| Literature DB >> 33868923 |
Dongze Zhu1, Jun Fu1, Ling Wang2, Zheng Guo1, Zhen Wang1, Hongbin Fan1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Surgery for Ewing sarcoma involving acetabulum in children is challenging. Considering the intrinsic structure of immature pelvis, trans-acetabular osteotomy through triradiate cartilage might be applied. The study was to describe the surgical technique and function outcomes of trans-acetabular osteotomy through triradiate cartilage and reconstruction with customized, 3D-printed prosthesis.Entities:
Keywords: 3D printing; Acetabulum; Ewing sarcoma; Pelvis; Prosthesis
Year: 2021 PMID: 33868923 PMCID: PMC8022806 DOI: 10.1016/j.jot.2020.12.006
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Orthop Translat ISSN: 2214-031X Impact factor: 5.191
Clinical data of children undergone trans-acetabular osteotomy for tumor excision.
| Study/Year | Pelvic zone involved (pts No.) | Age (year) | Indications | Recon. (pts No) | FU (month) | Functional score (MSTS) | Status (pts No) | Complications | Potential advantages | Limitations | Future development |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ozaki et al. [ | Ilium and acetabulum close to TRC (3); pubis and acetabulum close to TRC (1) | 7.8 | Open TRC and no tumor crossing | None (1); hip transposition (3) | 21 | Excellent (1); Fair (3) | ANED (2); DOD (1); AWD (1) | Major leg-length discrepancy (7–9 cm) | Limb salvage | Arthrosis caused by hip transposition needs further surgery | Solve the problem of postoperative limb deformity |
| Sales et al. [ | Ilio-pubic and ischio-pubic part close to TRC (2) | 8 | Open TRC and no tumor crossing intact ilio ischiatic ramus | None | 144 (1); 36 (1) | Excellent (100%; 90%) | ANED (2) | Medial subluxation; abnormal gait; Trendelenburg limping gait; loss of hip flexion | Limb salvage; preserve partial acetabular development | Not applicable for children with tumor involving upper acetabular component | CAS to increase the safety and accuracy of procedure. |
| Fan et al. [ | Ilium and partial acetabulum (3); pubis and partial acetabulum (4); ischium and partial acetabulum (1) | 12 | Open TRC and no tumor crossing | Allograft and plate (12) | 39 | Excellent (90%) | ANED (6); DOD (1); AWD (1) | Wound healing; leg-length discrepancy (2 cm); screw loosening | Limb salvage; preserve partial acetabular development | Allografts: limited availability; over-size; risk of disease transmission; immunoreaction | To match the growth potential between femoral head and reconstructed acetabulum |
| Current study | Ilium and partial acetabulum (2) | 7 | Open TRC and no tumor crossing | Customized 3D printing prosthesis (2) | 48 (1); 24 (1) | Excellent (93%; 90%) | ANED (2) | Slightly lateral protrusion of femoral head | Limb salvage; preserve partial acetabular development; Geometrical adaptiveness for irregular bone defect | Complex surgical technique and rich surgical experience needed | To match the growth potential between femoral head and reconstructed acetabulum |
TRC: triradiate cartilage; pt: patient; CAS: computer-assisted surgery; Recon.: reconstruction, FU: follow up; ANED: alive with no evidence of disease; DOD: died of disease; AWD: alive with disease
Fig. 1The tumor was located in the ilium and infiltrated the acetabulum close to the triradiate cartilage (TRC). And the osteotomy could be performed through TRC to maximally preserve the un-affected acetabular component.
Fig. 2(A) Pelvic radiograph showed a large osteolytic lesion in the right ilium. (B) Axial CT images showed a large destructive lesion in the right iliac wing with soft tissue mass. (C) The 3D reconstructed CT images showed the expandable osteolytic lesion with soft-tissue invasion. (D) The coronal and sagittal CT images showed that the tumor did not penetrate the triradiate cartilage. (indicated by white arrow).
Fig. 3(A, D) The A-P and lateral view of the prosthesis that was designed to mimic pelvic anatomical structure basing on CT data by Mimics software. (B, E) The A-P and lateral view of the prosthesis with reduced volume after topology optimization. (C) The loading on prosthesis was examined in finite element (FE) model to determine the proper design. (F) The prosthesis was simulated to install on pelvic model.
Fig. 4(A) Gross photography of 3D-printed prostheses (B) Preoperative simulated reconstruction was performed in pelvic model to verify the matching between prosthesis and residual bone. (C) The comparison image of excised tumor and the prosthesis. (D) The 3D-printed prosthesis was implanted after tumor excision.
Fig. 5(A) Pelvic radiograph at 48 months postoperatively; (B) CT indicated that the bone was tightly bound to the prosthesis at the interface 48 months postoperatively; (C) Radiograph of the full length of both lower limbs at 48 months postoperatively.
Fig. 6(A) Weight-bearing position of the patient. (B) Flexion position of the patient. (C) External position of the patient. (D) Internal position of the patient. (E) Abduction position of the patient.
Fig. 7(A, B) The X-ray and MRI of pelvis indicated the lesion of left ilium and upper acetabular component with soft tissue mass. (C, D) The coronal and sagittal CT images showed the tumor did not penetrate the triradiate cartilage (indicated by white arrow).
Fig. 8(A, D) The A-P and lateral view of the prosthesis that was designed to mimic pelvic anatomical structure basing on CT data by Mimics software. (B, E) The A-P and lateral view of the prosthesis with reduced volume after topology optimization. (C) The prosthesis was examined in finite element (FE) model. (F) The prosthesis was simulated to install on pelvic model.
Fig. 9(A) Pre-operative CT reconstruction showed the lesion located in left ilium and upper acetabular component; (B) The prosthesis was simulated to be implanted in pelvic model to verify the matching; (C) The comparison photograph of pelvic model and excised tumor; (D) The intra-operative image showed the prosthesis was implanted to fill the defect.
Fig. 10(A) Pelvic radiograph immediately after operation; (B) CT scans at 24 months postoperatively; (C, D) 3D reconstruction of CT image showed the prosthesis was in appropriate position and femoral head had adequate coverage.