Literature DB >> 33766723

Recruitment and retention of pregnant women in prospective birth cohort studies: A scoping review and content analysis of the literature.

Ellen Goldstein1, Ludmila N Bakhireva2, Kendra Nervik3, Shelbey Hagen4, Alyssa Turnquist5, Aleksandra E Zgierska6, Lidia Enriquez Marquez7, Ryan McDonald8, Jamie Lo9, Christina Chambers10.   

Abstract

Longitudinal cohort studies present unique methodological challenges, especially when they focus on vulnerable populations, such as pregnant women. The purpose of this review is to synthesize the existing knowledge on recruitment and retention (RR) of pregnant women in birth cohort studies and to make recommendations for researchers to improve research engagement of this population. A scoping review and content analysis were conducted to identify facilitators and barriers to the RR of pregnant women in cohort studies. The search retrieved 574 articles, with 38 meeting eligibility criteria and focused on RR among English-speaking, adult women, who are pregnant or in early postpartum period, enrolled in birth cohort studies. Selected studies were birth cohort (including longitudinal) (n = 20), feasibility (n = 14), and other (n = 4) non-interventional study designs. The majority were from low-risk populations. Abstracted data were coded according to emergent theme clusters. The majority of abstracted data (79%) focused on recruitment practices, with only 21% addressing retention strategies. Overall, facilitators were reported more often (75%) than barriers (25%). Building trusting relationships and employing diverse recruitment methods emerged as major recruitment facilitators; major barriers included heterogeneous participant reasons for refusal and cultural factors. Key retention facilitators included flexibility with scheduling, frequent communication, and culturally sensitive practices, whereas participant factors such as loss of interest, pregnancy loss, relocation, multiple caregiver shifts, and substance use/psychiatric problems were cited as major barriers. Better understanding of facilitators and barriers of RR can help enhance the internal and external validity of future birth/pre-birth cohorts. Strategies presented in this review can help inform investigators and funding agencies of best practices for RR of pregnant women in longitudinal studies.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Barriers; Birth cohort; Facilitators; Pregnant women; Recruitment; Retention

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33766723      PMCID: PMC8137666          DOI: 10.1016/j.ntt.2021.106974

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurotoxicol Teratol        ISSN: 0892-0362            Impact factor:   3.763


  52 in total

1.  Implementation of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project in the United States.

Authors:  M K Dighe; I O Frederick; H F Andersen; M G Gravett; S E Abbott; A A Carter; H Algren; D A Rocco; S A Waller; T K Sorensen; D Enquobahrie; I Blakey; H E Knight; L Cheikh Ismail
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 6.531

2.  Implementation of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project in the UK.

Authors:  F Roseman; H E Knight; F Giuliani; S Lloyd; P Di Nicola; A Laister; S Roseman; K Kennedy; O Burnham; B Patel; F Puglia; I Blakey; L Cheikh Ismail
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 6.531

3.  Cohort Profile: The Barwon Infant Study.

Authors:  Peter Vuillermin; Richard Saffery; Katrina J Allen; John B Carlin; Mimi L K Tang; Sarath Ranganathan; David Burgner; Terry Dwyer; Fiona Collier; Kim Jachno; Peter Sly; Christos Symeonides; Kathleen McCloskey; John Molloy; Michael Forrester; Anne-Louise Ponsonby
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2015-03-30       Impact factor: 7.196

Review 4.  Recruiting vulnerable populations into research: a systematic review of recruitment interventions.

Authors:  Stacy J UyBico; Shani Pavel; Cary P Gross
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-03-21       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 5.  Recruiting Latina families in a study of infant iron deficiency: a description of barriers, study adjustments and review of the literature.

Authors:  Alyssa K Phillips; Beth A Fischer; Ryan J Baxter; Sue A Shafranski; Christopher L Coe; Pamela J Kling
Journal:  WMJ       Date:  2011-02

6.  Feasibility of recruiting a birth cohort through the Internet: the experience of the NINFEA cohort.

Authors:  Lorenzo Richiardi; Iacopo Baussano; Loredana Vizzini; Jeroen Douwes; Neil Pearce; Franco Merletti
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2007-10-23       Impact factor: 8.082

Review 7.  Recruitment and retention of children in behavioral health risk factor studies: REACH strategies.

Authors:  Stephanie Schoeppe; Melody Oliver; Hannah M Badland; Matthew Burke; Mitch J Duncan
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2014

8.  How do you recruit and retain a prebirth cohort? Lessons learnt from growing up in New Zealand.

Authors:  Susan M B Morton; Cameron C Grant; Polly E Atatoa Carr; Elizabeth M Robinson; Jennifer M Kinloch; Courtney J Fleming; Te Kani R Kingi; Lana M Perese; Renee Liang
Journal:  Eval Health Prof       Date:  2012-10-28       Impact factor: 2.651

9.  The National Children's Study: Recruitment Outcomes Using an Enhanced Household-Based Approach.

Authors:  Laura L Blaisdell; Jennifer A Zellner; Alison A King; Elaine Faustman; Mari Wilhelm; Mark L Hudak; Robert D Annett
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 7.124

10.  Google AdWords and Facebook Ads for Recruitment of Pregnant Women into a Prospective Cohort Study With Long-Term Follow-Up.

Authors:  Marleen M H J van Gelder; Tom H van de Belt; Lucien J L P G Engelen; Robin Hooijer; Sebastian J H Bredie; Nel Roeleveld
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2019-10
View more
  2 in total

1.  Disparities in Vitamin D Status of Newborn Infants from a Diverse Sociodemographic Population in Montreal, Canada.

Authors:  Hope A Weiler; Catherine A Vanstone; Maryam Razaghi; Nathalie Gharibeh; Sharina Patel; Shu Q Wei; Dayre McNally
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 4.687

2.  A socioecological framework for engaging substance-using pregnant persons in longitudinal research: Multi-stakeholder perspectives.

Authors:  Ellen Goldstein; Kendra Nervik; Shelbey Hagen; Florence Hilliard; Alyssa Turnquist; Ludmila N Bakhireva; Ryan McDonald; Pilar N Ossorio; Jamie Lo; Aleksandra E Zgierska
Journal:  Neurotoxicol Teratol       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 4.071

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.