on dental models derived from cone-beam computed tomography compared with digital dental casts.

Authors:  Olivier de Waard; Frits Andreas Rangel; Piotr Stanislaw Fudalej; Ewald Maria Bronkhorst; Anne Marie Kuijpers-Jagtman; Karel Hero Breuning
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.650

8.  Clinical use of a direct chairside oral scanner: an assessment of accuracy, time, and patient acceptance.

Authors:  Thorsten Grünheid; Shawn D McCarthy; Brent E Larson
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 2.650

Review 9.  Rapid Prototyping Technologies and their Applications in Prosthodontics, a Review of Literature.

Authors:  Kianoosh Torabi; Ehsan Farjood; Shahram Hamedani
Journal:  J Dent (Shiraz)       Date:  2015-03

10.  Differences in dental arch characteristics between genders in patients with suspected condylar hyperplasia in a North Sumatra subpopulation: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Ervina Sofyanti; Trelia Boel; Denny Satria; Zuriyah Fionita Ritonga; Indah Hafniar Hasibuan
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2020-04-16
View more
  2 in total

1.  Assessment of different types of intra oral scanners and 3D printers on the accuracy of printed models: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Fernando Igai; Washington-Steagall Junior; Carolina-Mayumi Iegami; Pedro-Tortamano Neto
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2021-12-01

2.  The Effect of Scanning Strategy on Intraoral Scanner's Accuracy.

Authors:  Nikolaos A Gavounelis; Chrysoula-Maria C Gogola; Demetrios J Halazonetis
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-04
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.