Literature DB >> 23993663

Selecting the optimal time to perform biopsy for preimplantation genetic testing.

Katherine L Scott1, Kathleen H Hong, Richard T Scott.   

Abstract

A consistent requirement for all preimplantation genetic testing is the need to obtain DNA from the oocyte or embryo. Currently this sample is attained through biopsy of one or both polar bodies, blastomere biopsy at the cleavage stage, or trophectoderm biopsy after blastulation. Selecting the optimal time for biopsy requires careful consideration. Polar body biopsy is less invasive and provides more time for analysis but fails to capture as many as one in three embryonic aneuploidies. Additionally, the inability to readily distinguish nondysjunction from premature separation of sister chromatids greatly limits the predictive value of the technique and may lead to an overdiagnosis of aneuploidy in as many as 45% of cases with first polar-body errors. Cleavage-stage biopsy provides adequate samples but is detrimental to the embryo. The adverse effect of blastomere biopsy may result in approximately two of every five reproductively competent embryos losing their ability to implant and sustain development. Trophectoderm biopsy does not adversely impact the embryos. However, for the majority of clinical programs without a genetics laboratory, vitrification would be necessary to allow time for the genetic analysis. Although this extends the time required for treatment, clinical outcomes are equivalent after transfer of euploid blasts during fresh IVF and cryopreserved embryo transfer cycles, so that excellent outcomes are maintained. At present the blastocyst stage is the optimal time to perform biopsies for preimplantation genetic testing.
Copyright © 2013 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  IVF; blastocyst biopsy; comprehensive chromosomal screening; embryo biopsy; preimplantation genetic screening

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23993663     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.07.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  36 in total

1.  Vitrified/warmed single blastocyst transfer in preimplantation genetic diagnosis/preimplantation genetic screening cycles.

Authors:  Jin Huang; Rong Li; Ying Lian; Lixue Chen; Xiaodan Shi; Jie Qiao; Ping Liu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-11-15

2.  Chromosomal characteristics at cleavage and blastocyst stages from the same embryos.

Authors:  Jin Huang; Nan Zhao; Xiaozhu Wang; Jie Qiao; Ping Liu
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-02-21       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Blastomere biopsy for PGD delays embryo compaction and blastulation: a time-lapse microscopic analysis.

Authors:  Liron Bar-El; Yael Kalma; Mira Malcov; Tamar Schwartz; Shaul Raviv; Tania Cohen; Hadar Amir; Yoni Cohen; Adi Reches; Ami Amit; Dalit Ben-Yosef
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Re-analysis of aneuploidy blastocysts with an inner cell mass and different regional trophectoderm cells.

Authors:  Jin Huang; Liying Yan; Sijia Lu; Nan Zhao; Jie Qiao
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Ante-natal counseling in phacomatoses.

Authors:  Dana Brabbing-Goldstein; Shay Ben-Shachar
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2020-07-05       Impact factor: 1.475

6.  Birth of a healthy child after preimplantation genetic screening of embryos from sperm of a man with non-mosaic Down syndrome.

Authors:  Lusine Aghajanova; Jean M Popwell; Ryszard J Chetkowski; Christopher N Herndon
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  Molecular analysis of DNA in blastocoele fluid using next-generation sequencing.

Authors:  Yixin Zhang; Na Li; Li Wang; Huiying Sun; Minyue Ma; Hui Wang; Xiaofei Xu; Wenke Zhang; Yingyu Liu; David S Cram; Baofa Sun; Yuanqing Yao
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  The number of biopsied trophectoderm cells may affect pregnancy outcomes.

Authors:  Luis Guzman; D Nuñez; R López; N Inoue; J Portella; F Vizcarra; L Noriega-Portella; L Noriega-Hoces; S Munné
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  Cost-effectiveness of preimplantation genetic screening for women older than 37 undergoing in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  Stephen C Collins; Xiao Xu; Winifred Mak
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 3.412

10.  Comparing Non-Medical Sex Selection and Saviour Sibling Selection in the Case of JS and LS v Patient Review Panel: Beyond the Welfare of the Child?

Authors:  Malcolm K Smith; Michelle Taylor-Sands
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 1.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.