Literature DB >> 33858459

Radiographic assessment of radiolucent lines around a highly porous titanium cup (Tritanium) using digital tomosynthesis, after total hip arthroplasty.

Kazuki Oishi1, Yuji Yamamoto2, Yoshifumi Harada2, Ryo Inoue2, Eiji Sasaki2, Yasuyuki Ishibashi2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The objectives of this study were to assess radiolucent lines around a highly porous titanium cup (Tritanium) using digital tomosynthesis and to investigate the clinical and radiographic factors associated with radiolucent lines on tomosynthesis.
METHODS: Fifty-five patients underwent total hip arthroplasty using a Tritanium cup, and digital tomosynthesis and plain radiography were performed at 1 week, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after surgery. The radiolucent lines around the cup were measured on both DTS and plain radiography at each postoperative period. Clinical evaluations were performed by the Japanese Orthopaedic Association hip disease evaluation questionnaire (JHEQ), and revision surgeries were examined. Based on the presence of radiolucent lines on digital tomosynthesis at 2 years postoperatively, patients were divided into RL (+) and RL (-) groups and investigated for related factors.
RESULTS: There were 20 cases in the RL (+) group and 35 cases in the RL (-) group, and no revision surgeries were required. Statistically, there were more cases with radiolucent lines on digital tomosynthesis (45.4% at 1 week and 36.3% at 2 years) than on plain radiography (9.1% at 1 week and 9.1% at 2 years) at each postoperative point. Logistic analysis showed no significant associations between the presence of radiolucent lines at 2 years on digital tomosynthesis, and the JHEQ parameters of pain (p = 0.937), movement (p = 0.266), or mental status (p = 0.404).
CONCLUSION: In a short-term evaluation up to 2 years, digital tomosynthesis detected more radiolucent lines around the titanium cups than plain radiography. The occurrence of radiolucent lines was not related to the postoperative clinical evaluation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Digital tomosynthesis; Highly porous titanium cup; Hip arthroplasty; Radiolucent lines

Year:  2021        PMID: 33858459     DOI: 10.1186/s13018-021-02396-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res        ISSN: 1749-799X            Impact factor:   2.359


  18 in total

1.  Highly Porous Titanium Acetabular Components in Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Michael-Alexander Malahias; Lazaros Kostretzis; Alex Greenberg; Vasileios S Nikolaou; Amit Atrey; Peter K Sculco
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  High initial stability in porous titanium acetabular cups: a biomechanical study.

Authors:  Scott R Small; Michael E Berend; Leah A Howard; Renee D Rogge; Christine A Buckley; Merrill A Ritter
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Short to Midterm Follow-Up of the Tritanium Primary Acetabular Component: A Cause for Concern.

Authors:  Alberto V Carli; Lucian C Warth; Karen L de Mesy Bentley; Bryan J Nestor
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Accuracy of Digital Tomosynthesis With Metal Artifact Reduction for Detecting Osteointegration in Cementless Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Shengjie Guo; Hao Tang; Yixin Zhou; Yong Huang; Hongyi Shao; Dejin Yang
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2017-12-29       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Periacetabular bone densitometry after total hip arthroplasty with highly porous titanium cups: a 2-year follow-up prospective study.

Authors:  Leo Massari; Alessandro Bistolfi; Pier Paolo Grillo; Alda Borré; Gaetano Gigliofiorito; Carlotta Pari; Andrea Francescotto; Piermario Tosco; Davide Deledda; Laura Ravera; Araldo Causero
Journal:  Hip Int       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 2.135

6.  Comparison of a highly porous titanium cup (Tritanium) and a conventional hydroxyapatite-coated porous titanium cup: A retrospective analysis of clinical and radiological outcomes in hip arthroplasty among Japanese patients.

Authors:  Shinji Yoshioka; Shunji Nakano; Yutaka Kinoshita; Masaru Nakamura; Tomohiro Goto; Daisuke Hamada; Koichi Sairyo
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 1.601

7.  Detection of small periprosthetic bone defects after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yukihide Minoda; Taku Yoshida; Kazutaka Sugimoto; Shinogo Baba; Mitssuhiko Ikebuchi; Hiroaki Nakamura
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2014-05-24       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  Excellent results of primary THA using a highly porous titanium cup.

Authors:  Qais Naziri; Kimona Issa; Robert Pivec; Steven F Harwin; Ronald E Delanois; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.390

9.  Projections and Epidemiology of Revision Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in the United States to 2030.

Authors:  Andrew M Schwartz; Kevin X Farley; George N Guild; Thomas L Bradbury
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 4.757

10.  An economic analysis of aseptic revision hip arthroplasty: calculation of partial hospital costs in relation to reimbursement.

Authors:  G Assmann; R Kasch; A Hofer; A P Schulz; R Kayser; A Lahm; H Merk; S Flessa
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 3.067

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.