| Literature DB >> 33801641 |
Matthew P G Barnett1,2, Wayne Young1,2,3, Kelly Armstrong1, Diane Brewster4, Janine M Cooney5, Stephanie Ellett6, Richard V Espley4, William Laing7, Paul Maclean1, Tony McGhie7, Greg Pringle4, Nicole C Roy1,2,3,8,9, Lynnette R Ferguson6.
Abstract
Polyphenols within fruits and vegetables may contribute to health benefits due to their consumption, with the anthocyanin sub-set also adding colour. The Lemonade™ apple variety has green skin and white flesh, with low anthocyanin content, while some apple varieties have high anthocyanin content in both the skin and flesh. Effects of red compared with white-fleshed apples were studied in healthy human subjects in a randomized, placebo-controlled, cross-over intervention trial. Twenty-five healthy subjects consumed dried daily portions of the red-fleshed or placebo (white-fleshed) apple for two weeks, followed by one-week washout and further two-week crossover period. During the study, volunteers provided faecal samples for microbiota composition analysis and blood samples for peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) gene expression analysis. Subtle differences were observed in the faecal microbiota of subjects that were fed the different apples, with significant (p < 0.05) reductions in relative abundances of Streptococcus, Ruminococcus, Blautia, and Roseburia, and increased relative abundances of Sutterella, Butyricicoccus, and Lactobacillus in subjects after consuming the red apple. Changes in PBMC gene expression showed 18 mRNA transcripts were differentially expressed between the two groups, of which 16 were immunoglobulin related genes. Pathway analysis showed that these genes had roles in pathways such as immunoglobulin production, B cell-mediated immunity, complement activation, and phagocytosis. In conclusion, this study shows that anthocyanin-rich apples may influence immune function compared to control apples, with changes potentially associated with differences in the faecal microbiota.Entities:
Keywords: 16s rRNA; Malus × domestica; RNA-Seq; immunoglobulins
Year: 2021 PMID: 33801641 PMCID: PMC8065949 DOI: 10.3390/nu13041092
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Figure 1Red-fleshed (A) and white-fleshed placebo (B) apples after being sliced and dipped in food grade 2% calcium ascorbate.
Polyphenol content of the two apple varieties, calculated as mg/100 g freeze-dried apple. Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation.
| Compound | Red-Fleshed | Placebo | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chlorogenic acid | 116.7 ± 13.5 | 136.9 ± 9.3 | 0.102 |
| Catechin | 0.3 ± 0.0 | 9.9 ± 1.7 | <0.001 |
| Cyanidin 3-galactoside | 26.3 ± 3.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | <0.001 |
| Cyanidin 3-glucoside | 0.3 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | <0.001 |
| Epicatechin | 3.0 ± 0.4 | 34.7 ± 3.6 | <0.001 |
| 4-p-Coumaryl quinic acid | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | N/A |
| Phloridzin | 11.1 ± 1.1 | 6.0 ± 1.2 | <0.01 |
| Phloridzin xyloside | 119.4 ± 10.7 | 35.2 ± 4.1 | <0.001 |
| Procyanidin B1 | 0.2 ± 0.0 | 13.2 ± 2.1 | <0.001 |
| Procyanidin B2 | 4.3 ± 0.1 | 70.0 ± 10.2 | <0.001 |
| Procyanidin B5 | 0.5 ± 0.1 | 6.6 ± 0.9 | <0.001 |
| Quercetin 3-arabinoside | 2.1 ± 0.1 | 1.2 ± 0.3 | <0.01 |
| Quercetin 3-galactoside | 19.1 ± 0.6 | 6.5 ± 2.7 | <0.001 |
| Quercetin 3-rutinoside | 0.9 ± 0.6 | 0.6 ± 0.3 | 0.5339 |
Figure 2Consort flow diagram of study participant recruitment, intervention, and analysis; n refers to the number of participants at each stage.
Baseline participant characteristics.
| Measure | Female ( | Male ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sequence 1 | 1 ( | 2 ( | 1 ( | 2 ( |
| BMI (kg/m) 2 | 23.3 ± 3.0 | 23.4 ± 2.1 | 22.82 | 27.4 ± 4.7 |
| Age (years) | 39.8 ± 15.4 | 38.0 ± 13.0 | 47.3 ± 8.1 | 39.7 ± 14.2 |
| Cholesterol (mmol/L) | 4.87 ± 1.18 | 5.34 ± 1.42 | 6.25 ± 2.62 | 5.20 ± 1.65 |
| HDL cholesterol (mmol/L) | 1.85 ± 0.36 | 1.76 ± 0.20 | 2.25 ± 0.21 | 1.40 ± 0.46 |
| Chol/HDL ratio | 2.66 ± 0.51 | 3.06 ± 0.94 | 2.85 ± 1.48 | 4.03 ± 1.68 |
| LDL cholesterol (mmol/L) | 2.65 ± 0.99 | 3.16 ± 1.36 | 3.40 ± 2.40 | 3.17 ± 1.70 |
| Triglycerides (mmol/L) | 0.81 ± 0.21 | 0.94 ± 0.39 | 1.25 ± 0.92 | 1.40 ± 0.72 |
| C-reactive protein (CRP; mg/L) 3 | 5.70 ± 12.01 | 1.05 ± 0.93 | 1.00 ± 0.00 | 4.67 ± 7.22 |
1 Sequence refers to the order in which the two apples were consumed; 1 = red-fleshed apple first; 2 = placebo (white-fleshed) apple first. 2 As a baseline BMI value was not obtained for one of the male participants, there is no standard deviation (SD) for this value. 3 For CRP, several data values were below the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ); for analysis, these were set to ½ LLOQ. Cholesterol, triglyceride and CRP measures are all in plasma. Abbreviations: BMI = body mass index; HDL = high-density lipoprotein; LDL = low-density lipoprotein; n = number of participants. All data are presented as the mean ± SD.
Effect of red-fleshed apple on fasting plasma cholesterol, triglycerides, and CRP.
| Variable | Apple | Estimate (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CRP | Red | −0.372 (−0.976–0.232) | 0.2208 |
| White | 0 | ||
| Cholesterol | Red | −0.124 (−0.329–0.082) | 0.2315 |
| White | 0 | ||
| Cholesterol/HDL | Red | 0.036 (−0.114–0.186) | 0.6337 |
| White | 0 | ||
| HDL | Red | −0.096 (−0.203–0.011) | 0.0761 |
| White | 0 | ||
| LDL | Red | −0.043 (−0.198–0.111) | 0.5748 |
| White | 0 | ||
| Triglycerides | Red | 0.069 (−0.094–0.231) | 0.3977 |
| White | 0 |
Abbreviations: CI = confidence interval; CRP = C-reactive protein; HDL = high-density lipoprotein; LDL = low-density lipoprotein. All data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation.
Effect of the overall intervention on fasting plasma cholesterol, triglycerides, and CRP.
| Variable | Intervention |
| Mean ± SD | Range | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRP (mg L−1) | Before | 48 | 1.354 ± 1.830 | 0.5–9.0 | 0.3648 |
| After | 49 | 1.286 ± 1.373 | 0.5–6.0 | ||
| Cholesterol | Before | 50 | 5.128 ± 1.359 | 3.3–8.1 | 0.0565 |
| After | 49 | 4.986 ± 1.322 | 3.1–8.0 | ||
| Cholesterol/HDL ratio | Before | 50 | 2.956 ± 0.945 | 1.7–6.0 | 0.8714 |
| After | 49 | 2.953 ± 0.845 | 1.7–5.6 | ||
| HDL | Before | 50 | 1.794 ± 0.363 | 1.0–2.6 | 0.1353 |
| After | 49 | 1.737 ± 0.369 | 1.0–2.6 | ||
| LDL | Before | 50 | 2.914 ± 1.211 | 1.2–5.7 | 0.1293 |
| After | 49 | 2.831 ± 1.144 | 1.2–5.5 | ||
| Triglycerides | Before | 50 | 0.918 ± 0.411 | 0.4–2.0 | 0.9594 |
| After | 49 | 0.918 ± 0.356 | 0.3–2.1 |
Abbreviations: CRP = C-reactive protein; HDL = high-density lipoprotein; LDL = low-density lipoprotein; n = number of participants for which data are available. All data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD), with units mmol L−1 unless otherwise defined; the range is also shown.
Differentially expressed genes between apple interventions.
| Ensembl ID | Gene Name | Description | LogFC | LogCPM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ENSG00000243264 | IGKV2D-29 | Immunoglobulin kappa variable 2D-29 | 1.50 | 2.60 | <0.001 |
| ENSG00000244575 | IGKV1-27 | Immunoglobulin kappa variable 1-27 | −1.38 | 4.00 | 0.002 |
| ENSG00000211976 | IGHV3-73 | Immunoglobulin heavy variable 3-73 | 1.17 | 2.32 | 0.002 |
| ENSG00000253998 | IGKV2-29 | Immunoglobulin kappa variable 2-29 | 1.05 | 0.59 | 0.002 |
| ENSG00000224650 | IGHV3-74 | Immunoglobulin heavy variable 3-74 | 0.77 | 3.73 | 0.004 |
| ENSG00000119508 | NR4A3 | Nuclear receptor subfamily 4 group A member 3 | −1.15 | 1.05 | 0.010 |
| ENSG00000239571 | IGKV2D-30 | Immunoglobulin kappa variable 2D-30 | 0.79 | 0.81 | 0.013 |
| ENSG00000211898 | IGHD | Immunoglobulin heavy constant delta | 0.77 | 7.06 | 0.014 |
| ENSG00000104918 | RETN | Resistin | 0.71 | 2.85 | 0.015 |
| ENSG00000239951 | IGKV3-20 | Immunoglobulin kappa variable 3-20 | −0.90 | 6.79 | 0.019 |
| ENSG00000211970 | IGHV4-61 | Immunoglobulin heavy variable 4-61 | −1.12 | 3.16 | 0.025 |
| ENSG00000211639 | IGLV4-60 | Immunoglobulin lambda variable 4-60 | −1.13 | 1.90 | 0.025 |
| ENSG00000211945 | IGHV1-18 | Immunoglobulin heavy variable 1-18 | −0.81 | 3.23 | 0.033 |
| ENSG00000211670 | IGLV3-9 | Immunoglobulin lambda variable 3-9 | 0.71 | 1.97 | 0.033 |
| ENSG00000239855 | IGKV1-6 | Immunoglobulin kappa variable 1-6 | 0.64 | 2.66 | 0.046 |
| ENSG00000211611 | IGKV6-21 | Immunoglobulin kappa variable 6-21 | 0.65 | 0.88 | 0.047 |
| ENSG00000211668 | IGLV2-11 | Immunoglobulin lambda variable 2-11 | −0.77 | 4.25 | 0.047 |
| ENSG00000211895 | IGHA1 | Immunoglobulin heavy constant alpha 1 | −0.89 | 9.78 | 0.048 |
LogFC = log2 fold change, LogCPM = log2 counts per million. Positive LogFC value indicates higher expression in the placebo (white-fleshed) apple group; negative LogFC indicates lower expression in the placebo apple group.
Figure 3Pathway enrichment analysis showing pathways significantly enriched with differentially expressed genes between the different apple interventions. Colour intensities indicate significance of enrichment with darker colour indicating increasing significance. Genes common to different pathways are shown.
Figure 4Stacked bar plot showing mean relative abundances of taxa at the family level for those consuming red-fleshed (R) apples and placebo or white-fleshed (W) apples at the start of each intervention period (T1 and T3) and at the end of each intervention period (T2 and T4).
Figure 5Unweighted unifrac phylogenetic distance analyses of communities reiterate the variability between samples. The Principle coordinate analysis (PCoA) plots below shows the community similarity between samples; Red = red-fleshed apple; yellow = placebo (white-fleshed) apple; spheres = T1 (baseline, week 0); squares = T2 (at the end of the first intervention, week 2); diamonds = T3 (after washout and before the second intervention, week 3); triangles = T4 (at the end of the second intervention which is also the end of trial, week 5). Different plots show PC1 vs. PC2, PC1 vs. PC3, and PC2 vs. PC3. Lines join samples from the same donor. Here, we can see that the donor has the most influence on composition, as would be expected. No obvious differences based on treatments were observed.
Figure 6Partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) of microbial community composition in response to different apple treatments. Some differences in community composition between the two apple interventions (“Red” = red-fleshed, “White” = white-fleshed) can be discerned by PLS-DA. Plot shows communities at intervention endpoints (T2 and T4). Lines join samples from the same participant.
Taxa with significantly different mean relative abundances between apple interventions (linear mixed-effects model).
| Phylum | Genus | Red | White | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Firmicutes |
| 2.53 ± 0.32 | 3.12 ± 0.32 | 0.049 |
| Firmicutes |
| 2.30 ± 0.26 | 3.07 ± 0.35 | 0.041 |
| Firmicutes |
| 1.75 ± 0.33 | 2.79 ± 0.59 | 0.045 |
| Firmicutes | 1.10 ± 0.21 | 1.69 ± 0.28 | 0.024 | |
| Proteobacteria |
| 0.50 ± 0.12 | 0.33 ± 0.07 | 0.026 |
| Firmicutes |
| 0.30 ± 0.19 | 0.04 ± 0.02 | 0.045 |
| Bacteroidetes |
| 0.27 ± 0.18 | 0.11 ± 0.04 | 0.001 |
| Firmicutes |
| 0.23 ± 0.04 | 0.18 ± 0.03 | 0.049 |
| Firmicutes |
| 0.18 ± 0.05 | 0.36 ± 0.08 | 0.015 |
| Firmicutes |
| 0.17 ± 0.04 | 0.25 ± 0.05 | 0.050 |
| Proteobacteria |
| 0.12 ± 0.12 | 0.24 ± 0.17 | 0.037 |
| Tenericutes | uncl. Mollicutes RF39 | 0.11 ± 0.03 | 0.21 ± 0.06 | 0.033 |
| Firmicutes |
| 0.09 ± 0.03 | 0.22 ± 0.09 | 0.042 |
| Tenericutes | unclassified Izimaplasmatales | 0.03 ± 0.02 | 0.09 ± 0.06 | 0.041 |
| Firmicutes | Uncl. | 0.02 ± 0.01 | 0.01 ± 0.00 | 0.040 |