Literature DB >> 7673764

Accuracy of aortic stenosis severity assessment by Doppler echocardiography: importance of image quality.

J Bartunek1, D De Bacquer, A C Rodrigues, B De Bruyne.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The aim of the present study was to investigate which factors could influence the accuracy of aortic stenosis severity assessment by Doppler echocardiography in an unselected population. Doppler echocardiographic determination of mean transvalvular pressure gradient and aortic valve area by continuity equation was performed in 101 patients before catheterization. According to the catheterization data, aortic stenosis was classified into 2 categories: mild to moderate (orifice area [Gorlin formula] > 0.75 cm2, mean transvalvular gradient < 50 mmHg) and severe (orifice area < or = 0.75 cm2, mean transvalvular gradient > or = 50 mmHg). The influence of eight factors on the absolute difference in aortic valve area and mean transvalvular pressure gradient and on the concordant classification in the same category by both methods was investigated.
RESULTS: By multivariate analysis, the absolute difference in aortic valve area by both methods was significantly associated with poor image quality, absolute difference between mean catheterization and Doppler transvalvular gradient and inversely related to body mass index. Absolute difference in mean transvalvular gradients by both methods was significantly associated only with image quality. Poor image quality emerged as the only significant factor influencing the concordant classification between invasive and noninvasive studies according to orifice area (but not according to transvalvular pressure gradient).
CONCLUSION: Echographic image quality significantly influences the accuracy of Doppler echocardiographic determination of aortic valve area and, to a lesser extent, of transvalvular pressure gradient. Therefore, the mere noninvasive approach is not suitable to every consecutive patient with aortic stenosis. Qualifications concerning overall image quality should identify patients most likely to benefit from catheterization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7673764     DOI: 10.1007/bf01844707

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Card Imaging        ISSN: 0167-9899


  20 in total

1.  Hydraulic formula for calculation of the area of the stenotic mitral valve, other cardiac valves, and central circulatory shunts. I.

Authors:  R GORLIN; S G GORLIN
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1951-01       Impact factor: 4.749

2.  Methodologic issues in clinical evaluation of stenosis severity in adults undergoing aortic or mitral balloon valvuloplasty. The NHLBI Balloon Valvuloplasty Registry.

Authors:  C M Otto; K B Davis; D R Holmes; W O'Neill; J Ferguson; T M Bashore; R Bonan
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1992-06-15       Impact factor: 2.778

3.  Prediction of the severity of aortic stenosis by Doppler aortic valve area determination: prospective Doppler-catheterization correlation in 100 patients.

Authors:  J K Oh; C P Taliercio; D R Holmes; G S Reeder; K R Bailey; J B Seward; A J Tajik
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Limitations in assessing the severity of aortic stenosis by Doppler gradients.

Authors:  R Danielsen; J E Nordrehaug; L Stangeland; H Vik-Mo
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1988-05

5.  The rate of change of left ventricular volume in man. I. Validation and peak systolic ejection rate in health and disease.

Authors:  K E Hammermeister; R C Brooks; J R Warbasse
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1974-04       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Left ventricular volume and mass from single-plane cineangiocardiogram. A comparison of anteroposterior and right anterior oblique methods.

Authors:  J W Kennedy; S E Trenholme; I S Kasser
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1970-09       Impact factor: 4.749

7.  Determination of the stenotic aortic valve area in adults using Doppler echocardiography.

Authors:  C M Otto; A S Pearlman; K A Comess; R P Reamer; C L Janko; L L Huntsman
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Hemodynamic progression of aortic stenosis in adults assessed by Doppler echocardiography.

Authors:  C M Otto; A S Pearlman; C L Gardner
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1989-03-01       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Effect of stenosis geometry on the Doppler-catheter gradient relation in vitro: a manifestation of pressure recovery.

Authors:  H Baumgartner; H Schima; G Tulzer; P Kühn
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1993-03-15       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Doppler echocardiographic measurement of aortic valve area in aortic stenosis: a noninvasive application of the Gorlin formula.

Authors:  P Teirstein; M Yeager; P G Yock; R L Popp
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 24.094

View more
  4 in total

1.  Evaluation of aortic stenosis by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with established routine clinical techniques.

Authors:  C Kupfahl; M Honold; G Meinhardt; H Vogelsberg; A Wagner; H Mahrholdt; U Sechtem
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Planimetric measurement of the regurgitant orifice area using multidetector CT for aortic regurgitation: a comparison with the use of echocardiography.

Authors:  Min Hee Jeon; Yeon Hyeon Choe; Soo Jin Cho; Seung Woo Park; Pyo Won Park; Jae K Oh
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 3.500

3.  Assessment of aortic stenosis by three-dimensional echocardiography: an accurate and novel approach.

Authors:  Sorel Goland; Alfredo Trento; Kiyoshi Iida; Lawrence S C Czer; Michele De Robertis; Tasneem Z Naqvi; Kirsten Tolstrup; Takashi Akima; Huai Luo; Robert J Siegel
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2007-05-08       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  A comparison of echocardiographic and electron beam computed tomographic assessment of aortic valve area in patients with valvular aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Lieuwe H Piers; Riksta Dikkers; René A Tio; Maarten P van den Berg; Tineke P Willems; Felix Zijlstra; Matthijs Oudkerk
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2007-02-07       Impact factor: 2.357

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.