Literature DB >> 27844229

One-step reconstruction with a 3D-printed, custom-made prosthesis after total en bloc sacrectomy: a technical note.

Ran Wei1, Wei Guo2, Tao Ji1, Yidan Zhang1, Haijie Liang1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Surgeries for primary malignancies involving upper sacrum require total en bloc sacrectomy followed by complex mechanical reconstruction, which might be simplified by application of the three-dimensional (3D) printing technique. PURPOSES: To describe the design of a 3D-printed custom-made prosthesis for reconstruction after total en bloc sacrectomy, the surgical technique, and the clinical and functional outcome of a patient.
METHODS: A 62-year-old patient with recurrent sacral chordoma was admitted in our center. One-stage total en bloc sacrectomy through posterior approach was planned, and a 3D-printed sacral prosthesis was prepared for reconstruction according to the anticipated osteotomic planes.
RESULTS: The patient received one-stage total en bloc sacrectomy through posterior approach followed by reconstruction with the 3D-printed sacral prosthesis. The whole procedure took 5 h, and intra-operative blood loss was 3400 ml. The patient recovered uneventfully and started ambulation at 3 weeks after surgery. An asymptomatic instrument failure was found radiographically at 8-month follow-up. At 1 year after surgery, the patient was disease free and could walk over short distance with crutches without pain or any mechanical instability.
CONCLUSIONS: The advantages of our reconstruction method included: (1) the prosthesis provided an optimal reconstruction of lumbosacral and pelvic ring by integrating spinal pelvic fixation, posterior pelvic ring fixation, and anterior spinal column fixation in one step and (2) its porous surface could induce bone ingrowth and might enhance stability. Although there was an instrumental failure, we considered that it could be one reconstructive option. More research is warranted focusing on the modification of locations, diameters, and quantity of screws and biomechanical characteristics. The long-term functional and bone in-growth outcome will be followed to validate the use of the prosthesis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D printing; Chordoma; Oncology; Prosthesis; Reconstruction; Total en bloc sacrectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27844229     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-016-4871-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  26 in total

Review 1.  Long-term survival following total sacrectomy with reconstruction for the treatment of primary osteosarcoma of the sacrum. A case report.

Authors:  D A Spiegel; W J Richardson; S P Scully; J M Harrelson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Reconstructive surgery using dual U-shaped rod instrumentation after posterior en bloc sacral hemiresection for metastatic tumor: case report.

Authors:  Seung-Hoon Lim; Dae-Jean Jo; Sung-Min Kim; Young-Jin Lim
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2015-07-31

3.  One-step reconstruction with a 3D-printed, biomechanically evaluated custom implant after complex pelvic tumor resection.

Authors:  K C Wong; S M Kumta; N V Geel; J Demol
Journal:  Comput Aided Surg       Date:  2015-08-20

Review 4.  Total sacrectomy and Galveston L-rod reconstruction for malignant neoplasms. Technical note.

Authors:  Z L Gokaslan; M M Romsdahl; S S Kroll; G L Walsh; T A Gillis; D M Wildrick; M E Leavens
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 5.115

5.  The Galveston technique for L rod instrumentation of the scoliotic spine.

Authors:  B L Allen; R L Ferguson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1982 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Reconstruction after total en bloc sacrectomy for osteosarcoma using a custom-made prosthesis: a technical note.

Authors:  P Wuisman; O Lieshout; M van Dijk; P van Diest
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 7.  Surgical techniques for spinopelvic reconstruction following total sacrectomy: a systematic review.

Authors:  S Samuel Bederman; Kalpit N Shah; Jeffrey M Hassan; Bang H Hoang; P Douglas Kiester; Nitin N Bhatia
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Total sacrectomy and reconstruction: oncologic and functional outcome.

Authors:  P Wuisman; O Lieshout; S Sugihara; M van Dijk
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Gait-simulating fatigue loading analysis and sagittal alignment failure of spinal pelvic reconstruction after total sacrectomy: comparison of 3 techniques.

Authors:  Aaron J Clark; Jessica A Tang; Jeremi M Leasure; Michael E Ivan; Dimitriy Kondrashov; Jenni M Buckley; Vedat Deviren; Christopher P Ames
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2014-01-24

10.  3D printed Ti6Al4V implant surface promotes bone maturation and retains a higher density of less aged osteocytes at the bone-implant interface.

Authors:  Furqan A Shah; Anders Snis; Aleksandar Matic; Peter Thomsen; Anders Palmquist
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 8.947

View more
  25 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review of 3D printing in spinal surgery: the current state of play.

Authors:  Ben Wilcox; Ralph J Mobbs; Ai-Min Wu; Kevin Phan
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-09

Review 2.  Recent Research Advances in Biologic Bone Graft Materials for Spine Surgery.

Authors:  Mark A Plantz; Wellington K Hsu
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2020-06

Review 3.  [3D printing in spinal surgery-Update].

Authors:  S Roth; S Sehmisch; S Decker
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 1.000

4.  Lumbopelvic shortening and local host bone-to-host bone reconstruction: a surgical method for lumbopelvic fusion following total sacrectomy.

Authors:  Ahmed Cherry; Colby Oitment; Jay Wunder; Peter Ferguson; Raja Rampersaud
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-09-03       Impact factor: 2.721

Review 5.  The evolution of three-dimensional technology in musculoskeletal oncology.

Authors:  Vishaal Nanik Thadani; Muhammad Jahangir Riaz; Gurpal Singh
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2018-07-25

Review 6.  Three-dimensional Printing in Orthopaedic Surgery: Current Applications and Future Developments.

Authors:  Colleen M Wixted; Jonathan R Peterson; Rishin J Kadakia; Samuel B Adams
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev       Date:  2021-04-20

7.  Biomechanics of artificial pedicle fixation in a 3D-printed prosthesis after total en bloc spondylectomy: a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Xiaodong Wang; Hanpeng Xu; Ye Han; Jincheng Wu; Yang Song; Yuanyuan Jiang; Jianzhong Wang; Jun Miao
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 2.359

8.  Comparative efficacy of intraoperative extracorporeal irradiated and alcohol-inactivated autograft reimplantation for the management of osteosarcomas-a multicentre retrospective study.

Authors:  Meitao Xu; Ming Xu; Shuai Zhang; Hanqing Li; A I Qiuchi; Xiuchun Yu; Xu Quan Wang
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 2.754

9.  Clinical study of 3D printed personalized prosthesis in the treatment of bone defect after pelvic tumor resection.

Authors:  Lin Xu; Hao Qin; Jia Tan; Zhilin Cheng; Xiang Luo; Haitao Tan; Wenhua Huang
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Individual resection and reconstruction of pelvic tumor with three-dimensional printed customized hemi-pelvic prosthesis: A case report.

Authors:  Qing Han; Kesong Zhang; Yong Zhang; Chenyu Wang; Kerong Yang; Yun Zou; Bingpeng Chen; Jincheng Wang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.