Literature DB >> 16957730

Interference among deleterious mutations favours sex and recombination in finite populations.

Peter D Keightley1, Sarah P Otto.   

Abstract

Sex and recombination are widespread, but explaining these phenomena has been one of the most difficult problems in evolutionary biology. Recombination is advantageous when different individuals in a population carry different advantageous alleles. By bringing together advantageous alleles onto the same chromosome, recombination speeds up the process of adaptation and opposes the fixation of harmful mutations by means of Muller's ratchet. Nevertheless, adaptive substitutions favour sex and recombination only if the rate of adaptive mutation is high, and Muller's ratchet operates only in small or asexual populations. Here, by tracking the fate of modifier alleles that alter the frequency of sex and recombination, we show that background selection against deleterious mutant alleles provides a stochastic advantage to sex and recombination that increases with population size. The advantage arises because, with low levels of recombination, selection at other loci severely reduces the effective population size and genetic variance in fitness at a focal locus (the Hill-Robertson effect), making a population less able to respond to selection and to rid itself of deleterious mutations. Sex and recombination reveal the hidden genetic variance in fitness by combining chromosomes of intermediate fitness to create chromosomes that are relatively free of (or are loaded with) deleterious mutations. This increase in genetic variance within finite populations improves the response to selection and generates a substantial advantage to sex and recombination that is fairly insensitive to the form of epistatic interactions between deleterious alleles. The mechanism supported by our results offers a robust and broadly applicable explanation for the evolutionary advantage of recombination and can explain the spread of costly sex.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16957730     DOI: 10.1038/nature05049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  143 in total

1.  Selection for mitonuclear co-adaptation could favour the evolution of two sexes.

Authors:  Zena Hadjivasiliou; Andrew Pomiankowski; Robert M Seymour; Nick Lane
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Scrambling eggs: meiotic drive and the evolution of female recombination rates.

Authors:  Yaniv Brandvain; Graham Coop
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Scaling expectations for the time to establishment of complex adaptations.

Authors:  Michael Lynch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Genetic linkage and natural selection.

Authors:  N H Barton
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-08-27       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 5.  Mutation and the evolution of recombination.

Authors:  N H Barton
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  The population genetics of mutations: good, bad and indifferent.

Authors:  Laurence Loewe; William G Hill
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Higher rates of sex evolve in spatially heterogeneous environments.

Authors:  Lutz Becks; Aneil F Agrawal
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Coalescence with Background and Balancing Selection in Systems with Bi- and Uniparental Reproduction: Contrasting Partial Asexuality and Selfing.

Authors:  Aneil F Agrawal; Matthew Hartfield
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Conflict and cooperation in eukaryogenesis: implications for the timing of endosymbiosis and the evolution of sex.

Authors:  Arunas L Radzvilavicius; Neil W Blackstone
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 4.118

10.  Nucleotide polymorphism and within-gene recombination in Daphnia magna and D. pulex, two cyclical parthenogens.

Authors:  Christoph R Haag; Seanna J McTaggart; Anaïs Didier; Tom J Little; Deborah Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.