OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of increasing the limit for gastric residual volume (GRV) in the adequacy of enteral nutrition. Frequency of gastrointestinal complications and outcome variables were secondary goals. DESIGN: An open, prospective, randomized study. SETTING:Twenty-eight intensive care units in Spain. PATIENTS: Three hundred twenty-nine intubated and mechanically ventilated adult patients with enteral nutrition (EN). INTERVENTIONS: EN was administered by nasogastric tube. A protocol for management of EN-related gastrointestinal complications was used. Patients were randomized to be included in a control (GRV = 200 ml) or in study group (GRV = 500 ml). MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS:Diet volume ratio (diet received/diet prescribed), incidence of gastrointestinal complications, ICU-acquired pneumonia, days on mechanical ventilation and ICU length of stay were the study variables. Gastrointestinal complications were higher in the control group (63.6 vs. 47.8%, P = 0.004), but the only difference was in the frequency of high GRV (42.4 vs. 26.8%, P = 0.003). The diet volume ratio was higher for the study group only during the 1st week (84.48 vs. 88.20%) (P = 0.0002). Volume ratio was similar for both groups in weeks 3 and 4. Duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU length of stay or frequency of pneumonia were similar. CONCLUSIONS:Diet volume ratio of mechanically ventilated patients treated withenteral nutrition is not affected by increasing the limit in GRV. A limit of 500 ml is not associated with adverse effects in gastrointestinal complications or in outcome variables. A value of 500 ml can be equally recommended as a normal limit for GRV.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of increasing the limit for gastric residual volume (GRV) in the adequacy of enteral nutrition. Frequency of gastrointestinal complications and outcome variables were secondary goals. DESIGN: An open, prospective, randomized study. SETTING: Twenty-eight intensive care units in Spain. PATIENTS: Three hundred twenty-nine intubated and mechanically ventilated adult patients with enteral nutrition (EN). INTERVENTIONS: EN was administered by nasogastric tube. A protocol for management of EN-related gastrointestinal complications was used. Patients were randomized to be included in a control (GRV = 200 ml) or in study group (GRV = 500 ml). MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Diet volume ratio (diet received/diet prescribed), incidence of gastrointestinal complications, ICU-acquired pneumonia, days on mechanical ventilation and ICU length of stay were the study variables. Gastrointestinal complications were higher in the control group (63.6 vs. 47.8%, P = 0.004), but the only difference was in the frequency of high GRV (42.4 vs. 26.8%, P = 0.003). The diet volume ratio was higher for the study group only during the 1st week (84.48 vs. 88.20%) (P = 0.0002). Volume ratio was similar for both groups in weeks 3 and 4. Duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU length of stay or frequency of pneumonia were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Diet volume ratio of mechanically ventilated patients treated with enteral nutrition is not affected by increasing the limit in GRV. A limit of 500 ml is not associated with adverse effects in gastrointestinal complications or in outcome variables. A value of 500 ml can be equally recommended as a normal limit for GRV.
Authors: Adam Deane; Marianne J Chapman; Robert J Fraser; Laura K Bryant; Carly Burgstad; Nam Q Nguyen Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2007-08-07 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Stephen A McClave; Mark T DeMeo; Mark H DeLegge; James A DiSario; Daren K Heyland; James P Maloney; Norma A Metheny; Frederick A Moore; James S Scolapio; David A Spain; Gary P Zaloga Journal: JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr Date: 2002 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 4.016
Authors: S A McClave; L K Sexton; D A Spain; J L Adams; N A Owens; M B Sullins; B S Blandford; H L Snider Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 1999-07 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Juan C Montejo; Teodoro Grau; Jose Acosta; Sergio Ruiz-Santana; Mercé Planas; Abelardo García-De-Lorenzo; Alfonso Mesejo; Manuel Cervera; Carmen Sánchez-Alvarez; Rafael Núñez-Ruiz; Jorge López-Martínez Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2002-04 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Stephen A McClave; Jill Gualdoni; Annie Nagengast; Luis S Marsano; Kathryn Bandy; Robert G Martindale Journal: Curr Gastroenterol Rep Date: 2020-01-07
Authors: Andrew Rhodes; Laura E Evans; Waleed Alhazzani; Mitchell M Levy; Massimo Antonelli; Ricard Ferrer; Anand Kumar; Jonathan E Sevransky; Charles L Sprung; Mark E Nunnally; Bram Rochwerg; Gordon D Rubenfeld; Derek C Angus; Djillali Annane; Richard J Beale; Geoffrey J Bellinghan; Gordon R Bernard; Jean-Daniel Chiche; Craig Coopersmith; Daniel P De Backer; Craig J French; Seitaro Fujishima; Herwig Gerlach; Jorge Luis Hidalgo; Steven M Hollenberg; Alan E Jones; Dilip R Karnad; Ruth M Kleinpell; Younsuk Koh; Thiago Costa Lisboa; Flavia R Machado; John J Marini; John C Marshall; John E Mazuski; Lauralyn A McIntyre; Anthony S McLean; Sangeeta Mehta; Rui P Moreno; John Myburgh; Paolo Navalesi; Osamu Nishida; Tiffany M Osborn; Anders Perner; Colleen M Plunkett; Marco Ranieri; Christa A Schorr; Maureen A Seckel; Christopher W Seymour; Lisa Shieh; Khalid A Shukri; Steven Q Simpson; Mervyn Singer; B Taylor Thompson; Sean R Townsend; Thomas Van der Poll; Jean-Louis Vincent; W Joost Wiersinga; Janice L Zimmerman; R Phillip Dellinger Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2017-01-18 Impact factor: 17.440