Literature DB >> 23054524

Poor long-term clinical results of saddle prosthesis after resection of periacetabular tumors.

J A Jansen1, M A J van de Sande, P D S Dijkstra.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The saddle prosthesis originally was developed to reconstruct large acetabular defects in revision hip arthroplasty and was used primarily for hip reconstruction after periacetabular tumor resections. The long-term survival of these reconstructions is unclear. QUESTIONS/
PURPOSE: We therefore examined the long-term function, complications, and survival in patients treated with saddle prostheses after periacetabular tumor resection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1987 and 2003 we treated 17 patients with a saddle prosthesis after periacetabular tumor resection (12 chondrosarcomas, three osteosarcomas, one malignant fibrous histiocytoma, one metastasis). During followup, 11 patients died, resulting in a median overall survival of 49 months (95% CI, 30-68 months). The remaining six patients were alive without disease (mean followup, 12.1 years; range, 8.3-16.8 years). In one patient the saddle prosthesis was removed after 3 months owing to dislocation and infection. We obtained SF-36 questionnaires, Toronto Extremity Salvage Scores (TESS), and Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) scores.
RESULTS: Thirteen of 17 patients used walking assists for mobilization at last followup: eight patients required two crutches, five needed one crutch, and one did not use any walking aids. The other three patients were not able to mobilize independently and only made bed to chair transfers. The mean hip flexion in the six surviving patients was 60° (range, 40°-100°) at last followup. Local complications were seen in 14 of the 17 patients: nine wound infections, seven dislocations, and two leg-length discrepancies requiring additional surgery. In the five surviving patients with their index prosthesis still in situ, the mean MSTS score at long-term followup was 47% (range, 20%-77%), the mean TESS score was 53% (range, 41%-67%), and the mean composite SF-36 physical and mental component summaries were 43.9 and 50.6, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Reconstruction with saddle prostheses after periacetabular tumor surgery has a high risk of complications and poor long-term function with limited hip flexion; therefore, we no longer use the saddle prosthesis for reconstruction after periacetabular tumor resections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23054524      PMCID: PMC3528941          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-012-2631-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  30 in total

1.  Outcome after pelvic sarcoma resection reconstructed with saddle prosthesis.

Authors:  Fawzi Aljassir; Gordon P Beadel; Robert E Turcotte; Anthony M Griffin; Robert S Bell; Jay S Wunder; Marc H Isler
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Reconstruction of type II pelvic resection with a new peri-acetabular reconstruction endoprosthesis.

Authors:  Y Falkinstein; E R Ahlmann; L R Menendez
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2008-03

3.  Periacetabular reconstruction with a new endoprosthesis.

Authors:  Lawrence R Menendez; Elke R Ahlmann; Yuri Falkinstein; Daniel C Allison
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-08-20       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Complications and outcome of external hemipelvectomy in the management of pelvic tumors.

Authors:  J P Apffelstaedt; D L Driscoll; J E Spellman; A F Velez; J F Gibbs; C P Karakousis
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Pelvic reconstruction using saddle prosthesis following limb salvage operation for periacetabular tumour.

Authors:  Y Kitagawa; E T Ek; P F M Choong
Journal:  J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong)       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.118

6.  External and internal hemipelvectomy for sarcomas of the pelvic girdle: consequences of limb-salvage treatment.

Authors:  S J Ham; H Schraffordt Koops; R P Veth; J R van Horn; W H Eisma; H J Hoekstra
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 4.424

7.  Evaluating functional outcome in patients with lower extremity sarcoma.

Authors:  A M Davis; R S Bell; E M Badley; K Yoshida; J I Williams
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Functional outcomes and quality of life after tumor-related hemipelvectomy.

Authors:  Lisa A Beck; Marlene J Einertson; Mark H Winemiller; Robert W DePompolo; Kurtis M Hoppe; Franklin F Sim
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2008-06-05

9.  High complication rates with pelvic allografts. Experience of 22 sarcoma resections.

Authors:  T Ozaki; A Hillmann; D Bettin; P Wuisman; W Winkelmann
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1996-08

10.  The Friedman-Eilber resection arthroplasty of the pelvis.

Authors:  Adam J Schwartz; Piya Kiatisevi; Fritz C Eilber; Frederick R Eilber; Jeffrey J Eckardt
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  26 in total

1.  The modified Harrington procedure for metastatic peri-acetabular bone destruction.

Authors:  Ines Vielgut; Patrick Sadoghi; Markus Gregori; Florian M Kovar; Karin Pichler; Werner Maurer-Ertl; Andreas Leithner
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Computer-aided designed, three dimensional-printed hemipelvic prosthesis for peri-acetabular malignant bone tumour.

Authors:  Baichuan Wang; Yongqiang Hao; Feifei Pu; Wenbo Jiang; Zengwu Shao
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Pelvic reconstructions following peri-acetabular bone tumour resections using a cementless ice-cream cone prosthesis with dual mobility cup.

Authors:  Samir-Pierre Issa; David Biau; Antoine Babinet; Valérie Dumaine; Malo Le Hanneur; Philippe Anract
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-01-27       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Is It Possible and Safe to Perform Acetabular-preserving Resections for Malignant Neoplasms of the Periacetabular Region?

Authors:  Ying-Lee Lam; Raymond Yau; Kenneth W Y Ho; Ka-Lok Mak; Sin-Tak Fong; Timothy Y C So
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Rate and risk factors for wound complications after internal hemipelvectomy.

Authors:  Koichi Ogura; Patrick J Boland; Nicola Fabbri; John H Healey
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 5.082

6.  CORR Insights®: Which Factors Are Associated with Local Control and Survival of Patients with Localized Pelvic Ewing's Sarcoma? A Retrospective Analysis of Data from the Euro-EWING99 Trial.

Authors:  Steven Gitelis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 4.755

7.  What are the Complications of Three-dimensionally Printed, Custom-made, Integrative Hemipelvic Endoprostheses in Patients with Primary Malignancies Involving the Acetabulum, and What is the Function of These Patients?

Authors:  Jie Wang; Li Min; Minxun Lu; Yuqi Zhang; Yitian Wang; Yi Luo; Yong Zhou; Hong Duan; Chongqi Tu
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 4.755

8.  The use of iliac stem prosthesis for acetabular defects following resections for periacetabular tumors.

Authors:  Massimiliano De Paolis; Alessio Biazzo; Carlo Romagnoli; Nikolin Alì; Sandro Giannini; Davide Maria Donati
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2013-10-22

Review 9.  The surgical treatment of pelvic bone metastases.

Authors:  Daniel A Müller; Rodolfo Capanna
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2015-02-24

10.  Extracorporeal Irradiation and Reimplantation with Total Hip Arthroplasty for Periacetabular Pelvic Resections: A Review of 9 Cases.

Authors:  Lester Wai Mon Chan; Jungo Imanishi; Samuel Y Ngan; Sarat Chander; Julie Chu; Renae Thorson; Grant Pang; Peter Choong
Journal:  Sarcoma       Date:  2016-04-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.