Literature DB >> 33876338

Does ultrasonographic assessment of gastric antrum correlate with gastric residual volume in critically ill patients? A prospective observational study.

Gurhan Taskin1, Volkan Inal2, Levent Yamanel3.   

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between ultrasonographic gastric antral measurements and aspirated gastric residual volume (GRV) in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients receiving enteral nutrition (EN). This prospective observational study included 56 enterally-fed critically ill patients in one-year period. All imaging procedures were done at 30-degree head-of-bed elevation and supine position on epigastric region of abdomen with 2.5-6 MHz convex-array probe just before routine GRV aspiration. The antral cross-sectional area (CSA) was calculated by measuring the anteroposterior (dAP) and craniocaudal diameters (dCC) of the gastric antrum. Total 283 ultrasonographic gastric antrum imaging procedures were done. In only eight (2.82%) attempts, the antrum could not be visualized due to inhibition from intra-gastric air or gas in the surrounding intestinal lumen. The calculated mean antral CSA was 568.15 ± 348.37 mm2 (103.43-2,846.30). The antral CSA correlated significantly with aspirated GRV, and the antral CSA increased linearly with increasing aspirated GRV (R2 = 0.73, p < 0.0001). In Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis of antral CSA ≥ 920 mm2 (mean + 1*SD) for estimating aspirated GRV, the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.848 (95% CI, 0.76 ~ 0.93) (p < 0.0001), and ROC analysis of antral CSA to discriminate aspirated GRV ≥ 250 mL showed a significant relation (AUC = 0.969, 95% CI 0.94 ~ 0.99, p < 0.0001). Ultrasonographic measurement of gastric antral CSA is an easy and reliable bedside procedure to estimate GRV in critically ill patients receiving EN in 30-degree head-of-bed elevation and supine position. Trial registration number: NCT04413474, date of registration: June 17, 2020, retrospectively registered.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Critical care; Enteral nutrition; Feeding intolerance; Gastric volume; Ultrasonography

Year:  2021        PMID: 33876338     DOI: 10.1007/s10877-021-00707-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


  25 in total

1.  Monitoring for intolerance to gastric tube feedings: a national survey.

Authors:  Norma A Metheny; Andrew C Mills; Barbara J Stewart
Journal:  Am J Crit Care       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.228

2.  Provision of protein and energy in relation to measured requirements in intensive care patients.

Authors:  Matilde Jo Allingstrup; Negar Esmailzadeh; Anne Wilkens Knudsen; Kurt Espersen; Tom Hartvig Jensen; Jørgen Wiis; Anders Perner; Jens Kondrup
Journal:  Clin Nutr       Date:  2011-12-29       Impact factor: 7.324

3.  Guidelines for the Provision and Assessment of Nutrition Support Therapy in the Adult Critically Ill Patient: Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) and American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (A.S.P.E.N.).

Authors:  Stephen A McClave; Beth E Taylor; Robert G Martindale; Malissa M Warren; Debbie R Johnson; Carol Braunschweig; Mary S McCarthy; Evangelia Davanos; Todd W Rice; Gail A Cresci; Jane M Gervasio; Gordon S Sacks; Pamela R Roberts; Charlene Compher
Journal:  JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.016

4.  Optimal amount of calories for critically ill patients: depends on how you slice the cake!

Authors:  Daren K Heyland; Naomi Cahill; Andrew G Day
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 5.  Definition, prevalence, and outcome of feeding intolerance in intensive care: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  A Reintam Blaser; J Starkopf; Ü Kirsimägi; A M Deane
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 2.105

6.  Gastric residual volume during enteral nutrition in ICU patients: the REGANE study.

Authors:  J C Montejo; E Miñambres; L Bordejé; A Mesejo; J Acosta; A Heras; M Ferré; F Fernandez-Ortega; C I Vaquerizo; R Manzanedo
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  Poor validity of residual volumes as a marker for risk of aspiration in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Stephen A McClave; James K Lukan; James A Stefater; Cynthia C Lowen; Stephen W Looney; Paul J Matheson; Kevin Gleeson; David A Spain
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 7.598

8.  Gastric emptying of water in obese pregnant women at term.

Authors:  Cynthia A Wong; Robert J McCarthy; Paul C Fitzgerald; Kiril Raikoff; Michael J Avram
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 5.108

9.  Gastric emptying of water in term pregnancy.

Authors:  Cynthia A Wong; Mariann Loffredi; Jeanne N Ganchiff; Jia Zhao; Zhao Wang; Michael J Avram
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 7.892

10.  Aspirating gastric residuals causes occlusion of small-bore feeding tubes.

Authors:  K S Powell; S P Marcuard; E S Farrior; M L Gallagher
Journal:  JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr       Date:  1993 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.016

View more
  2 in total

1.  Gastric Ultrasound: POCUSing an Intolerant GUT!

Authors:  Amol Trimbakrao Kothekar; Anand Vinaykumar Joshi
Journal:  Indian J Crit Care Med       Date:  2022-09

2.  Serial Ultrasonographic-measurement of Gastric Residual Volume in Critically Ill Patients for Prediction of Gastric Tube Feed Intolerance.

Authors:  Basavaraj Ankalagi; Preet Mohinder Singh; Vimi Rewari; Rashmi Ramachandran; Richa Aggarwal; Kapil Dev Soni; Debashish Das; Kumble Seetharama Madhusudhan; Deep Narayan Srivastava; Manpreet Kaur; Anjan Trikha
Journal:  Indian J Crit Care Med       Date:  2022-09
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.