Literature DB >> 31479817

Mechanical testing setups affect spine segment fracture outcomes.

Asghar Rezaei1, Hugo Giambini2, Kent D Carlson3, Hao Xu1, Susheil Uthamaraj4, Dan Dragomir-Daescu3, Michael J Yaszemski1, Lichun Lu5.   

Abstract

The purpose of the work presented here was to establish an experimental testing configuration that would generate a bending compression fracture in a laboratory setting. To this end, we designed and fabricated a fixture to accommodate a three level spine segment and to be able to perform mechanical testing by applying an off-centric compressive loading to create a flexion-type motion. Forces and moments occurring during testing were measured with a six-channel load cell. The initial testing configuration (Fixture A) included plates connected to the superior potted vertebral body and to the ball-socket joint of the testing system ram. Surprisingly, while all cadaveric specimens underwent a similar off-centric compressive loading, most of the specimens showed extension outcomes as opposed to the intended pure-flexion motion. The extension was due to fixture size and weight; by applying an off-centric load directly on the top plate, unintended large shear forces were generated. To resolve the issue, several modifications were made to the original fixture configuration. These modifications included the removal of the superior plates and the implementation of wedges at the superior surface of the fixture (Fixture B). A synthetic sample was used during this modification phase to minimize the number of cadaveric specimens while optimizing the process. The best outcomes were consistently observed when a 15°-wedge was used to provide flexion-type loading. Cadaveric specimens were then experimentally tested to fracture using the modified testing configuration (Fixture B). A comparison between both fixtures, A and B, revealed that almost all biomechanical parameters, including force, moment, and displacement data, were affected by the testing setup. These results suggest that fixture design and implementation for testing is of extreme importance, and can influence the fracture properties and affect the intended motion.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomechanical analysis; Flexion bending moment; Mechanical testing fixture; Spine fracture; Spine motion segment

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31479817      PMCID: PMC8686181          DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.103399

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater        ISSN: 1878-0180


  31 in total

1.  Noninvasive prediction of vertebral body compressive strength using nonlinear finite element method and an image based technique.

Authors:  Ahad Zeinali; Bijan Hashemi; Shahram Akhlaghpoor
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 2.685

Review 2.  Biomechanics of the human intervertebral disc: A review of testing techniques and results.

Authors:  N Newell; J P Little; A Christou; M A Adams; C J Adam; S D Masouros
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2017-01-31

Review 3.  Biomechanics of metastatic disease in the vertebral column.

Authors:  Cari M Whyne
Journal:  Neurol Res       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 2.448

4.  Burst fracture in the metastatically involved spine: development, validation, and parametric analysis of a three-dimensional poroelastic finite-element model.

Authors:  Cari M Whyne; Serena S Hu; Jeffery C Lotz
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 5.  Mechanical testing of the spine. An appraisal of methodology, results, and conclusions.

Authors:  M A Adams
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1995-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Biomechanical evaluation of an injectable and biodegradable copolymer P(PF-co-CL) in a cadaveric vertebral body defect model.

Authors:  Zhong Fang; Hugo Giambini; Heng Zeng; Jon J Camp; Mahrokh Dadsetan; Richard A Robb; Kai-Nan An; Michael J Yaszemski; Lichun Lu
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 3.845

7.  Postfracture instability of vertebrae with simulated defects can be predicted from computed tomography data.

Authors:  H Windhagen; J A Hipp; W C Hayes
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-07-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  The effect of cement augmentation on the geometry and structural response of recovered osteopenic vertebrae: an anterior-wedge fracture model.

Authors:  Ron N Alkalay; Dietrich von Stechow; Katherine Torres; Serhan Hassan; Robert Sommerich; David Zurakowski
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Female Human Spines with Simulated Osteolytic Defects: CT-based Structural Analysis of Vertebral Body Strength.

Authors:  Ron Alkalay; Robert Adamson; Alexander Miropolsky; David Hackney
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Specimen-specific nonlinear finite element modeling to predict vertebrae fracture loads after vertebroplasty.

Authors:  Y Matsuura; H Giambini; Y Ogawa; Z Fang; A R Thoreson; M J Yaszemski; L Lu; K N An
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  2 in total

1.  Three-dimensional surface strain analyses of simulated defect and augmented spine segments: A biomechanical cadaveric study.

Authors:  Asghar Rezaei; Maryam Tilton; Hugo Giambini; Yong Li; Alexander Hooke; Alan L Miller Ii; Michael J Yaszemski; Lichun Lu
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2021-04-23

2.  CT-based structural analyses of vertebral fractures with polymeric augmentation: A study of cadaveric three-level spine segments.

Authors:  Asghar Rezaei; Hugo Giambini; Alan L Miller Ii; Hao Xu; Haocheng Xu; Yong Li; Michael J Yaszemski; Lichun Lu
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 6.698

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.