Literature DB >> 22056687

Correlation of contrast-detail analysis and clinical image quality assessment in chest radiography with a human cadaver study.

An De Crop1, Klaus Bacher, Tom Van Hoof, Peter V Smeets, Barbara S Smet, Merel Vergauwen, Urszula Kiendys, Philippe Duyck, Koenraad Verstraete, Katharina D'Herde, Hubert Thierens.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the correlation between the clinical and physical image quality of chest images by using cadavers embalmed with the Thiel technique and a contrast-detail phantom.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The use of human cadavers fulfilled the requirements of the institutional ethics committee. Clinical image quality was assessed by using three human cadavers embalmed with the Thiel technique, which results in excellent preservation of the flexibility and plasticity of organs and tissues. As a result, lungs can be inflated during image acquisition to simulate the pulmonary anatomy seen on a chest radiograph. Both contrast-detail phantom images and chest images of the Thiel-embalmed bodies were acquired with an amorphous silicon flat-panel detector. Tube voltage (70, 81, 90, 100, 113, 125 kVp), copper filtration (0.1, 0.2, 0.3 mm Cu), and exposure settings (200, 280, 400, 560, 800 speed class) were altered to simulate different quality levels. Four experienced radiologists assessed the image quality by using a visual grading analysis (VGA) technique based on European Quality Criteria for Chest Radiology. The phantom images were scored manually and automatically with use of dedicated software, both resulting in an inverse image quality figure (IQF). Spearman rank correlations between inverse IQFs and VGA scores were calculated.
RESULTS: A statistically significant correlation (r = 0.80, P < .01) was observed between the VGA scores and the manually obtained inverse IQFs. Comparison of the VGA scores and the automated evaluated phantom images showed an even better correlation (r = 0.92, P < .001).
CONCLUSION: The results support the value of contrast-detail phantom analysis for evaluating clinical image quality in chest radiography. © RSNA, 2011.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22056687     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.11110447

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  17 in total

1.  Brachial plexus 3D reconstruction from MRI with dissection validation: a baseline study for clinical applications.

Authors:  Joris Van de Velde; Stephanie Bogaert; Pieter Vandemaele; Wouter Huysse; Eric Achten; Joris Leijnse; Wilfried De Neve; Tom Van Hoof
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2015-08-23       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  An investigation into the validity of utilising the CDRAD 2.0 phantom for optimisation studies in digital radiography.

Authors:  Sadeq Al-Murshedi; Peter Hogg; Andrew England
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  A feasibility study on reduction of the entrance-surface dose to neonates by use of a new digital mobile X-ray system.

Authors:  Satoru Utsunomiya; Hajime Monzen; Mami Akimoto; Nobutaka Mukumoto; Yoshitomo Ishihara; Takehiko Shiinoki; Mitsuhiro Nakamura; Yuki Miyabe; Sayaka Sato; Satoru Matsuo; Masahiro Hiraoka
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2012-10-20

4.  Correlation of the clinical and physical image quality in chest radiography for average adults with a computed radiography imaging system.

Authors:  C S Moore; T J Wood; A W Beavis; J R Saunderson
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 5.  Human body preservation - old and new techniques.

Authors:  Erich Brenner
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2014-01-18       Impact factor: 2.610

6.  Reliability and accuracy assessment of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group-endorsed guidelines for brachial plexus contouring.

Authors:  Joris Van de Velde; Tom Vercauteren; Werner De Gersem; Johan Wouters; Katrien Vandecasteele; Philippe Vuye; Frank Vanpachtenbeke; Katharina D'Herde; Ingrid Kerckaert; Wilfried De Neve; Tom Van Hoof
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 3.621

7.  Application of frozen Thiel-embalmed specimens for radiotherapy delineation guideline development: a method to create accurate MRI-enhanced CT datasets.

Authors:  Michael E J Stouthandel; Pim Pullens; Stephanie Bogaert; Max Schoepen; Carl Vangestel; Eric Achten; Liv Veldeman; Tom Van Hoof
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Improved cone-beam computed tomography in supine and prone breast radiotherapy. Surface reconstruction, radiation exposure, and clinical workflow.

Authors:  A De Puysseleyr; T Mulliez; A Gulyban; E Bogaert; T Vercauteren; T Van Hoof; J Van de Velde; R Van Den Broecke; C De Wagter; W De Neve
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 3.621

9.  Evaluation of Non-Uniform Image Quality Caused by Anode Heel Effect in Digital Radiography Using Mutual Information.

Authors:  Ming-Chung Chou
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-25       Impact factor: 2.524

10.  Correlation of clinical and physical-technical image quality in chest CT: a human cadaver study applied on iterative reconstruction.

Authors:  An De Crop; Peter Smeets; Tom Van Hoof; Merel Vergauwen; Tom Dewaele; Mathias Van Borsel; Eric Achten; Koenraad Verstraete; Katharina D'Herde; Hubert Thierens; Klaus Bacher
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 1.930

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.