Literature DB >> 20648973

Gyri-precise head model of transcranial direct current stimulation: improved spatial focality using a ring electrode versus conventional rectangular pad.

Abhishek Datta1, Varun Bansal, Julian Diaz, Jinal Patel, Davide Reato, Marom Bikson.   

Abstract

The spatial resolution of conventional transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is considered to be relatively diffuse owing to skull dispersion. However, we show that electric fields may be clustered at distinct gyri/sulci sites because of details in tissue architecture/conductivity, notably cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). We calculated the cortical electric field/current density magnitude induced during tDCS using a high spatial resolution (1 mm3) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-derived finite element human head model; cortical gyri/sulci were resolved. The spatial focality of conventional rectangular-pad (7 x 5 cm2) and the ring (4 x 1) electrode configurations were compared. The rectangular-pad configuration resulted in diffuse (unfocal) modulation, with discrete clusters of electric field magnitude maxima. Peak-induced electric field magnitude was not observed directly underneath the pads, but at an intermediate lobe. The 4 x 1 ring resulted in enhanced spatial focality, with peak-induced electric field magnitude at the sulcus and adjacent gyri directly underneath the active electrode. Cortical structures may be focally targeted by using ring configurations. Anatomically accurate high-resolution MRI-based forward-models may guide the "rational" clinical design and optimization of tDCS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Finite Element Modeling; MRI Human Head Model; TES; focality; tDCS

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20648973      PMCID: PMC2790295          DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2009.03.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Stimul        ISSN: 1876-4754            Impact factor:   8.955


  68 in total

1.  Quantitative analysis of the electroencephalogram during cranial electrotherapy stimulation.

Authors:  M J Schroeder; R E Barr
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Facilitation of implicit motor learning by weak transcranial direct current stimulation of the primary motor cortex in the human.

Authors:  Michael A Nitsche; Astrid Schauenburg; Nicolas Lang; David Liebetanz; Cornelia Exner; Walter Paulus; Frithjof Tergau
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Computation of electric and magnetic stimulation in human head using the 3-D impedance method.

Authors:  Mohammad Nadeem; Thorleif Thorlin; Om P Gandhi; Mikael Persson
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.538

4.  Increased cortical excitability induced by transcranial DC and peripheral nerve stimulation.

Authors:  J Uy; M C Ridding
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2003-08-15       Impact factor: 2.390

5.  INTRACELLULAR ACTIVITIES AND EVOKED POTENTIAL CHANGES DURING POLARIZATION OF MOTOR CORTEX.

Authors:  D P PURPURA; J G MCMURTRY
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1965-01       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Transcranial direct current stimulation for major depression: a general system for quantifying transcranial electrotherapy dosage.

Authors:  Marom Bikson; Peter Bulow; John W Stiller; Abhishek Datta; Fortunato Battaglia; Sergei V Karnup; Teodor T Postolache
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.598

7.  Transcranial current stimulation focality using disc and ring electrode configurations: FEM analysis.

Authors:  Abhishek Datta; Maged Elwassif; Fortunato Battaglia; Marom Bikson
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2008-04-28       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 8.  Computer modelling of spinal cord stimulation and its contribution to therapeutic efficacy.

Authors:  J Holsheimer
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 2.772

9.  The electrical conductivity of human cerebrospinal fluid at body temperature.

Authors:  S B Baumann; D R Wozny; S K Kelly; F M Meno
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 4.538

10.  Transcranial direct current stimulation: a computer-based human model study.

Authors:  Tim Wagner; Felipe Fregni; Shirley Fecteau; Alan Grodzinsky; Markus Zahn; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-02-04       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  347 in total

1.  Transcranial direct current stimulation in patients with skull defects and skull plates: high-resolution computational FEM study of factors altering cortical current flow.

Authors:  Abhishek Datta; Marom Bikson; Felipe Fregni
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 2.  Fundamentals of transcranial electric and magnetic stimulation dose: definition, selection, and reporting practices.

Authors:  Angel V Peterchev; Timothy A Wagner; Pedro C Miranda; Michael A Nitsche; Walter Paulus; Sarah H Lisanby; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 8.955

3.  Left lateralizing transcranial direct current stimulation improves reading efficiency.

Authors:  Peter E Turkeltaub; Jennifer Benson; Roy H Hamilton; Abhishek Datta; Marom Bikson; H Branch Coslett
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2011-05-05       Impact factor: 8.955

4.  Noninvasive neurostimulation of left ventral motor cortex enhances sensorimotor adaptation in speech production.

Authors:  Terri L Scott; Laura Haenchen; Ayoub Daliri; Julia Chartove; Frank H Guenther; Tyler K Perrachione
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 2.381

5.  Benchmarking transcranial electrical stimulation finite element models: a comparison study.

Authors:  Aprinda Indahlastari; Munish Chauhan; Rosalind J Sadleir
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 6.  Neuromodulation for brain disorders: challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Matthew D Johnson; Hubert H Lim; Theoden I Netoff; Allison T Connolly; Nessa Johnson; Abhrajeet Roy; Abbey Holt; Kelvin O Lim; James R Carey; Jerrold L Vitek; Bin He
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 4.538

7.  Modeling transcranial electrical stimulation in the aging brain.

Authors:  Aprinda Indahlastari; Alejandro Albizu; Andrew O'Shea; Megan A Forbes; Nicole R Nissim; Jessica N Kraft; Nicole D Evangelista; Hanna K Hausman; Adam J Woods
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 8.955

8.  Clinician accessible tools for GUI computational models of transcranial electrical stimulation: BONSAI and SPHERES.

Authors:  Dennis Q Truong; Mathias Hüber; Xihe Xie; Abhishek Datta; Asif Rahman; Lucas C Parra; Jacek P Dmochowski; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2014-03-30       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 9.  Electrical stimulation of cranial nerves in cognition and disease.

Authors:  Devin Adair; Dennis Truong; Zeinab Esmaeilpour; Nigel Gebodh; Helen Borges; Libby Ho; J Douglas Bremner; Bashar W Badran; Vitaly Napadow; Vincent P Clark; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2020-02-23       Impact factor: 8.955

10.  Noninvasive brain stimulation to lateral prefrontal cortex alters the novelty of creative idea generation.

Authors:  Yoed N Kenett; David S Rosen; Emilio R Tamez; Sharon L Thompson-Schill
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 3.282

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.