Literature DB >> 30029248

Poly(Propylene Fumarate)-Hydroxyapatite Nanocomposite Can Be a Suitable Candidate for Cervical Cages.

Yong Teng1,2,3, Hugo Giambini4, Asghar Rezaei5, Xifeng Liu1,4, A Lee Miller4, Brian E Waletzki4, Lichun Lu1,4.   

Abstract

A wide range of materials have been used for the development of intervertebral cages. Poly(propylene fumarate) (PPF) has been shown to be an excellent biomaterial with characteristics similar to trabecular bone. Hydroxyapatite (HA) has been shown to enhance biocompatibility and mechanical properties of PPF. The purpose of this study was to characterize the effect of PPF augmented with HA (PPF:HA) and evaluate the feasibility of this material for the development of cervical cages. PPF was synthesized and combined with HA at PPF:HA wt:wt ratios of 100:0, 80:20, 70:30, and 60:40. Molds were fabricated for testing PPF:HA bulk materials in compression, bending, tension, and hardness according to ASTM standards, and also for cage preparation. The cages were fabricated with and without holes and with porosity created by salt leaching. The samples as well as the cages were mechanically tested using a materials testing frame. All elastic moduli as well as the hardness increased significantly by adding HA to PPF (p < 0.0001). The 20 wt % HA increased the moduli significantly compared to pure PPF (p < 0.0001). Compressive stiffness of all cages also increased with the addition of HA. HA increased the failure load of the porous cages significantly (p = 0.0018) compared with nonporous cages. PPF:HA wt:wt ratio of 80:20 proved to be significantly stiffer and stronger than pure PPF. The current results suggest that this polymeric composite can be a suitable candidate material for intervertebral body cages.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30029248      PMCID: PMC6056183          DOI: 10.1115/1.4040458

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech Eng        ISSN: 0148-0731            Impact factor:   2.097


  21 in total

1.  Strength of the cervical spine in compression and bending.

Authors:  Andrzej S Przybyla; Daniel Skrzypiec; Phillip Pollintine; Patricia Dolan; Michael A Adams
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-07-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 2.  Biomaterials in orthopaedics.

Authors:  M Navarro; A Michiardi; O Castaño; J A Planell
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2008-10-06       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  In vitro degradation of a poly(propylene fumarate)-based composite material.

Authors:  M J Yaszemski; R G Payne; W C Hayes; R Langer; A G Mikos
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 12.479

4.  Revision strategies for salvaging or improving failed cylindrical cages.

Authors:  P C McAfee; B W Cunningham; G A Lee; C M Orbegoso; C J Haggerty; I L Fedder; S L Griffith
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  The mechanical properties and osteoconductivity of hydroxyapatite bone scaffolds with multi-scale porosity.

Authors:  Joseph R Woodard; Amanda J Hilldore; Sheeny K Lan; C J Park; Abby W Morgan; Jo Ann C Eurell; Sherrie G Clark; Matthew B Wheeler; Russell D Jamison; Amy J Wagoner Johnson
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2006-09-11       Impact factor: 12.479

6.  In vitro biomechanical investigation of the stability and stress-shielding effect of lumbar interbody fusion devices.

Authors:  M Kanayama; B W Cunningham; C J Haggerty; K Abumi; K Kaneda; P C McAfee
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 5.115

7.  Soft and hard tissue response to photocrosslinked poly(propylene fumarate) scaffolds in a rabbit model.

Authors:  John P Fisher; Johan W M Vehof; David Dean; Jan Paul C M van der Waerden; Theresa A Holland; Antonios G Mikos; John A Jansen
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  2002-03-05

8.  Photocrosslinking characteristics and mechanical properties of diethyl fumarate/poly(propylene fumarate) biomaterials.

Authors:  John P Fisher; David Dean; Antonios G Mikos
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 12.479

9.  Anterior and posterior variations in mechanical properties of human vertebrae measured by nanoindentation.

Authors:  Hugo Giambini; Hua-Jun Wang; Chunfeng Zhao; Qingshan Chen; Ahmad Nassr; Kai-Nan An
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2012-11-23       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  Beyond bar and line graphs: time for a new data presentation paradigm.

Authors:  Tracey L Weissgerber; Natasa M Milic; Stacey J Winham; Vesna D Garovic
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  4 in total

1.  Single-level subject-specific finite element model can predict fracture outcomes in three-level spine segments under different loading rates.

Authors:  Asghar Rezaei; Maryam Tilton; Yong Li; Michael J Yaszemski; Lichun Lu
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2021-09-09       Impact factor: 6.698

2.  Injectable Catalyst-Free Poly(Propylene Fumarate) System Cross-Linked by Strain Promoted Alkyne-Azide Cycloaddition Click Chemistry for Spine Defect Filling.

Authors:  Xifeng Liu; A Lee Miller; Hao Xu; Brian E Waletzki; Lichun Lu
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 6.988

3.  Three-dimensional surface strain analyses of simulated defect and augmented spine segments: A biomechanical cadaveric study.

Authors:  Asghar Rezaei; Maryam Tilton; Hugo Giambini; Yong Li; Alexander Hooke; Alan L Miller Ii; Michael J Yaszemski; Lichun Lu
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2021-04-23

4.  CT-based structural analyses of vertebral fractures with polymeric augmentation: A study of cadaveric three-level spine segments.

Authors:  Asghar Rezaei; Hugo Giambini; Alan L Miller Ii; Hao Xu; Haocheng Xu; Yong Li; Michael J Yaszemski; Lichun Lu
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 6.698

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.