Literature DB >> 35736370

Local fitness and epistatic effects lead to distinct patterns of linkage disequilibrium in protein-coding genes.

Aaron P Ragsdale1.   

Abstract

Selected mutations interfere and interact with evolutionary processes at nearby loci, distorting allele frequency trajectories and creating correlations between pairs of mutations. Recent studies have used patterns of linkage disequilibrium between selected variants to test for selective interference and epistatic interactions, with some disagreement over interpreting observations from data. Interpretation is hindered by a lack of analytic or even numerical expectations for patterns of variation between pairs of loci under the combined effects of selection, dominance, epistasis, and demography. Here, I develop a numerical approach to compute the expected two-locus sampling distribution under diploid selection with arbitrary epistasis and dominance, recombination, and variable population size. I use this to explore how epistasis and dominance affect expected signed linkage disequilibrium, including for nonsteady-state demography relevant to human populations. Using whole-genome sequencing data from humans, I explore genome-wide patterns of linkage disequilibrium within protein-coding genes. I show that positive linkage disequilibrium between missense mutations within genes is driven by strong positive allele-frequency correlations between mutations that fall within the same annotated conserved domain, pointing to compensatory mutations or antagonistic epistasis as the prevailing mode of interaction within conserved genic elements. Linkage disequilibrium between missense mutations is reduced outside of conserved domains, as expected under Hill-Robertson interference. This variation in both mutational fitness effects and selective interactions within protein-coding genes calls for more refined inferences of the joint distribution of fitness and interactive effects, and the methods presented here should prove useful in that pursuit.
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Genetics Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  diffusion approximation; distribution of fitness effects; epistasis; interference; linkage disequilibrium

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35736370      PMCID: PMC9339331          DOI: 10.1093/genetics/iyac097

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.402


  60 in total

1.  Inferences about the distribution of dominance drawn from yeast gene knockout data.

Authors:  Aneil F Agrawal; Michael C Whitlock
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-11-23       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Shifting Fitness and Epistatic Landscapes Reflect Trade-offs along an Evolutionary Pathway.

Authors:  Barrett Steinberg; Marc Ostermeier
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  Unbiased Estimation of Linkage Disequilibrium from Unphased Data.

Authors:  Aaron P Ragsdale; Simon Gravel
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 16.240

4.  Dynamics of unconditionally deleterious mutations: Gaussian approximation and soft selection.

Authors:  A S Kondrashov
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 1.588

5.  The sampling distribution of linkage disequilibrium.

Authors:  G B Golding
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  The fine-scale structure of recombination rate variation in the human genome.

Authors:  Gilean A T McVean; Simon R Myers; Sarah Hunt; Panos Deloukas; David R Bentley; Peter Donnelly
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-04-23       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 7.  Exploring protein fitness landscapes by directed evolution.

Authors:  Philip A Romero; Frances H Arnold
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 94.444

8.  Linkage disequilibrium between rare mutations.

Authors:  Benjamin H Good
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Multi-nucleotide de novo Mutations in Humans.

Authors:  Søren Besenbacher; Patrick Sulem; Agnar Helgason; Hannes Helgason; Helgi Kristjansson; Aslaug Jonasdottir; Adalbjorg Jonasdottir; Olafur Th Magnusson; Unnur Thorsteinsdottir; Gisli Masson; Augustine Kong; Daniel F Gudbjartsson; Kari Stefansson
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  Models of archaic admixture and recent history from two-locus statistics.

Authors:  Aaron P Ragsdale; Simon Gravel
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 5.917

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.