Literature DB >> 33948303

Comparison of dosimetric characteristics of physical wedge and enhanced dynamic wedge in inhomogeneous medium using Monte Carlo simulations.

Seied Rabi Mahdavi1, Atefeh Mahmoudi2, Ghazale Geraily2, Ahmad Mostaar3, Golbarg Esmaili4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Widely used physical wedges in clinical radiotherapy lead to beam intensity attenuation as well as the beam hardening effect, which must be considered. Dynamic wedges devised to overcome the physical wedges (PWs) problems result in dosimetry complications due to jaw movement while the beam is on. This study was aimed to investigate the usability of physical wedge data instead of enhanced dynamic wedge due to the enhanced dynamic wedge (EDW) dosimetry measurement hardships of Varian 2100CD in inhomogeneous phantom by Monte Carlo code as a reliable method in radiation dosimetry.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A PW and EDW-equipped-linac head was simulated using BEAMnrc code. DOSXYZnrc was used for three-dimensional dosimetry calculation in the CIRS phantom.
RESULTS: Based on the isodose curves, EDW generated a less scattered as well as lower penumbra width compared to the PW. The depth dose variations of PWs and EDWs were more in soft tissue than the lung tissue. Beam profiles of PW and EDW indicated good coincidence in all points, except for the heel area.
CONCLUSION: Results demonstrated that it is possible to apply PW data instead of EDW due to the dosimetry and commissioning hardships caused by EDW in inhomogeneous media.
© 2021 Greater Poland Cancer Centre.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Monte Carlo code; enhanced dynamic wedge; inhomogeneous medium; physical wedge

Year:  2021        PMID: 33948303      PMCID: PMC8086706          DOI: 10.5603/RPOR.a2021.0012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother        ISSN: 1507-1367


  12 in total

1.  Incorporating dynamic collimator motion in Monte Carlo simulations: an application in modelling a dynamic wedge.

Authors:  F Verhaegen; H H Liu
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Dynamic wedge versus physical wedge: a Monte Carlo study.

Authors:  R Shih; X A Li; J C Chu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Clinical implementation of enhanced dynamic wedges into the Pinnacle treatment planning system: Monte Carlo validation and patient-specific QA.

Authors:  Munir Ahmad; Jun Deng; Molly W Lund; Zhe Chen; James Kimmett; Meena S Moran; Ravinder Nath
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-12-19       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Comparison of dosimetric characteristics of physical and enhanced dynamic wedges.

Authors:  Sathiyan Saminathan; Ravikumar Manickam; Sanjay S Supe
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2011-08-15

5.  Validation and automation of the DYNJAWS component module of the BEAMnrc Monte Carlo code.

Authors:  M B Kakakhel; E S Baveas; A L Fielding; T Kairn; J Kenny; J V Trapp
Journal:  Australas Phys Eng Sci Med       Date:  2011-03-19       Impact factor: 1.430

6.  Comparison of beam hardening effect of physical and enhanced dynamic wedges at bladder inhomogeneity using EBT3 film dosimeter.

Authors:  Ghazale Geraily; Nooshin Sharafi; Alireza Shirazi; Mahbod Esfehani; Maryam Masoudifar; Blookat Eftekhar Rajab
Journal:  J Cancer Res Ther       Date:  2017 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.805

7.  Dosimetric characteristic of physical wedge versus enhanced dynamic wedge based on Monte Carlo simulations.

Authors:  Seied Rabie Mahdavi; Ghazale Geraily; Ahmad Mostaar; Arman Zia; Golbarg Esmaili; Somayeh Farahani
Journal:  J Cancer Res Ther       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.805

8.  Dosimetric Characteristics of 6 MV Modified Beams by Physical Wedges of a Siemens Linear Accelerator.

Authors:  Mansour Zabihzadeh; Mohammad Javad Tahmasebi Birgani; Mojtaba Hoseini-Ghahfarokhi; Sholeh Arvandi; Seyed Mohammad Hoseini; Mahbube Fadaei
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2016

9.  Beam data measurements for dynamic wedges on Varian 600C (6 MV) and 2100C (6 and 10 MV) linear accelerators.

Authors:  A M Bidmead; A J Garton; P J Childs
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  An investigation into the comparison between different dosimetric methods of measuring profiles and depth doses for dynamic wedges on a Varian 600C linear accelerator.

Authors:  P J Elder; F M Coveney; A D Welsh
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 3.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.