Literature DB >> 33915439

Three-dimensional surface strain analyses of simulated defect and augmented spine segments: A biomechanical cadaveric study.

Asghar Rezaei1, Maryam Tilton1, Hugo Giambini2, Yong Li1, Alexander Hooke3, Alan L Miller Ii3, Michael J Yaszemski1, Lichun Lu4.   

Abstract

While several studies have investigated fracture outcomes of intact vertebrae, fracture properties in metastatically-involved and augmented vertebrae are still far from understood. Consequently, this study was aimed to use 3D digital image correlation (3D-DIC) method to investigate the failure properties of spine segments with simulated metastatic lesions, segments augmented with poly(propylene fumarate) (PPF), and compare the outcomes with intact spines. To this end, biomechanical experiments accompanied by 3D-DIC were performed on spine segments consisting of three vertebrae and two intervertebral discs (IVDs) at loading rates of 0.083 mm/s, mimicking a physiological loading condition, and 200 mm/s, mimicking an impact-type loading condition such as a fall or an accident. Full-field surface strain analysis indicated PPF augmentation reduces the superior/inferior strain when compared with the defect specimens; Presence of a defect in the middle vertebra resulted in shear band fracture pattern. Failure of the superior endplates was confirmed in several defect specimens as the superior IVDs were protruding out of defects. The augmenting PPF showed lower superior/inferior surface strain values at the fast speed as compared to the slow speed. The results of our study showed a significant increase in the fracture force from slow to fast speeds (p = 0.0246). The significance of the study was to determine the fracture properties of normal, pathological, and augmented spinal segments under physiologically-relevant loading conditions. Understanding failure properties associated with either defect (i.e., metastasis lesion) or augmented (i.e., post-treatment) spine segments could potentially provide new insights on the outcome prediction and treatment planning. Additionally, this study provides new knowledge on the effect of PPF augmentation in improving fracture properties, potentially decreasing the risk of fracture in osteoporotic and metastatic spines.
Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomechanics of vertebral bodies; Fracture outcomes; Mechanical testing; Metastasis; Vertebral augmentation

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33915439      PMCID: PMC8744146          DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104559

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater        ISSN: 1878-0180


  30 in total

1.  Comparison of Strain Rosettes and Digital Image Correlation for Measuring Vertebral Body Strain.

Authors:  Hannah Gustafson; Gunter Siegmund; Peter Cripton
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  Elucidating failure mechanisms in human femurs during a fall to the side using bilateral digital image correlation.

Authors:  Lorenzo Grassi; Joeri Kok; Anna Gustafsson; Yi Zheng; Sami P Väänänen; Jukka S Jurvelin; Hanna Isaksson
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Biphasic material properties of lytic bone metastases.

Authors:  C M Whyne; S S Hu; K L Workman; J C Lotz
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.934

4.  Poly(Propylene Fumarate)-Hydroxyapatite Nanocomposite Can Be a Suitable Candidate for Cervical Cages.

Authors:  Yong Teng; Hugo Giambini; Asghar Rezaei; Xifeng Liu; A Lee Miller; Brian E Waletzki; Lichun Lu
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 2.097

5.  A 3D finite element model of prophylactic vertebroplasty in the metastatic spine: Vertebral stability and stress distribution on adjacent vertebrae.

Authors:  Alessandra Berton; Giuseppe Salvatore; Hugo Giambini; Mauro Ciuffreda; Umile Giuseppe Longo; Vincenzo Denaro; Andrew Thoreson; Kai-Nan An
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 1.985

Review 6.  Painful osseous metastases.

Authors:  Howard S Smith
Journal:  Pain Physician       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.965

7.  Damage Identification on Vertebral Bodies During Compressive Loading Using Digital Image Correlation.

Authors:  Hannah M Gustafson; Angela D Melnyk; Gunter P Siegmund; Peter A Cripton
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Effects of cement augmentation on the mechanical stability of multilevel spine after vertebral compression fracture.

Authors:  Eelin Tan; Tian Wang; Matthew H Pelletier; William R Walsh
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-06

9.  Effects of tumor location, shape and surface serration on burst fracture risk in the metastatic spine.

Authors:  C E Craig E Tschirhart; Amik Nagpurkar; C M Cari M Whyne
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  Mechanical testing setups affect spine segment fracture outcomes.

Authors:  Asghar Rezaei; Hugo Giambini; Kent D Carlson; Hao Xu; Susheil Uthamaraj; Dan Dragomir-Daescu; Michael J Yaszemski; Lichun Lu
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2019-08-17
View more
  1 in total

1.  Single-level subject-specific finite element model can predict fracture outcomes in three-level spine segments under different loading rates.

Authors:  Asghar Rezaei; Maryam Tilton; Yong Li; Michael J Yaszemski; Lichun Lu
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2021-09-09       Impact factor: 6.698

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.