Literature DB >> 33828202

Neurophysiological and behavioural effects of conventional and high definition tDCS.

Fabio Masina1,2, Giorgio Arcara3, Eleonora Galletti4, Isabella Cinque4, Luciano Gamberini5,4, Daniela Mapelli5,4.   

Abstract

High-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) seems to overcome a drawback of traditional bipolar tDCS: the wide-spread diffusion of the electric field. Nevertheless, most of the differences that characterise the two techniques are based on mathematical simulations and not on real, behavioural and neurophysiological, data. The study aims to compare a widespread tDCS montage (i.e., a Conventional bipolar montage with extracephalic return electrode) and HD-tDCS, investigating differences both at a behavioural level, in terms of dexterity performance, and a neurophysiological level, as modifications of alpha and beta power as measured with EEG. Thirty participants took part in three sessions, one for each montage: Conventional tDCS, HD-tDCS, and sham. In all the conditions, the anode was placed over C4, while the cathode/s placed according to the montage. At baseline, during, and after each stimulation condition, dexterity was assessed with a Finger Tapping Task. In addition, resting-state EEG was recorded at baseline and after the stimulation. Power spectrum density was calculated, selecting two frequency bands: alpha (8-12 Hz) and beta (18-22 Hz). Linear mixed effect models (LMMs) were used to analyse the modulation induced by tDCS. To evaluate differences among the montages and consider state-dependency phenomenon, the post-stimulation measurements were covariate-adjusted for baseline levels. We observed that HD-tDCS induced an alpha power reduction in participants with lower alpha at baseline. Conversely, Conventional tDCS induced a beta power reduction in participants with higher beta at baseline. Furthermore, data showed a trend towards a behavioural effect of HD-tDCS in participants with lower beta at baseline showing faster response times. Conventional and HD-tDCS distinctively modulated cortical activity. The study highlights the importance of considering state-dependency to determine the effects of tDCS on individuals.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33828202     DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-87371-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  59 in total

1.  Gyri-precise head model of transcranial direct current stimulation: improved spatial focality using a ring electrode versus conventional rectangular pad.

Authors:  Abhishek Datta; Varun Bansal; Julian Diaz; Jinal Patel; Davide Reato; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 8.955

2.  Cortical theta wanes for language.

Authors:  Dora Hermes; Kai J Miller; Mariska J Vansteensel; Erik Edwards; Cyrille H Ferrier; Martin G Bleichner; Peter C van Rijen; Erik J Aarnoutse; Nick F Ramsey
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Transcranial current stimulation focality using disc and ring electrode configurations: FEM analysis.

Authors:  Abhishek Datta; Maged Elwassif; Fortunato Battaglia; Marom Bikson
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2008-04-28       Impact factor: 5.379

4.  Spatial and polarity precision of concentric high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS).

Authors:  Mahtab Alam; Dennis Q Truong; Niranjan Khadka; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Transcranial direct current stimulation over the sensory-motor regions inhibits gamma synchrony.

Authors:  Giovanni Pellegrino; Giorgio Arcara; Giovanni Di Pino; Cristina Turco; Matteo Maran; Luca Weis; Francesco Piccione; Hartwig Roman Siebner
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-03-10       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 6.  Modulating brain activity and behaviour with tDCS: Rumours of its death have been greatly exaggerated.

Authors:  Hannah L Filmer; Jason B Mattingley; Paul E Dux
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 4.027

Review 7.  Non-invasive Human Brain Stimulation in Cognitive Neuroscience: A Primer.

Authors:  Beth L Parkin; Hamed Ekhtiari; Vincent F Walsh
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Direct Current Stimulation Modulates LTP and LTD: Activity Dependence and Dendritic Effects.

Authors:  Greg Kronberg; Morgan Bridi; Ted Abel; Marom Bikson; Lucas C Parra
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 8.955

9.  Origin and evolution of qingke barley in Tibet.

Authors:  Xingquan Zeng; Yu Guo; Qijun Xu; Martin Mascher; Ganggang Guo; Shuaicheng Li; Likai Mao; Qingfeng Liu; Zhanfeng Xia; Juhong Zhou; Hongjun Yuan; Shuaishuai Tai; Yulin Wang; Zexiu Wei; Li Song; Sang Zha; Shiming Li; Yawei Tang; Lijun Bai; Zhenhua Zhuang; Weiming He; Shancen Zhao; Xiaodong Fang; Qiang Gao; Ye Yin; Jian Wang; Huanming Yang; Jing Zhang; Robert J Henry; Nils Stein; Nyima Tashi
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 10.  Transcranial direct current stimulation: five important issues we aren't discussing (but probably should be).

Authors:  Jared C Horvath; Olivia Carter; Jason D Forte
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-24
View more
  5 in total

1.  High-definition transcranial direct current stimulation modulates performance and alpha/beta parieto-frontal connectivity serving fluid intelligence.

Authors:  Yasra Arif; Rachel K Spooner; Elizabeth Heinrichs-Graham; Tony W Wilson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 6.228

2.  Multichannel Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Combined With Treadmill Gait Training in Patients With Parkinson's Disease: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Yoonju Na; Jinuk Kim; Su-Hyun Lee; Jihye Kim; Jungsoo Lee; Se Young Shin; Won Hyuk Chang; Jin Whan Cho; Yun-Hee Kim
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 4.003

3.  Task-Related Hemodynamic Changes Induced by High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Chronic Stroke Patients: An Uncontrolled Pilot fNIRS Study.

Authors:  Heegoo Kim; Jinuk Kim; Gihyoun Lee; Jungsoo Lee; Yun-Hee Kim
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-03-28

4.  Comparing the effects of focal and conventional tDCS on motor skill learning: A proof of principle study.

Authors:  Aline Iannone; Irene Santiago; Silvia T Ajao; Joaquim Brasil-Neto; John C Rothwell; Danny A Spampinato
Journal:  Neurosci Res       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 2.904

5.  Conventional and HD-tDCS May (or May Not) Modulate Overt Attentional Orienting: An Integrated Spatio-Temporal Approach and Methodological Reflections.

Authors:  Lorenzo Diana; Giulia Scotti; Edoardo N Aiello; Patrick Pilastro; Aleksandra K Eberhard-Moscicka; René M Müri; Nadia Bolognini
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-12-31
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.