Literature DB >> 3953450

Comparison of Doppler-derived pressure gradient to that determined at cardiac catheterization in adults with aortic valve stenosis: implications for management.

M Yeager, P G Yock, R L Popp.   

Abstract

Over a 1-year period cardiac catheterization was performed in 58 patients, mean age 66 years, who had elevated aortic blood flow velocity (more than 1.7 m/s) by continuous-wave Doppler echocardiography. Doppler echo signals were initially judged acceptable for quantitative analysis in 95% of patients, usually from the apical transducer position. Cardiac catheterization was performed within a mean of 8 days (60% within 1 day) of the Doppler echo study. The aortic valve mean pressure gradients at catheterization ranged from 0 to 93 mm Hg. The linear correlation coefficient (r value) between the mean pressure gradient determined by Doppler echocardiography and catheterization was 0.87. The correlation was maintained in 15 patients with aortic regurgitation (r = 0.91) and in 16 patients with significant coronary artery disease (r = 0.93). In the 16 patients with reduced cardiac output (mean 3.2 liters/min, range 2.2 to 3.9) the correlation was 0.81. A strategy for using the Doppler echo-calculated pressure gradient to manage patients with valvular aortic stenosis (AS) was derived by investigating the relation of the Doppler echo gradient to the aortic valve area in 35 patients with no aortic regurgitation detected at catheterization. All 12 patients with a Doppler echo mean gradient of less than 30 mm Hg had an aortic valve area of more than 0.75 cm2 and all 11 patients with a Doppler echo mean gradient of more than 50 mm Hg had an aortic valve area of less than 0.75 cm2.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3953450     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(86)90851-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  8 in total

1.  Aortic stenosis: the spectrum of practice.

Authors:  O Khalid; D M Luxenberg; C Sable; O Benavidez; T Geva; B Hanna; R Abdulla
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2006-11-16       Impact factor: 1.655

Review 2.  Problems in the diagnosis and investigation of aortic stenosis.

Authors:  A Bishop; P Wilkinson
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 2.401

3.  Doppler echocardiography in elderly patients with ejection systolic murmurs.

Authors:  G M McKillop; D A Stewart; J M Burns; D Ballantyne
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 2.401

4.  Limitations in assessing the severity of aortic stenosis by Doppler gradients.

Authors:  R Danielsen; J E Nordrehaug; L Stangeland; H Vik-Mo
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1988-05

Review 5.  Assessment of cardiac hemodynamics and valvular function by Doppler echocardiography.

Authors:  D C Wallerson; J Dubin; R B Devereux
Journal:  Bull N Y Acad Med       Date:  1987-10

Review 6.  Quantitative applications of Doppler cardiography in congenital heart disease.

Authors:  S D Colan
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.740

7.  Incidence and prognosis of congenital aortic valve stenosis in Liverpool (1960-1990).

Authors:  D J Kitchiner; M Jackson; K Walsh; I Peart; R Arnold
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1993-01

8.  Prognosis of aortic valve disease following mitral valve surgery.

Authors:  Kinnaresh Baria; Jignesh Kothari; Divyesh Rathod
Journal:  Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol       Date:  2019-06-28
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.