Literature DB >> 26931333

Surgical planning, manufacturing and implantation of an individualized cervical fusion titanium cage using patient-specific data.

Uwe Spetzger1, Miles Frasca2, Stefan Alexander König3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Most cervical fusion cages imperfectly mimic the anatomy of the intervertebral disc space. The production of individualized cages might be the next step to further improve spinal implants due to their enhanced load-bearing surface.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the planning, manufacturing, and implantation of an individualized cervical cage in co-operation with EIT and 3D Systems.
METHODS: A digital 3D model of the patient's cervical spine was rendered from the patients CT data. It was then possible to correct degenerative deformities by digitally repositioning the vertebrae and virtually resecting the osteophytes. The implantation of the cage can be simulated to check the accuracy of the fit. The cage is made of trabecular titanium and manufactured by Direct Metal Printing.
RESULTS: The pilot project for the implantation of the first individualized cervical cage ever, resulted in a highly accurate fit. During surgery, the cage self-located into the correct position after suspending distraction due to the implants unique end plate design. Furthermore, it was impossible to move the cage in any direction with the inserting instrument after suspending distraction for the same reason. Thus, it can be assumed that an individualized cervical implant provides excellent primary stability.
CONCLUSION: Preconditions for the manufacturing of individualized cervical fusion cages using specific patient data are given. The implantation is uncomplicated. The improved load-bearing surface will lower the rate of implant dislocation and subsidence. The production of individualized cages at a reasonable price has to be evaluated by spine surgeons and the industry.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D modeling; Cervical spine; Computer-aided design; Fusion; Manufacturing; Patient data; Titanium cage

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26931333     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-016-4473-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  11 in total

1.  Reconstructing complex cranial defects with a preformed cranial prosthesis.

Authors:  T C Origitano; R Izquierdo; L B Scannicchio
Journal:  Skull Base Surg       Date:  1995

2.  Evaluation of mobility and stability in the Discover artificial disc: an in vivo motion study using high-accuracy 3D CT data.

Authors:  Martin Skeppholm; Per Svedmark; Marilyn E Noz; Gerald Q Maguire; Henrik Olivecrona; Claes Olerud
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2015-06-05

3.  Subsidence as of 12 months after single-level anterior cervical inter-body fusion. Is it related to clinical outcomes?

Authors:  Chang-Hyun Lee; Ki-Jeong Kim; Seung-Jae Hyun; Jin S Yeom; Tae-Ahn Jahng; Hyun-Jib Kim
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 2.216

4.  Cranioplasty with custom-made implants: analyzing the cases of 10 patients.

Authors:  Horatiu Rotaru; Horatiu Stan; Ioan Stefan Florian; Ralf Schumacher; Yong-Tae Park; Seong-Gon Kim; Horea Chezan; Nicolae Balc; Mihaela Baciut
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 1.895

5.  Cage subsidence does not, but cervical lordosis improvement does affect the long-term results of anterior cervical fusion with stand-alone cage for degenerative cervical disc disease: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Wen-Jian Wu; Lei-Sheng Jiang; Yu Liang; Li-Yang Dai
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-12-29       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Anterior cervical arthrodesis using a "stand alone" cylindrical titanium cage: prospective analysis of radiographic parameters.

Authors:  Frode Kolstad; Øystein P Nygaard; Hege Andresen; Gunnar Leivseth
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Influence of cervical bone mineral density on cage subsidence in patients following stand-alone anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

Authors:  Christopher Brenke; Martin Dostal; Johann Scharf; Christel Weiß; Kirsten Schmieder; Martin Barth
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Long-term results following titanium cranioplasty of large skull defects.

Authors:  Mario Cabraja; Martin Klein; Thomas-Nikolas Lehmann
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.047

9.  Outcomes of contemporary use of rectangular titanium stand-alone cages in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: cage subsidence and cervical alignment.

Authors:  Toru Yamagata; Toshihiro Takami; Takehiro Uda; Hidetoshi Ikeda; Takashi Nagata; Shinichi Sakamoto; Naohiro Tsuyuguchi; Kenji Ohata
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 1.961

10.  Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: comparison of titanium and polyetheretherketone cages.

Authors:  Mario Cabraja; Soner Oezdemir; Daniel Koeppen; Stefan Kroppenstedt
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2012-09-14       Impact factor: 2.362

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  3-dimensional printing for anterior cervical surgery: a review.

Authors:  Wen Jie Choy; William C H Parr; Kevin Phan; William R Walsh; Ralph J Mobbs
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-12

2.  Design of mulitlevel OLF approach ("V"-shaped decompressive laminoplasty) based on 3D printing technology.

Authors:  Qinjie Ling; Erxing He; Hanbin Ouyang; Jing Guo; Zhixun Yin; Wenhua Huang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Application of a 3D custom printed patient specific spinal implant for C1/2 arthrodesis.

Authors:  Kevin Phan; Alessandro Sgro; Monish M Maharaj; Paul D'Urso; Ralph J Mobbs
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-12

4.  Can an Endplate-conformed Cervical Cage Provide a Better Biomechanical Environment than a Typical Non-conformed Cage?: A Finite Element Model and Cadaver Study.

Authors:  Fan Zhang; Hao-Cheng Xu; Bo Yin; Xin-Lei Xia; Xiao-Sheng Ma; Hong-Li Wang; Jun Yin; Ming-Hao Shao; Fei-Zhou Lyu; Jian-Yuan Jiang
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.071

Review 5.  Systematic review of 3D printing in spinal surgery: the current state of play.

Authors:  Ben Wilcox; Ralph J Mobbs; Ai-Min Wu; Kevin Phan
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-09

Review 6.  3D printed anatomical (bio)models in spine surgery: clinical benefits and value to health care providers.

Authors:  William C H Parr; Joshua L Burnard; Peter John Wilson; Ralph J Mobbs
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-12

Review 7.  [3D printing in spinal surgery-Update].

Authors:  S Roth; S Sehmisch; S Decker
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 1.000

8.  [Effectiveness of three-dimensional printing artificial vertebral body and interbody fusion Cage in anterior cervical surgery].

Authors:  Zhiqiang Wang; Haoyu Feng; Xun Ma; Chen Chen; Chen Deng; Lin Sun
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2021-09-15

9.  Resection of giant invasive sacral schwannoma using image-based customized osteotomy tools.

Authors:  Cheng-Li Lin; Jing-Jing Fang; Ruey-Mo Lin
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 10.  3D Printing Applications in Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery.

Authors:  Megan R Hsu; Meraaj S Haleem; Wellington Hsu
Journal:  Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2018-04-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.