Literature DB >> 33796863

Isolation and Characterization of Klebsiella Phages for Phage Therapy.

Eleanor M Townsend1, Lucy Kelly1, Lucy Gannon2, George Muscatt1, Rhys Dunstan3, Slawomir Michniewski1, Hari Sapkota4, Saija J Kiljunen5,6, Anna Kolsi5, Mikael Skurnik5,6, Trevor Lithgow3, Andrew D Millard2, Eleanor Jameson1.   

Abstract

Introduction: Klebsiella is a clinically important pathogen causing a variety of antimicrobial resistant infections in both community and nosocomial settings, particularly pneumonia, urinary tract infection, and sepsis. Bacteriophage (phage) therapy is being considered a primary option for the treatment of drug-resistant infections of these types.
Methods: We report the successful isolation and characterization of 30 novel, genetically diverse Klebsiella phages.
Results: The isolated phages span six different phage families and nine genera, representing both lysogenic and lytic lifestyles. Individual Klebsiella phage isolates infected up to 11 of the 18 Klebsiella capsule types tested, and all 18 capsule-types were infected by at least one of the phages. Conclusions: Of the Klebsiella-infecting phages presented in this study, the lytic phages are most suitable for phage therapy, based on their broad host range, high virulence, short lysis period and given that they encode no known toxin or antimicrobial resistance genes. Phage isolates belonging to the Sugarlandvirus and Slopekvirus genera were deemed most suitable for phage therapy based on our characterization. Importantly, when applied alone, none of the characterized phages were able to suppress the growth of Klebsiella for more than 12 h, likely due to the inherent ease of Klebsiella to generate spontaneous phage-resistant mutants. This indicates that for successful phage therapy, a cocktail of multiple phages would be necessary to treat Klebsiella infections. © Eleanor M. Townsend et al. 2021; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Klebsiella; antibiotics; antimicrobial resistance; bacteriophage; characterization; nosocomial infection; phage; phage therapy; virulence

Year:  2021        PMID: 33796863      PMCID: PMC8006926          DOI: 10.1089/phage.2020.0046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phage (New Rochelle)        ISSN: 2641-6530


Background

The Klebsiella genus causes pneumonia, urinary tract infection, and sepsis, particularly in vulnerable populations, often causing secondary infections in ventilated or catheterized patients, in both the community and nosocomial settings.[1-4] In addition, the subclinical carriage of Klebsiella is linked to cardiovascular[5,6] and inflammatory bowel disease.[7] Klebsiella pneumoniae is the most problematic species giving rise to hypervirulent clones with extended virulence factors.[8-11] Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) represents a threat to global health and security, fueled by our intensive use of antibiotics in medicine and agriculture. Klebsiella readily gains and transfers AMR genes, particularly in health care settings, making it a World Health Organization priority pathogen.[12,13] The prevalence of multi-drug resistant (MDR) Klebsiella has increased exponentially to most available antimicrobial drugs, and cases of pan-resistant Klebsiella are now common around the world.[14-17] MDR Klebsiella infections pose an increased risk of mortality,[18,19] are difficult to treat[20,21] and outbreaks are economically costly.[19] Bacteriophages (phages)[22] offer one potential alternative treatment. Phage therapy is a potential weapon against MDR bacterial infections.[23,24] Phage therapy depends on preparedness, particularly in having a real or virtual “biobank” of characterized phages against common AMR bacteria. Phage characterization is essential to provide effective, timely treatment and mitigate side effects.[25] In this article, we use genomic and imaging technologies to characterize novel phages isolated against Klebsiella spp. Phages were isolated from rivers, ponds, estuaries, canals, slurry, and sewage. Their characterization focused on their infection cycle, host range, and gene content. We present phages with siphovirus, myovirus, podovirus, and inovirus morphologies, spanning six phage families and nine genera, of which the majority have lytic lifestyles. A number of these phages have potential use in phage therapy.

Materials and Methods

Bacterial strains and culture conditions

The Klebsiella strains used in this work are listed in Table 1. All culturing in liquid medium was performed with shaking (150 rpm) at 37°C. All culturing was carried out in Lysogeny broth (LB), with the addition of 5 mM CaCl2 and MgCl2. The Klebsiella were originally isolated from clinical and environmental samples (Table 1). They represented six species: K. pneumoniae, Klebsiella oxytoca, Klebsiella quasipneumoniae, Klebsiella variicola, Klebsiella michagenesis, and Klebsiella aerogenes.
Table 1.

Details of Klebsiella Species and Strains Used in This Study

SpeciesStrainCapsule (K) and LPS antigen (O) locusIsolation host?OriginIsolation source
Klebsiella aerogenes 30053DSMZ Culture CollectionSputum
Klebsiella michiganensis 25444O1v1×DSMZ Culture CollectionToothbrush holder
Klebsiella oxytoca 170748O1v1×Clinical IsolateCatheter specimen urine
5175KL29×DSMZ Culture CollectionPharyngeal tonsil
25736KL74DSMZ Culture CollectionCase of pneumonia
170821OL104Clinical IsolateUrine
171266OL104×Clinical IsolateUrostomy urine
Klebsiella pneumoniae 170958KL28Clinical IsolateUrine
171304KL144×Clinical IsolateCatheter specimen urine
13440KL38NCTC Culture CollectionClinical
13442KL110×NCTC Culture CollectionHospital, Italy
30104KL3DSMZ Culture CollectionHuman blood
13465KL57×NCTC Culture CollectionClinical
170820KL158×Clinical IsolateUrine
16358KL4×DSMZ Culture CollectionHuman, nose
170723KL2Clinical IsolateUrine
171167KL2×Clinical IsolateUrine
13443KL2×NCTC Culture CollectionClinical
13882KL64×ATCC Culture CollectionWater
13439KL14NCTC Culture CollectionOutbreak strain
Klebsiella variicola W12KL14×Environmental IsolateSoil
15968KL16DSMZ Culture CollectionBanana root
Klebsiella quasipneumoniae 28211KL35DSMZ Culture CollectionHuman blood
700603KL53ATCC Culture CollectionUrine

Capsule and LPS antigen locus types are given where applicable, alongside the origin of the strain and indication of use as an isolation host.

LPS, lipopolysaccheride.

Details of Klebsiella Species and Strains Used in This Study Capsule and LPS antigen locus types are given where applicable, alongside the origin of the strain and indication of use as an isolation host. LPS, lipopolysaccheride. No ethical approval was required for this work.

Klebsiella capsule typing

Kaptive Web was used to determine the capsule (K) and LPS antigen (O) locus types of the 24 Klebsiella strains.

Phage isolation

Phages were isolated from water samples from various sources, listed in Table 2. Water samples were filtered through 0.2 μm pore-size syringe filters to remove debris and bacteria. Phages were then isolated by enrichment: 2.5 mL of filtered water was added to 2.5 mL nutrient broth, containing 5 mM CaCl2 and 5 mM MgCl2, and inoculated with 50 μL of overnight-grown Klebsiella. This enrichment culture was then incubated overnight at 37°C and centrifuged, and the supernatant was filtered through a 0.2 μm pore-size filter to remove cells. This filtrate was serially diluted to 10−11 in LB and used in an overlay agar plaque assay.
Table 2.

Phage Isolate Details

Phage nameLab IDLife style lytic (L) or temperate (T)Source of isolation Strain of isolationCapsule (K) and LPS antigen (O) locusAccession no.
Klebsiella phage vB_KppS-Eggy49TSewage—anoxic sludgeSpernal sewage works, United KingdomKlebsiella pneumoniae DSM 30104KL3PRJEB40146
Klebsiella phage vB_KppS-Pokey50TSewage—anoxic sludgeSpernal sewage works, United KingdomK. pneumoniae DSM 30104KL3PRJEB40147
Klebsiella phage vB_KppS-Raw33TSewage—rawSpernal sewage works, United KingdomK. pneumoniae DSM 30104KL3PRJEB40132
Klebsiella phage vB_KppS-Ant35TSewage—anoxic sludgeSpernal sewage works, United KingdomK. pneumoniae DSM 30104KL3PRJEB40148
Klebsiella phage vB_KaS-Ahsoka7LSlurrySlurry tank, United KingdomKlebsiella aerogenes DSM 30053PRJEB40160
Klebsiella phage vB_KaS-Gatomon6LMarine canalGrand canal, Venice, ItalyK. aerogenes DSM 30053PRJEB40159
Klebsiella phage vB_KppS-Samwise8LSlurrySlurry tank, United KingdomK. pneumoniae DSM 30104KL3PRJEB40161
Klebsiella phage vB_KvM-Eowyn4LEstuaryJelitkowo, PolandKlebsiella variicola DSM 15968KL16PRJEB40131
Klebsiella phage vB_KpP-Screen46LSewage—sieveSpernal sewage works, United KingdomK. pneumoniae 170723KL2PRJEB40164
Klebsiella phage vB_KpP-Yoda43LSewage—storm tankSpernal sewage works, United KingdomK. pneumoniae 170723KL2PRJEB40162
Klebsiella phage vB_KqP-Goliath44LSewage—rawSpernal sewage works, United KingdomKlebsiella quasipneumoniae DSM 700603KL53PRJEB40163
Klebsiella phage vB_KaS-Benoit1LEstuaryJelitkowo, PolandK. aerogenes DSM 30053PRJEB39773
Klebsiella phage vB_KaS-Veronica2LMarine canalGrand canal, Venice, ItalyK. aerogenes DSM 30053PRJEB40165
Klebsiella phage vB_KppS-Anoxic52LSewage—anoxic sludgeSpernal sewage works, United KingdomK. pneumoniae DSM 30104KL3PRJEB40170
Klebsiella phage vB_KppS-Jiji27LPondGneiwkowo, PolandK. pneumoniae DSM 30104KL3PRJEB40168
Klebsiella phage vB_KppS-Ponyo19LRiverGneiwkowo, PolandK. pneumoniae DSM 30104KL3PRJEB40167
Klebsiella phage vB_KppS-Storm34LSewage—storm tankSpernal sewage works, United KingdomK. pneumoniae DSM 30104KL3PRJEB40169
Klebsiella phage vB_KppS-Totoro10LEstuaryJelitkowo, PolandK. pneumoniae DSM 30104KL3PRJEB40166
Klebsiella phage vB_KqM-Bilbo38LSewage—rawSpernal sewage works, United KingdomK. quasipneumoniae DSM 28211KL35PRJEB40172
Klebsiella phage vB_KqM-LilBean36LSewage—rawSpernal sewage works, United KingdomK. quasipneumoniae DSM 28211KL35PRJEB40171
Klebsiella phage vB_KqM-Westerburg39LSewage—rawSpernal sewage works, United KingdomK. quasipneumoniae DSM 28211KL35PRJEB40173
Klebsiella phage vB_KoM-Liquor61LSewage—mixed liquorSpernal sewage works, United KingdomKlebsiella oxytoca 170821OL104PRJEB40174
Klebsiella phage vB_KoM-MeTiny68LSewage—mixed liquorSpernal sewage works, United KingdomK. oxytoca DSM 25736KL74PRJEB40179
Klebsiella phage vB_KoM-Pickle12LEstuaryJelitkowo, PolandK. oxytoca DSM 25736KL74PRJEB40176
Klebsiella phage vB_KpM-KalD67LSewage—mixed liquorSpernal sewage works, United KingdomK. pneumoniae DSM 13439KL14PRJEB40178
Klebsiella phage vB_KpM-Mild65LSewage—mixed liquorSpernal sewage works, United KingdomK. pneumoniae DSM 13439KL14PRJEB40177
Klebsiella phage vB_KoM-Milk62LSewage—mixed liquorSpernal sewage works, United KingdomK. oxytoca 170821OL104PRJEB40175
Klebsiella phage vB_KpM-SoFaint70LSewage—mixed liquorSpernal sewage works, United KingdomK. pneumoniae DSM 13440KL38PRJEB40180
Klebsiella phage vB_KoM-Flushed63LSewage—mixed liquorSpernal sewage works, United KingdomK. pneumoniae 170958KL28PRJEB40181
Klebsiella phage vB_KpM-Wobble64LSewage—mixed liquorSpernal sewage works, United KingdomK. pneumoniae 170958KL28PRJEB40182

Lab ID refers to the laboratory identification number, source of isolation indicates where the water sample was collected for phage enrichment and isolation, and the strain of isolation indicates Klebsiella sp. strain on which three rounds of plaque assay isolation were performed. Accession numbers refer to the associated project accession numbers assigned by the ENA for each phage.

Phage Isolate Details Lab ID refers to the laboratory identification number, source of isolation indicates where the water sample was collected for phage enrichment and isolation, and the strain of isolation indicates Klebsiella sp. strain on which three rounds of plaque assay isolation were performed. Accession numbers refer to the associated project accession numbers assigned by the ENA for each phage. Briefly, 50 μL of each serial dilution was mixed with 0.5 mL of a single Klebsiella strain in the logarithmic growth phase (approximately OD600nm 0.2) and incubated at room temperature for 5 min. To each serial dilution/cell mix, 2.5 mL of cooled, molten LB agar (0.4% weight/volume) was added and mixed by swirling. The molten agar mix was poured onto 1% LB agar plates. Overlay agar plates were allowed to set, then inverted, and incubated overnight at 37°C. From the plaque assay plates, single plaques were picked, mixed with 50 μL of LB, and filtered through a 0.22 μm pore-size spin filter (Costar Spin-X; Corning, United Kingdom). This filtrate underwent two further rounds of plaque assay to ensure that clonal phages were isolated. Phages were named by using the ICTV binomial system of viral nomenclature.[26]

DNA extraction

DNA was extracted by using the phenol–chloroform method.[27] Briefly, phage lysates were concentrated by using a protein column with a 30 kDa cutoff. Seven hundred fifty microliters of concentrated phage was treated with DNase I and Proteinase K, before phenol–chloroform, then overnight precipitation with ammonium acetate and ethanol at −20°C. The DNA was resuspended in 50 μL of molecular-grade water. For phage DNA with high protein contamination from the method described earlier, the Norgen Phage DNA Isolation Kit was used following the manufacturer's instructions. To assess the quantity and quality of DNA for sequencing, both a spectrophotometer-based method and Qubit were used.

Genome sequencing

Sequencing was performed by MicrobesNG (Birmingham, United Kingdom); briefly, genomic DNA libraries were prepared by using Nextera XT Library Prep Kit (Illumina, San Diego) following the manufacturer's protocol with modifications: 2 ng of DNA were used as the input, and a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) elongation time of 1 min. DNA quantification and library preparations were carried out on a Hamilton Microlab STAR automated liquid handling system. Pooled libraries were quantified by using the Kapa Biosystems Library Quantification Kit for Illumina, on a Roche light cycler 96 quantitative PCR machine. Libraries were sequenced on the Illumina HiSeq by using a 250 bp paired end protocol.

Bioinformatics

Contig and genome assembly was carried out by MicrobesNG; reads were trimmed with Trimmomatic 0.30, sliding window quality cutoff of Q1528; and SPAdes (v3.7) was used for de novo assembly.[29] Genomes were annotated by using Prokka,[30] with a custom database downloaded from Genbank as previously described.[31] The capsule types of the Klebsiella strain genomes were predicted by using Kaptive.[32] To determine phage taxonomy, phage isolate genomes were added to VIPtree[33] and subject to BLASTn and tBLASTn against NCBI. The average nucleotide identity (ANI) of our phages was compared with the genomes identified from the methods described earlier by using orthoANI.[34] Genomes with an ANI >95% were designated as the same species.[35] For genus-level clustering, a shared protein network analysis was performed by using vConTACT2 (v0.9.13)[36] with all phage genomes available (May 2020).[31] The resulting network graph was visualized and annotated within Cytoscape (v3.8.0).[37] Finally, sequence alignments were performed by using MAFFT (v7.271)[38] on the DNA polymerase, large terminase subunit, and major capsid proteins of each phage isolate genus with the most closely related phage proteins. Phylogenetic trees were constructed with RaxML (v8.2.4)[39] with 1000 bootstrap calculations by using the GAMMA model of heterogeneity and the maximum-likelihood method based on the JTT substitution matrix. Subsequent trees were visualized and annotated in R (v3.6.1) by using ggtree (v1.16.6)[40,41] and phytools (v0.7-70).[42] Depolymerases were predicted in the phage isolate's structural genes, through enzymatic domains or features common to characterized depolymerase proteins. Each prediction was analyzed by BLASTP (v2.10.0), Pfam HMMER (v3.3), and HHpred (v33.1) by using the default settings. Sequences from biochemically characterized depolymerase proteins that target Klebsiella spp. (Supplementary Table S1) or the putative depolymerases from our phage isolates (Supplementary Table S2) were used for analysis. Sequences were aligned with Muscle (v3.8.31)[43] by using SeaView (v4).[44] Phylogenetic tree construction was performed with MegaX[45] with 500 bootstrap calculations by using the LG model. Tree topology searches were performed by using a combination of NNI and NJ/BioNJ. The tree was subsequently visualized and annotated by using iTOL(v4).[46]

Host range testing

Spot testing was carried out; 5 μL of phage stock serial dilutions was plated on to bacterial lawn, in 0.4% overlay agar. Zones of bacterial lawn clearing, indicating cell lysis, were recorded as follows: (1) visible plaques, (2) complete bacterial lawn clearing, (3) turbid bacterial lawn, or (4) no effect. The presence or absence of halos; reduced turbidity of the bacterial lawn surrounding the plaques or clearing were also recorded.

Plaque formation and morphology

Phages were plated by using the overlay agar plaque assay method, as described earlier, on their isolation host. Plates were incubated overnight at 37°C to allow plaques to form. Plaque morphology was noted (halos/no halo), and photographs were taken.

Transmission electron microscopy

Pure phage stocks were imaged by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) on glow-discharged (1 min under vacuum) formvar/carbon-coated copper grids (Agar Scientific Ltd, United Kingdom). Five microliters of phage stock was applied to a grid and incubated for 1.5 min at room temperature. The grid was blotted to remove excess liquid. A drop of 2% uranyl acetate stain was applied and incubated for 1 min, before blotting off; staining was repeated four times; and finally the grid was air dried. Stained phage grids were imaged on a JEOL 2100Plus TEM. The morphology of the phage particles was visualized in ImageJ; 30 capsids and tails for each phage isolate were measured by using the measure function.

Lysis period

Klebsiella cultures in the exponential growth phase were adjusted to OD600nm of 0.2, using a spectrophotometer and phage lysates were diluted 1:4. The OD600nm was measured every 5 min for 16 h. Growth was compared with a positive control culture without the addition of phages. The lysis period was calculated by measuring the time from phage addition to a drop in culture OD600nm, relative to the positive control, indicating bacterial cell lysis.

Virulence

Two metrics the virulence index (VP) and MV50 were calculated based on the protocol described by Storms et al.[47] Briefly, bacterial cultures were grown to the exponential phase and adjusted (see Lysis Period section) to an optical density equivalent to 1 × 108 cfu/mL. In a 96-well plate, phages were serially diluted from 1 × 108 to 10 pfu/mL in 100 μL volumes. A bacterial culture was then added in equal volume (100 μL) to the phage dilution, resulting in multiplicity of infections (MOIs) from 1 to 10−7. The optical density of the 96-well plate was read at 600 nm at 5 min intervals for 18 h. The area under the curve was calculated for the bacterial-only control and at each phage MOI, from initial infection until the exponential growth stage. The VP at each MOI was calculated from this by following the method described[47] using RStudio (version 1.1.463). VP is a quantified measure of the virulence of a phage against a bacterial host on a scale of 0–1 (0 = no reduction in bacterial growth to 1, instantaneous complete killing); the MV50 calculates the theoretical MOI at which a phage achieves a VP of 0.5 (half the theoretical maximum virulence).

Data visualization

Resulting graphs were visualized in R (v3.6.1) implemented through RStudio (v1.1.456)[48] by using the ggplot2 (v3.3.2) package,[49] with a custom color-blind palette generated from ColorBrewer.

Results

Klebsiella capsule and LPS antigen locus types

Kaptive determined that the 24 Klebsiella strains belonged to 18 different capsule (K) and LPS antigen (O) locus types (Table 1). Three K. pneumoniae strains were identified as capsule type KL2; two Klebsiella sp. were each typed as O1v1, OL104, and KL14. All other types were unique. K. aerogenes 30053 could not be typed.

Sequence similarity to known phages

The 30 Klebsiella phages were purified by multiple rounds of plating, and genome sequencing showed a genome size range from 16,548 to 268,500 bp. The Klebsiella phage genomes represented nine diverse, distinct genera, as determined by VIPtree (Fig. 1) and vConTACT2 (Fig. 2). Genome similarities between our phage isolates and known phages are given in Table 3.
FIG. 1.

Protein-level phylogenetic tree, generated by VIPtree. Klebsiella phage isolates (★). A–I denote phage groups with the following genera: A (red) Nonagvirus; B (black) unclassified family/genus; C (blue) Tempevirinae unclassified; D (lime) Myoviridae unclassified; E (green) Drulisvirus; F (purple) Sugarlandvirus; G (orange) Taipeivirus; H (brown) Slopekvirus; and I (pink) Jiaodavirus. Icons indicate phage morphology.

FIG. 2.

Network analysis of phage-encoded proteins calculated with vConTACT2. Colored, numbered nodes represent our Klebsiella phage isolates, colored according to the phage group and subsequent genera to which each phage belongs. Numbers within nodes indicate the lab identification numbers (Table 2). Our Klebsiella phage isolates are colored according to the genera to which the phage belongs: red, Nonagvirus; gray, unclassified; blue, Tempevirinae unclassified; lime, Myoviridae unclassified; green, Drulisvirus; purple, Sugarlandvirus; orange, Taipeivirus; brown, Slopekvirus; and Pink, Jiaodavirus. The numbers are the lab identification numbers (Table 2). Smaller, black nodes represent previously sequenced phages as references. Edges between nodes represent shared proteins, such that many connecting edges imply greater pairwise shared protein content. Phage nodes are clustered based on shared proteins, with a spring-embedded (force directed) layout visualization created in Cytoscape.

Table 3.

Phage Taxonomy and Similarity to Closest Sequenced Phage

Phage namePhage groupTaxonomy
Comparison phage
FamilySubfamilyGenusPhage nameAccessionANI
vB_KppS-EggyA Siphoviridae   Nonagvirus Enterobacteria phage JenP2KP71913265.86
vB_KppS-PokeyA Siphoviridae   Nonagvirus Enterobacteria phage JenP2KP71913266.69
vB_KppS-RawA Siphoviridae   Nonagvirus Enterobacteria phage JenP2KP71913266.77
vB_KppS-AntB Siphoviridae  unclassifiedCaudovirales_phage_clone_3F_1MF41795190.14
vB_KaS-AhsokaC Drexlerviridae Tunavirinae unclassifiedEscherichia phage Henu7MN01912892.09
vB_KaS-GatomonC Drexlerviridae Tunavirinae unclassifiedEscherichia phage Henu7MN01912893.55
vB_KppS-SamwiseC Drexlerviridae Tunavirinae unclassifiedEscherichia phage Henu7MN01912893.55
vB_KvM-EowynD Myoviridae Tempevirinae unclassifiedSerratia_phage_KpHz_2KF80658995.02
vB_KpP-ScreenE Autographiviridae Slopekvirinae Drulisvirus Klebsiella phage vB_KpnP_SU552AKP70898686.58
vB_KpP-YodaE Autographiviridae Slopekvirinae Drulisvirus Klebsiella phage vB_KpnP_SU552AKP70898687.03
vB_KqP-GoliathE Autographiviridae Slopekvirinae Drulisvirus Klebsiella phage vB_KpnP_SU552AKP70898685.82
vB_KaS-BenoitF Demerecviridae   Sugarlandvirus vB_Kpn_IME260NC_04189994.29
vB_KaS-VeronicaF Demerecviridae   Sugarlandvirus ★Klebsiella phage SugarlandNC_04209393.46
vB_KppS-AnoxicF Demerecviridae   Sugarlandvirus vB_Kpn_IME260NC_04189996.11
vB_KppS-JijiF Demerecviridae   Sugarlandvirus ★Klebsiella phage SugarlandNC_04209393.26
vB_KppS-PonyoF Demerecviridae   Sugarlandvirus ★Klebsiella phage SugarlandNC_04209394.15
vB_KppS-StormF Demerecviridae   Sugarlandvirus ★Klebsiella phage SugarlandNC_04209395.02
vB_KppS-TotoroF Demerecviridae   Sugarlandvirus vB_Kpn_IME260NC_04189994.29
vB_KqM-BilboG Ackermannviridae   Taipeivirus ★Klebsiella virus 0507KN21NC_02234397.22
vB_KqM-LilBeanG Ackermannviridae   Taipeivirus ★Klebsiella virus 0507KN21NC_02234397.83
vB_KqM-WesterburgG Ackermannviridae   Taipeivirus ★Klebsiella virus 0507KN21NC_02234396.93
vB_KoM-LiquorH Myoviridae Tevenvirinae Slopekvirus ★Klebsiella phage KP15GU29596497.83
vB_KoM-MeTinyH Myoviridae Tevenvirinae Slopekvirus ★Klebsiella phage KP15GU29596497.92
vB_KoM-PickleH Myoviridae Tevenvirinae Slopekvirus ★Klebsiella phage KP15GU29596497.93
vB_KpM-KalDH Myoviridae Tevenvirinae Slopekvirus ★Klebsiella phage KP15GU29596497.42
vB_KpM-MildH Myoviridae Tevenvirinae Slopekvirus ★Klebsiella phage KP15GU29596497.65
vB_KpM-MilkH Myoviridae Tevenvirinae Slopekvirus ★Klebsiella phage KP15GU29596498.38
vB_KpM-SoFaintH Myoviridae Tevenvirinae Slopekvirus ★Klebsiella phage KP15GU29596497.72
vB_KoM-FlushedI Myoviridae Tevenvirinae Jiaodavirus ★Klebsiella phage JD18KT23944696.19
vB_KpM-WobbleI Myoviridae Tevenvirinae Jiaodavirus ★Klebsiella phage JD18KT23944697.01

Family, Subfamily, and Genus are assigned based on the clustering patterns observed in vConTACT2 analysis (Fig. 2), and conserved branching patterns observed in the marker gene phylogenetic trees (Supplementary Figs. S10–S18). ANI calculated with orthoANI. Details for “comparison phage” relate to details of previously sequenced phages available in public databases used for ANI analysis, ★ in front on the comparison phage name indicates it is the type species.

ANI, average nucleotide identity.

Protein-level phylogenetic tree, generated by VIPtree. Klebsiella phage isolates (★). A–I denote phage groups with the following genera: A (red) Nonagvirus; B (black) unclassified family/genus; C (blue) Tempevirinae unclassified; D (lime) Myoviridae unclassified; E (green) Drulisvirus; F (purple) Sugarlandvirus; G (orange) Taipeivirus; H (brown) Slopekvirus; and I (pink) Jiaodavirus. Icons indicate phage morphology. Network analysis of phage-encoded proteins calculated with vConTACT2. Colored, numbered nodes represent our Klebsiella phage isolates, colored according to the phage group and subsequent genera to which each phage belongs. Numbers within nodes indicate the lab identification numbers (Table 2). Our Klebsiella phage isolates are colored according to the genera to which the phage belongs: red, Nonagvirus; gray, unclassified; blue, Tempevirinae unclassified; lime, Myoviridae unclassified; green, Drulisvirus; purple, Sugarlandvirus; orange, Taipeivirus; brown, Slopekvirus; and Pink, Jiaodavirus. The numbers are the lab identification numbers (Table 2). Smaller, black nodes represent previously sequenced phages as references. Edges between nodes represent shared proteins, such that many connecting edges imply greater pairwise shared protein content. Phage nodes are clustered based on shared proteins, with a spring-embedded (force directed) layout visualization created in Cytoscape. Phage Taxonomy and Similarity to Closest Sequenced Phage Family, Subfamily, and Genus are assigned based on the clustering patterns observed in vConTACT2 analysis (Fig. 2), and conserved branching patterns observed in the marker gene phylogenetic trees (Supplementary Figs. S10–S18). ANI calculated with orthoANI. Details for “comparison phage” relate to details of previously sequenced phages available in public databases used for ANI analysis, ★ in front on the comparison phage name indicates it is the type species. ANI, average nucleotide identity. Phage isolates were grouped at genus-level into groups A–I, referred to, respectively, by their genera or closest identifiable taxonomy level: Nonagvirus, unclassified family/genus, Tempevirinae unclassified, Myoviridae unclassified, Drulisvirus, Sugarlandvirus, Taipeivirus, Slopekvirus, and Jiaodavirus. The phage isolates of groups B–D displayed lower sequence similarities to previously identified phages, hence they were not classified into known genera. The sequence data were deposited in the ENA; accession numbers are given in Table 2. Alignments constructed in VIPtree[33] showed that the phage groups with the highest levels of amino acid identity and gene synteny to known phages were F, G, H, and I (Drulisvirus, Sugarlandvirus, Taipeivirus, and Jiaodavirus genera, respectively; Supplementary Figs. S6–S9). Phage isolates in group F, Sugarlandvirus, showed the greatest similarity to previously described phages (Supplementary Fig. S6). All Sugarlandvirus isolates were grouped with previously described vB_Kpn_IME260 and Klebsiella phage Sugarland, except vB_KaS-Veronica, which represents a new species based on ANI. The Sugarlandvirus isolates did exhibit variation in their tail fiber genes (Supplementary Fig. S7; at ∼75 kb). In contrast, phage isolates in group A (Nonagvirus) were more similar to each other than previously known phages (Supplementary Fig. S2). There was low sequence identity between our isolates and previously sequenced phages for groups B–D (Supplementary Figs. S3–S5); as a result, the isolates in these groups have unresolved taxonomies. Interestingly, analysis of the phage with the smallest genome, vB_KppS-Ant of group B, revealed >99% nucleotide identity to region of the K. pneumoniae 30104 genome (data not shown). For further similarity analysis between our isolates and known phages, protein phylogenetic trees were drawn for marker genes (DNA polymerase, major capsid protein and terminase large subunit; Supplementary Figs. S10–S18). Conserved branching patterns, indicating close evolutionary history, were observed for groups A and E–I, confirming that they belong to known genera (Supplementary Figs. S10 and S14–S18), whereas groups B–D (Supplementary Figs. S11–S13) do not. Given more distant relationships between the marker protein sequences, it is proposed that group C represents a novel genus of the subfamily Tempevirinae (Supplementary Fig. S12) and group D represents a novel genus of the Myoviridae family (Supplementary Fig. S13), whereas the marker genes of the phage isolate of group B has an even more distant relationship with phages of both Siphoviridae and Myoviridae families (Supplementary Fig. S11). Given the inovirus morphology observed for group B (Fig. 5, black box), classification at the family level also remains unresolved.
FIG. 5.

Phage morphology, TEM, and plaque morphology. Colored boxes are drawn according to the phage group and subsequent genera to which each phage belongs: A (red) Nonagvirus; B (black) unclassified family/genus; C (blue) Tempevirinae unclassified; D (lime) Myoviridae unclassified; E (green) Drulisvirus; F (purple) Sugarlandvirus; G (orange) Taipeivirus; H (brown) Slopekvirus; and I (pink) Jiaodavirus. The clearest TEM images were selected for each phage, scales vary for each image, and nm scale bars are included for each image. An image of the plaques produced by each phage is included after overnight incubation at 37°C on agar overlay plates. TEM, transmission electron microscopy.

Most phages had a host range that extended past their isolation host and was not explained by depolymerase activity. The number of strains infected by each phage is displayed in Figure 3.
FIG. 3.

Phage host range matrix. Host range was determined by spot testing on LB agar overlay plates against the Klebsiella spp. in our panel. The Klebsiella capsule and LPS antigen locus have been designated by Kaptive. The phage names labels are colored according to the phage group and subsequent genera to which each phage belongs: A (red) Nonagvirus; B (black) unclassified family/genus; C (blue) Tempevirinae unclassified; D (lime) Myoviridae unclassified; E (green) Drulisvirus; F (purple) Sugarlandvirus; G (orange) Taipeivirus; H (brown) Slopekvirus; and I (pink) Jiaodavirus. The number of putative depolymerases identified by BLAST/HMMER analysis is given under the phage name. In the matrix, dark blue indicates the host of isolation, in which plaques were produced; light blue indicates the non-host strains where plaques were produced in a bacterial lawn; red indicates that spot testing caused the bacterial lawn to clear, but no plaques were visible; dark red indicates that some reduction in the turbidity of the bacterial lawn was observed, but no plaques; gray indicates no observed effect; and yellow triangle overlays indicate that a halo of reduced turbidity of the bacterial lawn was observed surrounding the plaques or clearing. LB, lysogeny broth; LPS, lipopolysaccheride.

Phage host range matrix. Host range was determined by spot testing on LB agar overlay plates against the Klebsiella spp. in our panel. The Klebsiella capsule and LPS antigen locus have been designated by Kaptive. The phage names labels are colored according to the phage group and subsequent genera to which each phage belongs: A (red) Nonagvirus; B (black) unclassified family/genus; C (blue) Tempevirinae unclassified; D (lime) Myoviridae unclassified; E (green) Drulisvirus; F (purple) Sugarlandvirus; G (orange) Taipeivirus; H (brown) Slopekvirus; and I (pink) Jiaodavirus. The number of putative depolymerases identified by BLAST/HMMER analysis is given under the phage name. In the matrix, dark blue indicates the host of isolation, in which plaques were produced; light blue indicates the non-host strains where plaques were produced in a bacterial lawn; red indicates that spot testing caused the bacterial lawn to clear, but no plaques were visible; dark red indicates that some reduction in the turbidity of the bacterial lawn was observed, but no plaques; gray indicates no observed effect; and yellow triangle overlays indicate that a halo of reduced turbidity of the bacterial lawn was observed surrounding the plaques or clearing. LB, lysogeny broth; LPS, lipopolysaccheride. The infection range of the two putatively temperate phage genera was limited to their isolation host; Nonagvirus (except vB_KppS-Raw, which infected one additional strain) and unclassified family/genera (B). The lytic phage genera Myoviridae unclassified, Drulisvirus and Taipeivirus cleared a bacterial lawn in three to seven Klebsiella strains and formed plaques in one to seven of those strains. Sugarlandvirus phages showed a clearance of 16 and produced plaques in 10 Klebsiella strains; Tempevirinae phages were highly variable, with vB_KaS-Gatomon and vB_KaS-Ahsoka forming plaques on only their isolation host; and vB_Kpp-Samwise formed plaques in seven strains and cleared a further five strains. The broadest range were lytic phages belonging to the subfamily Tevenvirinae; Slopekvirus and Jiaodavirus, which demonstrated clearance in 23 and 17 strains, respectively, and produced plaques on 13 and 9 strains, respectively. Within these genera, the host range varied between individual phages; from Slopekvirus, phage vB_KoM-Pickle only formed plaques on its isolation host, yet showed lawn clearance in 22 out of 23 Klebsiella spp. (Fig. 3).

Phage annotation

Genome annotation is notoriously difficult with phages, given the extremes of sequence variation evident in all phage proteins,[50,51] PROKKA was used and identified key phage genes, for example, portal proteins, capsid genes, tail proteins, and components of the DNA replication. In addition, PhoH was a common feature in 18 out of 30 phages sequenced, including phages from Myoviridae unclassified, Sugarlandvirus, Taipeivirus, and Slopekvirus, respectively. Holin and lysin pairs were identified in groups Nonagvirus, Tempevirinae unclassified, and Taipeivirus, whereas endolysin and Rz1 spanin complex genes were identified in Drulisvirus and Jiaodavirus. Most of our isolated phages encode at least one gene annotated as a putative “tail-fibre” or “tail-spike” protein (Supplementary Table S2). Structural predictions suggested that these proteins adopt beta-helical structures, a common protein architecture of tail-spike proteins and capsule depolymerase enzymes, which are suggested to have evolved from these purely structural proteins,[52-54] These proteins also contained predicted enzymatic domains, for example, Pectate_lyase_3 domain or Peptidase_S74 domain, which have been identified in other phage-encoded depolymerases.[55-58] Several of the phage groups: B, C, F, H, and I, did not contain a predicted tail-fiber depolymerase protein. For phages encoding a candidate depolymerase, protein sequence relationships were mapped on a tree (Fig. 4). Phages of the genera Nonagvirus, and Drulisvirus encode a similar predicted depolymerase protein. The putative depolymerases from Drulisvirus phages share high sequence conservation (∼95% identity, 100% query) to the experimentally characterized depolymerase Kpv74_56 from the closely related Drulisvirus, K. pneumoniae phage KpV74,[59] and all these characterized phages infect K2 capsule-producing strains of Klebsiella; however, the Nonagvirus isolates in our study do not (Fig. 4).
FIG. 4.

Phylogenetic tree of previously biochemically characterized depolymerase proteins that target Klebsiella spp. and putative depolymerase proteins in our phage isolates. Sequences were aligned with Muscle by using SeaView. Phylogenetic tree construction was performed with MegaX with 500 bootstrap calculations by using the LG model. Tree topology searches were performed by using a combination of NNI and NJ/BioNJ. The tree was subsequently visualized and annotated by using iTOL (v4). Depolymerases highlighted in color blocks have overlapping potential target K antigens.

Phylogenetic tree of previously biochemically characterized depolymerase proteins that target Klebsiella spp. and putative depolymerase proteins in our phage isolates. Sequences were aligned with Muscle by using SeaView. Phylogenetic tree construction was performed with MegaX with 500 bootstrap calculations by using the LG model. Tree topology searches were performed by using a combination of NNI and NJ/BioNJ. The tree was subsequently visualized and annotated by using iTOL (v4). Depolymerases highlighted in color blocks have overlapping potential target K antigens. Interestingly, the phages of two further genera; Myoviridae unclassified (vB_KqM-Eowyn) and Taipeivirus (vB_KqvM-LilBean, vB_KqvM-Bilbo and vB_KqvM-Westerburg) contain multiple putative depolymerase proteins (7, 4, 4, 5, respectively; Fig. 4). The putative depolymerase-like proteins of vB_KqM-Eowyn (Myoviridae unclassified) show low identity to previously characterized depolymerases (Fig. 4). From our host range assays, these phages showed activity toward strains that produced a small subset of K-antigens (vB_KqM-Eowyn—KL16, KL110; vB_KqvM-LilBean—KL35; vB_KqvM-Bilbo—KL35, K2 and vB_KqvM-Westerburg—KL35, KL2, KL3).

Morphology of phages

Phage-induced plaques in the lawns of host bacteria varied in size, and in the presence/absence of halos surrounding the phage plaques. Representative images of phage plaques for each described genera are presented in Figure 5. A diffuse halo around the phage plaques was observed in 15 of the 30 phage isolates (Supplementary Table S3 and Fig. 5). Phage morphology, TEM, and plaque morphology. Colored boxes are drawn according to the phage group and subsequent genera to which each phage belongs: A (red) Nonagvirus; B (black) unclassified family/genus; C (blue) Tempevirinae unclassified; D (lime) Myoviridae unclassified; E (green) Drulisvirus; F (purple) Sugarlandvirus; G (orange) Taipeivirus; H (brown) Slopekvirus; and I (pink) Jiaodavirus. The clearest TEM images were selected for each phage, scales vary for each image, and nm scale bars are included for each image. An image of the plaques produced by each phage is included after overnight incubation at 37°C on agar overlay plates. TEM, transmission electron microscopy. Representative TEM images of the described phage genera are provided in Figure 5. Average tail length and capsid widths are given in Supplementary Table S3 (based on 30 particles per phage), and a representative TEM image for each phage is given in Figure 5. Of the phages imaged, 13 are myovirus, 13 are siphovirus, 3 are podovirus, and 1 is inovirus. The largest phage in this study was vB_KvM-Eowyn (Myoviridae unclassified), which had a capsid width of 140 nm and a tail length of 140 nm; this corresponded to the largest genome at 269 kbp. The smallest caudovirale phage was vB_KqP-Goliath, a podovirus (Drulisvirus), with a capsid width of 41 nm and tail length of 10 nm, had the second smallest genome at 44 kbp, after the filamentous prophage vB_KppS-Ant (unclassified family/genus). vB_KppS-Raw (Nonagvirus), a siphovirus, had a comparable capsid size of 46 nm, but a substantially longer tail (153 nm) and genome of 61 kbp. The smallest caudovirale phages (Drulisvirus) produced the largest plaques and halos, hence the name KqP-Goliath (Supplementary Table S1 and Fig. 5).

Phage lysis period and virulence in host strains

The lysis period and virulence indices (VP and MV50) of each phage, in their relevant isolation host strain in LB at 37°C, are displayed in Figure 6. For six phages a lysis period was not achieved (vB_KppS-Eggy, vB_KppS-Pokey, vB_KppS-Ant, vB_KpM-Milk, vB_KpM-KalD, and vB_KpM-SoFaint), and the growth curve of the bacteria was dampened (except vB_KppS-Ant); however, the culture density did not crash compared with the positive control—indicative of temperate phages. These phages also demonstrated a below-average VP, close to 0 (with the exception of vB_KpM-KalD), indicating little difference in growth curves between the control and phage-infected cultures (Fig. 6).
FIG. 6.

Lysis period and virulence indices are not correlated, but temperate phages are less virulent. (A) Displays the virulence index of the phages. Virulence index is a quantified measure of the phage, in their respective isolation host (Table 2), in LB with 5 mM each of CaCl2 and MgCl2, at 37°C. (B) displays the MV50, the MOI at which each phage achieves 50% of their maximal theoretical virulence. Both of these virulence measures are described in more detail by Storms.[47] (C) Displays the lysis period of the phage. Where this is left blank, a lysis period could not be established, usually indicating temperate lifestyle. Individual points are colored based on phage group and the subsequent genera to which each phage belongs: A (red) Nonagvirus; C (blue) Tempevirinae unclassified; D (lime) Myoviridae unclassified; E (green) Drulisvirus; F (purple) Sugarlandvirus; G (orange) Taipeivirus; H (brown) Slopekvirus; and I (pink) Jiaodavirus. Dashed lines indicate the median values for each metric. MOI, multiplicity of infection.

Lysis period and virulence indices are not correlated, but temperate phages are less virulent. (A) Displays the virulence index of the phages. Virulence index is a quantified measure of the phage, in their respective isolation host (Table 2), in LB with 5 mM each of CaCl2 and MgCl2, at 37°C. (B) displays the MV50, the MOI at which each phage achieves 50% of their maximal theoretical virulence. Both of these virulence measures are described in more detail by Storms.[47] (C) Displays the lysis period of the phage. Where this is left blank, a lysis period could not be established, usually indicating temperate lifestyle. Individual points are colored based on phage group and the subsequent genera to which each phage belongs: A (red) Nonagvirus; C (blue) Tempevirinae unclassified; D (lime) Myoviridae unclassified; E (green) Drulisvirus; F (purple) Sugarlandvirus; G (orange) Taipeivirus; H (brown) Slopekvirus; and I (pink) Jiaodavirus. Dashed lines indicate the median values for each metric. MOI, multiplicity of infection. Of the phages with a lysis period, the median time was ∼70 min, ranging from 15 to 210 min. There was no correlation between lysis period and the virulence measures (Fig. 6; statistical data not shown). The average VP was 0.33 (range 0.06–0.64) and MV50 was achieved with a projected MOI of 4.17 × 1017 (range 3.5 × 10−7 to 1 × 1019) for the lytic phage genera. The putatively temperate phages had lower virulence measures; average VP 0.06 (range −0.07 to 0.36) and MV50 returned a theoretical MOI of 6.00 × 1058 (range 0.012 to 3 × 1059). Tempevirinae unclassified, Drulisvirus, Sugarlandvirus, and Jiaodavirus had the highest virulence (VP) (range 0.12–0.64, average 0.42) and below-average MV50 (range 3.5 × 10−7 to 1.30 × 105, average 9.30 × 103), indicating that they rapidly killed their hosts and needed a lower phage:host ratio to achieve this. It is, however, difficult to generalize for each genus, because the metrics varied drastically within genera. The virulence index results are specific to each phage and conditions assessed, and therefore they are not directly comparable between phages grown on different hosts.

Discussion

Klebsiella-infecting phages, belonging to nine phylogenetically distinct lineages, were isolated from water samples sourced from different environments. The 30 phages were discovered by using a panel of K. pneumoniae, K. oxytoca, K. quasipneumoniae, K. aerogenes, and K. variicola. These Klebsiella spp. represent clinical and environmental strains that span 18 different capsule types. This study discovered several phages and phage genera that have not previously been described. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that the filamentous phage vB_KppS-Ant did not significantly cluster with any known phages at the shared protein level, and therefore represents a novel genus. The genome reconstruction of this ssDNA phage is unexpected, however previously studies have demonstrated Illumina sequencing to be inefficient yet successful at sequencing ssDNA phages.[60] The high sequence similarity of phage vB_KppS-Ant to a region of the K. pneumoniae 30104 genome (>99%) indicates that it is an induced prophage. By combining shared protein network analysis and marker gene phylogenetic tree analysis, we identified two further novel phage genera: Tempevirinae unclassified and Myoviridae unclassified.

Factors determining host range

In general, comparative genomics revealed sequence conservation over a large portion of their genomes, with variability in only a few genes (Supplementary Figs. S4–S11), resulting in divergent characteristics in terms of host range and virulence (Figs. 3 and 6). Despite several of these phage species having been identified in previous studies, there are examples where these showed differences in host range. Thus, even within the small sample presented here, there is information to be gained about the factors determining host range. It has been suggested that selection pressure imposed from the use of a host is sufficient to amplify nongenetic variants of a phage that can cross host -range,[47,61] and it also remains possible that uncharacterized genes, encoding proteins of unknown function, could adapt a given phage to a distinct host.[62] By way of example, Sugarlandvirus phages showed a high degree of similarity between genome sequences, with most variation concentrated in their tail fiber genes. Tail fibers mediate interaction with host cell receptors and are frequently rearranged in phages, allowing them to adhere to bacterial hosts.[63] These tail fibers can include domains with enzymatic function, enabling degradation of host-specific features such as polysaccharide capsules.[64] Three phages with >99% genome sequence similarity were isolated on two distinct hosts: K. pneumoniae 30104 (vB_KppS_Ponyo and vB_KppS_Totoro) or K. aerogenes 30053 (vB_KaS-Benoit). vB_KppS_Ponyo and vB_KaS-Benoit are 100% identical at the nucleotide level, and vB_KppS_Totoro has a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP). Host range analysis showed that the two phages propagated on K. pneumoniae 30104 had comparable host ranges, whereas the phage propagated on K. aerogenes 30053 had a slightly different host range (Fig. 3). This indicates that the propagation host, influenced host range, and that genome sequence alone cannot be used to infer host range.[65] This is a vitally important consideration for phage therapy, and we cannot generalize phage behavior based on genome similarity, but we must also consider prevailing culture conditions.[66] Although multiple features of strain-specific bacterial immunity can protect against phage replication, in Klebsiella the primary defense against both phages and antibiotics is a protective polysaccharide capsule.[67,68] This capsule forms the outermost layer of the Klebsiella cell and acts as an important virulence factor.[69] There are at least 77 different serologically defined Klebsiella capsule types.[70,71] Whole-genome capsule typing[32] showed that our Klebsiella panel encompassed 18 capsule types, including three KL2 strains, which are important in clinical infections and therefore of interest to develop effective therapies.[9] Klebsiella phages have repeatedly shown to be specific to host capsule types,[72-74] and this is often linked to phage sugar-degrading enzymes called depolymerases that target specific capsule types.[56,59,75] Given the broad host ranges observed in our collection of phages (Fig. 3) and depolymerase-indicative halos[76] in 83% of our phage isolates (Supplementary Table S3), we sought to identify depolymerase genes. A surprisingly high number of putative depolymerase genes (7) were identified in vB_KvM-Eowyn (Myoviridae unclassified), which only produced plaques in its KL16 host strain, but showed potential depolymerase activity against a KL110-producing strain. The Taipeivirus phages encoded four to six depolymerases, each of which also exceeded the number expected[53]; these phages produced plaques against the clinically relevant KL2 capsule type. These depolymerases have yet to be verified, and a wider panel of Klebsiella capsule types is necessary to confirm their activity. Klebsiella phages encoding up to 11 depolymerase genes have previously been characterized, but these infect a correspondingly wide range of Klebsiella capsule types,[77] indicating a need to expand our Klebsiella panel. Nonagvirus and Drulisvirus phages encoded one depolymerase gene each and demonstrated a small host range (Fig. 3). Characterization of these putative depolymerase genes will be important to further investigate the potential host range of these phages, beyond our current analysis. Genes encoding depolymerases were not identifiable in all of our halo-producing phages, including in some of the broadest ranging phages: Sugarlandvirus, Slopekvirus, and Jiaodavirus. The phage with the broadest host range, KoM-MeTiny (Slopekvirus), showed lawn clearance in 79% and produced plaques in 42% of the Klebsiella tested, which included nine different capsule types, but had no identifiable depolymerase genes. We suggest that this is either because they lack depolymerases or due to inadequate tools for depolymerase identification.[50,51] There is limited sequence conservation between many of the putative tail-fiber/tail-spike depolymerase proteins from our phages and biochemically validated depolymerases, therefore further characterization will be critical to optimize phage cocktails for therapeutic use.

Application to future phage-based therapy

None of our lytic phages was able to suppress Klebsiella growth for more than 12 h (Supplementary Fig. S1). In addition, selecting effective phages for the bacteria to be targeted can improve phage performance; phage vB_KoM_Liquor had an exceptionally long lysis period of 210 min, possibly due to poor propagation in the isolation host K. oxytoca 170821. Phage cocktails are used to improve the impact of phages on Klebsiella populations and are considered crucial for the efficacy of phage therapy.[78-80] Phage cocktails benefit from complementarity and redundancy between the phages to overcome host-evolved phage resistance,[81] which may account for the resurgences seen in our Klebsiella cultures. After phage selection, the testing of phage combinations is essential to avoid adverse effects, which could result in bacterial stress responses or biofilm formation, as seen with sub-lethal antibiotic use.[82,83] The phages described in this study have been supplied for use in compassionate phage therapy cocktails, requiring rigorous and lengthy testing to ensure safety and activity against the clinical Klebsiella. For use in phage therapy, phages must not encode toxins or AMR genes.[78,80,84] Fortunately, none of our Klebsiella phages contained either. Other factors, for example, the host infection dynamics and low virulence of the Nonagvirus indicate that these isolates may be temperate and/or may not be curative on infections. The temperate phage vB_KppS-Ant, as the only phage with an identifiable integrase for lysogeny, will be excluded for phage therapy purposes.[85] Jiaodavirus phages encode a Hoc-like protein, which in phage T4 has been demonstrated to be highly immunogenic.[86] It should be established as to whether these phages cause an immune response before using them for phage therapy. The genomic information and experimental data presented here for Tempevirinae unclassified, Sugarlandvirus, Taipeivirus, and Slopekvirus indicate that they are lytic and, thus, suitable for preclinical evaluation. We suggest that the Sugarlandvirus and Slopekvirus isolates are the best candidates for future development in phage therapy, given their broad host range, high virulence, short latency period, and lack of potentially harmful genes. Taken together, our data suggest that to provide universal, effective phage therapy against Klebsiella infections, a phage cocktail comprising multiple diverse phages should be developed.

Conclusions

A diverse range of Klebsiella phages were isolated. Despite some of our phage isolates being grouped into a single previously described phage species, within-species variation in both host range and virulence was observed. This demonstrates the necessity to microbiologically characterize phages for therapeutic use.
  78 in total

1.  OrthoANI: An improved algorithm and software for calculating average nucleotide identity.

Authors:  Imchang Lee; Yeong Ouk Kim; Sang-Cheol Park; Jongsik Chun
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 2.747

Review 2.  Bacteriophage-encoded depolymerases: their diversity and biotechnological applications.

Authors:  Diana P Pires; Hugo Oliveira; Luís D R Melo; Sanna Sillankorva; Joana Azeredo
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 3.  Targeting mechanisms of tailed bacteriophages.

Authors:  Franklin L Nobrega; Marnix Vlot; Patrick A de Jonge; Lisa L Dreesens; Hubertus J E Beaumont; Rob Lavigne; Bas E Dutilh; Stan J J Brouns
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 60.633

4.  Outcome of carbapenem resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infections.

Authors:  D Ben-David; R Kordevani; N Keller; I Tal; A Marzel; O Gal-Mor; Y Maor; G Rahav
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 8.067

5.  MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across Computing Platforms.

Authors:  Sudhir Kumar; Glen Stecher; Michael Li; Christina Knyaz; Koichiro Tamura
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 16.240

6.  MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability.

Authors:  Kazutaka Katoh; Daron M Standley
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 16.240

7.  Capsule-Targeting Depolymerase, Derived from Klebsiella KP36 Phage, as a Tool for the Development of Anti-Virulent Strategy.

Authors:  Grażyna Majkowska-Skrobek; Agnieszka Łątka; Rita Berisio; Barbara Maciejewska; Flavia Squeglia; Maria Romano; Rob Lavigne; Carsten Struve; Zuzanna Drulis-Kawa
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 5.048

Review 8.  Methodological considerations for the identification of choline and carnitine-degrading bacteria in the gut.

Authors:  Eleanor Jameson; Mussa Quareshy; Yin Chen
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 3.608

9.  ACORN (A Clinically-Oriented Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Network): a pilot protocol for case based antimicrobial resistance surveillance.

Authors:  Paul Turner; Elizabeth A Ashley; Olivier J Celhay; Anousone Douangnouvong; Raph L Hamers; Clare L Ling; Yoel Lubell; Thyl Miliya; Tamalee Roberts; Chansovannara Soputhy; Pham Ngoc Thach; Manivanh Vongsouvath; Naomi Waithira; Prapass Wannapinij; H Rogier van Doorn
Journal:  Wellcome Open Res       Date:  2020-06-01

10.  Isolation of a bacteriophage specific for a new capsular type of Klebsiella pneumoniae and characterization of its polysaccharide depolymerase.

Authors:  Chun-Ru Hsu; Tzu-Lung Lin; Yi-Jiun Pan; Pei-Fang Hsieh; Jin-Town Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  5 in total

1.  Genomic evaluation of novel Kenyan virulent phage isolates infecting carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae and safety determination of their lysates in Balb/c mice.

Authors:  Noutin Fernand Michodigni; Atunga Nyachieo; Juliah Khayeli Akhwale; Gabriel Magoma; Andrew Nyerere Kimang'a
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 2.667

2.  Practical Assessment of an Interdisciplinary Bacteriophage Delivery Pipeline for Personalized Therapy of Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections.

Authors:  Silvia Würstle; Jana Stender; Jens André Hammerl; Kilian Vogele; Kathrin Rothe; Christian Willy; Joachim Jakob Bugert
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-02

3.  Isolation and characterization of two homolog phages infecting Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Niu Yuanyuan; Yang Xiaobo; Wang Shang; Yang Yutong; Zhou Hongrui; Li Chenyu; Xue Bin; Zhang Xi; Zhao Chen; Shen Zhiqiang; Wang Jingfeng; Ling Yun; Yu Pingfeng; Qiu Zhigang
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 6.064

4.  Isolation and Molecular Characterization of a Novel Lytic Bacteriophage That Inactivates MDR Klebsiella pneumoniae Strains.

Authors:  Victor M Balcão; Fernanda C Moreli; Erica C Silva; Bianca G Belline; Layla F Martins; Fernando P N Rossi; Carla Pereira; Marta M D C Vila; Aline M da Silva
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 6.525

5.  Characterisation of Bacteriophage-Encoded Depolymerases Selective for Key Klebsiella pneumoniae Capsular Exopolysaccharides.

Authors:  George Blundell-Hunter; Mark C Enright; David Negus; Matthew J Dorman; Gemma E Beecham; Derek J Pickard; Phitchayapak Wintachai; Supayang P Voravuthikunchai; Nicholas R Thomson; Peter W Taylor
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 5.293

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.