Wei Zhao1,2, Chang-Lin Zhao1,2. 1. Key Laboratory for Forest Resources Conservation and Utilization in the Southwest Mountains of China, Ministry of Education, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming, China. 2. College of Biodiversity Conservation, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming, China.
Abstract
Wood-inhabiting fungi play a significant role in wood degradation and the cycle of matter in the ecological system. In the present study, three new wood-inhabiting fungal species, Trechispora bambusicola, Trechispora fimbriata, and Trechispora fissurata spp. nov., are nested in Trechispora, which are proposed based on a combination of morphological features and molecular evidence. Sequences of internal transcribed spacer (ITS) and large subunit (nLSU) regions of the studied samples were generated, and the phylogenetic analyses were performed with maximum likelihood, maximum parsimony, and Bayesian inference methods. The phylogenetic analyses inferred from ITS showed that T. bambusicola was sister to Trechispora stevensonii, T. fimbriata grouped with Trechispora nivea, and T. fissurata grouped with Trechispora echinospora. The phylogenetic tree based on ITS + nLSU sequences demonstrated that T. bambusicola formed a single lineage and then grouped with Trechispora rigida and T. stevensonii. T. fimbriata was sister to T. nivea. T. fissurata grouped with Trechispora thelephora.
Wood-inhabiting fungi play a significant role in wood degradation and the cycle of matter in the ecological system. In the present study, three new wood-inhabiting fungal species, Trechispora bambusicola, Trechispora fimbriata, and Trechispora fissurata spp. nov., are nested in Trechispora, which are proposed based on a combination of morphological features and molecular evidence. Sequences of internal transcribed spacer (ITS) and large subunit (nLSU) regions of the studied samples were generated, and the phylogenetic analyses were performed with maximum likelihood, maximum parsimony, and Bayesian inference methods. The phylogenetic analyses inferred from ITS showed that T. bambusicola was sister to Trechispora stevensonii, T. fimbriata grouped with Trechispora nivea, and T. fissurata grouped with Trechispora echinospora. The phylogenetic tree based on ITS + nLSU sequences demonstrated that T. bambusicola formed a single lineage and then grouped with Trechispora rigida and T. stevensonii. T. fimbriata was sister to T. nivea. T. fissurata grouped with Trechispora thelephora.
Trechispora P. Karst. (Hydnodontaceae, Trechisporales) was typified with Trechisporaonusta P. Karst. (Karsten, 1890). It is characterized by the resupinate to effused basidiomata with smooth to hydnoid to poroid hymenophore, a monomitic or dimitic hyphal structure with clamped generative hyphae having typical ampullaceous septa, and short cylindric basidia and smooth to verrucose or aculeate basidiospores (Karsten, 1890; Bernicchia and Gorjón, 2010). About 49 species are currently known in Trechispora worldwide (Liberta, 1966, 1973; Larsson, 1994, 1995, 1996; Ryvarden, 2002; Trichiès and Schultheis, 2002; Miettinen and Larsson, 2006; Ordynets et al., 2015; Xu et al., 2019) and Index Fungorum[1] and MycoBank[2].Larsson (2007) addressed the classification of corticioid fungi and revealed that Trechispora farinacea (Pers.) Liberta grouped with Trechispora hymenocystis (Berk. and Broome) K.H. Larss., in which both species nested within the family Hydnodontaceae Jülich. Based on the large subunit nuclear ribosomal RNA gene (nLSU) datasets, Albee-Scott and Kropp (2010) supported to transfer Hydnodon thelephorus (Lév.) Banker to Trechispora as Trechispora thelephora (Lév.) Ryvarden. The order Trechisporales was studied employing the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) and nLSU regions, in which it suggested that Porpomyces Jülich, Sistotremastrum J. Erikss., Subulicystidium Parmasto, and Trechispora belonged to a highly supported clade and Trechispora belongs to Hydnodontaceae and was closely related to Brevicellicium K.H. Larss. and Hjortstam (Telleria et al., 2013). A phylogenetic study of Trechispora was addressed and demonstrated that Trechispora cyatheae Ordynets, Langer and K.H. Larss. and Trechispora echinocristallina Ordynets, Langer and K.H. Larss. clustered into Trechispora as new members, inferred from the combined data of the ITS and LSU datasets (Ordynets et al., 2015). The phylogeny of Trechisporales was inferred from a combined dataset of ITS-nLSU sequences and showed that Porpomyces, Scytinopogon Singer, and Trechispora grouped together and nested within family Hydnodontaceae (Liu et al., 2019). Phylogram generated from analysis of ITS sequence dataset of Trechispora showed that Trechispora echinospora Telleria was sister to the clade formed by Trechispora araneosa (Hohn. and Litsch.) K.H. Larss., T. farinacea, T. hymenocystis, and Trechispora mollusca (Pers.) Liberta with a low support (Phookamsak et al., 2019). The ITS + nLSU dataset comprised 22 species and revealed that Trechispora yunnanensis C.L. Zhao formed a monophyletic lineage within Trechispora and was closely related to Trechispora byssinella (Bourdot) Liberta and Trechispora laevis K.H. Larss. (Xu et al., 2019).During the studies on wood-inhabiting fungi in southern China, three species of Trechispora could not be assigned to any described species. Obtaining sequences from the new taxa, the authors examine taxonomy and phylogeny of three new species within the genus Trechispora, based on the ITS and nLSU sequences.
Materials and Methods
Morphology
The studied specimens are deposited at the herbarium of Southwest Forestry University (SWFC), Kunming, Yunnan Province, China. Macromorphological descriptions were based on field notes. Color terms follow Petersen (1996). Micromorphological data were obtained from the dried specimens and observed under a light microscope following Dai (2012). The following abbreviations were used: KOH = 5% potassium hydroxide, CB = Cotton Blue, CB− = acyanophilous, IKI = Melzer’s reagent, IKI− = both inamyloid and indextrinoid, L = mean spore length (arithmetic average for all spores), W = mean spore width (arithmetic average for all spores), Q = variation in the L/W ratios between the studied specimens, n (a/b) = number of spores (a) measured from given number (b) of specimens, spore measurements do not include ornamentation.
Molecular Phylogeny
Cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) rapid plant genome extraction kit-DN14 (Aidlab Biotechnologies Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) was used to obtain genomic deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) from dried specimens, according to the manufacturer’s instructions following Zhao and Wu (2017). ITS region was amplified with primer pair ITS5 and ITS4 (White et al., 1990). Nuclear LSU region was amplified with primer pair LR0R and LR7[3]. The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) procedures for ITS and nLSU following Zhao and Wu (2017). The PCR products were purified and directly sequenced at Kunming Tsingke Biological Technology Limited Company, Kunming, Yunnan Province, China. All newly generated sequences were deposited at GenBank (Table 1).
TABLE 1
List of species, specimens, and GenBank accession numbers of sequences used in this study.
Species name
Sample no.
GenBank accession no.
References
ITS
nLSU
Fibrodontia alba
TNMF 24944
KC928274
KC928275
Yurchenko and Wu (2014)
Fibrodontia gossypina
GEL 5042
DQ249274
AY646100
Unpublished
Trechispora araneosa
KHL 8570
AF347084
AF347084
Larsson et al. (2004)
Trechispora bambusicola
CLZhao 3302
MW544021
MW520171
This study
Trechispora bambusicola
CLZhao 3305
MW544022
MW520172
This study
Trechispora bispora
CBS 142.63
MH858241
MH869842
Vu et al. (2019)
Trechispora byssinella
UC 2023068
KP814481
–
Unpublished
Trechispora cohaerens
TU 110332
UDB008249
–
Ordynets et al. (2015)
Trechispora cohaerens
TU 115568
UDB016421
–
Ordynets et al. (2015)
Trechispora confinis
KHL 11064
AF347081
AF347081
Larsson et al. (2004)
Trechispora cyatheae
FR-0219442
UDB024014
UDB024014
Ordynets et al. (2015)
Trechispora cyatheae
FR-0219443
UDB024015
UDB024015
Ordynets et al. (2015)
Trechispora echinocristallina
FR-0219445
UDB024018
UDB024018
Ordynets et al. (2015)
Trechispora echinocristallina
FR-0219448
UDB024022
UDB024022
Ordynets et al. (2015)
Trechispora echinospora
E11/37-03
JX392845
JX392846
Telleria et al. (2013)
Trechispora echinospora
E09/60-06
JX392847
JX392848
Telleria et al. (2013)
Trechispora echinospora
E11/37-05
–
JX392849
Telleria et al. (2013)
Trechispora farinacea
KHL 8451
AF347082
AF347082
Unpublished
Trechispora farinacea
KHL 8793
AF347089
AF347089
Larsson et al. (2004)
Trechispora fissurata
CLZhao 995
MW544026
MW520176
This study
Trechispora fissurata
CLZhao 4571
MW544027
MW520177
This study
Trechispora fimbriata
CLZhao 4154
MW544023
MW520173
This study
Trechispora fimbriata
CLZhao 7969
MW544024
MW520174
This study
Trechispora fimbriata
CLZhao 9006
MW544025
MW520175
This study
Trechispora hymenocystis
KHL 8795
AF347090
AF347090
Unpublished
Trechispora hymenocystis
TL 11112
UDB000778
UDB000778
Ordynets et al. (2015)
Trechispora incisa
EH 24/98
AF347085
–
Unpublished
Trechispora kavinioides
KGN 981002
AF347086
AF347086
Larsson et al. (2004)
Trechispora laevis
TU 115551
UDB016468
–
Ordynets et al. (2015)
Trechispora mollusca
DLL 2010-077
JQ673209
–
Ordynets et al. (2015)
Trechispora mollusca
DLL 2011-186
KJ140681
–
Ordynets et al. (2015)
Trechispora nivea
MA-Fungi 76238
JX392824
JX392825
Telleria et al. (2013)
Trechispora nivea
MA-Fungi 76257
JX392826
JX392827
Telleria et al. (2013)
Trechispora nivea
MA-Fungi 82480
JX392829
JX392830
Telleria et al. (2013)
Trechispora nivea
MA-Fungi 74044
JX392832
JX392833
Telleria et al. (2013)
Trechispora regularis
KHL 10881
AF347087
AF347087
Larsson et al. (2004)
Trechispora rigida
URM 85754
–
MH279999
Unpublished
Trechispora stevensonii
MA-Fungi 70669
JX392841
JX392842
Telleria et al. (2013)
Trechispora stevensonii
HJM 18087
–
MH290761
Unpublished
Trechispora stevensonii
KHL 14654
–
MH290762
Unpublished
Trechispora stevensonii
TU 115499
UDB016467
UDB016467
Ordynets et al. (2015)
Trechispora stellulata
UC 2022880
KP814437
–
Unpublished
Trechispora stellulata
UC 2023099
KP814451
–
Unpublished
Trechispora subsphaerospora
KHL 8511
AF347080
AF347080
Larsson et al. (2004)
Trechispora thelephora
URM 85757
–
MH280001
Unpublished
Trechispora thelephora
URM 85758
–
MH280002
Unpublished
Trechispora yunnanensis
CLZhao 210
MN654918
MN654921
Xu et al. (2019)
Trechispora yunnanensis
CLZhao 214
MN654919
MN654922
Xu et al. (2019)
Trechispora yunnanensis
CLZhao 215
MN654920
MN654923
Xu et al. (2019)
List of species, specimens, and GenBank accession numbers of sequences used in this study.Sequencher 4.6 (GeneCodes, Ann Arbor, United States) was used to edit the DNA sequence. Sequences were aligned in MAFFT 7[4] using the “G-INS-I” strategy and manually adjusted in BioEdit (Hall, 1999). The sequence alignment was deposited in TreeBase (submission ID 25879). Sequences of Fibrodontia alba Yurchenko and Sheng H. Wu and Fibrodontia gossypina Parmasto retrieved from GenBank were used as an outgroup in the ITS + nLSU analyses by following Ordynets et al. (2015).Maximum parsimony (MP) analyses were applied to the ITS + nLSU dataset sequences. Approaches to phylogenetic analysis followed Zhao and Wu (2017), and the tree construction procedure was performed in PAUP∗ version 4.0b10 (Swofford, 2002). All characters were equally weighted and gaps were treated as missing data. Trees were inferred using the heuristic search option with tree-bisection reconnection (TBR) branch swapping and 1000 random sequence additions. Max-trees were set to 5000, branches of zero length were collapsed, and all parsimonious trees were saved. Clade robustness was assessed using a bootstrap (BT) analysis with 1000 replicates (Felsenstein, 1985). Descriptive tree statistics tree length (TL), consistency index (CI), retention index (RI), rescaled consistency index (RC), and homoplasy index (HI) were calculated for each Maximum Parsimonious Tree generated. Datamatrix was also analyzed using maximum likelihood (ML) approach with RAxML-HPC2 through the Cipres Science Gateway with GTR + I + G molecular evolution model[5] (Miller et al., 2009). Branch support (BS) for ML analysis was determined by 1000 BT replicates.MrModeltest 2.3 (Nylander, 2004) was used to determine the best-fit evolution model (GTR + I + G) for each data set for Bayesian inference (BI) of the phylogeny. BI was calculated with MrBayes 3.1.2 (Ronquist and Huelsenbeck, 2003). Four Markov chains were run for two runs from random starting trees for 1 million generations and trees were sampled every 100 generations; the first one-fourth of generations were discarded as burn-in. A majority rule consensus tree of all remaining trees was calculated. Branches were considered as significantly supported if they received ML BT values > 75%, MP BT values > 75%, or Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) > 0.95.
Results
In the ITS dataset, the sequences from 43 fungal specimens representing 25 species were included. The dataset had an aligned length of 1034 characters, of which 521 characters are constant, 86 are variable and parsimony-uninformative, and 427 are parsimony-informative. MP analysis yielded 26 equally parsimonious trees (TL = 2048, CI = 0.4561, HI = 0.5439, RI = 0.6174, RC = 0.2816). Best model for the ITS dataset estimated and applied in the Bayesian analysis: GTR + I + G, lset nst = 6, rates = invgamma; prset statefreqpr = dirichlet (1,1,1,1). Bayesian analysis and ML analysis resulted in a similar topology to MP analysis, with an average standard deviation of split frequencies = 0.009985 (BI).The phylogeny (Figure 1) inferred from ITS sequences showed that Trechispora bambusicola was sister to Trechispora stevensonii (Berk. and Broome) K.H. Larss, and Trechispora fimbriata grouped with Trechispora nivea. T. fissurata grouped with T. echinospora Telleria, M. Dueñas, I. Melo, and M.P. Martín.
FIGURE 1
Maximum Parsimony strict consensus tree illustrating the phylogeny of three new species and related species in Trechispora based on ITS sequences. Branches are labeled with maximum likelihood bootstrap values > 70%, parsimony bootstrap proportion values > 50%, and Bayesian posterior probabilities > 0.95, respectively.
Maximum Parsimony strict consensus tree illustrating the phylogeny of three new species and related species in Trechispora based on ITS sequences. Branches are labeled with maximum likelihood bootstrap values > 70%, parsimony bootstrap proportion values > 50%, and Bayesian posterior probabilities > 0.95, respectively.In the ITS + nLSU dataset, it included sequences from 49 fungal specimens representing 27 species. The dataset had an aligned length of 2256 characters, of which 1387 characters are constant, 188 are variable and parsimony-uninformative, and 681 are parsimony-informative. MP analysis yielded 100 equally parsimonious trees (TL = 2811, CI = 0.4963, HI = 0.5037, RI = 0.6409, RC = 0.3180). Best model for the ITS dataset estimated and applied in the Bayesian analysis: GTR + I + G, lset nst = 6, rates = invgamma; prset statefreqpr = dirichlet (1,1,1,1). Bayesian analysis and ML analysis resulted in a similar topology to MP analysis, with an average standard deviation of split frequencies = 0.009991 (BI).The phylogenetic tree (Figure 2) inferred from ITS + nLSU sequences demonstrated 27 species of Trechispora and revealed that T. bambusicola formed a single lineage and then grouped with Trechispora rigida (Berk.) K.H. Larss. and T. stevensonii. T. fimbriata was sister to T. nivea. T. fissurata grouped with T. thelephora (Lév.) Ryvarden.
FIGURE 2
Maximum Parsimony strict consensus tree illustrating the phylogeny of three new species and related species in Trechispora based on ITS + nLSU sequences. Branches are labeled with maximum likelihood bootstrap values > 70%, parsimony bootstrap proportion values > 50%, and Bayesian posterior probabilities > 0.95, respectively.
Maximum Parsimony strict consensus tree illustrating the phylogeny of three new species and related species in Trechispora based on ITS + nLSU sequences. Branches are labeled with maximum likelihood bootstrap values > 70%, parsimony bootstrap proportion values > 50%, and Bayesian posterior probabilities > 0.95, respectively.
Taxonomy
Trechispora bambusicola C.L. Zhao, sp. nov.
MycoBank no.: MB 838612 (Figures 3, 4).
FIGURE 3
Basidiomata of Trechispora bambusicola (holotype): Bars: (A) 2 cm; (B) 1 mm.
FIGURE 4
Microscopic structures of Trechispora bambusicola (drawn from the holotype): (A) Section of hymenium. (B) Basidiospores. (C) Basidia and basidioles. Bars: (A,C) 10 μm; (B) 5 μm.
Basidiomata of Trechispora bambusicola (holotype): Bars: (A) 2 cm; (B) 1 mm.Microscopic structures of Trechispora bambusicola (drawn from the holotype): (A) Section of hymenium. (B) Basidiospores. (C) Basidia and basidioles. Bars: (A,C) 10 μm; (B) 5 μm.Holotype—China, Yunnan Province, Pu’er, Laiyanghe National Forest Park, on dead bamboo, 30 September 2017, CLZhao 3305 (SWFC).Etymology—Bambusicola (Lat.): referring to occurrence on bamboo stump.
Basidiomata
Annual, adnate, soft, and fragile, without odor or taste when fresh, becoming granulose upon drying, up to 15 cm long and 5 cm wide, 50–300 μm thick. Hymenial surface odontioid, aculei cylindrical to conical, blunt, 0.3–0.5 mm long, white to cream when fresh, turn to cream to buff upon drying. Margin white to cream.
Hyphal structure
Monomitic, generative hyphae with clamp connections, hyaline, thick-walled, up to 0.7 μm, richly branched, 2–3 μm in diameter, IKI−, CB−; hyphae unchanged in KOH.
Hymenium
Cystidia and cystidioles absent; basidia shortly cylindrical to subclavate with median constriction, with 4-sterigmata and a basal clamp connection, 9–13 × 2.5–5 μm, basidioles dominant, in shape similar to basidia, but slightly smaller.
CHINA, Yunnan Province, Pu’er, Laiyanghe National Forestry Park, on dead bamboo, 30 September 2017, CLZhao 3302 (SWFC).
Trechispora fimbriata C.L. Zhao, sp. nov.
MycoBank no.: MB 838613 (Figures 5, 6).
FIGURE 5
Basidiomata of Trechispora fimbriata (holotype). Bars: (A) 5 mm; (B) 1 mm.
FIGURE 6
Microscopic structures of Trechispora fimbriata (drawn from the holotype). (A) Basidiospores. (B) Basidia and basidioles. (C) Section of hymenium. Bars: (A) 5 μm; (B,C) 10 μm.
Basidiomata of Trechispora fimbriata (holotype). Bars: (A) 5 mm; (B) 1 mm.Microscopic structures of Trechispora fimbriata (drawn from the holotype). (A) Basidiospores. (B) Basidia and basidioles. (C) Section of hymenium. Bars: (A) 5 μm; (B,C) 10 μm.Holotype—China, Yunnan Province, Puer, Jingdong County, Wuliangshan National Nature Reserve, on the angiosperm trunk, October 5, 2017, CLZhao 4154 (SWFC).Etymology—Fimbriata (Lat.): refers to the fimbriate margin of the basidiomata.Annual, adnate, without odor or taste when fresh, becoming fragile upon drying, up to 10 cm long and 3 cm wide, 100–200 μm thick. Hymenial surface hydnoid, with aculei, cylindrical, blunt, 0.4–0.7 mm long, white to pink when fresh, turn to pink to buff upon drying. Margin white to cream, thinning out, fimbriate.
Hyphal system
Monomitic, generative hyphae with clamp connections, hyaline, thick-walled, up to 0.6 μm, branched, 2–4 μm in diameter, IKI−, CB−; hyphae unchanged in KOH.Cystidia and cystidioles absent; basidia shortly cylindrical with median constriction, with 4–6 sterigmata and a basal clamp connection, 7–11.5 × 3.5–5 μm, basidioles dominant, in shape similar to basidia, but slightly smaller.Ellipsoid, hyaline, thick-walled, ornamented, sparse aculei, sharp, IKI−, CB−, (2.5−)3–3.6(−3.8) × 2.4–3.2 μm, L = 3.25 μm, W = 2.63 μm, Q = 1.17–1.38 (n = 90/3).White rot.
Additional specimens examined
China, Yunnan Province, Yuxi, Xinping County, Mopanshan National Forestry Park, on living tree of angiosperm, August 9, 2018, CLZhao 7969 (SWFC); on angiosperm trunk, October 15, 2018, CLZhao 9006 (SWFC).
Trechispora fissurata C.L. Zhao, sp. nov.
MycoBank no.: MB 838614 (Figures 7, 8).
FIGURE 7
Basidiomata of Trechispora fissurata (holotype). Bars: (A) 1 cm; (B) 1 mm.
FIGURE 8
Microscopic structures of Trechispora fissurata (drawn from the holotype). (A) Basidiospores. (B) Basidia and basidioles. (C) Section of hymenium. Bars: (A) 5 μm; (B,C) 10 μm.
Basidiomata of Trechispora fissurata (holotype). Bars: (A) 1 cm; (B) 1 mm.Microscopic structures of Trechispora fissurata (drawn from the holotype). (A) Basidiospores. (B) Basidia and basidioles. (C) Section of hymenium. Bars: (A) 5 μm; (B,C) 10 μm.Holotype—China, Yunnan Province, Puer, Jingdong County, Wuliangshan National Nature Reserve, on angiosperm trunk, October 6, 2017, CLZhao 4571 (SWFC).Etymology—Fissurata (Lat.): refers to the cracking fissures on hymenial surface.Annual, adnate, without odor or taste when fresh, becoming cracking upon drying, up to 8 cm long and 4.5 cm wide, 400–800 μm thick. Hymenial surface hydnoid, with aculei, cylindrical to conical, sharp, 0.5–0.9 mm long, cream to straw yellow when fresh, turn to cream to yellow upon drying. Margin cream to yellow.Monomitic, generative hyphae with clamp connections, hyaline, thick-walled, up to 0.8 μm, branched, 2.5–5 μm in diameter, IKI−, CB−; hyphae unchanged in KOH.Cystidia and cystidioles absent; basidia shortly clavate to tubular, with 4-sterigmata and a basal clamp connection, 8–10.5 × 2.5–4.5 μm, basidioles dominant, in shape similar to basidia, but slightly smaller.Ellipsoid, hyaline, thick-walled, ornamented, dense aculei, sharp, IKI−, CB−, (3−)3.3–4(−4.3) × (2.5−)2.8–3.5(−3.9) μm, L = 3.67 μm, W = 3.19 μm, Q = 1.13–1.17 (n = 60/2).White rot.CHINA, Yunnan Province, Yuxi, Xinping County, Mopanshan Forestry Park, on the fallen angiosperm branch, January 17, 2017, CLZhao 995 (SWFC).
Discussion
Phylogenetically, Phookamsak et al. (2019) introduced the phylogram generated from BI analysis of ITS sequence dataset of Trechispora sequences and included most taxa in this genus, in which it implied the phylogenetic relationship among species of Trechispora. In the present study, based on the ITS sequences (Figure 1), T. bambusicola was sister to T. stevensonii (Berk. and Broome) K.H. Larss; T. fimbriata grouped with T. nivea; T. fissurata grouped with T. echinospora Telleria, M. Dueñas, I. Melo, and M.P. Martín. Further ITS + nLSU dataset (Figure 2) revealed that T. bambusicola formed a single lineage and then grouped with T. rigida and T. stevensonii; T. fimbriata was sister to T. nivea; T. fissurata grouped with T. thelephora. However, T. rigida differs in its dirty white to buff hymenophore (Larsson, 1996). T. stevensonii is separated from T. bambusicola by the smooth to hydnoid hymenophore and larger basidiospores (4–4.5 × 3–3.5 μm; Larsson, 1995). T. nivea differs from T. fimbriata by the white to light ochraceous hymenial surface (Persoon, 1794). T. echinospora differs from T. fissurata by the farinaceous to grandinioid hymenophore and larger, globose basidiospores (3.3–4 × 2.8–3.5 μm; Phookamsak et al., 2019) and T. thelephora differs in its pileate to stipitate with light yellow brown surface and larger (4–5 × 3.4–4.5 μm; Albee-Scott and Kropp, 2010).In the present study, three new species, T. bambusicola, T. fimbriata, and T. fissurata spp. nov. are found from rotten wood. Morphologically, T. bambusicola is similar to T. cyatheae Ordynets, Langer and K.H. Larss. by sharing the characteristics of soft and fragile basidiomata. However, T. cyatheae differs from T. bambusicola by having farinaceous to grandinioid hymenophore and thin-walled generative hyphae (Ordynets et al., 2015).Trechispora fimbriata has similar characteristics of having the fimbriate margin with Trechispora canariensis Ryvarden and Liberta, Trechispora clancularis (Park.-Rhodes) K.H. Larss., Trechispora microspora (P. Karst.) Liberta, Trechispora stellulata (Bourdot and Galzin) Liberta, and Trechispora subhelvetica (Parmasto) Liberta. However, T. canariensis differs in its arachnoid to pelliculose hymenophore and larger basidiospores (5–7 × 3–3.5 μm; Ryvarden and Liberta, 1978); T. clancularis differs in the poroid to irpicoid hymenophore and slightly cyanophilous basidiospores (Larsson, 1994); T. stellulata differs in the arachnoid to byssoid hymenophore with whitish hymenial surface (Liberta, 1966); and T. subhelvetica differs in the narrower basidiospores (3–4 × 2–2.5 μm; Parmasto, 1965).Trechispora fissurata resembles several species with similar features of having the hydnoid hymenophore and a monomitic hyphal system: T. nivea (Pers.) K.H. Larss., T. stevensonii (Berk. and Broome) K.H. Larss., and Trechispora verruculosa (G. Cunn.) K.H. Larss., but T. nivea by the white to pale ochraceous hymenial surface and thin-walled generative hyphae encrusted with granular crystals (Bernicchia and Gorjón, 2010); T. stevensonii by the white to ochraceous hymenial surface and larger basidiospores (4–4.5 × 3–3.5 μm; Larsson, 1995); T. verruculosa by the slightly cyanophilous and larger basidiospores (4.5–5.5 × 3.5–4.5 μm; Larsson, 1996).Currently, eight species of Trechispora have been reported from China (Dai, 2011; Xu et al., 2019), Trechispora alnicola, Trechispora cohaerens, T. farinacea, T. microspora, T. nivea, Trechispora polygonospora Ryvarden, Trechispora subsphaerospora (Litsch.) Liberta, and T. yunnanensis, and one species of T. yunnanensis was found in Yunnan Province of China and it differs from three new species by having a smooth to farinaceous hymenial surface and larger basidiospores (7–8.5 × 5–5.5 μm; Xu et al., 2019). Three new taxa do not closely group together in phylogenetic trees, and morphologically, T. bambusicola differs from T. fimbriata and T. fissurata by having granulose basidiomata with cream to buff hymenial surface and growth on dead bamboo. T. fimbriata differs in its fimbriate margin of the basidiomata with pink to buff hymenial surface.In addition, the ectomycorrhizal fungi (EcM) play an important role in ecosystems based on their mutualistic association with many groups of plants (Heijden et al., 2015). Vanegas-León et al. (2019) discovered the Trechisporales basidiomes and root colonization from T. thelephora basidiome. In the present study, T. fissurata was sister to T. thelephora based on ITS + nLSU phylogenetic analysis (Figure 2), which implied that both species have close evolutionary relationship. However, T. fissurata grows on deeply decayed wood, and T. thelephora is a soil-inhabiting fungus. Therefore, future investigations in both inhabiting types are needed to determine whether the natural selection or other factors pushes the different direction on inhabiting soil/wood among Trechispora.In the habitat and distribution, Hibbett et al. (2014) revealed that most species of Trechispora is considered as soil-inhabiting. Later, some species were found on deeply decayed wood fungi (Bernicchia and Gorjón, 2010; Dai, 2011). However, some species in Trechispora are a typical feature of ectomycorrhizal fungi as frequently forming basidiomes on soil (Dunham et al., 2007; Vanegas-León et al., 2019). In the neotropical and subtropical region, the ectomycorrhizal basidiomes are found; however, the researches on the new taxa related to wood-decaying fungi of Trechispora from China are poorly reported. Further studies may focus on the relationships between the plants and species from Trechispora and try to better understand the evolutionary directions between soil-inhabiting and decayed wood fungi of Trechispora; many fungal studies on phylogeny and application were from these areas, which will be useful to push future researches for the genus Trechispora (Dai, 2011; Cui et al., 2019; Shen et al., 2019; Zhu et al., 2019; Richter et al., 2019; Angelini et al., 2020; Bao et al., 2020).
Disclosure
All the experiments undertaken in this study comply with the current laws of the People’s Republic of China.
Data Availability Statement
The data presented in the study are deposited in the https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/GenBank and https://www.mycobank.org/page/Home/MycoBank repository accession number of GenBank (ITS MW544021-MW544027 and nLSU MW520171-MW520177) and MycoBank (MB 838612-MB 838614).
Author Contributions
C-LZ collected the species. WZ performed the molecular phylogenetic analyses. Both authors were responsible for the morphological analysis and description of the collections, planned, organized, and evaluated critically the experimental parts, wrote the manuscript, contributed to the article, and approved the submitted version.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Authors: D Vu; M Groenewald; M de Vries; T Gehrmann; B Stielow; U Eberhardt; A Al-Hatmi; J Z Groenewald; G Cardinali; J Houbraken; T Boekhout; P W Crous; V Robert; G J M Verkley Journal: Stud Mycol Date: 2018-05-30 Impact factor: 16.097