Literature DB >> 15699835

Poor validity of residual volumes as a marker for risk of aspiration in critically ill patients.

Stephen A McClave1, James K Lukan, James A Stefater, Cynthia C Lowen, Stephen W Looney, Paul J Matheson, Kevin Gleeson, David A Spain.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Elevated residual volumes (RV), considered a marker for the risk of aspiration, are used to regulate the delivery of enteral tube feeding. We designed this prospective study to validate such use.
METHODS: Critically ill patients undergoing mechanical ventilation in the medical, coronary, or surgical intensive care units in a university-based tertiary care hospital, placed on intragastric enteral tube feeding through nasogastric or percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes, were included in this study. Patients were fed Probalance (Nestle USA) to provide 25 kcal/kg per day (to which 10 yellow microscopic beads and 4.5 mL of blue food coloring per 1,500 mL was added). Patients were randomized to one of two groups based on management of RV: cessation of enteral tube feeding for RV >400 mL in study patients or for RV >200 mL in controls. Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) III, bowel function score, and aspiration risk score were determined. Bedside evaluations were done every 4 hrs for 3 days to measure RV, to detect blue food coloring, to check patient position, and to collect secretions from the trachea and oropharynx. Aspiration/regurgitation events were defined by the detection of yellow color in tracheal/oropharyngeal samples by fluorometry. Analysis was done by analysis of variance, Spearman's correlation, Student's t-test, Tukey's method, and Cochran-Armitage test.
RESULTS: Forty patients (mean age, 44.6 yrs; range, 18-88 yrs; 70% male; mean APACHE III score, 40.9 [range, 12-85]) were evaluated (21 on nasogastric, 19 on percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy feeds) and entered into the study. Based on 1,118 samples (531 oral, 587 tracheal), the mean frequency of regurgitation per patient was 31.3% (range, 0% to 94%), with a mean RV for all regurgitation events of 35.1 mL (range, 0-700 mL). The mean frequency of aspiration per patient was 22.1% (range, 0% to 94%), with a mean RV for all aspiration events of 30.6 mL (range, 0-700 mL). The median RV for both regurgitation and aspiration events was 5 mL. Over a wide range of RV, increasing from 0 mL to >400 mL, the frequency of regurgitation and aspiration did not change appreciably. Aspiration risk and bowel function scores did not correlate with the incidence of aspiration or regurgitation. Blue food coloring was detected on only three of the 1,118 (0.27%) samples. RV was < or =50 mL on 84.1% and >400 mL on 1.4% of bedside evaluations. Sensitivities for detecting aspiration per designated RV were as follows: 400 mL = 1.5%; 300 mL = 2.3%; 200 mL = 3.0%; and 150 mL = 4.5%. Low RV did not assure the absence of events, because the frequency of aspiration was 23.0% when RV was <150 mL. Raising the designated RV for cessation of enteral tube feeding from 200 mL to 400 mL did not increase the risk, because the frequency of aspiration was no different between controls (21.6%) and study patients (22.6%). The frequency of regurgitation was significantly less for patients with percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes compared with those with nasogastric tubes (20.3% vs. 40.7%, respectively; p = .046). There was no correlation between the incidence of pneumonia and the frequency of regurgitation or aspiration.
CONCLUSIONS: Blue food coloring should not be used as a clinical monitor. Converting nasogastric tubes to percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes may be a successful strategy to reduce the risk of aspiration. No appropriate designated RV level to identify aspiration could be derived as a result of poor sensitivity over a wide range of RV. Study results do not support the conventional use of RV as a marker for the risk of aspiration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15699835     DOI: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000153413.46627.3a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  45 in total

1.  Interleukin-6 mediates pulmonary vascular permeability in a two-hit model of ventilator-associated lung injury.

Authors:  Ozlem U Gurkan; Chaoxia He; Rachel Zielinski; Hamid Rabb; Landon S King; Jeffrey M Dodd-o; Franco R D'Alessio; Neil Aggarwal; David Pearse; Patrice M Becker
Journal:  Exp Lung Res       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 2.459

2.  Endoscopic placement of enteral feeding tubes.

Authors:  Gerard P Rafferty; Tony Ck Tham
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2010-05-16

Review 3.  A comparison of early gastric and post-pyloric feeding in critically ill patients: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kwok M Ho; Geoffrey J Dobb; Steven A R Webb
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 4.  Mechanisms underlying feed intolerance in the critically ill: implications for treatment.

Authors:  Adam Deane; Marianne J Chapman; Robert J Fraser; Laura K Bryant; Carly Burgstad; Nam Q Nguyen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-08-07       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Inflammation and the host response to injury, a large-scale collaborative project: patient-oriented research core--standard operating procedures for clinical care VIII--Nutritional support of the trauma patient.

Authors:  Grant E O'Keefe; Marilyn Shelton; Joseph Cuschieri; Ernest E Moore; Stephen F Lowry; Brain G Harbrecht; Ronald V Maier
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2008-12

6.  A comparative observational study of early versus delayed feeding after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy.

Authors:  Manoj A Vyawahare; Mrunal Shirodkar; Amit Gharat; Prachi Patil; Shaesta Mehta; K M Mohandas
Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-08-17

7.  Tolerance of enteral feeding: from quantity to quality of gastric residual volume?

Authors:  Michele Umbrello; Giovanluigi Elia; Anne Lucia Leona Destrebecq; Gaetano Iapichino
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2009-06-13       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 8.  Current trends in critical care nutrition.

Authors:  Jinesh P Mehta; Bashar Chihada Alhariri; Mihir Kishorchandra Patel
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2011-08

9.  Challenges to optimal enteral nutrition in a multidisciplinary pediatric intensive care unit.

Authors:  Nilesh M Mehta; Dianne McAleer; Susan Hamilton; Elizabeth Naples; Kristen Leavitt; Paul Mitchell; Christopher Duggan
Journal:  JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 4.016

10.  ACG Clinical Guideline: Nutrition Therapy in the Adult Hospitalized Patient.

Authors:  Stephen A McClave; John K DiBaise; Gerard E Mullin; Robert G Martindale
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 10.864

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.