Literature DB >> 18318628

Task-demands can immediately reverse the effects of sensory-driven saliency in complex visual stimuli.

Wolfgang Einhäuser1, Ueli Rutishauser, Christof Koch.   

Abstract

In natural vision both stimulus features and task-demands affect an observer's attention. However, the relationship between sensory-driven ("bottom-up") and task-dependent ("top-down") factors remains controversial: Can task-demands counteract strong sensory signals fully, quickly, and irrespective of bottom-up features? To measure attention under naturalistic conditions, we recorded eye-movements in human observers, while they viewed photographs of outdoor scenes. In the first experiment, smooth modulations of contrast biased the stimuli's sensory-driven saliency towards one side. In free-viewing, observers' eye-positions were immediately biased toward the high-contrast, i.e., high-saliency, side. However, this sensory-driven bias disappeared entirely when observers searched for a bull's-eye target embedded with equal probability to either side of the stimulus. When the target always occurred in the low-contrast side, observers' eye-positions were immediately biased towards this low-saliency side, i.e., the sensory-driven bias reversed. Hence, task-demands do not only override sensory-driven saliency but also actively countermand it. In a second experiment, a 5-Hz flicker replaced the contrast gradient. Whereas the bias was less persistent in free viewing, the overriding and reversal took longer to deploy. Hence, insufficient sensory-driven saliency cannot account for the bias reversal. In a third experiment, subjects searched for a spot of locally increased contrast ("oddity") instead of the bull's-eye ("template"). In contrast to the other conditions, a slight sensory-driven free-viewing bias prevails in this condition. In a fourth experiment, we demonstrate that at known locations template targets are detected faster than oddity targets, suggesting that the former induce a stronger top-down drive when used as search targets. Taken together, task-demands can override sensory-driven saliency in complex visual stimuli almost immediately, and the extent of overriding depends on the search target and the overridden feature, but not on the latter's free-viewing saliency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18318628     DOI: 10.1167/8.2.2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  73 in total

1.  Search performance with discrete-cell stimulus arrays: filtered naturalistic images and probabilistic markers.

Authors:  Alan R Pinkus; Miriam J Poteet; Allan J Pantle
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-04-03

2.  Saliency and saccade encoding in the frontal eye field during natural scene search.

Authors:  Hugo L Fernandes; Ian H Stevenson; Adam N Phillips; Mark A Segraves; Konrad P Kording
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Selective tuning for contrast in macaque area V4.

Authors:  Ilaria Sani; Elisa Santandrea; Ashkan Golzar; Maria Concetta Morrone; Leonardo Chelazzi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  Eye movements: the past 25 years.

Authors:  Eileen Kowler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 5.  Guidance of visual search by memory and knowledge.

Authors:  Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  Nebr Symp Motiv       Date:  2012

6.  Modeling Search for People in 900 Scenes: A combined source model of eye guidance.

Authors:  Krista A Ehinger; Barbara Hidalgo-Sotelo; Antonio Torralba; Aude Oliva
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2009-08-01

7.  Visual memory during pauses between successive saccades.

Authors:  Timothy M Gersch; Eileen Kowler; Brian S Schnitzer; Barbara A Dosher
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-12-22       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Influence and limitations of popout in the selection of salient visual stimuli by area V4 neurons.

Authors:  Brittany E Burrows; Tirin Moore
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Eye movement prediction and variability on natural video data sets.

Authors:  Michael Dorr; Eleonora Vig; Erhardt Barth
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2012-03-26

10.  Influence of low-level stimulus features, task dependent factors, and spatial biases on overt visual attention.

Authors:  Sepp Kollmorgen; Nora Nortmann; Sylvia Schröder; Peter König
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.