Literature DB >> 27542705

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: a national multicenter obstetric and neonatal follow-up study.

Bjorn Bay1, Hans Jakob Ingerslev2, Josephine Gabriela Lemmen3, Birte Degn2, Iben Anne Rasmussen4, Ulrik Schiøler Kesmodel5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study whether women conceiving after preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) and their children have greater risks of adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes compared with children conceived spontaneously or after IVF with or without intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI).
DESIGN: Historical cohort study.
SETTING: Not applicable. PATIENT(S): All deliveries following PGD treatment for single gene and sex-linked disorders or structural chromosomal aberrations (n = 126 deliveries/149 children), IVF/ICSI treatment (n = 30,418 deliveries/36,115 children), and spontaneous conception (n = 896,448 deliveries/909,624 children). INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Adverse obstetric and neonatal outcomes, such as pre-eclampsia, preterm primary rupture of membranes, placenta previa, abruption of placenta, preterm birth, low birth weight, malformations, and neonatal admission. RESULT(S): Compared with spontaneously conceived pregnancies, PGD pregnancies were at significantly increased risk of placenta previa (adjusted odds ratio [ORa] 9.1; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 3.4, 24.9), cesarean section (ORa 2.0; 95% CI 1.3, 2.9), preterm birth (ORa 1.6; 95% CI 1.0, 2.7), shorter gestation (mean difference -3.4 days; 95% CI -5.7, -1.1 days), and longer neonatal admission (mean difference 21 days; 95% CI 15, 28 days). The risks were comparable to that of pregnancies following IVF/ICSI. In subanalyses, adverse outcomes were only present in children conceived by PGD owing to parental monogenetic disorder and comparable to those of children born to parents with monogenic disorders conceiving without PGD, except for a higher risk of placenta previa. CONCLUSION(S): In this cohort study, the risk of adverse obstetric and neonatal outcomes was mainly related to the underlying parental condition rather than the PGD procedure.
Copyright © 2016 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Assisted reproduction; PGD; neonatal outcomes; obstetric outcomes

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27542705     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.07.1092

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  11 in total

1.  Maternal and neonatal outcomes associated with trophectoderm biopsy.

Authors:  Wendy Y Zhang; Frauke von Versen-Höynck; Kristopher I Kapphahn; Raquel R Fleischmann; Qianying Zhao; Valerie L Baker
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  Pregnancy and child developmental outcomes after preimplantation genetic screening: a meta-analytic and systematic review.

Authors:  Misaki N Natsuaki; Laura M Dimler
Journal:  World J Pediatr       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 2.764

3.  Influence of Trophectoderm Biopsy Prior to Frozen Blastocyst Transfer on Obstetrical Outcomes.

Authors:  Michael S Awadalla; Kristen E Park; Kyle R Latack; Lynda K McGinnis; Ali Ahmady; Richard J Paulson
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 3.060

4.  Embryonic Cell-free DNA in Spent Culture Medium: A Non-invasive Tool for Aneuploidy Screening of the Corresponding Embryos.

Authors:  Afrodite Sialakouma; Ioannis Karakasiliotis; Vaia Ntala; Nikolaos Nikolettos; Byron Asimakopoulos
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2021 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.155

5.  Embryo biopsy and maternal and neonatal outcomes following cryopreserved-thawed single embryo transfer.

Authors:  Cynthia K Sites; Sophia Bachilova; Daksha Gopal; Howard J Cabral; Charles C Coddington; Judy E Stern
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 10.693

Review 6.  Risk of adverse pregnancy and perinatal outcomes after high technology infertility treatment: a comprehensive systematic review.

Authors:  Stefano Palomba; Roy Homburg; Susanna Santagni; Giovanni Battista La Sala; Raoul Orvieto
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 5.211

7.  Body composition and blood pressure in 6-year-old singletons born after pre-implantation genetic testing for monogenic and structural chromosomal aberrations: a matched cohort study.

Authors:  F Belva; M Roelants; S Kluijfhout; C Winter; F De Schrijver; S Desmyttere; M De Rycke; H Tournaye; I Liebaers; M Bonduelle
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2018-09-01

8.  Preimplantation Genetic Screening with Spent Culture Medium/Blastocoel Fluid for in Vitro Fertilization.

Authors:  Penghao Li; Zhe Song; Yaxin Yao; Tianhua Huang; Rurong Mao; Jun Huang; Yongyi Ma; Xin Dong; Wenlong Huang; Jihua Huang; Tianjian Chen; Ting Qu; Lingxiao Li; Ying Zhong; Jiang Gu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Preimplantation genetic testing and frozen embryo transfer synergistically decrease very pre-term birth in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization with elective single embryo transfer.

Authors:  Luke Y Ying; Mark D Sanchez; James Baron; Ying Ying
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 3.357

Review 10.  Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Monogenic Disorders.

Authors:  Martine De Rycke; Veerle Berckmoes
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 4.096

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.