Shi-Liang Liu1, Hai-Xia Ma2, Shuang-Hui He1, Yu-Cheng Dai1. 1. Institute of Microbiology, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China Beijing Forestry University Beijing China. 2. Institute of Tropical Bioscience and Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Hainan Key Laboratory of Tropical Microbe Resources, Haikou 571101, China Institute of Tropical Bioscience and Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences Haikou China.
Abstract
Four new species in Trechisporales from East Asia, Dextrinocystiscalamicola, Subulicystidiumacerosum, S.tropicum and Tubuliciumbambusicola, are described and illustrated, based on morphological and molecular evidence. The phylogeny of Trechisporales was inferred from a combined dataset of ITS-nrLSU sequences. In the phylogenetic tree, Sistotremastrum formed a family-level clade of its own, sister to the Hydnodontaceae clade formed by all other genera. Dextrinocystis, is for the first time, confirmed as a member of Hydnodontaceae. A key to all the accepted genera in Trechisporales is given.
Four new species in Trechisporales from East Asia, Dextrinocystiscalamicola, Subulicystidiumacerosum, S.tropicum and Tubuliciumbambusicola, are described and illustrated, based on morphological and molecular evidence. The phylogeny of Trechisporales was inferred from a combined dataset of ITS-nrLSU sequences. In the phylogenetic tree, Sistotremastrum formed a family-level clade of its own, sister to the Hydnodontaceae clade formed by all other genera. Dextrinocystis, is for the first time, confirmed as a member of Hydnodontaceae. A key to all the accepted genera in Trechisporales is given.
K.H. Larss. is a rather small but strongly supported order in (Hibbett et al. 2007; Larsson 2007). At present, eight to twelve genera, K.H. Larss. & Hjortstam, J. Erikss. & Ryvarden, Parmasto, K.H. Larss. & Hjortstam, Jülich, Parmasto, P. Karst. (type genus, including I. Johans. & Ryvarden, Park-Rhodes, Banker and Singer) and Oberw., are placed in the family , while J. Erikss. should be placed in a family of its own (Larsson 2001, 2007; Larsson et al. 2004; Binder et al. 2005; Hibbett et al. 2007, 2014; Birkebak et al. 2013; Telleria et al. 2013a). In addition, four genera, Gilb. & M. Blackw., Hjortstam & Ryvarden, Hjortstam & Ryvarden and Oberw. were listed as possible candidates of waiting for molecular confirmation (Larsson 2007; Hibbett et al. 2014). Except for and (Lév.) Ryvarden, all the taxa in have resupinate basidiomata and most of them have a non-poroid hymenophore (Fig. 1, Albee-Scott and Kropp 2011; Hibbett et al. 2014). However, the microscopic characters vary significantly amongst different genera and some of them were surprisingly placed in the order solely based on molecular phylogeny (Larsson 2007; Bernicchia and Gorjón 2010).
Figure 1.
Basidiomata of . a (Bres.) Singer (He 5192) b F. Wu & C.L. Zhao (Dai 13708) c Yurchenko & Sheng H. Wu (He 4761) d sp. (He 5491) e sp. (He 3048) f (Boidin & Gilles) Oberw., Kisim.-Hor. & L.D. Gómez (He 3191). Scale bar: 1 cm.
Basidiomata of . a (Bres.) Singer (He 5192) b F. Wu & C.L. Zhao (Dai 13708) c Yurchenko & Sheng H. Wu (He 4761) d sp. (He 5491) e sp. (He 3048) f (Boidin & Gilles) Oberw., Kisim.-Hor. & L.D. Gómez (He 3191). Scale bar: 1 cm.Except for , the largest genus in the order, most genera in have mostly few species and some are still monotypic. However, in recent years, many new species have been described, based on both DNA sequence data and morphological characters. Wu et al. (2015) described a cryptic species of (Pers.) Jülich, based mainly on sequence data. Ordynets et al. (2018) studied the short-spored species of and recognised eleven new species. Tens specimens of were collected from East Asia by the senior authors in the past three years. The purposes of the present paper are to study these specimens by using morphological and molecular methods and discuss the phylogeny of the , based on expanded sampling.
Materials and methods
Morphological studies
Voucher specimens were deposited in the herbaria of Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China (BJFC) and in the Centre for Forest Mycology Research, U.S. Forest Service, Madison, USA (CFMR). Freehand sections were made from dried basidiomata and mounted in 0.2% cotton blue in lactic acid, 1% phloxine (w/v) or Melzer’s reagent. Microscopic examinations were carried out with a Nikon Eclipse 80i microscope (Nikon Corporation, Japan) at magnifications up to 1000×. Drawings were made with the aid of a drawing tube. All measurements were carried out with sections mounted in Melzer’s reagent. The following abbreviations are used: L = mean spore length, W = mean spore width, Q = L/W ratio, n (a/b) = number of spores (a) measured from given number of specimens (b). Colour names and codes follow Kornerup and Wanscher (1978).
DNA extraction and sequencing
The CTAB plant genome rapid extraction kit DN14 (Aidlab Biotechnologies Co. Ltd, Beijing) was used for DNA extraction and PCR amplification from dried specimens. The ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 and partial nrLSU markers were amplified with the primer pairs ITS5/ITS4 (White et al. 1990) and LR0R/LR7 (Vilgalys and Hester 1990). The PCR procedures followed Liu et al. (2017). DNA sequencing was performed at Beijing Genomics Institute and the sequences were deposited in GenBank (Benson et al. 2018). The sequence quality control followed Nilsson et al. (2012). BioEdit v.7.0.5.3 (Hall 1999) and Geneious v.11.1.15 (Kearse et al. 2012) were used for chromatogram check and contig assembly.
Phylogenetic analyses
The molecular phylogeny was inferred from a combined dataset of ITS1-5.8S-ITS2-nrLSU sequences of sensu Larsson (2007) (Table 1). (Bourdot & Galzin) J. Erikss. and (P. Karst.) J. Erikss. were selected as the outgroup (Wu et al. 2015). The sequences of ITS and nrLSU were aligned separately using MAFFT v.7 (Katoh et al. 2017, http://mafft.cbrc.jp/alignment/server/) with the G-INS-i iterative refinement algorithm. The separate alignments were concatenated using Mesquite v.3.5.1 (Maddison and Maddison 2018). The combined alignments were deposited in TreeBase (http://treebase.org/treebase-web/home.html, submission ID: 23620).
Table 1.
Species and sequences used in the phylogenetic analyses.
Taxa
Voucher
Locality
ITS
nrLSU
Reference
Brevicelliciumexile
MA-Fungi 26554
Spain
HE963777
HE963778
Telleria et al. (2013a)
B.olivascens
MA-Fungi 41366
Spain
HE963785
HE963786
Telleria et al. (2013a)
B. sp
MPM 2012
Portugal
–
HE963774
Telleria et al. (2013a)
Dextrinocystiscalamicola
BJFC: He 5693
China
MK204533
MK204546
This study
D.calamicola
BJFC: He 5700
China
MK204534
MK204547
This study
BJFC: He 5701
China
–
MK204548
This study
Fibrodontiaalba
TNM: F25503
Taiwan
JQ612713
JQ612714
Yurchenko and Wu (2014)
F.alba
BJFC: He 4761
China
MK204529
MK204541
This study
F.brevidens
TNM: Wu 9807-16
Taiwan
KC928276
KC928277
Yurchenko and Wu (2014)
BJFC: He 3559
China
MK204528
–
This study
F.gossypina
AFTOL-ID 599
–
DQ249274
AY646100
Unpublished
Hyphodontiafloccosa
GB: Berglund 150-02
Sweden
DQ873618
DQ873617
Larsson et al. (2006)
H.subalutacea
GEL 2196
–
DQ340341
DQ340362
Unpublished
Litschauerella sp.
BJFC: He 3171
China
MK204555
MK204556
This study
Porpomycesmucidus
BJFC: Dai 12692
Czech Republic
KT157833
KT157838
Wu et al. (2015)
P.submucidus
BJFC: Cui 5183
China
KT152143
KT152145
Wu et al. (2015)
Subulicystidiumboidinii
KAS: L 1584a
Reunion
MH041527
–
Ordynets et al. (2018)
S.acerosum
BJFC: He 3804
China
MK204539
MK204543
This study
S.brachysporum
O: F: KHL 16100
Brazil
MH000599
MH000599
Ordynets et al. (2018)
BJFC: He 2207
USA
MK204532
MK204549
This study
S.fusisporum
GB: KHL 10360
Puerto Rico
MH041535
MH041567
Ordynets et al. (2018)
S.grandisporum
O: F: 506781
Costa Rica
MH041547
MH041592
Ordynets et al. (2018)
S.harpagum
KAS: L 1726a
Reunion
MH041532
MH041588
Ordynets et al. (2018)
S.inornatum
GB: KHL 10444
Puerto Rico
MH041558
MH041569
Ordynets et al. (2018)
S.longisporum
GB: KHL 14229
Sweden
MH000601
MH000601
Ordynets et al. (2018)
BJFC: He 2981
China
–
MK204550
This study
S.meridense
GB: Hjm 16400
Brazil
MH041538
MH041604
Ordynets et al. (2018)
S.nikau
KAS: L 1296
Reunion
MH041513
MH041565
Ordynets et al. (2018)
S.obtusisporum
FR: Piepenbrink & Lotz-Winter W213-3-I
Germany
MH041521
MH041566
Ordynets et al. (2018)
S.parvisporum
KAS: L 0140
Reunion
MH041529
MH041590
Ordynets et al. (2018)
S.perlongisporum
TU 124388
Italy
UDB028355
UDB028355
Kõljalg et al. (2013)
GB: KHL 16062
Brazil
MH000600
MH000600
Ordynets et al. (2018)
S.rarocrystallinum
O: F: 918488
Colombia
MH041512
MH041564
Ordynets et al. (2018)
S.robustius
GB: KHL 10813
Jamaica
MH041514
MH041608
Ordynets et al. (2018)
S.tedersooi
TU 110894
Vietnam
UDB014161
–
Kõljalg et al. (2013)
S.tropicum
BJFC: He 3968
China
MK204531
MK204544
This study
BJFC: He 3583
China
MK204530
MK204542
This study
Scytinopogonangulisporus
TFB 13611
USA
–
JQ684661
Unpublished
S.havencampii
SFSU: DED 8300
Príncipe island
KT253946
KT253947
Desjardin and Perry (2015)
S.pallescens
BJFC: He 5192
Vietnam
–
MK204553
This study
Sistotremastrumguttuliferum
MA-Fungi 82105
Portugal
JX310445
–
Telleria et al. (2013b)
S.guttuliferum
BJFC: He 3338
China
MK204540
MK204552
This study
S.niveocremeum
CBS 427.54
France
MH857380
MH868920
Vu et al. (2019)
S.suecicum
GB: KHL11849
Sweden
EU118666
EU118667
Larsson (2007)
Trechisporaalnicola
AFTOL-ID 665
–
–
AY635768
Unpublished
T.araneosa
GB: KHL 8570
Sweden
AF347084
AF347084
Larsson et al. (2004)
T.bispora
CBS 142.63
Australia
MH858241
MH869842
Vu et al. (2019)
T.confinis
GB: KHL 11064
Sweden
AF347081
AF347081
Larsson et al. (2004)
T.farinacea
TUB 011825
Germany
EU909231
EU909231
Krause et al. (2011)
T.hymenocystis
GB: KHL 8795
Sweden
AF347090
AF347090
Larsson et al. (2004)
T.kavinioides
GB: KGN 981002
Norway
AF347086
AF347086
Larsson et al. (2004)
T.mollusca
CBS 439.48
Canada
MH856428
–
Vu et al. (2019)
T.nivea
GB: G. Kristiansen
Norway
–
AY586720
Larsson et al. (2004)
Tubuliciumbambusicola
BJFC: He 4776
China
MK204536
MK204551
This study
T.bambusicola
BJFC: He 4058
Thailand
MK204535
–
This study
T.raphidisporum
BJFC: He 2851
China
MK204538
MK204554
This study
BJFC: He 3191
China
MK204537
MK204545
This study
T.vermiculare
GEL 5015
–
AJ406424
–
Langer (2002)
T.vermiferum
GB: KHL 8714
Norway
–
AY463477
Larsson et al. (2004)
Species and sequences used in the phylogenetic analyses.For both Maximum Likelihood (ML) and Bayesian Inference (BI), a partitioned analysis was performed with the following four partitions: ITS1, 5.8S, ITS2 and nrLSU. The ML analysis was performed using RAxML v.8.2.10 (Stamatakis 2014) with the bootstrap values (ML-BS) obtained from 1,000 replicates and the GTRGAMMA model of nucleotide evolution. The BI was performed using MrBayes 3.2.6 (Ronquist et al. 2012). The best-fit substitution model for each partitioned locus was estimated separately with jModeltest v.2.17 (Darriba et al. 2012) by restricting the search to models that can be implemented in MrBayes. Two runs of four Markov chains were run for 4,000,000 generations until the split deviation frequency value was lower than 0.01. The convergence of the runs was checked using Tracer v.1.7 (Rambaut et al. 2018). Trees and model parameters were sampled every 100th generation. The first quarter of the trees, which represented the burn-in phase of the analyses, was discarded and the remaining trees were used to build a majority rule consensus tree and to calculate Bayesian posterior probabilities (BPP). All trees were visualised in FigTree 1.4.2 (Rambaut 2014).
Results
Phylogenetic inference
The ITS-nrLSU sequence dataset contained 50 ITS and 51 nrLSU sequences from 58 samples representing 45 ingroup taxa and the outgroup (Table 1). Fourteen ITS and 15 nrLSU sequences were generated for this study. jModelTest suggested GTR+G, SYM+I+G, GTR+I+G and GTR+I+G to be the best-fit models of nucleotide evolution for ITS1, 5.8S, ITS2 and nrLSU markers, respectively, for the Bayesian analysis. BI analysis resulted in an almost identical tree topology compared to the ML analysis and no significant conflicts were found between the two analyses. Only the ML tree is shown in Fig. 2 with ML bootstrap values ≥ 50% and Bayesian posterior probabilities ≥ 0.95 labelled along the branches.
Figure 2.
Phylogeny of inferred from ITS-nrLSU sequences. Topology is from ML analysis with maximum likelihood bootstrap support values (≥ 50, former) and Bayesian posterior probability values (≥ 0.95, latter) shown along the branches. Different genera are indicated as coloured blocks. The new species are set in bold. Scale bar: 0.2 nucleotide substitutions per site.
Phylogeny of inferred from ITS-nrLSU sequences. Topology is from ML analysis with maximum likelihood bootstrap support values (≥ 50, former) and Bayesian posterior probability values (≥ 0.95, latter) shown along the branches. Different genera are indicated as coloured blocks. The new species are set in bold. Scale bar: 0.2 nucleotide substitutions per site.In the tree (Fig. 2), two large clades, corresponding to and family, were strongly supported. Except for , the other eight genera sampled were nested within the clade. The genera , , and were strongly supported as monophyletic lineages. , the first species sequenced in the genus, formed a sister lineage to with relatively strong support (ML-BS = 78%, BPP = 1). The three species of were nested within the lineage. and formed distinct lineages in the genus, while is closely related to .
Taxonomy
S.H. He & S.L. Liu
sp. nov.828718Fig. 3
Figure 3.
(holotype, He 5701). a basidiomata b, f basidiospores c, g basidia d, h cystidia e, i cystidia-like branches in subiculum j subicular hyphae. Scale bars: 1 cm (a), 10 µm (b–j). b, c Taken in phloxine d, e taken in Melzer’s reagent.
Typification.
CHINA. Fujian Province, Wuyishan County, Wuyishan Nature Reserve, on dead culms of , 3 Oct 2018, He 5701 (holotype, BJFC 026763).
Etymology.
“calamicola” refers to growing on .
Basidiomata.
Annual, resupinate, effused, thin, soft, easily separated from the substrate, at first as irregular small patches, later confluent up to 15 cm long, 2 cm wide. Hymenophore surface smooth, orange white (5A2) to greyish-orange [5B(3–5)], finely cracked with age; margin thinning out, fimbriate, slightly paler than hymenophore surface, becoming indistinct with age.
Microscopic structures.
Hyphal system monomitic; generative hyphae with clamp connections, hyaline, thin-walled, frequently branched and septate, loosely interwoven, 2–3 µm in diam. Cystidia-like branches present, branched from subicular hyphae, embedded, hyaline, thick-walled, encrusted at apex, 20–30 × 1.5–2 µm. Hymenial cystidia abundant, subulate, projecting beyond hymenium, bi- or multi-rooted, hyaline, distinctly thick-walled with a narrow lumen, slightly encrusted at apex, distinctly dextrinoid, 50–110 × 5–6 µm. Basidia suburniform to subclavate, hyaline, thin-walled, with 4 sterigmata and a basal clamp connection, 20–30 × 5–8 µm; sterigmata mostly cylindrical with a blunt tip; basidioles in shape similar to basidia, but slightly smaller. Basidiospores abundant, oblong ellipsoid to short cylindrical, hyaline, thin-walled, smooth, negative in Melzer’s reagent, acyanophilous, (7–)7.5–8.8(–9) × (3.2–)3.3–4 µm, L = 8.1 µm, W = 3.7 µm, Q = 2.1–2.2 (n = 60/2).
Additional specimens examined.
CHINA. Fujian Province, Wuyishan County, Wuyishan Nature Reserve, on dead culms of , 3 Oct 2018, He 5693 (BJFC 026755) & He 5700 (BJFC 026762).
Remarks.
The thin whitish basidiomata on a palm tree, distinctly thick-walled cystidia with a dextrinoid reaction in Melzer’s reagent, presence of small cystidia-like branches and short cylindrical basidiospores indicate that the new species is a member of . Two species, (D.P. Rogers & Boquiren) Gilb. & M. Blackw. and (Liberta) Nakasone have been reported in the genus, both of which differ from by having much larger basidiospores (11–14 × 3–4 µm for in Gilbertson and Blackwell 1988; 12–19 × 4.5–7 µm for in Liberta 1960) and a distribution in America. In the phylogenetic tree, formed a sister lineage to with relatively strong support (Fig. 2).(holotype, He 5701). a basidiomata b, f basidiospores c, g basidia d, h cystidia e, i cystidia-like branches in subiculum j subicular hyphae. Scale bars: 1 cm (a), 10 µm (b–j). b, c Taken in phloxine d, e taken in Melzer’s reagent.S.H. He & S.L. Liu
sp. nov.828719Fig. 4
Figure 4.
(holotype, He 3804). a basidiomata b, f basidiospores c acerose crystals d, e, g cystidia h basidia and a basidiole. Scale bars: 1 cm (a), 10 µm (b–h). b–e Taken in phloxine.
CHINA. Guizhou Province, Libo County, Maolan Nature Reserve, on fallen angiosperm trunk, 16 Jun 2016, He 3804 (holotype, BJFC 022303).“acerosum” refers to the presence of numerous needle-like crystals.Annual, resupinate, effused, very thin, easily separated from the substrate, up to 6 cm long, 2 cm wide. Hymenophore surface smooth, more or less arachnoid, white (5A1) to orange grey (5B2); margin undifferentiated.Hyphal system monomitic; generative hyphae with clamp connections, hyaline, thin-walled, frequently branched and septate, loosely interwoven, 2–3.5 µm in diam. Cystidia abundant, subulate, projecting beyond hymenium, hyaline, thick-walled and regularly covered with rectangular crystals at basal part, thin-walled and smooth at apex part, 50–100 × 3–5 µm. Crystals numerous, distributed in whole section or more commonly attached on cystidia, acerose, hyaline. Basidia short clavate, hyaline, thin-walled, with 4 sterigmata and a basal clamp connection, 15–20 × 4–5.5 µm; basidioles in shape similar to basidia, but slightly smaller. Basidiospores narrowly fusiform to slightly vermicular, hyaline, thin-walled, smooth, negative in Melzer’s reagent, acyanophilous, (14.5–)15.5–18(–20) × 1.8–2.2 µm, L = 16.6 µm, W = 2 µm, Q = 8.3 (n = 30/1).is characterised by the long and narrow basidiospores and presence of numerous acerose crystals. The species is similar to (Pat.) Parmasto, which differs in having slightly shorter and wider basidiospores (12–16 × 2–3 µm, Q < 7, Ordynets et al. 2018). Punugu is similar to by sharing needle-like crystals but differs in having larger basidiospores (20–27 × 2–3 µm, Punugu et al. 1980; Ordynets et al. 2018). Phylogenetically, is distinct from all the other sampled species of (Fig. 2).(holotype, He 3804). a basidiomata b, f basidiospores c acerose crystals d, e, g cystidia h basidia and a basidiole. Scale bars: 1 cm (a), 10 µm (b–h). b–e Taken in phloxine.S.H. He & S.L. Liu
sp. nov.828720Fig. 5
Figure 5.
(holotype, He 3968). a basidiomata b, d basidiospores c, e cystidia f basidia g subicular hyphae. Scale bars: 1 cm (a), 10 µm (b–g). b, c Taken in phloxine.
CHINA. Hainan Province, Wuzhishan County, Wuzhishan Nature Reserve, on fallen angiosperm branch, 10 Jun 2016, He 3968 (holotype, BJFC 022470).“tropicum” refers to the distribution in tropical areas.Annual, resupinate, effused, very thin, separable from the substrate, up to 10 cm long, 3 cm wide. Hymenophore surface smooth, white (5A1), orange grey (5B2) to greyish-orange [5B(3–4)], not cracked; margin undifferentiated.Hyphal system monomitic; generative hyphae with clamp connections, hyaline, slightly thick-walled, frequently branched and septate, loosely interwoven, 2–3.5 µm in diam. Cystidia abundant, subulate, projecting beyond hymenium, hyaline, thick-walled and regularly covered with rectangular crystals except at the apex, 40–70 × 3–5 µm. Basidia subclavate to suburniform, hyaline, thin-walled, with 4 sterigmata and a basal clamp connection, 12–17 × 4–5 µm; basidioles in shape similar to basidia, but slightly smaller. Basidiospores fusiform to slightly vermicular, hyaline, thin-walled, smooth, negative in Melzer’s reagent, acyanophilous, 11–12.5(–13) × 1.8–2.2 µm, L = 11.9 µm, W = 2 µm, Q = 5.95 (n = 30/1).CHINA. Hainan Province, Baoting County, Qixianling Forest Park, on fallen angiosperm branch, 18 Mar 2016, He 3583 (BJFC 022083).resembles and Boidin & Gilles by sharing narrow basidiospores in the genus, but differs from in having shorter basidiospores and lacking the needle-like crystals and from in having much shorter basidiospores and a tropical distribution (16–25 × 1.5–2.5 µm for in Ordynets et al. 2018). The new species is also similar to , but differs in having slender basidiospores and a tropical distribution. In the phylogenetic tree, formed a distinct lineage in (Fig. 2).(holotype, He 3968). a basidiomata b, d basidiospores c, e cystidia f basidia g subicular hyphae. Scale bars: 1 cm (a), 10 µm (b–g). b, c Taken in phloxine.S.H. He & S.L. Liu
sp. nov.828721Fig. 6
Figure 6.
(holotype, He 4058). a basidiomata b, d basidiospores c, e cystidia f basidia and a basidiole g subicular hyphae. Scale bars: 1 cm (a), 10 µm (b–g). b, c Taken in phloxine.
THAILAND. Chiang Rai Province, Doi Mae Salong, on dead culms of bamboo, 22 Jul 2016, He 4058 (holotype, BJFC 023499).“bambusicola” refers to growing on bamboo.Annual, resupinate, effused, closely adnate, thin, at first as irregular small patches, later confluent up to 15 cm long, 5 cm wide. Hymenophore surface smooth, pilose under lens due to the projecting cystidia, pale orange (5A3) to greyish-orange [5B(3–6)], finely cracked with age; margin undifferentiated.Hyphal system monomitic; generative hyphae with clamp connections, hyaline, thin-walled, moderately branched, frequently septate, loosely interwoven, 2–3 µm in diam. Cystidia abundant, subulate, projecting beyond hymenium, multi-rooted, hyaline, distinctly thick-walled, slightly amyloid, covered with dendroid branching hyphae, 70–100 × 10–16 µm. Basidia subclavate, hyaline, thin-walled, with 4 sterigmata and a basal clamp connection, 18–25 × 8–10 µm; basidioles in shape similar to basidia, but slightly smaller. Basidiospores narrowly fusiform to vermicular, bi-apiculate, hyaline, thin-walled, smooth, negative in Melzer’s reagent, acyanophilous, (17–)20–29(–30) × (2–)2.2–3(–3.2) µm, L = 23.9 µm, W = 2.6 µm, Q = 9–9.5 (n = 60/2).CHINA. Guizhou Province, Libo County, Maolan Nature Reserve, on rotten culms of bamboo, 11 Jul 2017, He 4776 (BJFC 024293).is distinguished by its large vermicular basidiospores and growing on bamboo. Three taxa, (Boidin & Gilles) Oberw., Kisim.-Hor. & L.D. Gómez, (Bourdot) Oberw. and J. Kaur & Dhingra are similar to by sharing long vermicular basidiospores but differ in the width of basidiospores (≥ 3.5 µm) and growing on woody plant. Boidin & Gaignon on differs from by having shorter and wider basidiospores (15–20 × 3–4.25 µm, Boidin and Gaignon 1992).(holotype, He 4058). a basidiomata b, d basidiospores c, e cystidia f basidia and a basidiole g subicular hyphae. Scale bars: 1 cm (a), 10 µm (b–g). b, c Taken in phloxine.
Discussion
Nine genera in the were included in the present analyses and the results mostly agree with previous studies (Larsson 2007; Birkebak et al. 2013; Telleria et al. 2013a). Most of the sampled genera were retrieved as monophyletic except , which was nested within the lineage (Fig. 2). A species was sequenced for the first time and its position in was confirmed. As indicated by the morphology (Burdsall and Nakasone 1983; Gilbertson and Blackwell 1988; Moreno and Esteve-Raventós 2007; Nakasone 2013), the genus is closely related to . However, is morphologically heterogenous, with different basidiospores (Moreno and Esteve-Raventós 2007; Hjortstam and Ryvarden 2008) and only species with fusiform to vermicular basidiospores were sequenced. Moreover, is well distinguished from by its distinctly dextrinoid cystida and cylindrical basidiospores (Gilbertson and Blackwell 1988; Nakasone 2013). Thus, at present, the authors prefer to retain them as separate genera until more species are sequenced.is a well-circumscribed genus characterised by the unique cystidia encrusted with rectangular crystals and fusiform to vermicular basidiospores (Bernicchia and Gorjón 2010; Ordynets et al. 2018). Although all the sampled species formed a strongly supported lineage in the tree (Fig. 2), the species Ordynets, Riebesehl & K.H.Larss. was not congeneric with other species and excluded from our analyses. Ordynets et al. (2018) showed that formed a distinct basal lineage in the ITS-nrLSU tree. The phylogenetic position of the species in needs to be further studied.
1
Basidiomata clavarioid
Scytinopogon
–
Basidiomata resupinate or stipitate hydnoid
2
2
Hymenophore poroid
3
–
Hymenophore non-poroid
4
3
Basidiospores smooth
Porpomyces
–
Basidiospores ornamented
Trechispora p.p.
4
Basidiomata brown
Luellia
–
Basidiomata light coloured
5
5
Cystidia present, large and distinct
6
–
Cystidia absent or indistinct
8
6
Cystidia distinctly dextrinoid in Melzer’s reagent
Dextrinocystis
–
Cystidia negative or amyloid in Melzer’s reagent
7
7
Cystidia regularly encrusted with rectangular crystals
Subulicystidium
–
Cystidia usually covered with dendroid hyphae
Tubulicium
8
Generative hyphae with ampullate septa
Trechispora p.p.
–
Generative hyphae without ampullate septa
9
9
Subhymenial hyphae isodiametric
Brevicellicium
–
Subhymenial hyphae not isodiametric
10
10
Hyphal system dimitic; basidia with 4 sterigmata
Fibrodontia
–
Hyphal system monomitic; basidia with 4–8 sterigmata