Literature DB >> 701308

Resection and reconstruction for primary neoplasms involving the innominate bone.

W F Enneking, W K Dunham.   

Abstract

Using described criteria for the selection of patients for excision or resection of tumors involving various portions of the innominate bone, as opposed to hemipelvectomy, fifty-seven out of the more than 200 patients evaluated were judged to be candidates for a curative procedure. Of these, twenty-five were selected for hemipelvectomy and thirty-two, for non-amputative procedures. Depending on the location and extent of the lesion as determined by complete preoperative work-ups, three types of procedures were performed singly or in combination:(1) wide excision or radical resection of the iliac wing; (2) periacetabular wide excision or radical resection; or (3) wide excision or radical resection of the pubis. Reconstruction was accomplished when the hip joint was excised by fusion or the creation of a pseudarthrosis either medially in relation to the pubis or laterally in relation to the ilium or wing of the sacrum. The results after follow-ups of one to seventeen years were assessed in terms of the immediate goals of surgery, control of the disease, and function. The findings were as follows: With the preoperative assessment and operative techniques described, an oncologically adequate procedure was performed in two-thirds of the cases. In the remaining cases, the adequacy of the procedure was compromised by poorly planned biopsies, occult microextensions, and surgical errors. The recurrence rate was high after the inadequate procedure (100 per cent) and low (4 per cent) after the adequately accomplished procedures. Function was nearly normal when the hip joint was preserved. If the hip joint was removed and fusion was obtained, the results were good, but fusion was obtained in only 50 percent of the cases in which it was attempted. If the hip joint was removed and pseudarthrosis resulted, the results ranged from good to poor. Sciatic-nerve involvement necessitating resection of the nerve was not a contraindication to a non-amputative procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1978        PMID: 701308

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  160 in total

1.  The anatomy of proximal femoral autografts for pelvic reconstruction: a cadaveric study.

Authors:  Shoufeng Wang; Jin Xiong; Chaoshuang Zhan; Aiguo Wang; Yixin Chen; Qing Jiang; Yong Qiu
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2011-12-03       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  Flail hip joint following periacetabular tumor resection of the pelvis using upper surface of the femoral neck as a saddle: A case report.

Authors:  Masatsugu Takami; Makoto Ieguchi; Masanari Aono; Manabu Hoshi; Jun Takada; Naoto Oebisu; Tadashi Iwai
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 2.967

3.  Periacetabular reconstruction with a new endoprosthesis.

Authors:  Lawrence R Menendez; Elke R Ahlmann; Yuri Falkinstein; Daniel C Allison
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-08-20       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Computer-aided designed, three dimensional-printed hemipelvic prosthesis for peri-acetabular malignant bone tumour.

Authors:  Baichuan Wang; Yongqiang Hao; Feifei Pu; Wenbo Jiang; Zengwu Shao
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 5.  [Osteosarcoma and chondrosarcoma of the pelvis and lower extremities].

Authors:  W K Guder; J Hardes; G Gosheger; M Nottrott; A Streitbürger
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 0.955

6.  Pelvic massive allograft reconstruction after bone tumour resection.

Authors:  Domenico Campanacci; Sara Chacon; Nicola Mondanelli; Giovanni Beltrami; Guido Scoccianti; Giuseppe Caff; Filippo Frenos; Rodolfo Capanna
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Osteosarcoma of the pelvis: outcome analysis of surgical treatment.

Authors:  Bruno Fuchs; Nathan Hoekzema; Dirk R Larson; Carrie Y Inwards; Franklin H Sim
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Mechanical comparison of iliosacral reconstruction techniques after sarcoma resection.

Authors:  Craig R Louer; Nader A Nassif; Michael D Brodt; Daniel J Leib; Matthew J Silva; Douglas J McDonald
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 2.063

9.  Surgical technique: Iliosacral reconstruction with minimal spinal instrumentation.

Authors:  Nader A Nassif; Jacob M Buchowski; Kelly Osterman; Douglas J McDonald
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-10-13       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Comparison of clinical and functional outcome between surgical treatment and carbon ion radiotherapy for pelvic chondrosarcoma.

Authors:  Hidetatsu Outani; Kenichiro Hamada; Yoshinori Imura; Kazuya Oshima; Tsukasa Sotobori; Yusuke Demizu; Shigeki Kakunaga; Susumu Joyama; Reiko Imai; Tomoaki Okimoto; Norifumi Naka; Ikuo Kudawara; Takafumi Ueda; Nobuhito Araki; Tadashi Kamada; Hideki Yoshikawa
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 3.402

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.