Literature DB >> 19098353

Clinical implementation of enhanced dynamic wedges into the Pinnacle treatment planning system: Monte Carlo validation and patient-specific QA.

Munir Ahmad1, Jun Deng, Molly W Lund, Zhe Chen, James Kimmett, Meena S Moran, Ravinder Nath.   

Abstract

The goal of this work is to present a systematic Monte Carlo validation study on the clinical implementation of the enhanced dynamic wedges (EDWs) into the Pinnacle(3) (Philips Medical Systems, Fitchburg, WI) treatment planning system (TPS) and QA procedures for patient plan verification treated with EDWs. Modeling of EDW beams in the Pinnacle(3) TPS, which employs a collapsed-cone convolution superposition (CCCS) dose model, was based on a combination of measured open-beam data and the 'Golden Segmented Treatment Table' (GSTT) provided by Varian for each photon beam energy. To validate EDW models, dose profiles of 6 and 10 MV photon beams from a Clinac 2100 C/D were measured in virtual water at depths from near-surface to 30 cm for a wide range of field sizes and wedge angles using the Profiler 2 (Sun Nuclear Corporation, Melbourne, FL) diode array system. The EDW output factors (EDWOFs) for square fields from 4 to 20 cm wide were measured in virtual water using a small-volume Farmer-type ionization chamber placed at a depth of 10 cm on the central axis. Furthermore, the 6 and 10 MV photon beams emerging from the treatment head of Clinac 2100 C/D were fully modeled and the central-axis depth doses, the off-axis dose profiles and the output factors in water for open and dynamically wedged fields were calculated using the Monte Carlo (MC) package EGS4. Our results have shown that (1) both the central-axis depth doses and the off-axis dose profiles of various EDWs computed with the CCCS dose model and MC simulations showed good agreement with the measurements to within 2%/2 mm; (2) measured EDWOFs used for monitor-unit calculation in Pinnacle(3) TPS agreed well with the CCCS and MC predictions within 2%; (3) all the EDW fields satisfied our validation criteria of 1% relative dose difference and 2 mm distance-to-agreement (DTA) with 99-100% passing rate in routine patient treatment plan verification using MapCheck 2D diode array.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19098353     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/54/2/018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  3 in total

1.  Comparison of dosimetric characteristics of physical wedge and enhanced dynamic wedge in inhomogeneous medium using Monte Carlo simulations.

Authors:  Seied Rabi Mahdavi; Atefeh Mahmoudi; Ghazale Geraily; Ahmad Mostaar; Golbarg Esmaili
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2021-02-25

2.  Assessing the role of volumetric-modulated arc therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Mian Xi; Li Zhang; Qiao-Qiao Li; Lei Zhao; Rui Zhang; Meng-Zhong Liu
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2013-05-06       Impact factor: 2.102

3.  Enhanced dynamic wedge output factors for Varian 2300CD and the case for a reference database.

Authors:  Christopher F Njeh
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 2.102

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.