Literature DB >> 23773313

Cleavage-stage biopsy significantly impairs human embryonic implantation potential while blastocyst biopsy does not: a randomized and paired clinical trial.

Richard T Scott1, Kathleen M Upham, Eric J Forman, Tian Zhao, Nathan R Treff.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine if cleavage- or blastocyst-stage embryo biopsy affects reproductive competence.
DESIGN: Paired randomized clinical trial.
SETTING: Academic-assisted reproduction program. PATIENT(S): Attempting conception through IVF. INTERVENTION(S): After selecting two embryos for transfer, one was randomized to biopsy and the other to control. Both were transferred within shortly thereafter. The biopsy was submitted for microarray analysis and single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) profiling. Buccal DNA obtained from the neonate after delivery had microarray analysis and SNP profile compared with that of the embryonic DNA. A match confirmed that the biopsied embryo implanted and developed to term, whereas a nonmatch indicated that the control embryo had led to the delivery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Paired analysis of the delivery rates of the transferred embryos. Either twin delivery or failure to deliver represents equivalent outcomes for the biopsied and control embryos. In contrast, singletons were determined to be from the biopsied or the control embryo. RESULT(S): Blastomere biopsy on day 3 of development resulted in a significant reduction in sustained implantation. Only 30% of biopsied embryos had sustained implantation and ultimately developed into live-born infants versus 50% of unbiopsied controls, a relative reduction of 39%. In contrast, sustained implantation rates were equivalent (51% vs. 54%) for biopsied and control blastocysts. CONCLUSION(S): Cleavage-stage biopsy markedly reduced embryonic reproductive potential. In contrast, trophectoderm biopsy had no measurable impact and may be used safely when embryo biopsy is indicated. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01219504.
Copyright © 2013 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA fingerprinting; Embryo biopsy; IVF; preimplantation genetic diagnosis

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23773313     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.04.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  117 in total

1.  Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD) for Monogenic Disorders: the Value of Concurrent Aneuploidy Screening.

Authors:  Kara N Goldman; Taraneh Nazem; Alan Berkeley; Steven Palter; Jamie A Grifo
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Chromosomal characteristics at cleavage and blastocyst stages from the same embryos.

Authors:  Jin Huang; Nan Zhao; Xiaozhu Wang; Jie Qiao; Ping Liu
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-02-21       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Noninvasive preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy in spent medium may be more reliable than trophectoderm biopsy.

Authors:  Lei Huang; Berhan Bogale; Yaqiong Tang; Sijia Lu; Xiaoliang Sunney Xie; Catherine Racowsky
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Hatching a new plot in reproductive genetics: from mutations to mosaics.

Authors:  David F Albertini
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Preimplantation genetic testing and chances of a healthy live birth amongst recipients of fresh donor oocytes in the United States.

Authors:  Cassandra Roeca; Rachel Johnson; Nichole Carlson; Alex J Polotsky
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Blastomere biopsy for PGD delays embryo compaction and blastulation: a time-lapse microscopic analysis.

Authors:  Liron Bar-El; Yael Kalma; Mira Malcov; Tamar Schwartz; Shaul Raviv; Tania Cohen; Hadar Amir; Yoni Cohen; Adi Reches; Ami Amit; Dalit Ben-Yosef
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  [Rapid preimplantation genetic diagnosis of α-thalassemia SEA deletion with blastocyst cell whole genome amplification and short fragment Gap-PCR method].

Authors:  Huiling Xu; Yanhui Liu; Ping Yan; Yi He; Jiachun Qin; Jiwu Lou; Wanjun Zhou
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2018-09-30

8.  An integrated investigation of oocyte developmental competence: expression of key genes in human cumulus cells, morphokinetics of early divisions, blastulation, and euploidy.

Authors:  C Scarica; D Cimadomo; L Dovere; A Giancani; M Stoppa; A Capalbo; F M Ubaldi; L Rienzi; R Canipari
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  Trophectoderm DNA fingerprinting by quantitative real-time PCR successfully distinguishes sibling human embryos.

Authors:  Richard T Scott; Jing Su; Xin Tao; Eric J Forman; Kathleen H Hong; Deanne Taylor; Nathan R Treff
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-08-17       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 10.  Human embryo mosaicism: did we drop the ball on chromosomal testing?

Authors:  Navid Esfandiari; Megan E Bunnell; Robert F Casper
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 3.412

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.