Greg Kronberg1, Morgan Bridi2, Ted Abel3, Marom Bikson4, Lucas C Parra4. 1. Department of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of New York, New York, NY 10031, USA. Electronic address: gregkronberg@gmail.com. 2. Laboratory of Neural Circuits and Behavior, Hussman Institute for Autism, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA. 3. Department of Biology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. 4. Department of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of New York, New York, NY 10031, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been reported to improve various forms of learning in humans. Stimulation is often applied during training, producing lasting enhancements that are specific to the learned task. These learning effects are thought to be mediated by altered synaptic plasticity. However, the effects of DCS during the induction of endogenous synaptic plasticity remain largely unexplored. OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS: Here we are interested in the effects of DCS applied during synaptic plasticity induction. METHODS: To model endogenous plasticity we induced long-term potentiation (LTP) and depression (LTD) at Schaffer collateral synapses in CA1 of rat hippocampal slices. Anodal and cathodal DCS at 20 V/m were applied throughout plasticity induction in both apical and basal dendritic compartments. RESULTS: When DCS was paired with concurrent plasticity induction, the resulting plasticity was biased towards potentiation, such that LTP was enhanced and LTD was reduced. Remarkably, both anodal and cathodal stimulation can produce this bias, depending on the dendritic location and type of plasticity induction. Cathodal DCS enhanced LTP in apical dendrites while anodal DCS enhanced LTP in basal dendrites. Both anodal and cathodal DCS reduced LTD in apical dendrites. DCS did not affect synapses that were weakly active or when NMDA receptors were blocked. CONCLUSIONS: These results highlight the role of DCS as a modulator, rather than inducer of synaptic plasticity, as well as the dependence of DCS effects on the spatial and temporal properties of endogenous synaptic activity. The relevance of the present results to human tDCS should be validated in future studies.
BACKGROUND: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been reported to improve various forms of learning in humans. Stimulation is often applied during training, producing lasting enhancements that are specific to the learned task. These learning effects are thought to be mediated by altered synaptic plasticity. However, the effects of DCS during the induction of endogenous synaptic plasticity remain largely unexplored. OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS: Here we are interested in the effects of DCS applied during synaptic plasticity induction. METHODS: To model endogenous plasticity we induced long-term potentiation (LTP) and depression (LTD) at Schaffer collateral synapses in CA1 of rat hippocampal slices. Anodal and cathodal DCS at 20 V/m were applied throughout plasticity induction in both apical and basal dendritic compartments. RESULTS: When DCS was paired with concurrent plasticity induction, the resulting plasticity was biased towards potentiation, such that LTP was enhanced and LTD was reduced. Remarkably, both anodal and cathodal stimulation can produce this bias, depending on the dendritic location and type of plasticity induction. Cathodal DCS enhanced LTP in apical dendrites while anodal DCS enhanced LTP in basal dendrites. Both anodal and cathodal DCS reduced LTD in apical dendrites. DCS did not affect synapses that were weakly active or when NMDA receptors were blocked. CONCLUSIONS: These results highlight the role of DCS as a modulator, rather than inducer of synaptic plasticity, as well as the dependence of DCS effects on the spatial and temporal properties of endogenous synaptic activity. The relevance of the present results to human tDCS should be validated in future studies.
Authors: Joyce G Rohan; Kim A Carhuatanta; Shawn M McInturf; Molly K Miklasevich; Ryan Jankord Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2015-09-16 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Noah S Philip; Brent G Nelson; Flavio Frohlich; Kelvin O Lim; Alik S Widge; Linda L Carpenter Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2017-02-24 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Mark P Jackson; Dennis Truong; Milene L Brownlow; Jessica A Wagner; R Andy McKinley; Marom Bikson; Ryan Jankord Journal: Brain Behav Immun Date: 2017-04-17 Impact factor: 7.217
Authors: Zeinab Esmaeilpour; Paola Marangolo; Benjamin M Hampstead; Sven Bestmann; Elisabeth Galletta; Helena Knotkova; Marom Bikson Journal: Brain Stimul Date: 2017-12-13 Impact factor: 8.955
Authors: Jessica Mitroi; Leah P Burroughs; Alexandra B Moussa-Tooks; Amanda R Bolbecker; Nancy B Lundin; Brian F O'Donnell; William P Hetrick Journal: Cerebellum Date: 2020-06 Impact factor: 3.847
Authors: Zhi-De Deng; Bruce Luber; Nicholas L Balderston; Melbaliz Velez Afanador; Michelle M Noh; Jeena Thomas; William C Altekruse; Shannon L Exley; Shriya Awasthi; Sarah H Lisanby Journal: Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol Date: 2020-01-06 Impact factor: 13.820