Literature DB >> 33941695

A simple expression for the strength of selection on recombination generated by interference among mutations.

Denis Roze1,2.   

Abstract

One of the most widely cited hypotheses to explain the evolutionary maintenance of genetic recombination states that the reshuffling of genotypes at meiosis increases the efficiency of natural selection by reducing interference among selected loci. However, and despite several decades of theoretical work, a quantitative estimation of the possible selective advantage of a mutant allele increasing chromosomal map length (the average number of cross-overs at meiosis) remains difficult. This article derives a simple expression for the strength of selection acting on a modifier gene affecting the genetic map length of a whole chromosome or genome undergoing recurrent mutation. In particular, it shows that indirect selection for recombination caused by interference among mutations is proportional to [Formula: see text], where [Formula: see text] is the effective population size, U is the deleterious mutation rate per chromosome, and R is the chromosome map length. Indirect selection is relatively insensitive to the fitness effects of deleterious alleles, epistasis, or the genetic architecture of recombination rate variation and may compensate for substantial costs associated with recombination when linkage is tight. However, its effect generally stays weak in large, highly recombining populations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  evolution of recombination; genetic architecture; genetic interference; meiosis; multilocus population genetics

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33941695      PMCID: PMC8126786          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2022805118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  55 in total

1.  Selection for recombination in small populations.

Authors:  S P Otto; N H Barton
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  Interference among deleterious mutations favours sex and recombination in finite populations.

Authors:  Peter D Keightley; Sarah P Otto
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-09-07       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 3.  Recombination rate variation in closely related species.

Authors:  C S Smukowski; M A F Noor
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 3.821

4.  The effect of linkage on limits to artificial selection.

Authors:  W G Hill; A Robertson
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1966-12       Impact factor: 1.588

5.  Defective recombination in infertile men.

Authors:  Joanna Gonsalves; Fei Sun; Peter N Schlegel; Paul J Turek; Carin V Hopps; Calvin Greene; Renee H Martin; Renee A Reijo Pera
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2004-09-22       Impact factor: 6.150

6.  Recombination rate and reproductive success in humans.

Authors:  Augustine Kong; John Barnard; Daniel F Gudbjartsson; Gudmar Thorleifsson; Gudrun Jonsdottir; Sigrun Sigurdardottir; Bjorgvin Richardsson; Jonina Jonsdottir; Thorgeir Thorgeirsson; Michael L Frigge; Neil E Lamb; Stephanie Sherman; Jeffrey R Gulcher; Kari Stefansson
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2004-10-03       Impact factor: 38.330

7.  Crossovers are associated with mutation and biased gene conversion at recombination hotspots.

Authors:  Barbara Arbeithuber; Andrea J Betancourt; Thomas Ebner; Irene Tiemann-Boege
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-02-02       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  A simple expression for the strength of selection on recombination generated by interference among mutations.

Authors:  Denis Roze
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Genetic diversity in the interference selection limit.

Authors:  Benjamin H Good; Aleksandra M Walczak; Richard A Neher; Michael M Desai
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  Genome-wide maps of recombination and chromosome segregation in human oocytes and embryos show selection for maternal recombination rates.

Authors:  Christian S Ottolini; Louise Newnham; Antonio Capalbo; Senthilkumar A Natesan; Hrishikesh A Joshi; Danilo Cimadomo; Darren K Griffin; Karen Sage; Michael C Summers; Alan R Thornhill; Elizabeth Housworth; Alex D Herbert; Laura Rienzi; Filippo M Ubaldi; Alan H Handyside; Eva R Hoffmann
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 38.330

View more
  5 in total

1.  Local fitness and epistatic effects lead to distinct patterns of linkage disequilibrium in protein-coding genes.

Authors:  Aaron P Ragsdale
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2022-07-30       Impact factor: 4.402

2.  The evolution of recombination in self-fertilizing organisms.

Authors:  Roman Stetsenko; Denis Roze
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 4.402

3.  A simple expression for the strength of selection on recombination generated by interference among mutations.

Authors:  Denis Roze
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  The "New Synthesis".

Authors:  Nicholas H Barton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 12.779

5.  Reproductive isolation via polygenic local adaptation in sub-divided populations: Effect of linkage disequilibria and drift.

Authors:  Himani Sachdeva
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 6.020

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.