| Literature DB >> 33799491 |
Sahar Avazzadeh1, Jara Maria Baena1, Cameron Keighron1, Yajaira Feller-Sanchez1, Leo R Quinlan1.
Abstract
Parkinson's Disease (PD) is a chronic neurodegenerative disorder characterized by motor and non-motor symptoms, among which are bradykinesia, rigidity, tremor as well as mental symptoms such as dementia. The underlying cause of Parkinson disease is degeneration of dopaminergic neurons. It has been challenging to develop an efficient animal model to accurately represent the complex phenotypes found with PD. However, it has become possible to recapitulate the myriad of phenotypes underlying the PD pathology by using human induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) technology. Patient-specific iPSC-derived dopaminergic neurons are available and present an opportunity to study many aspects of the PD phenotypes in a dish. In this review, we report the available data on iPSC-derived neurons derived from PD patients with identified gene mutations. Specifically, we will report on the key phenotypes of the generated iPSC-derived neurons from PD patients with different genetic background. Furthermore, we discuss the relationship these cellular phenotypes have to PD pathology and future challenges and prospects for iPSC modelling and understanding of the pathogenesis of PD.Entities:
Keywords: Parkinson’s disease; human pathology; induced pluripotent stem cells
Year: 2021 PMID: 33799491 PMCID: PMC8000082 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci11030373
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Brain Sci ISSN: 2076-3425
Figure 1Parkinson’s disease (PD) modelling. PD have been modelled and studied using post-mortem (A) tissues derived from PD. (B) Animal models have been vastly used both by knocking down specific gene or with use of chemicals. This help researchers to investigate the associated phenotypes such as mitochondrial dysfunction, neuronal degeneration and protein folding and aggregation for creating an efficient animal model and use in drug discovery and toxicity. (C) Novel induced pluripotent stem cells have been derived from somatic cells of a PD or a healthy individual, leading to generate a disease model in a dish where different phenotypes can be investigated and pave the way towards drug discovery, toxicity testing and cell therapy interventions.
SNCA-mutated iPSC-derived neuronal phenotypes.
| Reference | Number of Cohorts | Type of Mutation | Cell Type | Phenotype |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [ | 1 PD line vs. 2 control lines | Autosomal dominant Triplication | iPSC-derived neuronal progenitor cells | 1. Elevated α-synuclein levels |
| [ | 1 PD line vs. 1 control line | Autosomal dominant Triplication | iPSC-derived cortical neurons | 1. Elevated α-synuclein levels |
| [ | 1 PD line vs. 2 control lines | Autosomal dominant Triplication | iPSC-derived DA neurons | 1. Elevated α-synuclein levels |
| [ | 1 PD line vs. 1 control line | Autosomal dominant Duplication | iPSC-derived midbrain DA and Cortical projection neurons | 1. Elevated α-synuclein levels |
| [ | 1 PD line vs. 1 control line | Autosomal dominant Triplication | iPSC-derived DA neurons | 1. Increased α-synuclein aggregation |
| [ | 1 PD line vs. 1 control line | Autosomal dominant Triplication | iPSC-derived cortical neurons | 1. Elevated α-synuclein |
| [ | 1 PD line | Autosomal dominant Triplication | iPSC-derived DA progenitor cells | 1. Elevated α-synuclein levels |
| [ | 1 PD line vs. 1 control line | Autosomal dominant Triplication | iPSC-derived DA neurons | 1. Elevated α-synuclein levels |
| [ | 1 PD line vs. 1 control line | Autosomal dominant Triplication | iPSC-derived DA and basal forebrain cholinergic neurons | 1. Elevated α-synuclein levels |
| [ | 1 PD line vs. 3 control lines | Autosomal dominant Triplication | iPSC-derived DA neurons | 1. Elevated α-synuclein levels |
| [ | 1 PD line vs. 1 control line | Autosomal dominant Triplication | iPSC-derived neuronal progenitor cells | 1. Elevated α-synuclein levels |
| [ | 1 PD line vs. 1 control line vs. 1 isogenic control line | Autosomal dominant Triplication | iPSC-derived cortical neurons | 1. Elevated α-synuclein levels |
| [ | 1 PD line vs. 2 control line | Autosomal dominant Duplication | iPSC-derived cortical forebrain glutamatergic neurons | 1. Elevated α-synuclein levels |
| [ | 1 PD line vs. 1 isogenic control line | Autosomal dominant A53T | iPSC-derived A9 DA neurons | 1. Mitochondrial dysfunction |
| [ | 2 PD lines vs. 1 control line | Autosomal dominant A53T and A30T | iPSC-derived neural stem cells | 1. Mitochondrial dysfunction |
| [ | 2 PD line vs. 1 control line | Autosomal dominant A53T | iPSC-derived DA, GABAergic and glutaminergic neurons | 1. Altered synaptic activity |
| [ | 1 PD line vs. 1 isogenic control line | Autosomal dominant A53T | iPSC-derived A9 DA neurons | 1. Mitochondrial transport impairment |
| [ | 4 PD lines vs. 3 control line | Autosomal dominant A53T and Triplication | iPSC-derived DA neurons | 1. Elevated α-synuclein levels |
| [ | 1 PD line vs. 1 isogenic control line | Autosomal dominant A53T | iPSC-derived DA neurons | 1. Increased α-synuclein aggregation |
| [ | 1 PD line vs. 1 control line | Autosomal dominant A53T | iPSC-derived DA neurons | 1. Elevated α-synuclein levels |
| [ | 3 PD lines vs. 3 control lines | Autosomal dominant A53T and triplication | iPSC-derived DA neurons | 1. Elevated α-synuclein levels |
| [ | 2 PD lines vs. 1 control line vs. 1 isogenic control line | Autosomal dominant A53T and triplication | iPSC-derived DA neurons | 1. Lysosomal dysfunction |
Figure 2Induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived dopaminergic neurons modelling the role of mutant SNCA. The illustration shows the impact of the mutated α-synuclein in different cellular processes within the cell.
LRRK2-mutated iPSC-derived neuronal phenotypes.
| Reference | Number of Cohorts | Type of Mutation | Cell Type | Phenotype |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [ | 1 PD and isogenic KO line vs. isogenic controls | LG2019S | iPSC-derived cortical neurons | 1. Increased neuronal degeneration |
| [ | 3 PD and 2 isogenic KO lines vs. 4 controls and isogenic lines | G2019S | iPSC-derived neural stem cells | 1. Deficient dopaminergic differentiation |
| [ | 3 PD lines vs. 3 control lines | G2019S | iPSC-derived DA neurons | 1. Impairment in neuronal development |
| [ | 8 PD lines vs. 4 control lines | G2019S and R1441C | iPSC-derived DA neurons | 1. Decreased Endocytosis |
| [ | 2 PD lines vs. 2 control lines | G2019S, R1441C | iPSC-derived DA neurons | 1. Mitochondrial dysfunction. |
| [ | 6 PD lines vs. 3 control lines | G2019S | iPSC-derived DA neurons | 1. Increased oxidative stress |
| [ | 2 PD lines vs. 3 control lines vs. 1 isogenic control line | G2019S, | iPSC-derived DA neurons | 1. Increased neuronal degeneration |
| [ | 4 PD lines vs. 4 control lines | G2019S | iPSC-derived DA neurons | 1. Increased neuronal degeneration |
| [ | 6 PD lines vs. 3 control lines | G2019S | iPSC-derived DA neurons | 1. Decreased neuronal development |
| [ | 3 PD lines vs. 3 control lines | G2019S | iPSC-derived DA organoids | 1. Mitophagy impairment |
| [ | 1 PD line | G2019S | iPSC-derived neural stem cells | 1. Increased α-synuclein aggregation |
| [ | 8 PD lines vs. 5 control lines vs. 4 gene edited controls | G2019S | iPSC-derived DA neurons | 1. Increased mitochondrial dysfunction |
| [ | 2 PD lines vs. 2 control and H1, H9 lines | G2019S | iPSC-derived neural stem cells | 1. Altered calcium signalling |
| [ | 4 PD lines vs. 4 control line | G2019S | iPSC-derived DA neurons | 1. Nuclear envelope impairment |
| [ | 3 PD lines vs. 1 control line | G2019S | iPSC-derived DA neurons | 1. Impaired neuronal development |
| [ | 3 PD lines vs. 4 control lines | G2019S | iPSC-derived DA neurons | 1. Impaired neuronal Development |
| [ | 4 PD lines vs. 7 control lines | G2019S | iPSC-derived DA neurons | 1. Increased α-synuclein aggregation |
| [ | 1 PD and 1 isogenic KO line vs. 1 control and 1 isogenic control line | G2019S | iPSC-derived DA neurons | 1. Increased apoptosis and neuronal cell death |
| [ | 2 PD lines vs. 4 control lines | G2019S | iPSC-derived DA neurons | 1. Impaired Neuronal development |
| [ | 12 PD lines vs. 3 control lines | G2019S, R1441C | iPSC-derived DA neurons | 1. Increased Tau and α-synuclein aggregation. |
| [ | 3 PD lines vs. 3 control lines | G2019S | iPSC-derived sensory and DA neurons | 1. Mitochondrial dysfunction |
| [ | 3 PD lines vs. 3 control lines | G2019S | iPSC-derived sensory, Glutamatergic and DA neurons | 1. Large microtubule-containing neurite aggregations |
| [ | 3 PD and 2 isogenic KO lines vs. 4 control lines and 2 isogenic control | G2019S | iPSC-derived neural stem cells | 1. Mitochondrial Dysfunction |
| [ | 2 PD lines vs. 2 control lines | G2019S | iPSC-derived DA neurons | 1. Mitochondrial Dysfunction |
PARK2-mutated iPSC-derived neuronal phenotypes.
| Reference | Number of Cohorts | Type of Mutation | Cell Type | Phenotype |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [ | 6 PD patient lines vs. 3 control lines | Exon 2–4 or 6–7 deletions | iPSC-derived DA neurons | 1. Increased Oxidative stress |
| [ | 3 PD patient lines vs. 3 control lines | Exon 3–5 or R42P deletions | iPSC-derived DA neurons | 1. Dopamine dysregulation |
| [ | 2 PD patient lines vs. 2 control lines | Exon 2–4 or Exon 6–7 deletions | iPSC-derived DA neurons | 1. Increased oxidative stress |
| [ | 4 PD patient lines with 1 control line | Exon 3–4, R275W or R42P deletions | iPSC-derived DA neurons | 1. Mitochondrial dysfunction |
| [ | 1 PD patient line vs. 1 control line | Del202-203AG and IVS1+1G/A | iPSC-derived DA neurons | 1. Increased cell death |
| [ | 2 Isogenic mutated PD lines vs. 1 control line | Exon 2 deletion | iPSC-derived DA neurons | 1. Mitochondrial dysfunction |
| [ | 2 PD lines vs. 2 control lines | Exon 4 deletion | iPSC-derived DA neurons | 1. Dopamine dysregulation |
| [ | 2 PD lines vs. 2 control lines | Exon 2–4 deletion | iPSC-derived DA neurons | 1. Mitochondrial dysfunction |
| [ | 2 Isogenic mutated iPSC lines vs. 1 control line | Exon 2 deletion | iPSC-derived DA neurons | 1. Lysosomal dysfunction |
| [ | 1 PD line vs. 1 control line | Exon 5 deletion | iPSC-derived DA neurons | 1. Increase α-synuclein aggregation |
| [ | 3 PD lines vs. 3 control lines | Exon 7 deletion, c.1072delT or Exon 1 deletion and c.924C>Tor c.1072delT | iPSC-derived DA neurons | 1. Mitochondrial dysfunction |
| [ | 2 PD lines vs. 2 control lines | c.1366C.T and c.1072Tdel | iPSC-derived DA neurons | 1. Dopamine dysregulation |
Figure 3Effect of PINK1 and parkin mutation in IPSC-derived neurons. Parkin mutation in iPSC-derived neurons showed impairment in their requitement to PINK1, alteration in spontaneous postsynaptic current activity, reduction in dopamine receptor and release. PINK1 mutation in iPSC-derived neurons displayed fragmented mitochondria with alteration their DNA level, ATP, membrane potential and oxidative stress. Additionally, there is an increase in apoptotic cell death and α-synuclein aggregation and accumulation.
PINK1-mutated iPSC-derived neuronal phenotypes.
| Reference | Number of Cohorts | Type of Mutation | Cell Type | Phenotype |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [ | 3 PD lines vs. 1 control line | c.1366C>T, c.509T>G | iPSC-derived DA neurons | 1. Mitochondrial dysfunction |
| [ | 5 PD lines vs. 2 control lines | Q456X, R1441C | iPSC-derived DA neurons | 1. Increase in oxidative stress |
| [ | 1 PD line vs. 1 control line | V170G | iPSC-derived DA neurons | 1. Impairement in mitophagy |
| [ | 7 PD lines vs. 5 control lines | Exon 4 or 7 deletion | iPSC-derived DA neurons | 1. Dysregulation of |
GBA-mutated iPSC-derived neuronal phenotype.
| Reference | Number of Cohorts | Type of Mutation | Cell Type | Phenotype |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [ | 3 PD lines vs. 3 control lines | Heterozygous N370S | iPSC-derived DA neurons | 1. Lysosomal dysfunction |
| [ | 1 PD line vs. 1 control line | Heterozygous N370S | iPSC-derived DA neurons | 1. α- synuclein aggregation |
| [ | 4 PD lines vs. 2 isogenic control lines | Heterozygous N370S, L444P and RecNciI | iPSC-derived DA neurons | 1. Mitochondrial dysfunction |
| [ | Homozygous N370S | iPSC-derived DA neurons | 1.Dopamine dysregulation | |
| [ | 1 PD line vs. 3 controls lines | Heterozygous N3070S | iPSC-derived DA neurons | 1. Dopamine dysregulation |
| [ | 7 PD lines vs. 3 control lines | N370S | iPSC-derived DA neurons | 1. Autophagic and autophagosome dysfunction. |
| [ | 2 PD lines vs. 2 isogenic control lines | null GBA (CRISPR-Cas) | iPSC-derived cortical neurons | 1. Reduction in Gcase activity |
| [ | 3 PD lines vs. 3 control lines | N370S | iPSC-derived DA neurons | 1. Lysosomal dysfunction |
DJ-1-mutated iPSC-derived neuronal phenotype.
| Reference | Number of Cohorts | Type of Mutation | Cell Type | Phenotype |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [ | 1 PD isogonic lines vs. control lines |
| iPSC-derived DA neurons | 1. Increased oxidative stress |
| [ | 3 PD lines vs. 2 control lines | c.192G>C | iPSC-derived DA neurons | 1. Increased oxidative stress |
Figure 4Pathways of mitochondrial dysfunction, a major cellular and clinical phenotype in PD. Mitochondrial dysfunction can result from impairment in mitochondrial fission, change in mitochondrial morphology, electron transport chain, increase in mtDNA, elevation in oxidative stress leading to reactive oxygen species generation, alteration in mitochondrial biogenesis and electron transport dysfunction. These can lead and associated with protein aggregation and eventual endoplasmic (ER) stress that ultimately results in degeneration of dopaminergic neurons that underlines the PD pathogenesis.